SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

27,535 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + AMD Radeon RX 9060

This pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 3 desktop processor with AMD's RDNA 4.0 graphics card, creating a desktop build that sits at the 69th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings. The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded throughput with a 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU lands at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, suggesting a processor-forward balance that favors compute-heavy workloads over pure rasterization performance. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all frame rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay data.

FAQ

Q: What CPU socket does the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 uses the AMD Socket AM4, which means it fits into the widespread AM4 motherboard ecosystem that has been used across multiple Ryzen generations.

Q: How many cores and threads does the Ryzen 7 5800 have?

A: The processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Vermeer codename, produced on TSMC's 7 nm process node with 4,150 million transistors.

Q: What memory type does this build support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support for error-checking workloads.

Q: What PCIe generation does the GPU use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the CPU provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), meaning the GPU can run at full bandwidth on the CPU's Gen 4 lanes.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 132 W TDP, with a suggested PSU rating of 300 W for the system.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27,535 average benchmark points, placing it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 0.2% ahead of both the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X.

Q: Does the GPU have ray tracing support?

A: Yes, the Radeon RX 9060 includes 28 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The card features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth with a boost clock of 2990 MHz.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 produces an average benchmark score of 27,535, placing it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. This places it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals: the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H at 27,507 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core i5-12600K at 27,578 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X at 27,578 (0.2% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X at 27,636 (0.4% ahead). The differences are marginal, meaning real-world application performance will be nearly indistinguishable among these processors. The CPU shows particularly strong multi-threaded results: Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 21,953 points, while the single-core score is 3,099. The 3DMark 16-thread test yields 7,181 points, and the max-thread result is 7,138, showing that the processor scales well across its full 16-thread count.

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 posts an average benchmark score of 16,014, which places it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16,129 (0.7% higher), followed by the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15,862 (1% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 at 15,852 (1% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15,679 (2.1% lower). In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3,322 points. Geekbench OpenCL performance reaches 88,183, while Vulkan scores 39,476. The PassMark G3D score is 17,631, and GPU compute performance is 9,919. These numbers place the GPU in the upper-midrange tier, comparable to the RTX 3060 Ti but not challenging higher-end cards.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU in relative percentile terms by 20 points (79th vs 59th). This creates a system where the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers, which has implications for workload distribution and potential bottlenecks in graphics-heavy applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature socket that has supported multiple Ryzen generations. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU requires PCIe 5.0 x16 — the card will run at Gen 4 speeds on this platform, which is backward compatible and should not meaningfully restrict performance given the GPU's midrange class. Memory support is DDR4 in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported, making this platform suitable for workstation-adjacent tasks that benefit from error correction.

The power requirements are modest: the CPU draws 65 W TDP, and the GPU draws 132 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. This leaves substantial headroom for additional drives, fans, and peripherals, and it means most standard ATX power supplies will handle this build without issue. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor, keeping installation straightforward in most cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be to address the GPU, since the CPU sits 20 percentile points higher than the GPU. Moving to a higher-tier Radeon RX 9000 series card or a comparable NVIDIA option would better balance the system for 1440p or 4K gaming. Alternatively, adding more DDR4 memory (the platform supports dual-channel configurations) could benefit memory-sensitive workloads, though the existing 51.2 GB/s bandwidth is already competitive for the platform's class. The AM4 socket does limit future CPU upgrades to the existing Ryzen 5000 series family, so the processor itself is likely the long-term component in this build.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a CPU-favored balance: the processor ranks at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. This 20-point gap suggests the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU will handle compute-heavy tasks with relative ease. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will determine frame rates at higher resolutions and quality settings, while the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores will ensure it rarely holds back performance at lower resolutions or in CPU-bound titles.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,181 and max-thread score of 7,138 indicate excellent scaling across all 16 threads, which benefits modern games that use multiple cores. The single-thread score of 916 in 3DMark and 3,099 in Cinebench R23 single-core show capable per-core performance that handles game logic and physics well. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,322 and PassMark G3D score of 17,631 place it in a class where it can drive 1080p gaming at high settings comfortably, but 1440p ultra settings will stress it.

For productivity workloads, the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 25,823 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,953 mean the processor will not bottleneck content creation tasks. The GPU's compute score of 9,919 in PassMark and 88,183 in Geekbench OpenCL suggest it can accelerate some GPU-compute workloads, but it is not a compute powerhouse. The system is best described as a CPU-dominant build where the GPU handles mainstream graphics duties while the processor excels at threaded workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 16,014 and its position near the RTX 3060 Ti (0.7% lower) suggest it will deliver similar gaming performance to that card. At 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU should handle most titles at playable frame rates, with the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,099 in Cinebench R23 ensuring that processor-intensive games do not become CPU-bound.

At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will become more significant factors. The 128-bit memory bus may limit performance in texture-heavy games, but the RDNA 4.0 architecture with 1,792 shading units and 112 texture mapping units provides adequate raw throughput. The 64 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s, which supports high-resolution rendering. Games that are well-optimized for RDNA architecture should see better results than the raw scores suggest, while titles with NVIDIA-favored optimizations may underperform relative to the RTX 3060 Ti comparison.

Esports and competitive titles at 1080p will benefit most from this pairing, as the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads handle high frame rate scenarios without bottlenecking, and the GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides sufficient fill rate. For AAA single-player games at 1080p ultra, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but it should maintain playable frame rates in most releases. At 1440p, users should expect to adjust settings to high rather than ultra for demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance alongside competent mainstream graphics. Gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors will find the CPU capable of driving high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU handles the rendering duties. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering software will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,953 and PassMark multi-thread score of 25,823, which indicate strong parallel processing capability.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 8-core/16-thread configuration, and the PassMark data compression score of 316,429 suggests fast build and packaging operations. Students and small business users building a workstation for office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and light creative work will find the system responsive and capable, with the ECC memory support adding reliability for data-sensitive tasks. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking means it outperforms most processors on the market, making this a build that will remain relevant for several years of productivity use.

The GPU's 59th percentile ranking means it is a mid-pack graphics solution. Users who primarily play competitive esports titles or older games will be well served, but those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming will need to consider a higher-tier GPU. This build is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for work and play at 1080p, rather than those building a dedicated high-end gaming rig.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,099 in Cinebench R23 and 916 in 3DMark single-thread will keep frame rates high in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance handles rendering. Users can expect smooth performance in competitive titles, though the GPU's midrange class means demanding AAA games will require settings adjustments to maintain high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25,823 indicates the processor can handle both game logic and stream encoding simultaneously without significant frame rate impact, though users should use x264 encoding at medium preset or rely on GPU encoding to maximize gaming performance.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,953 and PassMark integer math score of 92,843 indicate strong performance for video encoding, rendering, and effects processing. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle 1080p timeline previews and effects acceleration, though 4K editing may stress the memory capacity.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar applications will benefit from the 16 threads and 32 MB shared L3 cache, with the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9,220 showing solid performance. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the card's 8 GB VRAM and 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, which is adequate for moderate scenes but not for heavy production work.

Software development: Compilation tasks will leverage the multi-threaded performance, with the PassMark data compression score of 316,429 and random string sorting score of 32,998 indicating fast file operations and build processes. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds and server-like workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,393 handles everyday productivity applications with ease, while the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for all-day use. The GPU's 1,002 PassMark G2D score supports smooth desktop compositing and multiple monitor setups through the 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 processor with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 graphics card, combining AMD's Zen 3 CPU architecture with RDNA 4.0 GPU architecture. The system achieves a combined percentile of 69 across all CPU-GPU pairings, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of desktop configurations. The CPU is the stronger component at the 79th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 59th percentile, creating a processor-dominant balance.

The build is designed for users who need strong multi-threaded compute performance for productivity workloads while maintaining competent gaming capability at 1080p. The platform uses the mature AM4 socket with DDR4 memory support, providing a stable and well-understood foundation. The modest power requirements (65 W CPU, 132 W GPU, 300 W suggested PSU) make this an efficient system that runs cool and quiet under typical loads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Vermeer codename. It operates at a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boosts up to 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps power consumption low for a desktop processor. The chip is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process node with 4,150 million transistors in a 74 mm² die, making it a compact and efficient design.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample fast memory for multi-threaded workloads. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop processor and adds value for workstation use. The PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes (CPU only) provides high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion, though the GPU's PCIe 5.0 interface will operate at Gen 4 speeds on this platform.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks: Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 21,953 points, while the single-core score of 3,099 indicates strong per-thread performance. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 1,795 points at 2 threads to 7,181 at 16 threads, demonstrating effective utilization of all available threads. PassMark scores are strong across the board: multi-thread at 25,823, integer math at 92,843, floating point math at 51,588, data encryption at 20,021, and extended instructions at 21,297. The processor's 79th percentile ranking places it ahead of most CPUs on the market, with its nearest rivals being the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Core i5-12600K, AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, and AMD Ryzen 5 7600X — all within 0.4% of its average score. This means the Ryzen 7 5800 is a highly competitive processor that trades blows with modern midrange and previous-generation high-end offerings, making it a solid choice for users who need robust multi-threaded performance without the power draw of higher-TDP alternatives.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

AMD Radeon RX 9060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds