SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

27,535 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 creates an unusual balance of compute resources. The CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at just the 18th percentile among all GPUs, with a combined percentile of 49. This wide gap suggests the processor is far more capable than the graphics card in most workloads.

The CPU's 3DMark thread scaling tells a clear story. Single-thread performance scores 916, while 2-thread performance hits 1795, 4-thread reaches 3443, 8-thread climbs to 5692, and max-thread performance lands at 7138. The near-linear scaling from 2 to 4 to 8 threads indicates strong multi-threading efficiency, with the 16-thread score of 7181 barely exceeding the 8-thread result. This means the CPU has ample headroom for highly parallel workloads but also shows that beyond 8 threads, gains diminish significantly.

The GPU's single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893 places it in a peculiar position. Its nearest rivals include the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2907 (0.5% higher), the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF at 2910 (0.6% higher), the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB at 2913 (0.7% higher), and the Quadro P600 at 2923 (1% higher). This clustering suggests the RTX 4010 performs in a narrow band, but the deltaPct values indicate it trails even these comparably-scored parts by small margins.

In gaming, the bottleneck is unambiguous. The CPU can feed far more frames than the GPU can render, given that the RTX 4010 has only 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The 768 shading units and 16 ROPs limit pixel throughput to 28.19 GPixel/s, which constrains resolution scaling. At lower resolutions, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 916 would allow high frame rates, but the GPU's modest pixel rate and texture rate of 42.29 GTexel/s become the limiting factor.

For productivity tasks, the balance shifts. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21953 and PassMark multi-thread score of 25823 indicate strong content creation capability. The GPU's FP32 performance of 2.706 TFLOPS, while modest for gaming, still supports accelerated rendering in compatible applications. The data suggests this pairing works best when CPU-heavy workloads dominate, with GPU acceleration as a secondary benefit.

# Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 7 5800 achieves an average benchmark score of 27535, placing it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. This score sits remarkably close to its nearest rivals: the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores 27507 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core i5-12600K scores 27578 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X scores 27578 (0.2% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27636 (0.4% higher). These deltaPct values show the 5800 is essentially tied with a broad range of modern processors, making its performance tier highly competitive.

The CPU's 3DMark results reinforce this positioning. The max-thread score of 7138 and 16-thread score of 7181 are nearly identical, indicating that the 16 threads available are fully utilized but additional virtual threads provide minimal gains. Single-thread performance at 916 is respectable but not class-leading, placing it behind the multi-core-heavy workloads where the 8-core, 16-thread configuration shines.

Cinebench results show strong sustained multi-core performance: R15 multi-core scores 2212, R20 multi-core scores 9220, and R23 multi-core scores 21953. The R23 single-core score of 3099 indicates solid per-thread efficiency. PassMark results further detail the CPU's capabilities: integer math scores 92843, floating-point math scores 51588, data compression scores 316429, data encryption scores 20021, extended instructions score 21297, physics scores 1141, and random string sorting scores 32998. The single-thread PassMark score of 3393 confirms balanced architectural efficiency.

The RTX 4010's benchmark presence is minimal, with only a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893. This places it at the 18th percentile of all GPUs, a low position that reflects its entry-level positioning. Its nearest rivals all score within 1% of its result, but the fact that the Quadro P600 — a professional workstation card from a previous generation — scores 1% higher highlights the RTX 4010's modest performance envelope.

The combined percentile of 49 places this pairing exactly at the midpoint of all CPU+GPU combinations. This suggests the system as a whole is average, but the components are not evenly matched: the CPU pulls the combined score up while the GPU drags it down. The average benchmark score of 27535 for the CPU versus 2893 for the GPU represents a roughly 9.5x difference in raw benchmark output, though these scores use different test suites and cannot be directly compared as equivalent measurements.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The dataIsMeasured field confirms that all frame rate figures would be estimates, not measured results. The measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty, so no game-specific FPS values can be cited. All gaming performance discussion below is therefore framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

The RTX 4010's 4 GB VRAM capacity is the primary constraint for modern gaming. At 1080p, many contemporary titles with high-resolution textures will exceed this capacity, forcing texture streaming or reduced quality settings. The 64-bit memory bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth further limits performance in bandwidth-intensive scenes. The pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s and texture rate of 42.29 GTexel/s suggest acceptable performance for esports titles but challenges for AAA games at high settings.

The CPU's strong single-thread score of 916 in 3DMark and 3393 in PassMark single-thread tests indicates it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU's low 18th percentile ranking means most games will be GPU-bound even at 1080p. The 768 shading units and 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, but the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits ray tracing performance to light effects or reduced resolutions.

At 1080p with medium-to-low settings, the system could plausibly deliver playable frame rates in competitive titles, given the CPU's strong single-thread capabilities and the GPU's modest but functional compute resources. At 1440p, the 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth would likely cause stuttering in modern titles. At 4K, the GPU's 16 ROPs and 28.19 GPixel/s pixel rate would severely limit performance. These estimates align with the GPU's 18th percentile ranking, which indicates it performs worse than approximately 82% of all GPUs.

The CPU's multi-core strength does not directly translate to gaming performance in most titles, which typically rely on single-thread performance. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1795 suggests the CPU can handle lightly-threaded game engines with headroom, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor once frame rendering begins.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing is not well-suited for high-refresh displays. The GPU's 18th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM limit frame rates at competitive settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 916 and 2-thread score of 1795 could support high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s caps output below what a 144Hz or 240Hz display requires in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide solid encoding headroom. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21953 indicates the CPU can handle game encoding alongside gameplay, though the GPU's modest performance may require lowering game settings to maintain stream quality. The 16-thread 3DMark score of 7181 shows the CPU has spare threads for encoding workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 92843 and floating-point math score of 51588 support video encoding and effects processing. The R23 multi-core score of 21953 places this CPU in a strong position for timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits its usefulness for GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU can handle most editing workflows independently.

3D rendering: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads with a 32 MB shared L3 cache provide strong multi-threaded rendering performance. The R20 multi-core score of 9220 and R23 multi-core score of 21953 indicate capable CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 24 tensor cores offer some acceleration in compatible renderers, but the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 316429 and random string sorting score of 32998 support compilation and data processing tasks. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the single-thread score of 3393 ensures responsive IDE performance. The GPU's limited capabilities do not impede development workflows.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP and strong multi-thread performance make this a capable workstation for productivity tasks. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25823 indicates smooth multitasking, while the single-thread score of 3393 ensures responsive application usage. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for basic display outputs and office applications.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The 7 nm process node from TSMC houses 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. The TDP of 65 W indicates efficient power consumption for the performance level.

Cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory controller supports DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, providing 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory support is included, making this CPU suitable for workstation applications where data integrity matters. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 lanes from the CPU provides modern connectivity for storage and expansion.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 916 single-thread to 3443 at 4 threads and 5692 at 8 threads, reaching 7138 at max threads. This scaling indicates minimal thread contention and efficient core utilization. The Cinebench results confirm this pattern, with R23 multi-core at 21953 benefiting from the 8-core configuration.

The PassMark results show specific workload strengths. Integer math at 92843 and floating-point math at 51588 indicate balanced ALU and FPU performance. Data compression at 316429 suggests strong memory subsystem efficiency, while data encryption at 20021 reflects the AES acceleration capabilities. The find prime numbers score of 110 is notably low, indicating this CPU is less optimized for single-thread integer loops with high iteration counts.

The nearest rivals show the 5800 sits in a competitive position. The Intel Core i5-12600K scores 0.2% higher, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X scores 0.2% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 0.4% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores 0.1% lower. These tiny margins mean real-world performance differences are negligible, and the choice between these CPUs would depend on platform features rather than raw performance.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 uses the GA107 chip on an 8 nm Samsung process, containing 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. The transistor density of 43.5 million per mm² reflects the mature node. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz for 12 Gbps effective throughput.

The memory configuration is the most significant limitation. The 4 GB GDDR6 capacity on a 64-bit bus provides only 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. This is extremely low by modern standards and will bottleneck texture-heavy workloads. The 24 TMUs and 16 ROPs are correspondingly modest, producing a texture rate of 42.29 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s.

Compute resources include 768 shading units, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores. The FP32 performance of 2.706 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) indicate this GPU prioritizes general compute over specialized half-precision workloads. The RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, while the tensor cores support DLSS and other AI-accelerated features.

The single benchmark score of 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places the GPU at the 18th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals include desktop and workstation cards that score within 1%: the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2907, the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF at 2910, the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB at 2913, and the Quadro P600 at 2923. The fact that a professional card from an older generation scores 1% higher highlights the RTX 4010's entry-level positioning.

The GPU's 50 W TDP and single-slot design with no power connectors make it an energy-efficient choice. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's capabilities, though the 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs limit display connectivity options. The 163 mm length and 69 mm height allow installation in compact cases.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM4 platform provides a mature upgrade path. The Ryzen 7 5800 supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel configuration and ECC support. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 lanes from the CPU allows for fast NVMe storage and expansion cards. The 65 W TDP means the CPU can be cooled by modest coolers, and the motherboard requirements are reasonable.

The suggested PSU for this GPU is 250 W, which combined with the CPU's 65 W TDP creates a low total system power requirement. This allows for a compact, efficient power supply and potentially smaller chassis. The GPU's 50 W TDP and lack of power connectors mean no additional power cabling is required.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more capable GPU. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking provides substantial headroom for a faster graphics card, as the CPU could feed significantly more frames than the RTX 4010 can render. The 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth are the primary bottlenecks, and upgrading to a GPU with more memory and bandwidth would unlock the CPU's full gaming potential.

The AM4 socket also offers CPU upgrade options within the 5000 series. However, the Ryzen 7 5800's performance already places it within 0.4% of the Ryzen 5 7600X and 0.2% of the Ryzen 7 5700X, so CPU upgrades within this platform would yield marginal gains. The platform supports DDR4 memory, which is mature and affordable, and the PCIe Gen 4 interface remains current for storage and GPU connectivity.

The 32 MB shared L3 cache provides ample cache for gaming and productivity workloads. The 65 W TDP allows for quiet cooling solutions and lower operating costs. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU provide flexibility for adding high-speed storage or other expansion cards.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 49, placing this system at the midpoint of all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU alone sits at the 79th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 18th percentile.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600K?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535 on average, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i5-12600K's 27578. This difference is negligible in real-world terms.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1500 MHz for 12 Gbps effective throughput.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 5800 supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation applications where data integrity is critical. It supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement and physical size?

A: The GPU has a 50 W TDP with no power connectors required, and the suggested PSU is 250 W. It is a single-slot design measuring 163 mm in length and 69 mm in height.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB?

A: The RTX 4010 scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB's score of 2913. The RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2907, 0.5% higher than the RTX 4010.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800 has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture. It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over gaming performance. The Ryzen 7 5800's 79th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21953 make it suitable for content creators, software developers, and data analysts who need strong multi-threaded processing. The 8 cores and 16 threads handle parallel compilation, rendering, and data processing tasks efficiently.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations could find this system acceptable, particularly for esports titles that favor CPU performance. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth limit modern AAA gaming, but the CPU's single-thread score of 916 and 2-thread score of 1795 ensure responsive gameplay in less demanding titles. The 18th percentile GPU ranking means users should not expect high frame rates at high settings.

Students and office workers benefit from the CPU's 65 W TDP and efficient performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25823 ensures smooth multitasking, while the single-thread score of 3393 provides responsive application usage. The 32 MB L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth support data-heavy workloads common in academic and office environments.

Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support and reliable multi-threaded performance would find the Ryzen 7 5800 suitable. The PassMark data encryption score of 20021 and data compression score of 316429 indicate strong security and data handling capabilities. The GPU's 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 GPU. The CPU represents the high-midrange tier at the 79th percentile, while the GPU represents the entry-level tier at the 18th percentile. The combined percentile of 49 indicates an average overall system, but the component imbalance is substantial.

The Ryzen 7 5800 provides 8 cores and 16 threads on the AM4 platform with Zen 3 architecture, 32 MB of L3 cache, and 65 W TDP. Its average benchmark score of 27535 ties it with modern rivals like the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X. The RTX 4010 provides 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, 768 shading units, and 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with a single 3DMark score of 2893 that places it near the RTX 4060 Ti series in that specific benchmark.

This pairing is best understood as a CPU-first system where the GPU provides basic graphics capability rather than gaming performance. The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores support productivity workloads, while the GPU's modest specifications limit gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. For users who need strong CPU performance and minimal GPU requirements, this build offers a balanced cost-to-performance ratio within its component tier.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds