SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

29,123 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 pairing represents a fascinating study in generational contrast, combining an older, established CPU architecture with a flagship, end-of-life GPU. The data reveals a system where the CPU, while still competitive, frequently becomes the limiting factor in high-refresh-rate scenarios, but where the GPU’s immense power ensures exceptional performance across all workloads. This analysis examines the benchmark results to understand the balance of this desktop build.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly indicates a system where the GPU is the dominant component, but the CPU plays a critical role in defining the upper limits of performance, particularly at lower resolutions. The GPU’s percentile rank of 88 among all GPUs places it in the top tier, while the CPU’s percentile of 81 is slightly lower but still robust. This gap suggests that in many gaming scenarios, the RTX 4090 has more rendering capability than the Ryzen 7 5800X can feed, especially when the resolution drops and the CPU’s frame-generation capacity becomes the bottleneck.

Evidence for this CPU bottleneck is most apparent in the measured FPS scaling across resolutions. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the system delivers 360 FPS at 1920x1080, which drops to 238.1 FPS at 2560x1440 and 132.5 FPS at 3840x2160. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a 34% reduction in FPS, but the scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a 44% reduction. This non-linear drop indicates that at lower resolutions, the CPU is limiting the frame rate, preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential. In contrast, a game like Cyberpunk 2077 shows a more balanced scaling, with 90.9 FPS at 1080p, 77 FPS at 1440p, and 51 FPS at 4K, suggesting the GPU is the primary constraint in this more demanding title.

The CPU’s single-threaded performance, as measured by the 3dmark_single_thread score of 943, is a key factor. In games like Valorant, which are often CPU-bound, the system achieves 432.2 FPS at 1080p, but this is likely a ceiling imposed by the processor rather than the GPU. The multi-threaded 3dmark_16_threads score of 7586 further illustrates that while the CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, its performance is not at the level of newer processors, making it the limiting factor in scenarios with extremely high frame rate targets.

The combinedPercentile of 85 reflects the overall system performance. The average FPS across all tested games is 212.4, which is exceptionally high, but the pairRankByFps of 144 out of 3732 pairs indicates that this combination is not the absolute top performer, likely due to the CPU’s age. In essence, the RTX 4090 is waiting on the Ryzen 7 5800X in many lighter workloads, while in heavier, GPU-intensive workloads, the pairing is more balanced.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is a behemoth of a graphics card, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It houses 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, a staggering amount of hardware. The GPU features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a massive 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth. This capacity and bandwidth are crucial for high-resolution textures and complex scenes, allowing the card to handle 4K gaming and professional workloads with ease.

The core configuration is equally impressive, with 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The RT cores number 128, and the tensor cores number 512, making this a formidable card for ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks. The boost clock of 2520 MHz, combined with the FP32 performance of 82.58 TFLOPS, demonstrates raw computational power that is unmatched by most rivals. The pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s further highlight its ability to fill frames with high-fidelity graphics.

Benchmark scores confirm the GPU’s dominance. The passmark_g3d score of 38194 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The geekbench_vulkan score of 271631 and geekbench_opencl score of 255416 show strong performance in compute-heavy APIs. The 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 9223 is a modern test that stresses the card’s capabilities. However, the passmark directx scores are lower (224 for DX10, 326 for DX11, 150 for DX12), which seems counterintuitive but may reflect specific testing conditions or driver optimizations. The gpu_compute score of 26613 indicates solid compute performance, though not as high as the graphics scores.

The nearest rivals, based on average benchmark score, are the Intel Arc Pro A60 (0% delta), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (0.3% delta), AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (-2.5% delta), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (2.9% delta). Only the Intel Arc Pro A60 matches its score, while the others trail significantly. This suggests the RTX 4090 is in a class of its own, with no consumer GPU near its performance level. The 24 GB VRAM is particularly noteworthy, as it provides headroom for future games and professional applications that require large frame buffers.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system that is exceptionally powerful, but with a noticeable gap between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29123, with a percentile of 81. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H (0.1% delta), Intel Xeon Phi 7210 (-0.4% delta), Intel Core i5-13500HX (-0.5% delta), and AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (0.6% delta). These are all close in performance, indicating the 5800X is competitive with mid-range and even some high-end mobile and desktop chips, but it is not a top-tier processor by modern standards.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 60347, with a percentile of 88. Its nearest rivals are all professional or prosumer cards, with the Intel Arc Pro A60 (0% delta) being the closest, followed by the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (0.3% delta), AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (-2.5% delta), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (2.9% delta). This shows that the RTX 4090 is not just a gaming card but a professional-grade compute powerhouse, outperforming dedicated workstation GPUs.

In terms of specific CPU benchmark scores, the Ryzen 7 5800X achieves a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 15476 and a singlecore score of 1574.5. The geekbench_multicore score is 11036, and the singlecore is 2032. The passmark_multithread score is 27732, with a passmark_single_thread score of 3445. These scores indicate solid multi-threaded performance for its core count, but the single-thread performance is where it lags behind newer architectures. The 3dmark scores show a progression from 1846 for 2_threads to 7586 for 16_threads, demonstrating good scaling across threads.

The measured FPS data provides a concrete picture of gaming performance. In esports titles, the system excels. For example, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves a massive 793.4 FPS at 1080p, and Valorant hits 432.2 FPS at 1080p. In more demanding AAA titles, the performance is still high. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 90.9 FPS at 1080p, 77 FPS at 1440p, and 51 FPS at 4K. Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 94.5 FPS at 1080p, 69.7 FPS at 1440p, and 49.5 FPS at 4K. These numbers show that the system is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and solid 4K gaming, though not always at 60 FPS in the most demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is targeted at users who demand the absolute maximum graphical performance and are willing to accept a CPU that may be a bottleneck in some scenarios. The primary audience is the enthusiast gamer who plays at 4K resolution and wants to experience the highest settings with ray tracing enabled. The measured FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K (51 FPS) shows that while it is playable, it may not be a locked 60 FPS experience without upscaling. However, in less demanding titles, the system easily exceeds 60 FPS at 4K, as seen in Call of Duty: Warzone (103.2 FPS) and Control (79.2 FPS).

For content creators, this system is a powerful workstation. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance make it ideal for 3D rendering, video editing, and AI workloads. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 15476, can handle multi-threaded tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering, though it is not the fastest in this regard. The combination is suitable for developers who need to compile code and run virtual machines, with the CPU’s passmark_integer_math score of 94969 indicating strong computational throughput.

Students and small business users would find this system overkill for typical tasks like word processing, web browsing, and spreadsheets. However, for those in STEM fields who need to run simulations or data analysis, the CPU’s passmark_data_compression score of 345414 and the GPU’s compute capabilities would be beneficial. The system is not a value-oriented choice, but for those who need the best possible performance, it delivers.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a desktop processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture and codenamed Vermeer. It is manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC, with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in professional platforms.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. This large L3 cache is a hallmark of the Zen 3 design, helping to reduce latency and improve performance in gaming and other latency-sensitive workloads. The CPU has a TDP of 105 W and uses the AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature platform with broad motherboard compatibility. It supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and NVMe SSDs.

Benchmark results show the CPU’s strengths and weaknesses. The single-thread performance, as measured by the 3dmark_single_thread score of 943 and passmark_single_thread score of 3445, is good but not exceptional. The multi-threaded performance is where the 8-core, 16-thread configuration shines, with a 3dmark_max_threads score of 7578 and a passmark_multithread score of 27732. The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 15476 is representative of its rendering capability. The geekbench scores of 2032 single-core and 11036 multi-core provide a cross-platform comparison.

The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H, has an average score of 29093, which is 0.1% higher than the 5800X’s 29123. This indicates that the 5800X is still competitive with newer mobile processors. However, the Intel Core i5-13500HX has a score of 29270, which is 0.5% higher, showing that it is slightly faster. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT is 0.6% slower, and the Intel Xeon Phi 7210 is 0.4% slower. This places the 5800X in a mid-to-high tier, but not at the top.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combinedPercentile is 85, indicating that this system outperforms 85% of all CPU and GPU pairings in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compare to its single-threaded performance?

A: The CPU achieves a 3dmark_max_threads score of 7578 compared to a 3dmark_single_thread score of 943, showing a roughly 8x scaling from single-core to multi-core workloads.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 4090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: In which game does the system achieve the highest FPS at 1080p?

A: The highest FPS at 1920x1080 is in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with a measured 793.4 FPS.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across all games is 212.4, and the pair ranks 144th out of 3732 pairs.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and socket type?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800X has a TDP of 105 W and uses the AMD Socket AM4.

Q: How does the GPU’s performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 4090’s average benchmark score is 60347, which is 0% different from the Intel Arc Pro A60, its closest rival.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system excels in esports titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 360 FPS, and Valorant at 432.2 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay on high refresh rate monitors. The CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient for these titles, though the GPU is heavily underutilized.

For streaming, the combination of the CPU’s 8 cores and the GPU’s NVENC encoder is potent. The CPU can handle the game encoding, while the GPU’s 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores can handle rendering and AI-enhanced streaming features. The system can maintain high FPS in games like Call of Duty: Warzone (134.3 FPS at 1080p) while streaming.

For video editing, the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerate rendering and effects. The CPU’s passmark_data_compression score of 345414 helps with codec handling. The system can handle 4K footage with ease, as evidenced by its high performance in GPU compute benchmarks.

For 3D rendering, this system is a professional-grade workstation. The GPU’s geekbench_opencl score of 255416 and vulkan score of 271631 are strong indicators of its compute power. The CPU’s cinebench_r23_multicore score of 15476 is adequate for CPU-based rendering, though the GPU will typically be the primary rendering engine.

For software development, the CPU’s 16 threads and passmark_integer_math score of 94969 are beneficial for compiling code. The large 32 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. The system can handle multiple virtual machines and containerized workloads.

For student and office work, this system is massively overpowered. Tasks like word processing and web browsing will use a fraction of the system’s capabilities. The high power draw and cost are not justified for these use cases, but the system will handle any such task without breaking a sweat.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The CPU is from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture, and is a mainstream desktop processor. The GPU is from the GeForce 40-series, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, and is a flagship enthusiast card. The overall tier of this system is high, with a combined percentile of 85. The GPU’s percentile of 88 is the primary driver of this ranking, while the CPU’s percentile of 81 is slightly lower.

The system is designed for maximum graphical performance, with the RTX 4090 being the centerpiece. The CPU is a capable partner, but its age is evident in some CPU-bound scenarios. The build class is clearly desktop, indicating a stationary, high-performance machine. The measured FPS data confirms that this is a top-tier gaming system, with an average FPS of 212.4 across all tested games.

Gaming Performance

The gaming performance of this system is exceptional, as measured at ultra settings across a wide range of titles. The dataIsMeasured field is true, meaning these are actual benchmark results. At 1920x1080, the system achieves over 100 FPS in almost all games. Esports titles see massive frame rates, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 793.4 FPS, Valorant at 432.2 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 427 FPS. Even more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 hit 90.9 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 94.5 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains high. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 119.3 FPS, Control at 112.9 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 at 77 FPS. Esports titles still see high frame rates, with Valorant at 409.7 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 238.1 FPS. Some extremely demanding games like Ark: Survival Ascended drop to 33 FPS, indicating the limit of even this hardware.

At 3840x2160, the system is still capable of 4K gaming, but some titles require compromises. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 51 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 49.5 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 18.1 FPS. However, many games are still playable at high frame rates, such as Call of Duty: Warzone at 103.2 FPS, Valorant at 379.4 FPS, and Control at 79.2 FPS. The 24 GB VRAM ensures that high-resolution textures are not an issue.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature socket with a long lifespan. It supports DDR4 memory, which is the standard for this platform. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, allowing for a high-bandwidth connection to the GPU and NVMe SSDs. The CPU’s TDP is 105 W, and it has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and is a triple-slot card, requiring significant case space. It has a TDP of 450 W and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 850 W, which provides headroom for the CPU and other components. The GPU is a large card, measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 61 mm in width.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU could be upgraded to a newer AM4 processor, such as a Ryzen 5000 series chip with more cores, but the platform is at the end of its life. A more significant upgrade would involve moving to a new platform, such as AM5, which would require a new motherboard and DDR5 memory. The GPU is already an end-of-life product, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, so upgrading it would mean a generational leap.

The power supply headroom of 850 W is sufficient for the current configuration, but if a newer, more power-hungry GPU is installed, a higher wattage PSU may be necessary. The PCIe 4.0 interface is still current, so the GPU is not bottlenecked by the connection. The platform’s DDR4 memory support is a limitation compared to newer DDR5 platforms, but for gaming and most workloads, the performance difference is minimal.