SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

29,879 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and AMD Radeon RX 6600 pairing represents a specific tier of desktop performance, combining a high-thread-count CPU with a mainstream GPU. The benchmark data shows a system with a combined percentile of 72, placing it above the majority of tested configurations. The CPU is a clear strength, while the GPU, though capable, anchors the system's overall performance in graphically intensive tasks. This analysis examines the individual components, their measured performance, and the resulting balance for various workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer) using a 7 nm TSMC process. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 105 W. This configuration provides strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 points. This score places the CPU in the 81st percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms a significant majority of processors. In single-threaded tasks, the Cinebench R23 score of 3359 points shows robust per-core performance, which is crucial for everyday responsiveness and gaming.

The 32 MB of shared L3 cache is a hallmark of the Zen 3 architecture, improving latency and performance in gaming and data-heavy workloads. The benchmark scores illustrate a balanced profile; the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7683 is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 7680, suggesting the processor's scaling plateaus at 16 threads, which is expected for an 8-core design. The Passmark multi-thread score of 28053 further reinforces its capability in multi-threaded applications like video rendering and compilation. The CPU's average benchmark score of 29879 is virtually on par with its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29868, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (29955, -0.3% delta). This indicates that despite being a 5000-series part, its performance is competitive with newer mobile and desktop offerings in this metric, though the 5800XT does edge out the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X by 0.6%.

For real-world workloads, this means the Ryzen 7 5800XT can handle heavy multi-tasking, content creation, and software compilation with considerable headroom. The high multi-core scores translate to faster render times and smoother performance in threaded applications. The single-core performance, while not class-leading, is more than sufficient for standard desktop tasks and ensures that the CPU is rarely a bottleneck in gaming scenarios when paired with a mid-range GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is built for the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature ecosystem. Memory support is limited to DDR4, running in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a benefit for workstation use cases. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, offering high bandwidth for modern NVMe SSDs and graphics cards.

The GPU, with a suggested PSU of 300 W and a TDP of 132 W, places minimal strain on a power supply. The CPU’s 105 W TDP adds to the total power draw, meaning a high-quality 500 W to 550 W PSU would offer ample headroom for this pairing plus other system components, though the exact figures are not specified here. The upgrade path is defined by the AM4 socket. A sensible next step for users seeking more CPU performance would be to look at other AM4 options, but the 5800XT is already a high-end part for this platform. For GPU upgrades, the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface of the RX 6600 is a consideration, as newer, more powerful GPUs typically use x16 slots, though the x8 slot will still function, potentially with a minor performance impact on some high-end cards.

The platform’s overall maturity means BIOS updates and driver stability are well-established. The fact that this CPU is an "XT" refresh of the 5800X suggests it is a late-life addition to the AM4 socket, maximizing the platform's potential. Users on older AM4 boards can upgrade to this processor, providing a significant performance boost without needing to change motherboards or memory.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture (Navi 23 chip) on a 7 nm process. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It also includes 28 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The boost clock is rated at 2491 MHz, with a game clock of 2044 MHz. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, ensuring compatibility with the latest gaming features.

In terms of raw compute, the RX 6600 delivers 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. This is reflected in its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 points. The GPU's overall average benchmark score is 19036, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-pack position, showing that while it is a capable card, it is not a high-end performer. Its closest rivals in benchmark scores are the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030, 0% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (19049, -0.1% delta), and the NVIDIA Tesla K20m (19089, -0.3% delta). The delta percentages show that the RX 6600 is essentially on par with these cards in terms of synthetic benchmarks, though architectural differences will lead to varied real-world performance.

The 8 GB VRAM is a crucial factor. At 1080p and 1440p, it is generally sufficient for most titles, but at 4K with ultra textures, it can become a limitation. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the GPU's compute capacity, but it is not overly generous. For rendering, the 28 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing performance. The data suggests that while the GPU can handle ray tracing, turning it on in demanding titles will significantly impact frame rates. The Passmark G3D score of 15096 indicates solid DirectX performance, but the score of 51 for DirectX 12 suggests that the card may not be optimized for all DX12 titles, although this is a synthetic metric and real-world results vary.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the RX 6600's gaming capabilities, with all figures representing performance at ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in esports titles, such as 326.1 FPS in Valorant and 314 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. In more demanding AAA titles, it still performs admirably; for example, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 134.7 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 142.6 FPS. These numbers suggest that for 1080p gaming, this pairing is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance drops significantly. Call of Duty: Warzone remains playable at 122.5 FPS, and Valorant at 276.1 FPS, but more demanding games struggle. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 33.9 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 29.6 FPS, which are below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly out of its depth for modern AAA titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 20.6 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at a mere 5 FPS. Even esports titles see a significant drop, with Valorant falling to 221 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 to 53.9 FPS.

The data shows a clear pattern: this system is optimized for 1080p gaming, with playable performance at 1440p for less demanding titles, and 4K gaming is only viable for older or lighter games. The average FPS across all tested games is 93.6, which reflects the strong 1080p results. The system's rank of 2931 out of 3732 pairs in the FPS database indicates that while it performs well, there are many faster gaming configurations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a system where the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking is much higher than the GPU's 63rd percentile. This imbalance suggests that in CPU-light, GPU-heavy workloads, such as high-resolution gaming, the RX 6600 will be the primary limiting factor. The FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this; as resolution increases from 1080p to 2160p, frame rates drop substantially across all games, indicating the GPU is saturated.

However, in CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p with lower graphical settings, the 8-core/16-thread CPU ensures that the GPU is fed with data. The high single-thread score of 959 in 3DMark and 3359 in Cinebench R23 means the CPU can handle game logic and physics without becoming a bottleneck. For example, the 326 FPS in Valorant at 1080p confirms the CPU's ability to drive high frame rates when the GPU is not the limiting factor.

In multi-threaded productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the dominant component, and the GPU will assist in tasks like preview rendering or effects. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 shows it can handle heavy compute loads, while the GPU's 8.928 TFLOPS will accelerate GPU-accelerated features. The Passmark data encryption score of 21461 and compression score of 352002 also show the CPU is a powerhouse for these specific tasks. The bottleneck is therefore context-dependent: the GPU is the primary limiter for gaming at 1440p and above, while the CPU is the main workhorse for multi-threaded professional workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this system excels. The data shows frame rates well above 144 FPS in competitive titles like Valorant (326.1 FPS) and Counter-Strike 2 (142.6 FPS), making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU has ample headroom for encoding a stream while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 indicates that the CPU can handle the extra load of x264 encoding without severely impacting game performance, and the GPU provides a solid foundation for gaming at 1080p.

Video Editing: The strong multi-threaded CPU performance is a boon for video editing. The Passmark multi-thread score of 28053 and the Cinebench scores suggest smooth timeline scrubbing and faster export times. The GPU can accelerate effects and rendering, though its 8 GB VRAM may limit work with very high-resolution project files.

3D Rendering: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU is well-suited for CPU-based rendering, with high Cinebench scores indicating fast render times. The GPU can handle GPU-accelerated rendering, but its 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is modest, so it will be slower than higher-end cards.

Software Development: The CPU is excellent for compilation, with high multi-threaded scores. The Passmark integer math score of 93942 indicates strong performance in code compilation and other integer-heavy tasks. The 32 MB L3 cache also helps with frequently accessed data.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for standard office tasks like word processing and spreadsheets. However, the high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3359) ensures that the system feels extremely responsive, and the CPU's capabilities make it suitable for more demanding student workloads like data analysis or light CAD work.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at gamers who primarily play at 1920x1080 and want to achieve high frame rates in esports and AAA titles. The measured FPS data, such as 134.7 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone and 142.6 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p, confirms this is a strong 1080p gaming machine. It is also well-suited for content creators on a budget who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for video editing and rendering, as indicated by the 23794 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The CPU's high percentile and strong Passmark scores make it a good choice for software developers who need fast compilation times.

For students, this system provides a very responsive desktop experience and enough power for demanding projects, but it may be more than needed for basic tasks. For small business workstations, the CPU's performance and ECC memory support make it a viable option for data processing and financial modeling, while the GPU provides adequate acceleration for office applications. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p gaming and light creative work, but users aiming for 1440p or 4K gaming should look at higher-tier GPUs, as the data shows significant frame rate drops at those resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The system has a combined percentile of 72, placing it above most tested configurations. The CPU is in the 81st percentile, while the GPU is in the 63rd percentile.

Q: What kind of gaming performance can I expect at 1920x1080 resolution?

A: At 1080p ultra settings, the system delivers high frame rates in most titles. For example, it achieves 326.1 FPS in Valorant, 134.7 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, and 142.6 FPS in Counter-Strike 2.

Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The data shows that 4K gaming is not a strength. In demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the system only manages 20.6 FPS at 3840x2160. It is best suited for 1080p gaming.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 29879. It is essentially on par with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (0% delta) and is 0.6% faster than the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 19036. It is statistically tied with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (0% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (-0.1% delta).

Q: What is the memory configuration for this build?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance?

A: The CPU excels in multi-threaded tasks. It scores 23794 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 28053 in Passmark multi-thread, indicating strong performance for rendering and compilation.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently strong. In Cinebench R23, it achieves 23794 points in multi-core and 3359 points in single-core. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 959 in single-thread to 7683 in 16-thread tests. The Passmark suite shows a multi-thread score of 28053, with specific strengths in integer math (93942) and floating-point math (53808). These scores put the CPU in the 81st percentile, with an average benchmark score of 29879.

The GPU's scores are more modest. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1492. In Geekbench, it scores 88398 in Metal, 67623 in Vulkan, and 28850 in OpenCL. The Passmark G3D score is 15096, with a GPU compute score of 6554. These figures place the GPU in the 63rd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 19036. The combined picture is one of a powerful CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The system's combined percentile of 72 reflects this, showing that the CPU is the performance driver, while the GPU is sufficient for mainstream 1080p gaming but will limit performance in more demanding scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT CPU with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 GPU. The CPU is a high-performance 8-core part for the AM4 platform, while the GPU is a mainstream 1080p-oriented card. The system's combined percentile of 72 indicates it is a solid mid-range to upper-mid-range configuration. The CPU's high percentile (81) and the GPU's mid-range percentile (63) define the character of the build: it is a productivity and high-refresh 1080p gaming machine where the CPU provides headroom for demanding tasks and future GPU upgrades, while the GPU is the immediate limiting factor for high-resolution gaming.