SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
73%
VS
GPU
95%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800U

3,369 Benchmark Score
Top 27% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a low-power, efficiency-focused AMD Ryzen 7 5800U processor with a high-end NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile GPU. The data indicates a significant performance imbalance, with the CPU positioned near the middle of the performance pack and the GPU in the top quintile. This analysis will detail the component specifications, benchmark results, and practical implications for this laptop configuration.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800U is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, specifically the Cezanne-U silicon. This is a 7nm TSMC part with a die size of 180 mm² and a transistor count of 10,700 million. It features a base clock of 1900.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, which is a substantial single-core capability for a mobile part. The cache hierarchy is generous for a laptop CPU, with 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, plus a 16 MB shared L3 pool. The processor has a 15W TDP, marking it as an ultra-low-power design intended for thin-and-light systems where thermal and battery constraints are paramount.

In benchmark results, the 5800U demonstrates a dual personality. Its multi-core performance is solid for its class; it scores 8154 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1613 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. However, its single-core scores are comparatively lower, with a Cinebench R23 single-core result of 1427 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1656. The Geekbench multi-core score of 7132 rounds out the picture. The average benchmark score across all tests is 3369, which places the CPU in the 54th percentile of all CPUs in the database. This is a middle-of-the-road position, indicating that while the CPU is capable of handling everyday tasks and moderate productivity workloads, it is not a high-performance computing champion. The nearest rivals confirm this positioning: it is a mere 0.6% ahead of the Intel Xeon D-1587 and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-7800X, while it trails the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U by 0.7% and the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I by 1.1%. These deltas are all within a narrow band, showing that the 5800U sits in a dense cluster of comparable processors.

The architecture’s focus on efficiency means that for sustained heavy workloads, the processor’s performance will be dictated by the laptop’s cooling solution. The benchmark scores represent the CPU’s peak capability, but in a chassis designed for a high-end GPU, thermal headroom may allow the CPU to sustain closer to its boost clocks, though the 15W TDP is a hard limit for power draw.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800U is built for the AMD Socket FP6 platform, a mobile-specific socket that is not designed for user-level upgrades. This is a soldered part, meaning the CPU is permanently attached to the motherboard. Consequently, the upgrade path for this processor is nonexistent in the traditional sense; users cannot swap it for a newer or more powerful chip. The platform supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes, which is a potential bottleneck for the GPU and storage devices, as the RTX 4080 Mobile is specified for a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The TDP of the CPU is 15W, which is minimal. The GPU, in contrast, has a TDP of 110W. The combined power draw of these two components is substantial for a laptop, but the CPU’s low power envelope means that the system’s power delivery can be heavily skewed toward the graphics card. The suggested PSU for the GPU is not specified in the data, but for a laptop, this is less relevant as the power supply is integrated. The sensible next upgrade for a user of this system would be to move to a newer platform entirely, such as a system with a more recent AMD or Intel processor that supports PCIe Gen 4 or Gen 5 and faster memory, rather than attempting to upgrade components within this chassis.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data shows a stark contrast between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 3369, placing it in the 54th percentile. The GPU, however, has an average benchmark score of 38135, which is more than ten times higher, and it sits in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the system is 68, reflecting the dominance of the GPU in the overall performance profile.

The CPU’s specific scores include 8154 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1427 in single-core, along with a Geekbench multi-core score of 7132. The GPU’s performance is headlined by a Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 and a Vulkan score of 145807. In Passmark tests, the GPU scores 24926 in G3D and 11191 in GPU Compute, but notably scores very low in DirectX-specific tests: 157 in DirectX 10, 244 in DirectX 11, 96 in DirectX 12, and 286 in DirectX 9. These low DirectX scores are unusual, but the G3D and compute scores are more representative of raw performance.

The GPU’s nearest rivals highlight its position: it is 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and 0.6% behind the RTX 5080 Mobile, while being 1.3% ahead of both the RTX 4070 and the Tesla P4. This places the RTX 4080 Mobile in a performance tier that is comparable to a desktop RTX 4070, which is a significant achievement for a mobile part. The data is clear: this system is a GPU-first machine, and the CPU is the limiting factor in many workloads. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, so all discussion of FPS is estimated from the benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800U?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800U has an average benchmark score of 3369, placing it in the 54th percentile of all CPUs. It is closely matched with rivals, being 0.6% faster than the Intel Xeon D-1587 and 1.1% faster than the Intel Core i7-7800X.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 Mobile compare to other GPUs?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 38135, which puts it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. It is 1.3% faster than both the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and the Tesla P4, and 0.6% slower than the RTX 5080 Mobile.

Q: What is the memory configuration of this system?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and does not support ECC memory. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 5800U is on the AMD Socket FP6 platform, which is a mobile socket. The CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded.

Q: What is the transistor count and process node for each component?

A: The CPU is a 7nm TSMC part with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The GPU is a 5nm TSMC part with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8M / mm².

Q: What are the clock speeds for the GPU?

A: The GPU has a base clock of 1290 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which equates to 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 68, indicating that the system is generally faster than 68% of all builds in the database.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is for users who prioritize graphics performance above all else. The 81st percentile GPU makes it suitable for gamers who want to play at high settings, though the CPU’s 54th percentile position means that frame rates in CPU-bound titles will be limited. Content creators who work with GPU-accelerated rendering, such as video editors using CUDA-accelerated effects, will benefit from the 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. 3D modelers and animators using renderers that leverage RT cores will find the 58 RT cores valuable. However, software developers who compile large codebases will find the CPU’s multi-core performance of 8154 in Cinebench R23 to be only adequate, not exceptional. Students and small business users doing general office work, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks will find the system more than capable, but it is overkill for such workloads. The system is best suited for a user who needs a laptop for gaming or GPU-centric creative work and is willing to accept the CPU as a secondary consideration.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a high-end mobile GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and the AD104 chip. It is manufactured on a 5nm process at TSMC, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1290 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). It is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory configuration is substantial, though the 192-bit bus is narrower than some desktop counterparts, which is a trade-off for mobile power efficiency.

The compute resources are extensive: 7424 shading units, 232 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 58 RT cores, and 232 tensor cores. This hardware translates to a pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 24.72 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines and APIs.

In benchmark results, the GPU’s OpenCL score of 159575 and Vulkan score of 145807 demonstrate strong compute and graphics throughput. The Passmark G3D score of 24926 and GPU Compute score of 11191 reinforce this, though the low DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are anomalies likely due to driver or test methodology issues. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 38135 places it in the 81st percentile, and its nearest rivals show it is competitive with desktop-class hardware like the RTX 4070, being 1.3% faster. For rendering workloads, the 12 GB of VRAM and high bandwidth are suitable for 1440p and 4K texture-heavy scenes, while the RT cores accelerate ray-traced lighting and shadows.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear bottleneck: the CPU is the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU’s 54th percentile and average score of 3369 are vastly overshadowed by the GPU’s 81st percentile and score of 38135. In gaming scenarios, this means that at lower resolutions or with lower graphical settings, the CPU will struggle to feed the GPU enough frames, capping FPS below what the GPU could achieve. Conversely, at higher resolutions or with ultra settings, the GPU will become the primary workload driver, and the CPU’s slower single-core performance will be less impactful.

The CPU’s single-core Geekbench score of 1656 is modest, which will affect games that rely on a few fast cores. The multi-core score of 7132 is better, but still not enough to match the GPU’s raw power. For productivity, a task like video editing that uses both CPU and GPU will see the CPU throttle the overall export time, even if the GPU handles effects rendering quickly. The GPU’s 110W TDP versus the CPU’s 15W TDP indicates that the system is designed to give the GPU precedence in power delivery, further cementing the imbalance. The estimated FPS in GPU-bound games will be high, but in CPU-bound titles, the frame rate will be lower, making the system feel less consistent.

Build Overview

This build class is a laptop pairing an AMD Ryzen 7 5800U with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. The CPU is a mobile processor from the 5000 series based on Zen 3, while the GPU is a GeForce 40-series part based on Ada Lovelace. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 68, is solidly above average but not top-tier. The CPU’s 54th percentile and the GPU’s 81st percentile create a lopsided configuration where the GPU dominates the performance identity of the system. This is a laptop designed for users who need high-end graphics in a portable form factor, accepting that the CPU is a compromise for power efficiency. The system is more than capable for GPU-accelerated tasks and high-refresh gaming, but it is not a balanced performer for CPU-intensive workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 81st percentile and 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will drive high frame rates in most games at 1080p and 1440p, but the CPU’s 1656 single-core Geekbench score may limit frame rates in esports titles or games with heavy physics simulations, causing inconsistent FPS.

Streaming: The GPU’s NVENC encoder is not specified in the data, but the tensor cores (232) and 12 GB of VRAM are sufficient for encoding and rendering concurrently. However, the CPU’s 8-core, 16-thread design with a 7132 multi-core Geekbench score will be taxed when running a game and streaming software simultaneously, potentially affecting stream smoothness.

Video editing: In applications like Premiere Pro, the GPU’s 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 80 ROPs will accelerate effects and color grading, but the CPU’s 8154 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will be the bottleneck for timeline scrubbing and final export rendering, leading to slower than expected completion times.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 58 RT cores and 11191 Passmark GPU Compute score make it excellent for ray-traced renders in Blender or Octane, with the 12 GB VRAM handling complex scenes. The CPU’s role in scene preparation and physics will be slower, but the render times will be dominated by the GPU, making this a strong scenario.

Software development: The CPU’s 16 threads and 16 MB of L3 cache are adequate for compiling moderate-sized projects, but the 54th percentile performance is not exceptional. Developers using heavy IDEs or running virtual machines will notice the CPU’s mid-range position, while the GPU is irrelevant for most coding tasks.

Student and office work: This system is significantly overprovisioned for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU’s 1427 Cinebench R23 single-core score is more than enough for these tasks, and the GPU will be idle most of the time, making the laptop’s high power draw a potential downside for battery life.