SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

27,535 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 pairing is a desktop configuration with a combined percentile of 69. The data shows a significant gap between the CPU’s strong multi-threaded showing and the GPU’s modest benchmark standing. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB202 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The GPU packs 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The memory subsystem is substantial: 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus delivers 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth, which is the strongest single specification in the entire build. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, or 28 Gbps effective.

Clock speeds are set at a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz. The compute configuration includes 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware consists of 170 RT cores, and the tensor core count matches the TMU count at 680. Pixel throughput is rated at 423.6 GPixel/s, texture fill at 1,636.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance at 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 104.8 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio. The board is rated at 575 W TDP, requires a 950 W suggested PSU, and uses a single 16-pin power connector. It occupies a dual-slot profile, measures 304 mm in length, and offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, with support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The sole GPU benchmark result is a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504. This places the GPU at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals provide context: the NVIDIA T400 scores 16,508 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16,415 (0.5% ahead of the RTX 5090 D V2), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16,408 (0.6% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16,361 (0.9% behind). The delta values are tight—within a single percentage point across all four rivals. This indicates that the RTX 5090 D V2’s benchmark score places it in a cluster where performance differences are negligible, despite the massive memory and bandwidth advantages it holds on paper.

For rendering workloads, the data suggests a paradox. The 24 GB VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are far beyond what the benchmark score implies. The 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores should accelerate ray-traced and AI-accelerated workflows, but the 3DMark result does not reflect a top-tier standing. The 59th percentile means the GPU sits in the middle of the field, not the top. In practical terms, the benchmark score indicates that the GPU’s raw rasterization throughput is average, while its memory capacity and bandwidth are exceptional. The FP32 and FP16 figures are high, but the measured score suggests real-world rendering performance is closer to the midrange rivals than to the flagship tier the memory specs would suggest.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27,535, placing it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 16,504, placing it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 69. The CPU’s individual scores are strong across multiple tests: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 21,953 and single-core at 3,099; Cinebench R20 multi-core at 9,220 and single-core at 1,301; Cinebench R15 multi-core at 2,212 and single-core at 312. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 7,181 for 16 threads, 5,692 for 8 threads, 3,443 for 4 threads, 1,795 for 2 threads, 7,138 for max threads, and 916 for single thread.

PassMark results reinforce the CPU’s multi-threaded strength: multi-thread score of 25,823, single-thread of 3,393, integer math at 92,843, floating point math at 51,588, extended instructions at 21,297, data encryption at 20,021, data compression at 316,429, physics at 1,141, and random string sorting at 32,998. Find prime numbers scores 110. The CPU’s nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H at 27,507 (0.1% ahead of the Ryzen 7 5800), the Intel Core i5-12600K at 27,578 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X at 27,578 (0.2% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X at 27,636 (0.4% behind). All deltas are under half a percent, meaning the CPU is effectively tied with these alternatives.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is well above average and a GPU that is only slightly above average. The 20-percentage-point gap between the CPU’s 79th percentile and the GPU’s 59th percentile is the defining feature of this build. The CPU outperforms its nearest rivals by a hair, while the GPU underperforms its specifications suggest. The data indicates a mismatch: the CPU is ready for demanding workloads, but the GPU’s measured performance does not match the CPU’s capability. In multi-threaded tasks, the CPU carries the build; in GPU-bound tasks, the benchmark score suggests the GPU will limit the overall experience.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Vermeer codename. It runs on AMD Socket AM4 and uses TSMC’s 7 nm process, containing 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. Base clock is 3.40 GHz and boost clock is 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The multiplier is unlocked, and the CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. Cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The processor was released on January 11, 2021, and is still in active production.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a strong multi-threaded performer. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,953 is a solid result for an 8-core chip. The R20 multi-core score of 9,220 and R15 multi-core score of 2,212 follow the same trend. Single-core performance is also respectable, with R23 single-core at 3,099 and R20 single-core at 1,301. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 1,795 for 2 threads to 7,181 for 16 threads, indicating that the CPU scales well with thread count. The max-thread score of 7,138 is close to the 16-thread score, suggesting the CPU is efficiently utilized at full load.

PassMark results favor integer-heavy and compression workloads. Integer math scores 92,843, and data compression scores 316,429. Floating point math at 51,588 is lower but still substantial. Data encryption at 20,021 and extended instructions at 21,297 show balanced performance in specialized tasks. The single-thread score of 3,393 is competitive. The 79th percentile ranking means the CPU outperforms roughly four out of five CPUs in the database.

For real workloads, the data indicates this CPU handles multi-threaded productivity tasks well. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 32 MB L3 cache is suited for compilation, encoding, and rendering tasks that scale with cores. The single-core scores are sufficient for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The 65 W TDP suggests efficient operation, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking potential, though no overclocking results are in the data. The CPU’s nearest rivals—all within 0.4% in average score—confirm that the Ryzen 7 5800 sits at a performance plateau where minor differences do not matter.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 916 and 2-thread score of 1,795 indicate adequate responsiveness for game logic and physics, but the GPU’s 59th percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16,504 suggest it will not push high refresh rates at demanding settings. The GPU is within 0.9% of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, a midrange card, so frame rates are likely capped well below what the CPU could support.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,953, provide enough headroom for encoding while gaming. The 20,021 data encryption score and 21,953 multi-core result suggest the CPU can handle concurrent workloads, but the GPU’s modest benchmark score means the gaming side of the stream may suffer at high settings.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 25,823 and floating point math score of 51,588 indicate solid performance for timeline editing and effects processing. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are useful for previews and rendering, but the GPU’s 59th percentile score suggests export times will be average, not exceptional.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,953 is strong for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 170 RT cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance are high on paper, but the benchmark score of 16,504, which sits 0.6% behind the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, indicates the GPU will not deliver top-tier render throughput despite its specs.

Software development: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with integer math at 92,843 and data compression at 316,429, are well-suited for compilation and code analysis. The 79th percentile CPU ranking means builds will be faster than most systems, while the GPU’s performance is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,393 and the overall 79th percentile ensure snappy responsiveness for spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is overkill for this use case, and its 59th percentile score does not affect office productivity. The 65 W TDP CPU keeps power draw modest.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data shows a clear bottleneck in GPU-bound workloads. The CPU sits at the 79th percentile while the GPU sits at the 59th percentile, a 20-point gap. In gaming, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16,504, which is effectively tied with the NVIDIA T400 at 16,508 and 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, will be the limiting factor for frame rates. The CPU’s single-thread score of 916 in 3DMark and 3,099 in Cinebench R23 single-core is sufficient to feed the GPU, so the bottleneck is the GPU’s rasterization throughput.

In CPU-bound workloads, the reverse is true. Multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering will be limited by the CPU’s 8 cores, despite the 79th percentile ranking. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are underutilized in these scenarios. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this imbalance—the build is neither a top-tier gaming machine nor a top-tier workstation, but a hybrid where the CPU carries productivity tasks and the GPU carries graphics tasks at a midrange level.

FPS scaling is not measured, but the percentile gap suggests that at lower resolutions and settings, the CPU will be less of a factor, and the GPU will dominate the frame rate ceiling. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s 1.34 TB/s bandwidth will help maintain memory throughput, but the raw compute score of 16,504 will still cap performance. The CPU’s 7,181 16-thread score in 3DMark indicates it can handle multi-threaded game scenes without becoming a bottleneck, but the GPU will still limit maximum FPS.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who need strong CPU performance and are willing to accept midrange GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with moderate settings will find the GPU’s 59th percentile acceptable, but those seeking high refresh rates at 4K will be disappointed by the 16,504 Steel Nomad score. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,953, but should not expect the GPU to accelerate render times significantly, given its 0.6% delta behind the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s 79th percentile and integer math score of 92,843 for compilation tasks. Students and office workers will find the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,393 more than adequate for daily tasks, and the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is irrelevant for their workloads. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded productivity software will benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and 32 MB L3 cache, but the GPU’s performance is excessive for typical business applications. The build is best suited for a developer or content creator who prioritizes CPU throughput and has occasional GPU-accelerated tasks, rather than a dedicated gamer or GPU-heavy renderer.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame-rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not measured results. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504, which is within 0.9% of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, suggests that gaming performance at ultra settings will be in the midrange tier. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 916 and 2-thread score of 1,795 indicate it will not be a bottleneck at typical gaming resolutions.

At 1080p ultra, the GPU’s 59th percentile suggests frame rates will be moderate, likely limited by the GPU’s compute throughput rather than the CPU. At 1440p, the GPU’s 1.34 TB/s bandwidth will help maintain consistent frame pacing, but the raw score of 16,504 will still cap maximum FPS. At 4K, the 24 GB VRAM is ample for texture-heavy games, but the GPU’s 176 ROPs and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 will struggle to push high frame rates. The CPU’s 7,181 16-thread score in 3DMark ensures that multi-threaded game scenes will run smoothly, but the GPU remains the limiting factor. These estimates should be treated as qualitative guidance, not precise figures.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 ranks at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27,535.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16,504 is 0.6% behind the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408) and 0.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has 1.34 TB/s of memory bandwidth, supported by 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz and a base clock of 3.40 GHz.

Q: Is the CPU’s multiplier unlocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 69.

Q: Does the FACT PACK contain measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussions are estimates.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 GPU. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 5000 series, based on Zen 3 architecture on the AM4 socket. The GPU is a 50-series Blackwell 2.0 card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory. The build’s overall tier is defined by a combined percentile of 69, which is driven by the CPU’s strong 79th percentile and the GPU’s more modest 59th percentile. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,953 and PassMark multi-thread score of 25,823 make it a capable productivity processor. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16,504 places it in the midrange tier, despite its large memory capacity and high bandwidth. The pairing is notable for the gap between the CPU’s high ranking and the GPU’s average ranking, making this a CPU-forward build for users who prioritize processing power over graphical performance. The GPU’s launch MSRP is 2,299 USD.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds