SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

29,879 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and AMD Radeon RX 9070 pairing represents a desktop configuration that combines a mature Zen 3 CPU with a current-generation RDNA 4 GPU. The processor, based on the Vermeer architecture and built on TSMC’s 7 nm process, brings 8 cores and 16 threads to the AM4 platform. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 105 W TDP. The graphics card, in contrast, uses the Navi 48 chip on a 4 nm process and introduces RDNA 4.0 architecture. This combination sits at the 75th percentile for all benchmarked pairs, indicating a solidly above-average performer in the database.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5800XT is a desktop processor from AMD’s 5000 series, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. This configuration is well-suited for workloads that scale with thread count, as evidenced by the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7683, which is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 7680. The single-thread score of 959 in 3DMark, combined with the Cinebench R23 single-core result of 3359, shows that the Zen 3 architecture still delivers competitive per-core performance. The L3 cache is 32 MB shared, and each core has 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 cache, which helps reduce memory latency in gaming and productivity tasks.

The benchmark scores place this CPU at the 81st percentile among all processors. Its average benchmark score of 29879 is virtually tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, which scores 29868, a delta of 0%. It is also within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS, both scoring 29955. The nearest rival on the lower side is the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X with a score of 29713, which is 0.6% behind. These near-identical scores indicate that the 5800XT is a strong performer for its generation, holding its own against newer mobile and desktop parts.

In real workloads, the 8-core/16-thread layout is ideal for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 demonstrates substantial multi-threaded throughput, while the PassMark multithread score of 28053 supports this. The single-thread performance, reflected in the PassMark single-thread score of 3535, ensures that the CPU does not become a bottleneck in lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing or office applications. The data indicates a balanced processor that excels in both productivity and gaming, though it is not the absolute top-tier for either, given its 81st percentile rank.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, marked as `dataIsMeasured`, provides a detailed look at how this pairing performs across a broad range of games at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 resolutions with ultra settings. At 1080p, competitive esports titles show exceptional frame rates. Counter-Strike 2 hits 239 FPS, Valorant reaches 443 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 285 FPS. These numbers are well above the threshold for high-refresh-rate monitors. For more demanding AAA titles, the results are still playable: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 68.3 FPS at 1080p, while Red Dead Redemption 2 manages 64 FPS at the same resolution.

Moving up to 1440p, the frame rates remain strong for most games. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 158 FPS, and Valorant stays at 420 FPS, indicating that esports titles are not constrained by the resolution increase. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 122 FPS, and Control manages 75 FPS. However, more graphically intensive games begin to show strain; Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 50.5 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 48 FPS. At 4K resolution, the limits of the GPU become apparent. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 38 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 32 FPS, which are borderline playable. The data shows a clear pattern: this pairing is excellent for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, but 4K ultra settings require compromises in the most demanding titles.

The average FPS across all tested games at 1080p is 152.3, which places this pair at rank 1130 out of 3732 pairs, putting it in the upper third of all configurations. Games like Ark: Survival Ascended show the hardware's limits, with only 37.9 FPS at 1080p and 20 FPS at 1440p, indicating that some titles are particularly heavy on the GPU. Overall, the measured data confirms that this is a high-performance gaming setup, but it is not a 4K ultra monster.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29879, placing it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23877, which puts it at the 69th percentile of all GPUs. This discrepancy is significant: the CPU is a stronger performer relative to its peers than the GPU is to its peers. The combined percentile for this pairing is 75, reflecting the averaged standing of both components.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 6290. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 131539, and the Vulkan score is 58705. These scores indicate strong compute performance, but the 69th percentile GPU ranking shows that there are many faster graphics cards available. The nearest GPU rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z with a score of 23736 (0.6% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S with 24063 (0.8% ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER with 24170 (1.2% ahead). These are older or lower-tier cards, which places the RX 9070 in a mid-to-high tier but not a flagship position.

When looking at the combined picture, the CPU’s 81st percentile score and the GPU’s 69th percentile score create an imbalance. The processor has more headroom relative to its class than the graphics card. This means that in CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform exceptionally well, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the graphics card will be the limiting factor. The PassMark G3D score of 25381 and the G2D score of 1280 provide additional context, showing that the GPU is capable of both 2D and 3D acceleration, while the GPU compute score of 14737 confirms its parallel processing abilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The CPU’s 81st percentile rank is notably higher than the GPU’s 69th percentile rank. In games with high frame rates, such as Valorant at 443 FPS at 1080p, the CPU must keep up with the GPU’s output. The single-thread performance of the 5800XT, evidenced by its 959 3DMark single-thread score and 3535 PassMark single-thread score, is sufficient to avoid holding back the GPU in these scenarios.

However, in games with lower frame rates, like Cyberpunk 2077 at 68.3 FPS at 1080p, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows a consistent drop that is typical of GPU-bound workloads. For example, Control drops from 100 FPS at 1080p to 75 FPS at 1440p and 51 FPS at 4K. This pattern is consistent across most titles, confirming that the RX 9070 is the component that dictates the system’s gaming performance ceiling.

Conversely, in productivity workloads that utilize all 16 threads, the CPU’s strength comes to the fore. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 7680 show that the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks without breaking a sweat. The bottleneck in these scenarios would be the GPU’s compute capabilities, which are lower relative to the CPU’s standing. The PassMark data compression score of 352002 and encryption score of 21461 further illustrate the CPU’s robust processing power. The conclusion is straightforward: for gaming, the GPU limits the pair; for productivity, the CPU is the stronger partner, though the GPU is still adequate for compute tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the pair delivers extremely high frame rates in esports titles, with Counter-Strike 2 at 239 FPS and Valorant at 443 FPS. The 1440p scores for these games remain high, at 158 FPS and 420 FPS respectively, making this an excellent setup for competitive gamers with 144Hz or 240Hz monitors.

Streaming: The 8-core CPU with 16 threads handles the encoding workload alongside gaming. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7683 provides ample headroom for streaming software, while the gaming FPS remains high. For instance, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 137 FPS at 1080p, leaving enough CPU resources for a stream encoding pipeline.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and PassMark multithread score of 28053 indicate strong performance in rendering timelines and exporting video. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and compute score of 14737 in PassMark help with effects and GPU-accelerated rendering, making this a capable setup for 1080p and 1440p video projects.

3D rendering: The 8-core/16-thread CPU configuration excels in CPU-based rendering, as shown by the 3DMark max-thread score of 7680. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 36.13 TFLOPS supports GPU rendering in applications that leverage it, though the 69th percentile GPU rank suggests it is not a top-tier renderer.

Software development: The CPU’s high single-thread score of 3535 in PassMark ensures fast compilation of single-threaded tasks, while the 16 threads handle parallel builds. The 32 MB of L3 cache helps with code caching, and the DDR4 memory support at 51.2 GB/s provides sufficient bandwidth for development workloads.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU’s single-thread performance and the GPU’s 2D acceleration (PassMark G2D score of 1280) handle spreadsheets, word processing, and web browsing effortlessly. The high frame rates in light games like Minecraft (236 FPS at 1080p) also make it a fun machine for downtime.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p and 1440p play. The measured FPS in Counter-Strike 2 (239 at 1080p) and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege (285 at 1080p) makes it ideal for competitive shooters. Content creators who work with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM, which handles large timelines and effects. Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times from the 8-core CPU, and the system is robust enough for 3D rendering tasks, though not at the extreme high end.

Students and small business users will find this system exceeds their needs, but it is a solid investment for those who also game. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is future-proof for texture-heavy workloads, and the CPU’s 81st percentile rank ensures it will not be obsolete soon. The pairing is less suitable for users targeting 4K ultra gaming, as the FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 (38) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (32) are below the 60 FPS ideal. For those users, a stronger GPU would be necessary, but this build offers a balanced experience for the majority of gaming and productivity scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is built on the Navi 48 chip using RDNA 4.0 architecture and a 4 nm process from TSMC. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1330 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. With 3584 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, the card delivers a pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 36.13 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 36.13 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio.

The GPU includes 56 ray tracing cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 API coverage ensure modern game compatibility. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, the GPU scores 6290, which is a representative measure of its DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 58705 shows strong cross-API performance, while the OpenCL score of 131539 indicates robust compute capabilities for non-gaming workloads.

The 69th percentile ranking for this GPU means it performs better than a majority of GPUs in the database, but the nearest rivals are older models like the RTX 2080 SUPER and the GTX TITAN Z. This suggests that the RX 9070 is a competent mid-to-high-end card, but not a flagship. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for 1440p gaming and even allows for 4K texture packs, though the compute power limits its 4K ultra gaming potential. The 220 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU requirement are moderate, and the dual-slot design with 2x 8-pin connectors makes it a manageable addition to most desktop builds.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, which means it outperforms 75% of all benchmarked pairs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800XT compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H?

A: The 5800XT has an average benchmark score of 29879, which is essentially tied with the 7840H’s score of 29868, a delta of 0%.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games at 1080p for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across all games at 1080p is 152.3, placing the pair at rank 1130 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 9070 have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 9070 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile rank compared to the GPU’s?

A: The CPU is at the 81st percentile, while the GPU is at the 69th percentile, indicating the CPU is a stronger performer relative to its peers.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $249, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 549 USD.

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 7 5800XT use?

A: It uses the AMD Socket AM4 and supports DDR4 memory.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class configuration, pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT with the AMD Radeon RX 9070. The CPU, from the 5000 series, is a Zen 3 architecture part on the AM4 socket, while the GPU is from the Radeon RX 9000 series using RDNA 4.0. The combined percentile of 75 indicates that this system is a solidly above-average performer in the database. The CPU’s 81st percentile rank is higher than the GPU’s 69th percentile, making this a CPU-strong pairing.

The measured gaming data shows that the system excels at 1080p and 1440p, with average FPS of 152.3 at 1080p. Esports titles run at very high frame rates, while demanding AAA games are playable but not at 4K ultra settings. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide strong multi-threaded performance for productivity tasks, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794. Overall, this build is classified as a high-performance desktop for gaming and content creation, with the CPU providing more relative strength than the GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 5800XT is built for the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which are sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, though the GPU will run at Gen 4 speeds due to the CPU’s limitation. The system supports ECC memory, adding a layer of reliability for workstation tasks.

The CPU has a 105 W TDP, and the GPU has a 220 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. This leaves headroom for additional components like storage drives and fans. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, which are common on modern power supplies. For a sensible next upgrade, users could consider a newer AM5 platform CPU, which would provide a significant performance boost, but that would also require a new motherboard and DDR5 memory. Alternatively, upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier model would improve 4K gaming performance, as the current GPU is the bottleneck in that scenario. The AM4 platform is mature, meaning that the 5800XT is likely one of the last CPU upgrades available for this socket, making the platform’s longevity dependent on the GPU’s life cycle.