SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

27,535 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that targets high-end professional work and demanding creative applications. The combined percentile of 87 places this build in the upper tier of all desktop configurations, but the data is clear that this is not a conventional gaming rig; rather, it is a workstation-class tool with significant compute capabilities.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination at 1080p, 1440p, or 4K resolutions, so there is no empirical frame-rate data for this specific CPU+GPU pairing. All FPS figures below are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores, not from direct game testing.

The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 123842 and OpenCL score of 146593 suggest very strong raw compute performance, but the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation card, not a gaming-focused GeForce product. Its 64 ROPs and 192 TMUs deliver a pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s, which are respectable numbers for 1440p gaming but do not indicate high-refresh 4K dominance. The CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by a 3DMark single-thread score of 916 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3099, is sufficient to feed most GPUs at 60–100 FPS in CPU-light titles, but the combination is more likely to excel in GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions.

At 1080p, the pairing would likely deliver high frame rates in esports and older titles, but the CPU’s 8-core/16-thread configuration with a 3.40 GHz base clock and 4.60 GHz boost clock will not hold back the GPU in most scenarios. The GPU’s 20 GB GDDR6 memory with 360.0 GB/s bandwidth suggests headroom for high-resolution textures, but the 160-bit bus width limits memory bandwidth compared to wider-bus gaming cards. At 1440p, estimated performance would be strong for competitive gaming, with the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS providing ample geometry and shader horsepower. At 4K, the data suggests playable but not exceptionally high frame rates in AAA titles, since the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is tuned for stability and precision rather than raw rasterization speed. The absence of measured FPS data means these are directional estimates; the actual gaming experience will vary by title and driver optimization.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1795 and 4-thread score of 3443 indicate solid low-thread-count performance, which is critical for high-refresh gaming. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 123842 supports 1440p high-refresh in many competitive titles, but the workstation-oriented drivers and 160-bit memory bus may limit performance in games that rely heavily on memory bandwidth. Expect 144Hz-class performance in lighter titles, with diminishing returns in heavier AAA releases.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and Passmark multithread score of 25823 provide ample headroom for software encoding alongside gaming. The GPU’s 192 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture support hardware-accelerated encoding, though specific encoder details are not in the data. The combination of 8 cores and 16 threads with a 65W TDP means the CPU can handle encoding workloads without thermal throttling.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21953 and Passmark data encryption score of 20021 suggest strong multi-threaded performance for timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth handle large video projects and effects stacks. The combined 87th percentile indicates this build can manage 4K video editing workflows, but the lack of measured FPS data means real-time preview performance is an estimate.

3D rendering: The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS and 48 RT cores make this a capable renderer for both rasterization and ray-traced workflows. The CPU’s Passmark floating-point math score of 51588 supports physics simulations and geometry computations. The 20 GB VRAM allows large scene loading without spillover, and the 192 tensor cores accelerate AI-based denoising.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 316429 and integer math score of 92843 indicate strong performance for compilation and code analysis tasks. The 32 MB shared L3 cache and 8 cores/16 threads handle parallel build processes efficiently. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 146593 supports GPU-accelerated compute in development workloads.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for typical student or office tasks, but the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3393 ensures snappy application responsiveness. The 65W TDP keeps power consumption manageable for sustained workloads, and the GPU’s single-slot design fits standard workstation cases. The data shows this build is better suited to professional work than basic productivity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27535, placing it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, which scores 27507, a delta of just 0.1% — effectively a statistical tie. The Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X both score 27578, placing the Ryzen 7 5800 0.2% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27636, a 0.4% gap. These tiny deltas mean the Ryzen 7 5800 sits in a crowded performance band where no single rival holds a meaningful advantage.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 135218, placing it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. The NVIDIA A10M scores 135230, a 0.0% delta, meaning the two are indistinguishable in benchmark terms. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135396, 0.1% ahead, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135774, 0.4% ahead. The AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136472, 0.9% ahead, which is the largest gap but still within noise for most workloads.

The combined picture is a CPU that performs at the 79th percentile and a GPU at the 95th percentile, yielding an overall build percentile of 87. This indicates the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the CPU is competent but not exceptional. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 123842 is 4.2% higher than its OpenCL score of 146593 is lower, suggesting the Vulkan driver path may be more optimized for certain workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a GPU-heavy build where the graphics card outperforms the CPU by a wider margin relative to their respective peer groups. The GPU’s 95th percentile versus the CPU’s 79th percentile indicates that in GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will not be the limiting factor, but in CPU-bound tasks, the GPU will sit idle waiting for the processor.

In gaming, the CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 5692 and max-thread score of 7138 suggest it can drive games that scale to 8 threads, but the GPU’s workstation nature means frame rates will be more dependent on driver optimization than raw hardware. The CPU’s single-thread score of 916 in 3DMark and 3393 in Passmark indicate it will not bottleneck the GPU at 1440p or 4K, where the GPU’s pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s becomes the limiting factor.

For compute workloads, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS vastly exceeds the CPU’s Passmark floating-point math score of 51588, meaning the GPU will dominate workloads that can offload to it. The CPU’s 16 threads and 32 MB L3 cache handle serial and light-threaded tasks, but any workload that can use the GPU’s 6144 shading units will see the CPU become a secondary actor. The 65W TDP of the CPU and 130W TDP of the GPU suggest the balance is power-efficient, with the GPU drawing more power but delivering proportionally more compute.

The bottleneck direction is clear: the GPU limits gaming performance at lower resolutions where the CPU could theoretically push higher frame rates, while the CPU limits tasks that are inherently single-threaded. At 1080p, the CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1795 may cap frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but this is a minor concern given the GPU’s workstation focus.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, using TSMC’s 7 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The chip has 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, with a cache hierarchy of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. It supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation builds. The PCIe Gen 4 interface provides 20 lanes from the CPU.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a solid mid-range performer. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21953 is strong for an 8-core chip, while the single-core score of 3099 is competitive with newer mainstream processors. The Passmark multithread score of 25823 aligns with its 16-thread configuration, and the data compression score of 316429 indicates efficient memory and cache utilization. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 1795 at 2 threads to 7138 at max threads, which is nearly linear and demonstrates good thread scaling.

In real workloads, the 8 cores and 16 threads handle video export, code compilation, and multi-tasking without strain. The 65W TDP means it can sustain full load in small-form-factor cases with a capable air cooler. The 32 MB L3 cache benefits gaming and database workloads by reducing memory latency. The ECC memory support is unusual for a mainstream chip and adds reliability for long-running compute tasks. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the 4.60 GHz boost is already near the practical limit for Zen 3.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 87, placing it above 87% of all desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H’s 27507, making them effectively equal in average benchmark score.

Q: What GPU memory configuration does the RTX 4000 Ada Generation use?

A: It has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s bandwidth at 18 Gbps effective memory speed.

Q: Is this pairing suitable for gaming at 4K resolution?

A: The data shows no measured FPS at any resolution, but the GPU’s 95th percentile score and 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest playable 4K performance, though not high-refresh rates. The 160-bit memory bus may limit bandwidth-heavy titles.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and how does it affect cooling?

A: The CPU has a 65W TDP, which is low for an 8-core processor, allowing for compact cooling solutions and efficient operation in constrained chassis.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 135218, which is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon PRO W6800’s 135396, indicating nearly identical average benchmark performance.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 5800 supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for data integrity in professional and compute workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It features 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, delivering an FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS. The GPU has 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s bandwidth. The base clock is 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 2175 MHz, and the memory runs at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The card is single-slot with a 130W TDP and requires a 300W power supply.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842 place the GPU at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, scores 135230, a 0.0% delta, meaning they are functionally identical in these benchmarks. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135396, 0.1% ahead, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135774, 0.4% ahead. These margins are negligible in real-world rendering tasks.

The 20 GB VRAM is a standout feature, allowing large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and multi-GPU AI workloads to fit in memory. The 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest compared to wider-bus cards, but the 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio of 26.73 TFLOPS means mixed-precision workloads see no penalty. The 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering, and the 192 tensor cores enable AI-based denoising and DLSS-like features. The pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s are sufficient for 4K workstation displays, and the four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups. The single-slot design and 130W TDP make it easy to integrate into workstations with multiple GPUs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, an 8-core/16-thread Zen 3 processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, a workstation-class GPU. The CPU operates on the AM4 socket with DDR4 memory and PCIe Gen 4, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and requires a 300W power supply. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 87 indicates it sits in the upper tier of desktop configurations.

The CPU’s 79th percentile means it outperforms most processors but sits near competitors like the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, both of which score 27578. The GPU’s 95th percentile is more impressive, matching the NVIDIA A10M and AMD Radeon PRO W6800 within a 0.1% margin. The pairing is asymmetric: the GPU is a top-tier professional card, while the CPU is a strong but not flagship mainstream chip. This makes the build well-suited for GPU-heavy workloads like rendering and AI compute, where the CPU’s 16 threads provide adequate support without bottlenecking the GPU.

The 65W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP keep total system power manageable, and the single-slot GPU allows for compact builds. The CPU’s ECC memory support and the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM make this a reliable workstation platform for long-running tasks. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated, but the hardware specifications align with a professional tool rather than a gaming rig.

Who Should Build It

This build targets GPU-centric professionals who need massive VRAM and compute throughput. 3D artists and animators will benefit from the 20 GB VRAM, which handles large scenes and high-resolution textures without swapping. The 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced previews, and the 192 tensor cores speed up AI-based rendering workflows.

Video editors working with 4K or higher footage will find the GPU’s 26.73 TFLOPS and CPU’s 21953 Cinebench R23 multicore score sufficient for smooth timeline scrubbing and fast exports. The CPU’s 16 threads handle multiple background tasks, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 146593 supports GPU-accelerated effects.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 92843 and data compression score of 316429. The 32 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity during long builds.

Students in engineering or data science fields can use this build for MATLAB, simulation, and deep learning assignments, though the GPU is overkill for basic coursework. Small business workstations running CAD, GIS, or financial modeling software will see strong performance, with the GPU’s workstation drivers providing certified stability.

Gamers at 1440p will get high frame rates in competitive titles, but this is not the intended market. The build’s strengths lie in rendering, compute, and professional applications where the GPU’s 95th percentile and 20 GB VRAM provide a significant advantage over gaming-focused cards. The 87th combined percentile confirms this is a high-tier desktop, but the specific component balance favors workstation workloads over gaming.