SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

29,879 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

42,723 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

This desktop pairing combines AMD's Zen 3-based Ryzen 7 5800XT with the RDNA 3.0-based Radeon RX 7650 GRE, landing at the 82nd percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU holds an 81st percentile position among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards — a closely matched duo where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The data indicates a balanced mid-to-high-tier desktop configuration suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, content creation, and productivity workloads, though no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is built on the Navi 33 chip using TSMC's 6 nm process, packing 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth — a configuration that suits 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads, with enough capacity for most modern titles at high settings but potentially limiting for texture-heavy 4K scenarios.

Clock speeds are substantial: the GPU runs at a 1720 MHz base clock, boosts to 2695 MHz, and has a 2350 MHz game clock. Memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, producing a pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance reaches 22.08 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), indicating strong raw compute capability for its class.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 32 dedicated RT cores, though the GPU lacks tensor cores entirely — this is an RDNA 3.0 architecture, not an AI-focused design. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 places this GPU at the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards, showing it outperforms roughly four-fifths of the GPU landscape. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, it scores 83109, which reflects solid general-purpose compute performance for tasks like video encoding acceleration or OpenCL-based rendering.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 7650 GRE trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER by 1.2%, sits 1.2% behind the Quadro M6000 24 GB, and is 1.3% behind both the RTX 5050 Mobile and the original Quadro M6000. These deltas are minor, meaning the RX 7650 GRE performs essentially on par with those cards in aggregate benchmark scores. For rendering workloads, the 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 345.0 GTexel/s texture rate suggest strong performance in rasterization-heavy scenes, while the 32 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing that will handle some RT effects but likely at lower settings or resolutions. The absence of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware for DLSS-style upscaling, though the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility.

FAQ

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect gaming?

A: The RX 7650 GRE provides 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth across an 8 GB GDDR6 memory pool on a 128-bit bus. This bandwidth level supports 1080p gaming with high texture settings and can handle 1440p in many titles, though 4K texture-heavy scenarios may encounter bandwidth limitations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the Ryzen 7 7840H?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800XT has an average benchmark score of 29879, while the Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868 — a delta of 0%, meaning they perform statistically identically in aggregate. The 5800XT also sits 0.6% above the Ryzen 5 9600X and 0.3% below the Ryzen 7 8845HS.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 7650 GRE includes 32 dedicated RT cores as part of its RDNA 3.0 architecture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 indicates solid DX12 performance, but the modest RT core count suggests ray tracing will be usable at 1080p with medium settings rather than at high RT presets.

Q: What is the CPU's memory architecture?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800XT supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. It has a 32 MB shared L3 cache, 512 KB L2 cache per core, and 64 KB L1 cache per core. It also supports ECC memory, which is advantageous for workstation stability.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined build sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations. Both components are closely matched, with the CPU at the 81st percentile and the GPU at the 83rd percentile, indicating a well-balanced system with no extreme bottleneck.

Q: How does the GPU's average benchmark score compare to the RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42723, while the RTX 4070 SUPER scores 43223 — a delta of -1.2%, meaning the RX 7650 GRE is roughly 1.2% slower in aggregate. This places them in the same performance tier.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and core configuration?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800XT has 8 cores and 16 threads with a 3.80 GHz base clock and a 4.80 GHz boost clock. It uses the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer codename) on a 7 nm TSMC process with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU are separated by only two percentile points — the GPU at 83rd and the CPU at 81st among their respective categories. This near-parity suggests that neither component will consistently bottleneck the other in most workloads, though specific applications will favor one side.

In multi-threaded CPU workloads, the Ryzen 7 5800XT demonstrates substantial headroom. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 7680 indicate strong CPU throughput that can keep pace with the GPU's rendering output. The PassMark multithread score of 28053 further confirms this, and the 16-thread 3DMark score of 7683 shows only marginal scaling loss from the max-thread result of 7680 — meaning the CPU is efficiently utilizing all 16 threads.

For gaming, the GPU is likely the primary limiter at higher resolutions. The RX 7650 GRE's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture quality and resolution scaling, while the CPU's single-thread score of 959 in 3DMark and 3359 in Cinebench R23 single-core should handle most game logic and physics at 1080p without becoming the bottleneck. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3535 reinforces this: it is competitive with modern processors, so frame rates at 1080p will generally be GPU-bound.

In compute-heavy productivity tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU's 8-core/16-thread configuration with a 4.80 GHz boost clock will carry significant load. The PassMark floating-point math score of 53808 and integer math score of 93942 show strong arithmetic throughput, while the data encryption score of 21461 and compression score of 352002 indicate the CPU handles memory-intensive workloads effectively. The GPU's 22.08 TFLOPS will accelerate parallel rendering tasks, but the 32 RT cores and 8 GB VRAM may limit ray-traced rendering complexity.

The memory subsystem shows a potential bottleneck point: the CPU's 51.2 GB/s DDR4 bandwidth is modest by modern standards, and the GPU's 288.0 GB/s, while adequate, is not exceptional for 8 GB cards. In workloads that stream large datasets between CPU and GPU, these bandwidth figures could become limiting factors, but for typical gaming and productivity scenarios, the balance is appropriate.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers seeking solid 1080p and capable 1440p performance without requiring a top-tier GPU. The RX 7650 GRE's 83rd percentile ranking and 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 throughput deliver smooth frame rates in most titles, while the Ryzen 7 5800XT's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample CPU headroom for gaming, streaming, and multitasking.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or graphic design will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 83109 useful for accelerated workloads. The CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock and 32 MB L3 cache benefit single-threaded applications, while the 16 threads handle multi-threaded exports and renders.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 21461 and integer math score of 93942, which indicate strong performance for compilation tasks and cryptographic operations. The ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use, and the AM4 socket allows for potential CPU upgrades within the same platform.

Students and small business users running office productivity, web development, or data analysis tools will find this build more than sufficient, with the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 28053 ensuring smooth multitasking. The desktop form factor with dual-slot GPU and 1x 8-pin power connector keeps the build straightforward, and the 450 W suggested PSU means power supply requirements are modest.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is a desktop processor from the 5000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Vermeer codename. It uses TSMC's 7 nm process node with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. The chip features 8 cores and 16 threads with a 3.80 GHz base clock boosting to 4.80 GHz, and it carries a 105 W TDP. It supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with ECC capability and provides 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, along with PCIe Gen 4 across 20 CPU lanes.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache — a configuration that provides low-latency access to frequently used data. The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4, which maintains compatibility with a wide range of motherboards, and it has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and R20 multicore score of 9993 indicate excellent rendering throughput. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7683 nearly matches the max-thread score of 7680, demonstrating efficient scaling across all cores. Single-thread performance is also solid, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3359 and 3DMark single-thread at 959, placing it competitively against modern processors.

The PassMark suite reveals specialized strengths: floating-point math at 53808 and integer math at 93942 show strong arithmetic capability, while data compression at 352002 and random string sorting at 35911 indicate good memory subsystem performance. The data encryption score of 21461 supports secure workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 29879 places it at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the Ryzen 7 7840H at a 0% delta.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7650 GRE's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2336 and 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest this build can drive 1080p displays at high refresh rates in most titles, with the CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock and single-thread score of 959 in 3DMark ensuring frame pacing stays consistent.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, evidenced by the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7683, can handle game capture and encoding while gaming, though the GPU's lack of tensor cores means no AI-based encoding acceleration — streamers should rely on CPU encoding or the GPU's standard video encoders.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 83109 combine to accelerate timeline rendering and export. The 8 GB VRAM handles 1080p and 1440p editing timelines with multiple effects, while the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 28053 supports smooth preview playback.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2398 and R20 multicore score of 9993 provide strong CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 22.08 TFLOPS and 32 RT cores accelerate GPU-accelerated renders and ray-traced previews, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 93942 and data encryption score of 21461 indicate fast compilation and secure data handling, while the 16 threads and 32 MB L3 cache reduce build times for multi-module projects.

Student and office work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3535 and the GPU's 2,048 shading units handle productivity applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease, while the 105 W CPU TDP and 170 W GPU TDP keep power and cooling requirements manageable for a desktop workstation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries. All gaming performance figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than precise measurements.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and its 83rd percentile ranking suggest strong 1080p gaming performance. With 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, the RX 7650 GRE should handle most modern titles at 1080p with high-to-ultra settings, achieving smooth frame rates above 60 FPS in typical titles. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus may require some settings reductions in VRAM-heavy games.

The CPU's gaming-relevant scores — 3DMark single-thread at 959, Cinebench R23 single-core at 3359, and PassMark single-thread at 3535 — indicate it will not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p in most scenarios. The 32 MB L3 cache and 4.80 GHz boost clock provide responsive game logic and physics processing.

For esports titles and lighter games, this build should comfortably exceed 144 FPS at 1080p, while AAA games will likely range from 60-100 FPS depending on optimization. Ray tracing performance will be more modest, with the 32 RT cores handling light RT effects but likely requiring reduced resolutions or RT quality settings. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and most 1440p textures, but 4K gaming would require substantial settings reductions.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 processor on AM4) with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE (8 GB GDDR6, RDNA 3.0 GPU). The pairing sits at the 82nd combined percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations, indicating a strong mid-to-high-tier system.

The CPU, released in July 2024 with a launch MSRP of $249, brings competitive multi-threaded performance with an average benchmark score of 29879 and an 81st percentile CPU ranking. The GPU, released in February 2025 with a launch MSRP of 279 USD, delivers an average benchmark score of 42723 and an 83rd percentile GPU ranking. Both components are actively in production.

The system uses DDR4 memory (dual-channel, 51.2 GB/s) and PCIe Gen 4 connectivity. The GPU requires a 450 W suggested PSU and uses a single 8-pin power connector, with a 170 W TDP and dual-slot cooling. The CPU carries a 105 W TDP. This is a balanced configuration where the GPU slightly outranks the CPU in percentile terms, but the difference is minimal enough that neither component consistently bottlenecks the other.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 7 5800XT achieves an average benchmark score of 29879, placing it at the 81st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29868, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (29955, -0.3% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (29955, -0.3% delta), and AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (29713, 0.6% delta). Key CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 23794, Cinebench R23 single-core at 3359, 3DMark max-thread at 7680, and PassMark multithread at 28053.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE achieves an average benchmark score of 42723, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43223, -1.2% delta), NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262, -1.2% delta), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43268, -1.3% delta), and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43301, -1.3% delta). Key GPU scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2336 and Geekbench OpenCL at 83109.

Combined, this pairing achieves an 82nd percentile ranking among all CPU+GPU configurations. The near-identical percentile positions of the CPU (81st) and GPU (83rd) indicate a harmonized system where performance is well-matched across workloads. The CPU's multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R20 multicore at 9993, 3DMark 16-thread at 7683) and the GPU's compute scores (22.08 TFLOPS FP32, OpenCL 83109) together provide a compelling case for both gaming and productivity, with neither component dominating the other in a way that would create a significant bottleneck.