SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

29,879 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and AMD Radeon RX 7700 form a desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1080p and capable 1440p gaming, backed by a strong eight-core CPU. The data shows a combined percentile rank of 70 across all systems, with the processor placing in the 81st percentile and the graphics card in the 58th percentile. Measured frame rates across a wide range of titles indicate this is a balanced system for its class, though certain workloads will favor one component over the other.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is AMD Socket AM4, which anchors the Ryzen 7 5800XT to the 5000 series family. The processor uses the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer) and is built on TSMC’s 7 nm process, with a transistor count of 4,150 million and a die size of 74 mm². This is a mature socket with broad motherboard support, meaning users upgrading from earlier Ryzen generations can often retain their existing boards with a BIOS update. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and ECC memory support. For storage and expansion, the processor provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a modern GPU and one or two fast NVMe drives.

Power delivery requirements are moderate. The CPU has a TDP of 105 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 200 W, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card is 550 W. This suggests that a quality 550 W unit will run the system, but users adding many drives or overclocking should consider headroom. The GPU draws power through two 8-pin connectors, and the card itself is a dual-slot design measuring 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. A sensible next upgrade path on this platform would be moving to a higher-tier AM4 CPU, such as a 16-core Zen 3 part, which would slot into the same socket and memory. The PCIe Gen 4 support also means future GPUs using that interface will run at full bandwidth, though the RX 7700 already uses the full PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Memory support is limited to DDR4, which is an older standard compared to current DDR5 platforms, but the 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth is adequate for the CPU’s 8-core, 16-thread configuration. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking on compatible boards, and the 105 W TDP leaves some thermal room for modest clock increases. The platform’s longevity is a key consideration: AM4 has been widely deployed, and the Ryzen 7 5800XT represents a late addition to that socket, meaning users building new systems have access to mature BIOS support and a wide range of coolers. For those on older AM4 boards with Ryzen 1000 or 2000 series CPUs, this processor is a drop-in upgrade that dramatically increases multi-threaded performance, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,794.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the system excels. Measured frame rates in Counter-Strike 2 reach 195 FPS at 1080p, while Valorant hits 443 FPS and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege achieves 232 FPS. These numbers comfortably exceed 144 Hz refresh rates, making the pairing ideal for competitive shooters. At 1440p, the same titles still deliver strong results: Counter-Strike 2 runs at 129 FPS, Valorant at 381 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 152 FPS, indicating that high-refresh 1440p monitors are also viable.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,794 and the Passmark multithread score of 28,053 indicate solid encoding performance for software x264 streams, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM provides ample headroom for simultaneous game capture and streaming overlays. Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro will see strong performance in export tasks, as the Passmark integer math score of 93,942 and floating point math score of 53,808 suggest efficient processing of effects and color grading.

3D rendering is a mixed workload. The CPU’s multicore scores are respectable for an 8-core part, but the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 25.18 TFLOPS means that GPU-accelerated renderers will significantly outperform CPU-only paths. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2,398 and R20 multicore score of 9,993 place the CPU in a good position for CPU-based rendering in Blender or Corona, but users with access to GPU renderers like Octane or Redshift will find the RX 7700’s compute capabilities more impactful.

Software development sees strong compile times from the CPU’s 16 threads. The Passmark data compression score of 352,002 and data encryption score of 21,461 indicate efficient handling of archive extraction and cryptographic operations, which are common in build pipelines. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,683 reflects sustained multi-threaded throughput, useful for parallel builds. For student and office work, the system is overkill for basic productivity, but the single-thread performance is strong: the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,359 and Passmark single-thread score of 3,535 ensure snappy response in document editing and spreadsheet calculations.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm TSMC process. The base clock is 3.80 GHz, boosting up to 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 105 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 32 MB shared L3 cache, which is a hallmark of the Zen 3 design that reduces latency and improves performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU.

Benchmark scores paint a picture of a well-rounded performer. The 3DMark single-thread score of 959 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,359 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for gaming and lightly threaded tasks. The multi-threaded scores are equally impressive: Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 23,794, while the Passmark multithread score is 28,053. The processor sits in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 29,879 places it in close competition with several mobile and desktop parts. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with an average score of 29,868 (a 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS at 29,955 (-0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X at 29,713 (0.6% delta). This means the 5800XT is statistically tied with these CPUs in overall benchmark performance, despite being on an older socket and process node.

In real workloads, the 8-core, 16-thread configuration hits a sweet spot. It has enough threads to handle modern game engines that use multiple cores for physics, AI, and streaming, while the strong single-thread performance ensures that older games and lightly threaded applications still run efficiently. The Passmark scores show balanced performance across different instruction types: floating point math at 53,808, integer math at 93,942, and extended instructions at 24,270. The find prime numbers score of 119 is low, but that is a synthetic test that does not reflect general usability. The CPU’s 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die result in high transistor density for its generation, and the unlocked multiplier allows enthusiasts to push clocks beyond the 4.80 GHz boost.

Who Should Build It

The primary target is gamers who want high-refresh 1080p performance and are willing to accept 1440p at moderate frame rates. Measured data shows 1080p averages of 137 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 115 FPS in Assetto Corsa, and 94 FPS in Fortnite, all of which are smooth on 144 Hz monitors. At 1440p, the system still delivers playable frame rates in most titles, with Warzone at 122 FPS and Assetto Corsa at 81 FPS, though heavier games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 43 FPS at that resolution.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks will find value in the 8-core, 16-thread configuration. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,794 is competitive with newer 8-core parts, and the Passmark data compression score of 352,002 indicates fast file archiving. Video editors using proxy workflows will appreciate the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM, which allows for large timeline previews without memory pressure. For 3D artists using CPU renderers, the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9,993 provides a baseline for render times, and the Passmark floating point math score of 53,808 suggests competent physics simulation.

Developers and small business workstations can leverage the platform’s ECC memory support and the CPU’s reliability. The Passmark data encryption score of 21,461 and extended instructions score of 24,270 indicate solid performance for security-related workloads. Students will find the system more than adequate for coursework, with the caveat that the lack of integrated graphics means a GPU is mandatory. The dual-slot GPU and 267 mm length require a case with sufficient clearance, but most mid-tower cases will accommodate it. The platform’s AM4 socket means budget motherboard options are plentiful, and the 105 W CPU TDP is manageable with a capable air cooler.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is a desktop graphics card based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 32 chip manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process. The chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, with a transistor density of 81.2 million per mm². The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This is a generous memory allocation for the card’s performance class, which helps at high resolutions and with large texture packs.

Clock speeds are substantial: the base clock is 1900 MHz, the boost clock is 2459 MHz, and the game clock is 2041 MHz. Memory runs at 2438 MHz, effectively 19.5 Gbps. The compute configuration includes 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, along with 40 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show the GPU in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15,852. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,865, while the Passmark G3D score is 20,974 and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 106,028. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X with an average score of 15,862 (-0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16,014 (-1% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16,129 (-1.7% delta). This places the RX 7700 in direct competition with the RTX 3060 Ti, with the RX 7700 trailing by 1.7% in average benchmark score. The Passmark GPU compute score of 10,963 indicates moderate compute performance, while the DirectX 11 score of 186 and DirectX 12 score of 96 show strong performance in modern APIs.

The 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage over rivals with 8 GB, allowing for higher texture quality and better performance in VRAM-heavy games. The 624.1 GB/s bandwidth ensures that the memory is not a bottleneck at 1080p or 1440p. The card’s power draw of 200 W and the suggested 550 W PSU make it manageable for most systems. The dual-slot design and 2x 8-pin connectors are standard, and the display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, providing modern connectivity.

Gaming Performance

The system’s measured frame rates at ultra settings (dataIsMeasured is true) reveal a clear performance profile. At 1080p, the average FPS across all tested games is 124.6, with a pair rank of 1,815 out of 3,732 pairs. This places the pairing in the middle of the pack, which is expected given the GPU’s 58th percentile position.

Esports titles show exceptional performance. Valorant reaches 443 FPS at 1080p, 381 FPS at 1440p, and 305 FPS at 4K. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 431 FPS at 1080p, 297 FPS at 1440p, and 175 FPS at 4K. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 195 FPS at 1080p and 129 FPS at 1440p. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 232 FPS at 1080p and 152 FPS at 1440p. These numbers are far above competitive thresholds and indicate that the system will not be a limiting factor in fast-paced shooters.

AAA titles at 1080p are generally smooth. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 137 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 115 FPS, Doom at 145 FPS, and Control at 81 FPS. More demanding games see lower numbers: Cyberpunk 2077 averages 58 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 averages 52 FPS, and The Medium averages 41 FPS. These are playable but not high-refresh territory. At 1440p, the frame rates drop: Warzone at 122 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 81 FPS, Control at 61 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 at 43 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 39 FPS. At 4K, the system struggles with modern AAA titles, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 28 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS, and The Medium at 27 FPS. Lighter games fare better at 4K, such as Valorant at 305 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 175 FPS.

The data shows that the system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1080p, most titles exceed 60 FPS, with many exceeding 100 FPS. At 1440p, the frame rates remain respectable for most games, but users seeking 144 Hz refresh rates will need to lower settings in the most demanding titles. The 16 GB VRAM helps at higher resolutions, but the GPU’s raw compute power is the limiting factor at 4K.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores demonstrate a strong 8-core part. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,794 and single-core score of 3,359 indicate a balanced design. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 1,879 for 2 threads to 7,683 for 16 threads, with the max threads score of 7,680 nearly identical to the 16-thread score, indicating efficient thread utilization. The Passmark multithread score of 28,053 is competitive with the nearest rivals, which all score around 29,700 to 29,900. The CPU’s percentile rank of 81 means it outperforms 81% of all CPUs in the database, which is a strong position for a part on a mature socket.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more modest. The Passmark G3D score of 20,974 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,865 place it in the 58th percentile. The average benchmark score of 15,852 is just 1.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which is a well-known mid-range card. The GPU’s compute performance is lower than its gaming performance, as shown by the Passmark GPU compute score of 10,963, which indicates that compute-heavy workloads like machine learning inference will not be as strong as gaming.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU in relative terms. The CPU sits in the 81st percentile while the GPU is in the 58th percentile, creating a 23-percentage-point gap. This means the CPU has headroom to drive more powerful GPUs in the future, but in this configuration, the GPU is the limiting factor for gaming performance. The combined percentile of 70 reflects this imbalance, as the system overall is stronger than the GPU alone but weaker than the CPU alone.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4, which is the same socket used by other Ryzen 5000 series processors.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 7700 have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT has a launch MSRP of $249.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 5800XT has no integrated graphics (N/A), so a discrete GPU is required.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is 550 W, with the GPU itself having a TDP of 200 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29,879, which is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29,868, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (29,713, 0.6% delta), and slightly below the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (29,955, -0.3% delta).

Q: What is the GPU’s performance relative to the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15,852, which is 1.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti’s score of 16,129.

Q: What is the maximum measured FPS in Valorant at 1080p?

A: Valorant reaches 443 FPS at 1920x1080 with ultra settings, which is the highest measured FPS in the dataset.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming workloads. The GPU’s 58th percentile is significantly lower than the CPU’s 81st percentile, and the measured frame rates show that the system’s performance scales with resolution in a way that is typical of GPU-bound configurations. At 1080p, the average FPS across games is 124.6, but at 1440p, the frame rates drop by roughly 30-40% in most titles, and at 4K, they drop by another 50%. This scaling pattern is consistent with the GPU being the limiting factor, as the CPU has ample headroom to process frames at higher resolutions.

For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 195 FPS at 1080p to 129 FPS at 1440p and 72 FPS at 4K. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,359 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient to handle the game’s logic at these frame rates, so the bottleneck is clearly the GPU’s pixel throughput. Similarly, in Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rates are 58 FPS at 1080p, 43 FPS at 1440p, and 28 FPS at 4K, which are all GPU-limited given the game’s heavy reliance on shading and ray tracing.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU is the limiting factor, but the GPU can assist in specific tasks. For instance, the Passmark GPU compute score of 10,963 is lower than the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 28,053, suggesting that pure CPU compute tasks will outperform GPU compute tasks that are not optimized for the GPU’s architecture. However, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 25.18 TFLOPS is higher than the CPU’s, so GPU-accelerated renderers that can utilize that throughput will shift the bottleneck to the CPU’s memory bandwidth or PCIe interface.

The 16 GB VRAM provides a buffer against VRAM-related bottlenecks at high resolutions and with large textures. In games like Microsoft Flight Simulator, which can use large amounts of memory, the 16 GB capacity ensures that the system does not stutter due to memory swapping. The GPU’s 624.1 GB/s bandwidth is also sufficient for the 256-bit memory bus, so the memory subsystem is not a bottleneck at 1080p or 1440p. Overall, the system’s balance is skewed toward CPU performance, making it a better fit for productivity tasks that need 8 cores and 16 threads, while gaming performance is solid but not exceptional for the GPU’s class.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT, an 8-core, 16-thread desktop CPU from the 5000 series, with the AMD Radeon RX 7700, a desktop GPU from the Radeon RX 7000 series. The CPU is based on Zen 3 architecture with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the GPU uses RDNA 3.0 with a boost clock of 2459 MHz and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. Both components are currently in active production, with the CPU released on 2024-07-30 and the GPU released on 2025-09-17.

The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 70, which places it above the majority of systems in the database. The CPU’s 81st percentile and GPU’s 58th percentile indicate that this is a system where the processor is the stronger component. The measured average FPS across games is 124.6 at 1080p, with a pair rank of 1,815 out of 3,732 pairs, meaning it performs better than roughly half of all tested CPU-GPU combinations.

In terms of tier, this is a mid-range to upper-mid-range desktop configuration. The CPU’s performance is comparable to newer 8-core parts like the Ryzen 7 7840H and Ryzen 5 9600X, while the GPU sits in the same performance class as the RTX 3060 Ti. The 16 GB VRAM is a standout feature that gives the system more longevity for future games with higher texture requirements. The platform’s AM4 socket and DDR4 memory support are mature, offering a wide range of compatible motherboards and memory kits at various price points. The system’s strengths lie in high-refresh 1080p gaming and multi-threaded productivity tasks, while its weaknesses are apparent at 4K resolution and in compute-heavy workloads that favor the GPU. For users seeking a balanced desktop that can handle both gaming and content creation without breaking the bank, this pairing offers a compelling combination of CPU headroom and GPU capability.