SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

29,879 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop combination that delivers strong 1080p and 1440p gaming performance, with the measured data showing an average of 135.2 FPS across all tested games. The CPU, based on the Zen 3 architecture, holds the 81st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, built on RDNA 3.0, sits in the 67th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 74. This pairing is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, offers good performance at 1440p, and provides a capable foundation for content creation workloads, though 4K gaming presents challenges for the most demanding titles.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

The data shows this system is a dominant force at 1920x1080, where measured FPS at ultra settings frequently exceeds the 144Hz threshold required for high-refresh displays. Competitive shooters see exceptional results: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 472 FPS, Valorant at 443 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 214 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 254 FPS, and Roblox reaches 276 FPS. Even graphically demanding titles like Call of Duty: Warzone achieve 136 FPS, while Minecraft runs at 211 FPS. The 1080p performance across the board indicates that the CPU and GPU combination rarely bottlenecks in this resolution, making it ideal for esports and fast-paced gaming.

At 2560x1440, the system retains solid playability for most titles, though frame rates begin to scale down with resolution pressure. Call of Duty: Warzone remains high at 123.4 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 drops to 141 FPS, and Valorant still achieves 413.6 FPS. Assetto Corsa runs at 88 FPS, and Doom hits 103 FPS. More demanding single-player titles see moderate reductions: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 47.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43 FPS, and Control at 67 FPS. The 1440p results show that the system is capable of high-refresh gaming in less demanding titles and remains playable in AAA games, but frame rates for the most intensive titles start to approach the 60 FPS mark.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor. The data reveals significant drops in performance, with many titles falling below 60 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is a standout at 105.1 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 manages 79 FPS, but most games see substantial reductions: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 30.5 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at just 10 FPS. The Medium runs at 28.3 FPS, and Control at 45 FPS. Lighter titles like Valorant (331.6 FPS) and Roblox (104 FPS) remain playable, but 4K gaming is only viable for less demanding or well-optimized games. The measured data confirms this pairing is best treated as a 1080p and 1440p solution rather than a native 4K performer.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmark results place the Ryzen 7 5800XT in the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29879. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, scores 29868, representing a 0% delta, indicating parity. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and 7840HS both score 29955, putting the 5800XT 0.3% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29713, which is 0.6% ahead of the 5800XT. In single-threaded performance, the Cinebench R23 score is 3359, and the PassMark single-thread score is 3535. Multi-threaded scores are strong, with Cinebench R23 multicore reaching 23794 and PassMark multithread scoring 28053. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 959 for single-thread, 7683 for 16 threads, and 7680 for max threads, indicating consistent performance across thread counts.

The GPU benchmark results put the Radeon RX 7700 XT in the 67th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22549. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, scores 22435, which is 0.5% behind the RX 7700 XT. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22729, putting it 0.8% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, which is 1.5% ahead, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 scores 22170, putting it 1.7% behind. The PassMark G3D score is 22547, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3316. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 138383, and the Vulkan score is 46443.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is firmly in the upper tier for desktop processors, sitting just above the 80th percentile, while the GPU is slightly above average, sitting in the upper two-thirds of all GPUs. The CPU’s performance is closely matched with recent mobile processors, showing it can hold its own in multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. The GPU’s performance is comparable to last-generation high-end cards and current mid-range mobile parts. The combined percentile of 74 suggests that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU, though capable, is the more average performer in this pairing.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is the primary strength of this build. The measured FPS data shows that titles like Counter-Strike 2 (214 FPS), Valorant (443 FPS), and Rainbow Six Siege (254 FPS) easily exceed 144Hz, and even Call of Duty: Warzone at 136 FPS is close to that mark. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 959 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3359 provide the per-core performance needed for high frame rates, and the GPU’s 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute ensures the rasterization throughput to keep up. This is a system built for competitive play at 1080p.

Streaming while gaming is supported by the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, which handle encoding overhead. The PassMark multithread score of 28053 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 indicate sufficient headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s 54 RT cores and RDNA 3.0 architecture also support hardware-accelerated encoding features. The 1080p gaming performance, as shown by the high FPS in most titles, means there is typically spare CPU capacity to manage streaming tasks without dropping below playable frame rates.

Video editing benefits from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s compute capability. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and PassMark data compression score of 352002 suggest good performance for rendering timelines and exporting video. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample resources for GPU-accelerated effects, and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 138383 indicates strong compute performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3316 further supports its capability in rendering tasks.

3D rendering workloads see a balanced contribution from both components. The CPU’s 8 cores with a 4.80 GHz boost clock deliver strong performance in CPU-based rendering, as evidenced by the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9993. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS is well-suited for GPU-accelerated rendering, and its 54 RT cores provide hardware support for ray-traced workloads. The combined 74th percentile ranking indicates this system handles rendering tasks at a level above the majority of configurations.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s high single-threaded performance for compilation and the multi-threaded power for parallel builds. The PassMark single-thread score of 3535 and 3DMark single-thread score of 959 indicate fast response for IDE tasks. The CPU’s 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794, accelerate code compilation. The system’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes.

Student and office work is handled with ease by this configuration. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3535 and the system’s overall 74th combined percentile ensure responsive performance for everyday tasks. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM is overkill for productivity applications, but the 2D performance, indicated by the PassMark G2D score of 1161, is more than adequate. The high FPS in lighter games like Dave The Diver (174.2 FPS at 1080p) shows that even casual gaming during breaks will run smoothly.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data suggests that the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing, sitting at the 81st percentile, while the GPU is at the 67th percentile. In gaming workloads, the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows this clearly: Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 64.9 FPS at 1080p to 47.4 FPS at 1440p and 30.5 FPS at 4K, a reduction that tracks with the GPU’s rendering load. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s become the constraints.

For CPU-bound scenarios, the 5800XT shows its strength. In competitive titles at 1080p, the FPS is often very high, indicating the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render. Counter-Strike 2 at 214 FPS and Valorant at 443 FPS are examples where the CPU’s single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 959) is not the bottleneck. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1879 and 4-thread score of 3603 show that it scales well with threads, but in gaming, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor once resolution and detail settings increase.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is often the primary workhorse. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and PassMark multithread score of 28053 show that the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks, and the GPU’s role becomes secondary. For tasks like 3D rendering, the balance shifts depending on the software; CPU-based renderers will rely on the 8-core processor, while GPU-based renderers will utilize the RX 7700 XT’s 35.17 TFLOPS. The bottleneck analysis shows that neither component is overwhelmingly weak, but the GPU is more likely to limit high-resolution gaming, while the CPU is the limiting factor in heavily threaded CPU-bound workloads.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform and is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and it has a TDP of 105 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

The benchmark scores show that this CPU performs well in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3359 and PassMark single-thread score of 3535 indicate strong per-core performance, which translates to snappy response in everyday tasks and good performance in games that rely on single-thread speed. The multi-threaded scores, such as Cinebench R23 multicore at 23794 and PassMark multithread at 28053, show that the 8 cores and 16 threads are well-utilized in parallel workloads. The 3DMark tests show a progression from 959 for single-thread to 7683 for 16 threads, indicating good scaling as more threads are used.

The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that it is a high-end part, and its performance is closely matched with recent mobile processors like the Ryzen 7 7840H and 8845HS. The 0.3% delta behind these parts is negligible in real-world use. The PassMark data encryption score of 21461 and extended instructions score of 24270 show that it handles security and SIMD workloads efficiently. The L3 cache of 32 MB helps with gaming and data-intensive tasks, and the ECC memory support makes it suitable for workstations where data integrity is critical. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, and the 4.80 GHz boost clock provides high frequency when needed.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The primary target user for this build is the 1080p gamer seeking high refresh rates. The measured FPS in competitive titles like Counter-Strike 2 (214 FPS), Valorant (443 FPS), and Rainbow Six Siege (254 FPS) shows that this system can drive 144Hz or 240Hz monitors in esports titles. For gamers at 1440p, the system remains viable, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 123.4 FPS and Doom at 103 FPS, making it suitable for high-refresh 1440p gaming in less demanding titles, while AAA games will require settings adjustments to maintain high frame rates.

Content creators, particularly video editors, will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and the PassMark data compression score of 352002 indicate that timeline scrubbing and video exports will be reasonably fast. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and OpenCL score of 138383 support GPU-accelerated effects in editing software. For 3D artists, the system’s combined 74th percentile ranking suggests it can handle moderate 3D rendering tasks, with the CPU’s 16 threads for CPU rendering and the GPU’s 35.17 TFLOPS for GPU rendering.

Software developers will find the CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3535) and 16 threads useful for compilation and running virtual machines. The 32 MB of L3 cache helps with code caching, and the ECC memory support is a plus for long-running build processes. Students and office workers will experience no performance issues, as the system’s overall power is far beyond the requirements for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work, as indicated by the PassMark G2D score of 1161.

Small business workstations that handle data analysis or moderate rendering will also benefit. The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 93942 and floating point math score of 53808 show strong computational throughput. The system’s performance in titles like Microsoft Flight Simulator (77 FPS at 1080p) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (57 FPS at 1080p) shows that it can handle simulation and visualization tasks. However, users targeting 4K gaming in AAA titles should look elsewhere, as the measured data shows most games fall below 60 FPS at 3840x2160.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Wheat Nas, and is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. It has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The GPU has 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines. The base clock is 1435 MHz, the game clock is 2171 MHz, and the boost clock is 2544 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective. It has 54 RT cores for ray tracing, and its FP32 performance is rated at 35.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate.

The benchmark scores show that the GPU performs at a level comparable to high-end last-generation cards. The PassMark G3D score of 22547 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 indicate strong rasterization performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 138383 shows good compute capability, which is relevant for rendering tasks. The GPU’s 67th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it above average, but the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile and RTX 4060 Mobile, showing that it competes with mid-range mobile parts. The 1.5% delta behind the RTX 2080 and 1.7% ahead of the RX 5700 shows its position in the desktop market.

For rendering, the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM is a significant asset, allowing for larger textures and more complex scenes. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides the data throughput needed for high-resolution textures. The 54 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is supported by the DirectX 12 Ultimate API. The pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s define the fill rates, which are key for high-resolution rendering. The FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS is substantial for GPU compute tasks, and the 1:1 FP16 ratio indicates strong performance in workloads that use reduced precision. The GPU’s power draw is 245 W, and it requires a 550 W power supply, with dual 8-pin connectors.

FAQ

Q: What is the measured average FPS across all games for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The data shows an average FPS of 135.2 across all tested games at various resolutions.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800XT compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800XT has an average benchmark score of 29879, while the 7840H scores 29868, resulting in a 0% delta, indicating they perform identically.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs, and what is its nearest rival?

A: The RX 7700 XT is in the 67th percentile, and its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, which has an average score of 22435, putting the RX 7700 XT 0.5% ahead.

Q: What are the CPU’s single-thread and multi-thread scores in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 3359 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 23794 in Cinebench R23 multicore.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The measured data shows that 4K gaming is challenging, with many titles falling below 60 FPS. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 30.5 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28 FPS at 3840x2160.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the RX 7700 XT?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile of the CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 74.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT. The CPU, an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 part, is in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, an RDNA 3.0 part with 12 GB VRAM, is in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 74 reflects a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The measured gaming performance shows an average of 135.2 FPS across games, with strong 1080p performance in competitive titles and good 1440p capability, while 4K is limited to less demanding games. The pairing is well-balanced for high-refresh 1080p gaming and solid for 1440p, with the CPU providing ample multi-threaded power for productivity tasks and the GPU offering 35.17 TFLOPS of compute performance. Overall, this build represents an upper-mid-range desktop configuration that excels in esports and high-FPS gaming, with sufficient power for content creation and rendering workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds