SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

27,535 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 form a desktop pairing built around an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 processor and a 16 GB RDNA 3.0 graphics card. The CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 58th percentile among all graphics cards, placing the combined system at the 69th percentile overall. This is a balanced mid-range-to-upper-mid-range configuration where the processor carries more relative weight in the performance profile than the graphics card.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, and fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. The chip contains 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The thermal design power is 65 W, which is notably modest for an 8-core part, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR4 over a dual-channel bus, providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the processor itself.

Benchmark scores show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark results progress from 916 in single-thread, 1,795 in 2-thread, 3,443 in 4-thread, 5,692 in 8-thread, to 7,181 in 16-thread and 7,138 in max-thread tests. This near-linear scaling from 2 to 8 threads indicates efficient use of the Zen 3 cores, with only a modest gain from 8 to 16 threads, which is typical for a design that shares resources across two core complexes.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R23 multicore score is 21,953, while the single-core score is 3,099, giving a multi-to-single ratio of roughly 7.1x, which is strong for an 8-core part. The R20 scores are 9,220 multicore and 1,301 single-core, and the R15 scores are 2,212 multicore and 312 single-core. These figures indicate that the CPU can handle heavily threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering with substantial throughput, while still delivering competitive single-thread performance for everyday tasks.

PassMark results show a multithread score of 25,823 and a single-thread score of 3,393. The integer math score is 92,843, floating-point math is 51,588, and extended instructions (which includes AES and AVX) is 21,297. Data encryption scores 20,021, data compression 316,429, random string sorting 32,998, and physics 1,141. The find prime numbers test scores 110, which is a lower score in this suite but not indicative of a weakness in general computing.

The average benchmark score is 27,535, placing the Ryzen 7 5800 at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores 27,507 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X both score 27,578 (0.2% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27,636 (0.4% higher). The Ryzen 7 5800 is effectively within a rounding error of these competitors, meaning that in aggregate benchmark terms, it trades blows with a modern laptop chip, a previous-generation desktop i5, its own sibling, and a newer Ryzen 5. The practical takeaway is that the 5800 is a very solid mid-range desktop CPU whose performance is competitive with several newer or more expensive options.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 79th percentile while the GPU sits at the 58th percentile, a 21-point gap that suggests the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulation, data compression, or heavy multitasking, the Ryzen 7 5800 will not be the limiting factor; the GPU will be the first to reach its ceiling in graphics-intensive tasks. The PassMark physics score of 1,141 and multithread score of 25,823 indicate that the CPU can feed a GPU of this class without presenting a significant bottleneck in most scenarios.

However, the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,181 and the 2-thread score of 1,795 show that the CPU's performance drops considerably when only a few threads are active. In lightly threaded games or applications, the single-thread score of 916 in 3DMark and 3,099 in Cinebench R23 will matter more. The GPU, with a PassMark G3D score of 20,974, is capable of high frame rates at lower resolutions, and at those settings the CPU's single-thread performance may become the limiting factor in esports titles.

The GPU's percentile is lower, meaning that in GPU-bound scenarios, such as 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, the RX 7700 will be the primary constraint. The CPU has enough headroom to push the GPU to its limits at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, but the exact balance depends on the workload. The combined percentile of 69 reflects a system where neither component is dramatically over- or under-powered relative to the other, but the CPU is clearly the more capable half of the pair.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800's average benchmark score is 27,535, which is within 0.4% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Core i5-12600K, AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, and AMD Ryzen 5 7600X, making it statistically equivalent to all four.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 5800 supports ECC memory, which is relevant for workstation and reliability-focused builds.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The RX 7700 has 40 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,865.

Q: What is the power draw of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 200 W, with a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 7700's average benchmark score is 15,852, which is 1.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's score of 16,129.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity tasks alongside a capable GPU for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking and 8-core/16-thread configuration make it a good fit for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation, where the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,953 and PassMark multithread score of 25,823 indicate solid throughput.

The GPU's 58th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier card, but its 16 GB of VRAM is generous for the class and can handle large textures in modern games or moderate GPU compute workloads. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p who prioritize high frame rates in esports titles will find the CPU's single-thread performance adequate, while those playing more demanding AAA titles at higher settings will rely on the GPU's capabilities.

Students and small business users who run office applications, web browsing, and light coding will find the CPU's single-thread score of 3,099 in Cinebench R23 more than sufficient. The 65 W TDP of the CPU means it can be cooled by a modest air cooler, and the system overall is not power-hungry, which is beneficial for those who leave machines running for long periods. Developers working with parallel builds will benefit from the 16 threads, and the ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for data-intensive work.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27,535, placing it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, scores 27,507, a 0.1% difference, while the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X score 27,578, a 0.2% difference, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27,636, a 0.4% difference. The Ryzen 7 5800 is thus at the center of a tight cluster, with no rival more than a fraction of a percent ahead or behind.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 15,852, placing it at the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15,862 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16,014 (1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15,679 (1.1% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16,129 (1.7% higher). The RX 7700 is therefore slightly behind the RTX 3060 Ti and RX 9060, but ahead of the Pro W5500, and essentially tied with the much older R9 370X in aggregate terms.

The combined percentile is 69, which reflects a system that is above the median but not in the top tier. The CPU's 3DMark scores range from 916 single-thread to 7,181 16-thread, and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,865. The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 20,974, and its compute score is 10,963. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 316,429 and encryption score of 20,021 indicate strong performance in those specific tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is a strong use case for this pairing. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,099 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20,974 suggest that the system can push high frame rates in less demanding titles, though the GPU's 58th percentile means it will not be a top-tier performer in the most demanding games.

Streaming while gaming benefits from the CPU's 16 threads and 79th percentile ranking. The multithread score of 25,823 in PassMark indicates enough headroom to encode video while maintaining game performance, though the 65 W TDP means the CPU is not a high-power part.

Video editing is well-supported by the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,953, which indicates strong rendering performance in software that uses multiple cores. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM can hold large timelines and effect buffers, though its compute score of 10,963 is modest.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will rely heavily on the CPU, and the 8-core/16-thread configuration with a 7,181 16-thread 3DMark score will provide good performance. The GPU can assist with viewport rendering, but its 40 ray tracing cores are not a primary strength.

Software development, especially compiling large codebases, will benefit from the CPU's multithread throughput. The PassMark integer math score of 92,843 and multithread score of 25,823 indicate solid performance for parallel builds.

Student and office work is easily handled. The single-thread score of 3,399 in PassMark is more than adequate for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet and cool.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 79th percentile and the GPU's 58th percentile suggest that at 1080p, the GPU will often be the limiting factor in modern AAA titles, with the CPU providing enough headroom to avoid major bottlenecks.

At 1440p, the GPU's load increases, and the RX 7700's 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth will be sufficient for most games, though its PassMark G3D score of 20,974 places it in the mid-range. The CPU's single-thread score of 916 in 3DMark will be adequate for most game engines, but in highly CPU-bound titles, frame rates may be constrained by the processor.

At 4K, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, and the RX 7700's 58th percentile ranking means it will not deliver high refresh rates at this resolution in demanding titles. The CPU's performance headroom will be largely unused, as the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates. For esports titles at 1080p, the combination of the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's decent rasterization power should allow for high frame rates, but these are estimates, not measured results.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 with the AMD Radeon RX 7700. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a 16 GB RDNA 3.0 card with a 200 W TDP. The combined percentile is 69, placing this system in the upper-mid-range tier, with the CPU at the 79th percentile and the GPU at the 58th percentile.

The CPU is the stronger component, and its performance is competitive with several newer or more expensive processors. The GPU is a mid-range card that is slightly behind the RTX 3060 Ti in aggregate benchmarks. This is a balanced build where the CPU has more headroom than the GPU, making it suitable for users who do both productivity work and gaming, with a slight emphasis on CPU-heavy tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is based on the Navi 32 chip, using the RDNA 3.0 architecture, and is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, with a transistor density of 81.2 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, along with 40 ray tracing cores.

The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, running at 2,438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective), providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The clocks are 1,900 MHz base, 2,041 MHz game, and 2,459 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s, and the FP32 compute is 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,865, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 106,028, and PassMark scores of 92 for DirectX 10, 186 for DirectX 11, 96 for DirectX 12, 261 for DirectX 9, 1,206 for G2D, 20,974 for G3D, and 10,963 for GPU compute. The average benchmark score is 15,852, placing it at the 58th percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU's performance is closely matched with the AMD Radeon R9 370X (0.1% higher), and it is 1% behind the RX 9060 and 1.7% behind the RTX 3060 Ti, while being 1.1% ahead of the Radeon Pro W5500. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant feature, providing ample capacity for high-resolution textures and large compute workloads, though the raw compute performance is mid-range.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, and the GPU's TDP is 200 W, with a suggested power supply of 550 W, which leaves modest headroom for additional components.

The platform supports ECC memory, which is a consideration for workstation use. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, though the 65 W TDP suggests the default power envelope is conservative. The GPU is a dual-slot card with 2x 8-pin power connectors, a length of 267 mm, and display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom at the 79th percentile. The CPU's performance is competitive with newer parts, so a GPU upgrade would be more impactful for gaming at higher resolutions or with ray tracing enabled. Alternatively, adding more DDR4 memory or faster storage would benefit productivity workloads, but the current configuration is well-balanced for its intended use. The 550 W PSU recommendation provides enough capacity for the current components, and a GPU upgrade would likely require a higher-wattage unit.