SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

24,709 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 69th combined percentile, indicating a system positioned for mainstream professional workloads rather than the extreme high-end. The CPU, a Vermeer-based 8-core/16-thread processor with 96 MB of shared L3 cache, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput, while the GPU, a Turing-generation workstation card, offers specialized compute features that balance the platform's overall capabilities. This analysis examines the benchmark data to determine exactly where this build excels and where its limitations become apparent.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is built on the Turing architecture and utilizes the TU104 chip, produced on a 12 nm process at TSMC with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1005 MHz and a boost clock of 1545 MHz, with memory running at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is connected via a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s — a figure that supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes without immediate bandwidth throttling.

The compute configuration includes 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The pixel rate measures 98.88 GPixel/s and the texture rate reaches 222.5 GTexel/s, which translates to solid fill-rate performance for viewport rendering and texture-heavy workloads. The FP32 throughput is 7.119 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance reaches 14.24 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio — the latter being relevant for applications that leverage half-precision compute paths. The presence of 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores is notable for a workstation card of this era, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based denoising or inference tasks within supported software.

Benchmark results for the GPU show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873, indicating moderate DirectX 12 rasterization performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 provide a measure of raw compute throughput across different APIs. PassMark scores are mixed: DirectX 11 yields 128, DirectX 12 drops to 52, and DirectX 9 shows 205, while the G3D score is 15117 and the GPU compute score is 6176. The GPU sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17789. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (deltaPct 0.7), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (deltaPct 0.9), AMD Radeon 780M (deltaPct 1.1), and AMD Radeon Pro 560 (deltaPct 1.4) — all within roughly one percent, meaning the Quadro RTX 4000's performance is statistically comparable to these varied cards. For rendering, the data points to a GPU that can handle professional 3D workloads with moderate complexity, but its FP32 performance and 8 GB VRAM will be limiting factors for very large scenes or extended render passes.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU and GPU each contribute distinct strengths to this pairing. The Ryzen 7 5700X3D achieves an average benchmark score of 24709, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D is 0.1% behind, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX is 0.5% behind, the Intel Core i5-12450HX is 0.5% ahead, and the Intel Core i5-11600 is 0.6% ahead. This indicates the 5700X3D sits in a performance tier where small percentage differences separate it from both newer and older competitors.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 17789 places it at the 61st percentile, with its nearest rivals again within a tight band — the Radeon HD 7790 is 0.7% ahead, the RTX 4060 is 0.9% ahead, the Radeon 780M is 1.1% ahead, and the Radeon Pro 560 is 1.4% ahead. The combined percentile for this build is 69, suggesting that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU is the bottleneck in the overall performance equation. The CPU's single-thread score of 804 in 3DMark and 3157 in Cinebench R23 indicates solid per-core performance, while the multicore scores — 22366 in Cinebench R23 and 26318 in PassMark multithread — show the 8-core/16-thread configuration scales well. The data shows a system where the processor outpaces the graphics card, which has implications for workload balance that are explored in the Balance and Bottleneck section.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is a desktop processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Vermeer codename. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The 105 W TDP classify it as a moderate-power part, and it is built on a 7 nm TSMC process with 8,850 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. The cache hierarchy is a key differentiator: 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache — a design that benefits workloads with large working sets that fit within this pool.

Memory support includes DDR4 at dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and ECC support, which is a plus for workstation reliability. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), providing ample bandwidth for a single GPU and NVMe storage. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, but it does have an active production status and a launch MSRP of $249, with a release date of January 7, 2024.

Benchmark data shows strong multi-threaded performance: 3DMark scores scale from 1575 (2 threads) to 6764 (16 threads) and 6755 (max threads), demonstrating near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads. Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 22366, while singlecore is 3157. Geekbench multicore is 11086, and PassMark multithread is 26318. For real workloads, the 96 MB L3 cache provides a measurable advantage in data-compression tasks — the PassMark data compression score is 307237 — and the CPU's strong integer math score of 81257 indicates solid performance in general-purpose computation. The floating point math score of 46492 and extended instructions score of 21202 further round out a profile suited for scientific computing and engineering simulations. The single-thread performance of 2970 in PassMark is adequate but not class-leading, meaning lightly-threaded tasks will perform reasonably but not exceptionally. The 3DMark single-thread score of 804 is the lowest of the CPU's benchmark suite, reinforcing that the processor's strength lies in multi-core throughput rather than raw single-core speed.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who need balanced CPU and GPU performance for professional applications, with the CPU's 77th percentile providing a solid foundation for multi-threaded work. Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or software compilation will benefit from the 8-core/16-thread configuration and the 96 MB L3 cache, which accelerates data-intensive tasks. The GPU's 61st percentile and 8 GB VRAM make it suitable for 1080p and some 1440p rendering, though its workstation heritage means it is optimized for stability and compute rather than raw gaming frame rates.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance adequate for compiling code or running simulations, while the GPU supports CUDA-based workloads for machine learning or graphics courses. Small business workstations that require reliable CAD or 3D rendering performance can leverage the Quadro RTX 4000's certified driver support and the CPU's ECC memory capability for data integrity. The build is less suited for gamers targeting high refresh rates at 4K, as the GPU's performance percentile and the lack of measured FPS data for this pairing indicate it will struggle with modern titles at ultra settings. For software developers, the PassMark integer math score of 81257 and data encryption score of 18788 point to strong performance in build pipelines and cryptographic operations.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around AMD Socket AM4, which supports the Ryzen 7 5700X3D with DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16 — meaning the graphics card does not fully utilize the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 capability, but the interface is backward-compatible and does not bottleneck the GPU's bandwidth. Memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s, and ECC support is available, which is a consideration for workstation builds that prioritize data accuracy.

The GPU has a TDP of 160 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 105 W. This leaves headroom in the power supply for additional components, making the 450 W recommendation a baseline rather than a constraint. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and is a single-slot card with a length of 241 mm (9.5 inches) and a height of 111 mm (4.4 inches), which fits in most mid-tower cases. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with a higher percentile ranking, as the CPU's 77th percentile leaves room for a more powerful graphics card to balance the system. The CPU's production status is active, meaning it remains available for purchase, while the GPU is end-of-life, suggesting a GPU replacement is the more urgent path. The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface on the GPU means a newer GPU with PCIe 4.0 would still function, but the CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes would be fully utilized by a modern card.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 and its 61st percentile among all GPUs suggest that this card is positioned below mainstream gaming GPUs like the RTX 4060, which is 0.9% ahead in average benchmark score. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (22366 in Cinebench R23) will not be a limiting factor in most games, but the GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 GB VRAM will cap performance.

For 1080p gaming, the Quadro RTX 4000's 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 2304 shading units should deliver playable frame rates at medium to high settings in most titles, though ultra settings will likely push the GPU to its limits. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM becomes a constraint for modern games with high-resolution textures, and the passmark DirectX 12 score of 52 indicates weak DX12-specific optimization. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117, while higher than its direct rivals, is still indicative of mid-range gaming performance. The lack of measured FPS data means these expectations are qualitative; the data shows a GPU that is better suited for professional workloads than for high-refresh-rate gaming, so users should temper expectations for competitive shooters or the latest AAA titles at maximum settings.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile of 69, with the CPU at 77 and the GPU at 61, clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting component in most graphics-intensive scenarios. In gaming, the GPU's 61st percentile and its proximity to the Radeon HD 7790 (0.7% ahead) and RTX 4060 (0.9% ahead) show that it operates in a performance class that is unlikely to match the CPU's multi-threaded output. The CPU's 3DMark scaling from 1575 at 2 threads to 6764 at 16 threads demonstrates excellent multi-threading, but games rarely scale beyond 8 threads, so the CPU's advantage is most pronounced in productivity tasks.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU is the stronger component, delivering a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22366 that places it at the 77th percentile. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 7.119 TFLOPS is adequate for GPU-accelerated rendering, but its 8 GB VRAM and 61st percentile mean that large scenes or high-resolution renders will bottleneck on the GPU. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6176 suggests that compute-heavy tasks like machine learning inference will be serviceable but not exceptional. The data indicates a system where the CPU has headroom for more demanding tasks, while the GPU is the first component to reach its limit — a configuration that favors multi-threaded CPU workloads over GPU-intensive ones.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000. The CPU's 77th percentile and the GPU's 61st percentile combine to a 69th overall percentile, placing this system in the upper-mid range of desktop performance. The pairing is best described as a workstation-oriented configuration: the CPU provides substantial multi-threaded capability with its 8 cores, 16 threads, and 96 MB L3 cache, while the GPU offers professional-grade features like 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, but at a performance level that is below mainstream gaming GPUs. The GPU's end-of-life production status and its 2018 release date, against the CPU's 2024 release date, indicate a generational mismatch where the GPU is the older component. The combined percentile of 69 suggests a system that can handle moderate professional workloads and light gaming, but it will not compete with high-end desktop configurations. The build class is desktop, confirming it is a stationary workstation rather than a portable solution.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile and its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D, which is 0.1% behind in average benchmark score.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have and what does it mean?

A: The CPU has 96 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache pool helps with data-intensive workloads, as evidenced by the PassMark data compression score of 307237.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation builds that require data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU's production status and release date?

A: The GPU is end-of-life and was released on November 12, 2018. The CPU is active and was released on January 7, 2024.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is $249.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has an average benchmark score of 17789, while the RTX 4060 has a score of 17639, meaning the RTX 4060 is 0.9% ahead. The Quadro's percentile is 61, indicating slightly below the RTX 4060 in overall performance.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: This build is not well-suited for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 61st percentile and its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 indicate weak DX12 performance, and the lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be conservative — 1080p at medium settings is the realistic ceiling, not high-refresh 1440p.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22366, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, but the GPU's limited gaming performance will cap the game's frame rate, making streaming viable but not optimal for high-motion titles.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance (PassMark multithread score of 26318) accelerates rendering and export times, while the GPU's 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 support GPU-accelerated effects. The 8 GB VRAM may limit work with large 4K timelines, but 1080p editing will be smooth.

3D rendering: The GPU's 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders and AI denoising, but its 61st percentile and 8 GB VRAM will constrain scene complexity. The CPU's 96 MB L3 cache helps with geometry processing, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck for final renders.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 81257 and data encryption score of 18788 support fast compilation and secure data handling. The GPU's compute score of 6176 is sufficient for basic CUDA development, but not for large-scale model training.

Student and office work: The system's CPU 77th percentile and GPU 61st percentile provide ample performance for office applications, web browsing, and light programming tasks. The single-threaded CPU score of 2970 in PassMark is adequate for everyday responsive use, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running student projects.