SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

27,535 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pairing represents a classic high-end desktop configuration, combining a Zen 3 processor with an Ampere flagship GPU. The CPU sits in the 79th percentile of all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile, resulting in a combined 74th percentile for this desktop build. The data presents a configuration where the processor’s strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s substantial compute resources are intended to complement each other, though the benchmark analysis reveals an interesting imbalance in their respective market positions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform and is manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process node, containing 4,150 million transistors within a 74 mm² die. The CPU has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that makes it a remarkably power-efficient part for its core count. The cache hierarchy is notable: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache, which is a significant allocation for gaming and productivity workloads.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well across thread counts. The 3DMark scores progress from 916 in single-thread to 1,795 in 2-threads, 3,443 in 4-threads, 5,692 in 8-threads, and peak at 7,181 in 16-threads, with max-threads reaching 7,138. This nearly linear scaling suggests the Zen 3 architecture is efficiently utilizing its cores, with only a slight drop from 16-thread to max-thread scores indicating minor scheduling overhead. Cinebench results reinforce this picture: the multi-core score of 21,953 in Cinebench R23 is roughly 7 times the single-core score of 3,099, which is strong scaling for an 8-core part. The single-core R23 score of 3,099 places it competitively against modern rivals, as the processor’s average benchmark score of 27,535 is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H at 27,507, a delta of just 0.1%.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into real-world workloads. The processor achieves 92,843 in integer math and 51,588 in floating-point math, with a multithread score of 25,823. Data compression reaches 316,429, while encryption scores 20,021. The extended instructions score of 21,297 and random string sorting at 32,998 indicate strong AVX and memory-bound performance. These numbers suggest the Ryzen 7 5800 is well-suited for content creation, scientific computing, and software compilation, where the combination of high core count and efficient Zen 3 cores provides substantial throughput. The processor’s 79th percentile ranking places it above the majority of CPUs, but its nearest rivals—the Intel Core i5-12600K, AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, and AMD Ryzen 5 7600X—all score within 0.4% of it, indicating a tightly contested mid-to-high-end segment.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 27,535 places it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, with its closest competitor being the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, which scores 27,507 (0.1% higher). The Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X both score 27,578, representing a 0.2% advantage over the Ryzen 7 5800, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X leads this group slightly at 27,636 (0.4% higher). These deltas are marginal, meaning the Ryzen 7 5800 is effectively performance-equivalent to these rivals in aggregate benchmarks, though individual workload characteristics may vary.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23,172, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are surprisingly lower-tier parts: the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23,249 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23,250 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23,273 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23,276 (0.4% higher). This is a curious result—the RTX 3080, despite having a 10 GB GDDR6X memory buffer and 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth, sits near these mobile and entry-level parts in the aggregate benchmark score. The explanation lies in the specific benchmark suite: the RTX 3080 achieves 25,086 in PassMark G3D but only 14,397 in GPU compute, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4,407. These figures suggest the aggregate score is dragged down by less favorable results in certain legacy or compute tests.

The combined picture shows a CPU at the 79th percentile paired with a GPU at the 68th percentile, yielding a combined 74th percentile for the build. This indicates the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card when compared to their respective markets. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,953 is a strong indicator of productivity performance, while the GPU’s 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is substantial for gaming and rendering. However, the GPU’s percentile position suggests that while it is a capable part, it is not at the top of the current graphics card hierarchy, possibly due to the age of the Ampere architecture relative to newer generations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing, relative to their respective market positions. The processor’s 79th percentile versus the GPU’s 68th percentile indicates the CPU has more headroom over its competition than the GPU does. In gaming workloads, this typically means the RTX 3080 will be the limiting factor at lower resolutions where CPU performance matters more, but at higher resolutions the GPU’s workload becomes the bottleneck. The 3DMark scores support this: the CPU’s 16-thread score of 7,181 and single-thread score of 916 are strong enough to feed a high-end GPU, but the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4,407 and PassMark G3D score of 25,086 represent the ceiling for frame generation.

The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 25,823 and physics score of 1,141 indicate it can handle complex game logic and physics calculations without becoming a constraint. Meanwhile, the GPU’s pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s are substantial, but the 68th percentile ranking suggests that in a system with a higher-end CPU, the GPU would be the primary limiter in frame rate. Conversely, the CPU’s 0.4% delta from the Ryzen 5 7600X means that upgrading to a faster processor would yield minimal gains in CPU-bound scenarios, so the balance is reasonably good for most workloads. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means bottleneck analysis must rely on benchmark scores, which indicate the CPU is slightly overqualified relative to the GPU, but not to a degree that would cause significant imbalance in real-world usage.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the AMD Socket AM4, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for the RTX 3080’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU supports ECC memory, a feature that adds reliability for workstation tasks. The 65 W TDP of the processor is notably low for an 8-core part, which means cooling requirements are modest, but the GPU’s 320 W TDP and suggested PSU of 700 W dictate the overall power supply needs for the system.

The upgrade path on AM4 is limited to other 5000-series or older Ryzen processors, but the Ryzen 7 5800’s performance parity with newer parts—the 0.1% delta from the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and 0.2% from the Core i5-12600K—suggests that upgrading the CPU within the same platform would yield minimal gains. A more sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the RTX 3080’s 68th percentile leaves more room for improvement compared to the CPU’s 79th percentile. The GPU’s 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for current games, but future titles with higher VRAM demands could benefit from a GPU with more memory. The PCIe 4.0 support on both CPU and GPU ensures compatibility with the latest storage and expansion cards, while the 700 W suggested PSU provides headroom for overclocking the CPU, which has an unlocked multiplier.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread score of 916 in 3DMark and 3,099 in Cinebench R23 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for gaming frame rates. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 25,086 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4,407 suggest it can handle high-resolution gaming, but the 68th percentile ranking implies it is not at the absolute top tier.

Based on these scores, the RTX 3080 should deliver high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most titles, with the 10 GB VRAM being sufficient for current games at high settings. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 4.60 GHz boost clock, should prevent bottlenecks in most games, particularly those that favor higher core counts. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache is beneficial for gaming workloads that repeatedly access small data sets. However, without measured FPS data, these are qualitative estimates, and actual performance will vary by game and resolution. The data suggests this pairing is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and solid 4K performance, but the GPU’s percentile position means it may not sustain maximum settings in the most demanding titles at 4K.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA102 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. It features 8,704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, with 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores. The clock speeds are 1,440 MHz base and 1,710 MHz boost, with memory running at 1,188 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The 10 GB of GDDR6X memory is connected via a 320-bit bus, providing 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU delivers 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and an equal 29.77 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1 ratio), which is notable for AI and machine learning workloads.

The pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s are high figures that support demanding rendering tasks. The 68 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 272 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-accelerated features. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 25,086 is the primary gaming performance indicator, while the GPU compute score of 14,397 suggests strong computational capability for non-gaming tasks. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4,407 is a more modern benchmark, and its value relative to the GPU’s 68th percentile suggests the RTX 3080 is a capable but not class-leading part in today’s market. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 152,423 and Vulkan score of 33,620 further quantify its compute and graphics capabilities, with the OpenCL score being particularly high, indicating strong general-purpose compute performance.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and substantial GPU compute without requiring the absolute top-tier components. Gamers at 1440p resolution would benefit from the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth, which can handle high refresh rates in most titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering would leverage the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,953, which is competitive with newer parts, and the GPU’s 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 compute for acceleration in compatible software. Software developers would appreciate the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 92,843 and data compression score of 316,429 for compilation and data processing tasks. Students and small business users building a workstation would find the ECC memory support and 65 W TDP appealing for reliability and efficiency, though the GPU’s 320 W TDP means the system is not a low-power build. The 79th percentile CPU and 68th percentile GPU indicate this is a high-performance configuration for those who want strong productivity and gaming capabilities, but it is not aimed at enthusiasts seeking the absolute fastest components, as the CPU’s 0.4% delta from the Ryzen 5 7600X shows it is at the edge of its performance tier.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor’s performance relative to its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800 has an average benchmark score of 27,535, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, and 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X. These deltas are negligible in real-world terms.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3080 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, providing 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1,188 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 5800 supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for workstation reliability. It uses DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 320 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W, which should provide sufficient headroom for this pairing.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance in compute benchmarks?

A: The RTX 3080 achieves 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 compute, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 152,423 and a Vulkan score of 33,620. Its PassMark GPU compute score is 14,397.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this build?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so gaming performance must be estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing and tensor core configuration?

A: The RTX 3080 has 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features like DLSS. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4,407.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 916 and the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 25,086 suggest this build can drive high frame rates at 1440p, with the 10 GB VRAM handling modern textures. Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, as Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,953 provides ample encoding headroom, while the GPU’s NVENC (via tensor cores) can offload encoding tasks. Video editing workloads will leverage the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 92,843 and the GPU’s 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 compute for effects and rendering acceleration. 3D rendering tasks will scale well with the CPU’s 16 threads, as indicated by the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,181, and the GPU’s 68 RT cores enable ray-traced rendering in compatible software. Software development benefits from the CPU’s data compression score of 316,429 and extended instructions score of 21,297, which accelerate compilation and code analysis. For student and office work, the 65 W TDP and ECC support make this an efficient and reliable platform, though the GPU’s 320 W TDP means the system is not a low-power office machine, but the CPU’s single-thread performance of 3,099 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive everyday use.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The CPU, a Zen 3 (Vermeer) part, ranks in the 79th percentile of all processors, while the GPU, an Ampere (GA102) part, ranks in the 68th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 74, indicating a high-performance configuration that is above average but not at the extreme top end. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads with a 4.60 GHz boost clock, paired with the GPU’s 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, make this a balanced system for gaming at 1440p and content creation workloads. The platform’s AM4 socket and DDR4 memory support are mature, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps processor cooling simple, while the 700 W suggested PSU accommodates the GPU’s 320 W draw. This is a sensible pairing for users who want strong performance across productivity and gaming without chasing the absolute top-tier components, as evidenced by the CPU’s near-parity with its closest rivals and the GPU’s position above the majority of graphics cards.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds