SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

23,277 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S represents a unique hybrid configuration in the mobile space. The processor is a proven 8-core Zen 3 part from the 5000 series, while the graphics solution is a modern RDNA 3.5 integrated part built on the Strix Halo chip. Benchmark data for this exact pairing shows a combined performance percentile of 83, placing it in the upper tier of all systems. However, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this combination, meaning all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the raw CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H is built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that has become the sweet spot for multitasking and threaded workloads in mobile platforms. The base clock runs at 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, operating within a 45 W TDP envelope. The chip uses the AMD Socket FP6 interface and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s, though it lacks ECC support and PCIe Gen 3 is the available bus standard.

The CPU benchmark results paint a clear picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 12091.5 in multi-core and 1416 in single-core. The multi-core figure is strong for a 45 W mobile part, indicating that sustained all-core workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering will be handled competently. The single-core score of 1416 is more modest, reflecting the Zen 3 architecture's age relative to newer designs, but it is still sufficient for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. Geekbench results show 8230 multi-core and 1669 single-core, which corroborates the Cinebench data—the chip is a solid multi-threaded performer with adequate single-thread capability.

The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal how the CPU handles varying thread counts. It scores 819 in single-thread, 1595 in 2-threads, 3053 in 4-threads, 5105 in 8-threads, and 6143 in 16-threads. The jump from 8 to 16 threads is only about 20%, which indicates that while the chip has 16 threads, the scaling efficiency diminishes beyond 8 threads due to power and thermal limits typical of a 45 W mobile design. The max threads score of 6127 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score, confirming that the processor is fully utilized at 16 threads. For real workloads, this means applications that use 8 or fewer threads will see near-linear scaling, while heavily threaded tasks will still benefit but with diminishing returns.

PassMark tests add further depth. The multi-thread score is 20789, while single-thread is 3021. Integer math scores 80786, floating-point math scores 44479, and extended instructions score 18203. Data compression scores 270608, data encryption 16962, and random string sorting 28144. The physics score is 830, and the find prime numbers score is a low 49. These figures suggest the CPU excels at integer-heavy and compression tasks, which are common in database operations, file archiving, and software compilation. The floating-point performance is respectable but not class-leading, which is relevant for scientific computing and some content creation tasks.

The CPU holds a percentile of 76 against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23277. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 266V with an average score of 23297 (0.1% faster), the Intel Core i9-11900F at 23254 (0.1% slower), the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V at 23219 (0.3% slower), and the AMD EPYC 4124P at 23167 (0.5% slower). This places the 5800H in a tightly contested performance band where the differences between these chips are negligible—within 0.5% of each other. The data shows that despite being a 2021 release, the 5800H still trades blows with much newer Intel parts, making it a viable option for users who prioritize multi-threaded performance over the latest architecture features.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 7 5800H and the Radeon 8050S is unusual because the GPU is an integrated part, not a discrete solution. The GPU shares system memory, which means the CPU's memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s is a shared resource. This creates a potential bottleneck for GPU-intensive tasks because the integrated graphics cannot access dedicated VRAM. The GPU's memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which directly ties its performance to the CPU's memory subsystem. In practical terms, this means the GPU will be limited by how fast the CPU can feed it data through the dual-channel DDR4 interface.

The CPU's percentile of 76 versus the GPU's percentile of 89 indicates that the graphics component is relatively stronger in the benchmark hierarchy. This disparity suggests that in gaming scenarios, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6143 and single-thread score of 819 provide evidence that the CPU's single-thread performance is modest, which can constrain frame rates in games that rely heavily on a single main thread.

However, the CPU's multi-threaded strength means that games that scale well across cores will be less constrained. The 8-thread score of 5105 is 83% of the 16-thread score, indicating strong scaling up to 8 cores. For modern games that use 6-8 cores, the 5800H should provide adequate headroom. The bottleneck analysis shows that in CPU-light, GPU-heavy workloads like high-resolution gaming with maxed settings, the Radeon 8050S will be the primary driver. In CPU-heavy workloads like physics simulation, the PassMark physics score of 830 is the limiting factor. The data indicates a system where the GPU is the stronger component, but the CPU's memory bandwidth constraints will cap GPU performance in memory-intensive scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is a mobile integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It uses the Strix Halo chip with a die size of 308 mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz, drawing up to 55 W of power. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU includes 32 ray tracing cores, which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. The FP32 performance is rated at 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, though as an integrated part, it uses system memory.

The memory configuration is entirely system-dependent, with no dedicated VRAM. The memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," which means the GPU draws from the same DDR4 pool as the CPU. This is a significant limitation for gaming because the memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s is shared between CPU and GPU. The GPU's benchmark scores are 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58398 in Geekbench Vulkan, giving an average score of 62108 and a percentile of 89 against all GPUs.

The GPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61896, which is 0.3% slower. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, which is 2.5% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775, which is 2.6% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830, which is 2.7% faster. These deltas show that the 8050S sits in a competitive position, trading blows with older workstation parts and being only slightly slower than some newer discrete mobile GPUs. The 89th percentile ranking indicates that this integrated GPU outperforms the vast majority of all GPUs in the benchmark database, which is remarkable for an integrated solution.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all modern graphics APIs. The RT cores enable ray tracing, which the benchmark scores suggest can be handled at playable frame rates in lighter ray tracing scenarios, though the shared memory bandwidth will limit ray tracing performance in heavier scenes. The 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 figure is competitive with entry-level discrete GPUs, making this integrated solution suitable for 1080p gaming and light 1440p gaming in less demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

The data indicates that this CPU+GPU pairing is suited for users who need a balanced mobile workstation with strong graphics capabilities without the power draw of a discrete GPU. The combined percentile of 83 places this configuration above 83% of all systems in the database, making it a high-tier laptop solution. The CPU's 76th percentile and GPU's 89th percentile suggest a system that is more graphics-capable than CPU-capable, which is ideal for users who prioritize visual workloads.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this configuration adequate for most titles at high settings, given the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS and the CPU's 8-core/16-thread setup. Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12091.5, which handles rendering tasks competently, while the GPU accelerates effects and previews. Software developers will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 80786 and data compression score of 270608, which speed up compilation and archive operations. Students and small business users will find the system responsive for office work, with the CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 1669 handling everyday tasks smoothly.

The 45 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP combined indicate a system that requires adequate cooling but is still portable compared to laptops with discrete GPUs. The absence of a launch MSRP in the data means pricing information is not available, but the performance profile suggests a mid-to-high-tier mobile workstation or gaming laptop. Users who need ray tracing capabilities will benefit from the 32 RT cores, though the shared memory will limit performance in this area.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 89th percentile and 11.47 TFLOPS suggest that 1080p gaming at high refresh rates is achievable in esports and less demanding titles, with frame rates estimated to exceed 60 FPS in most scenarios. The CPU's single-thread score of 819 in 3DMark may limit maximum frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the 8-core configuration provides enough headroom for modern titles.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously, with the 3DMark 16-thread score of 6143 indicating sufficient multitasking capability. The GPU's hardware encoding support, implied by its modern architecture, will offload encoding tasks from the CPU, though the shared memory bandwidth may introduce latency in memory-heavy streaming scenarios.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12091.5 provides strong performance for rendering and exporting video, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 65818 accelerates effects and color grading. The 64 ROPs and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate ensure smooth timeline scrubbing and preview rendering in 1080p and light 4K workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the PassMark multi-thread score of 20789, will handle CPU-based rendering engines competently. The GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-based renderers, though the shared memory limits the size of scenes that can be rendered without spilling to system memory.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 80786 and data compression score of 270608 speed up compilation and packaging tasks. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, reducing iteration times for developers working with large codebases. The GPU's Vulkan 1.4 support enables graphics programming and testing.

Student and office work: The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 1669 and PassMark single-thread score of 3021 provide snappy responsiveness for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The integrated GPU handles 4K display output and video playback smoothly, while the 8 cores ensure that background tasks do not interfere with foreground applications.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU's percentile of 89 and FP32 performance of 11.47 TFLOPS suggest that this configuration can handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with frame rates estimated to range from 60 to 100 FPS in optimized games. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide sufficient processing power for modern game engines, though the single-thread score of 819 in 3DMark may limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

For esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, the GPU's 2.8 GHz boost clock and 2048 shading units should deliver frame rates well above 100 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA titles at high settings, the GPU's 89th percentile ranking suggests frame rates in the 50-70 FPS range, with lower settings enabling higher frame rates. The shared memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s is the primary constraint, as the GPU must compete with the CPU for memory access. The 32 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the memory bandwidth limitation means ray tracing performance will be modest, likely requiring lower resolutions or reduced ray tracing quality.

At 1440p, the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS will struggle in demanding titles, with estimated frame rates dropping to 30-50 FPS at high settings. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides ample bandwidth to the CPU, but the system memory bottleneck remains. The GPU's closest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, is 0.3% slower, indicating that this integrated solution performs like a mid-range discrete GPU from a previous generation. Users should expect 1080p gaming to be the sweet spot for this configuration, with 1440p possible in less demanding or older titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 23277, with a percentile of 76 against all CPUs. The most representative CPU scores are Cinebench R23 multi-core at 12091.5 and single-core at 1416, along with Geekbench multi-core at 8230 and single-core at 1669. The PassMark multi-thread score is 20789, and the 3DMark 16-thread score is 6143. These scores place the 5800H in a performance tier where it matches the Intel Core Ultra 7 266V within 0.1%, making it competitive with much newer processors.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 62108, with a percentile of 89 against all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 65818, and the Vulkan score is 58398. These scores place the 8050S within 2.7% of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, which is a newer discrete GPU. The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is significantly stronger than the CPU relative to their respective benchmarks, with the GPU's 89th percentile ranking far exceeding the CPU's 76th percentile. This indicates that the system is well-suited for graphics-intensive workloads but may struggle in CPU-bound tasks.

The combined percentile of 83 places this configuration in the top 17% of all systems in the database. The pair rank by FPS is null, as no measured FPS data exists, but the benchmark scores provide a reliable basis for performance estimates. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, is only 0.3% faster, while the GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, is 0.3% slower. These tight deltas indicate that the 5800H and 8050S combination is well-balanced within its performance class, with no single component dramatically outperforming the other relative to their peers.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, manufactured on a 7 nm process.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S has an average benchmark score of 62108, which is 0.3% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and 2.5% slower than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this system?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU uses system-shared memory, meaning it draws from the same DDR4 pool as the CPU, with bandwidth listed as system-dependent.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 83, placing it above 83% of all systems in the benchmark database.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 32 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games.

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance relative to its multi-core performance?

A: The CPU scores 1416 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 12091.5 in multi-core, indicating strong multi-threaded scaling. The 3DMark single-thread score is 819, while the 16-thread score is 6143.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this exact configuration?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H mobile processor with the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU in a laptop class configuration. The CPU is an 8-core/16-thread Zen 3 part from the 5000 series, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution based on the Strix Halo chip. The combined performance percentile of 83 places this system in the upper tier of all configurations, with the GPU's 89th percentile being the standout component. The CPU's 76th percentile is respectable but indicates that the graphics solution is the stronger half of this pairing.

The system is designed for users who need strong graphics performance in a mobile form factor without the power draw of a discrete GPU. The 45 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP allow for a thinner laptop design while still delivering competitive performance. The shared memory architecture is the primary limitation, as both CPU and GPU compete for the same 68.3 GB/s bandwidth. For gaming at 1080p, this configuration is well-suited, with the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS providing enough horsepower for high settings in most titles. The CPU's multi-threaded strength ensures smooth multitasking and content creation workflows. Overall, this is a high-tier laptop configuration that excels in graphics workloads while providing solid CPU performance, making it a versatile choice for gamers and content creators who prioritize visual performance.