SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

24,709 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 pairing represents a unique intersection of legacy platform value and flagship graphics performance. This desktop configuration combines an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 processor built on the mature AM4 socket with NVIDIA’s top-tier Ada Lovelace GPU, creating a system that sits at the 83rd combined percentile across all benchmarked pairs. The data presents a fascinating study in imbalance, where a CPU from the 5000 series that launched in 2024 meets a GPU that is already marked end-of-life, yet together they deliver an average frame rate of 199.2 FPS across a broad game library. The benchmark results suggest this is less about theoretical synergy and more about raw component dominance, with the RTX 4090 carrying the majority of the performance weight in most scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X3D is a desktop processor built on TSMC’s 7 nm process, housing 8,850 million transistors within a 74 mm² die. Its Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, all within a 105 W TDP. The processor’s defining feature is its cache hierarchy: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool is the primary driver behind the CPU’s benchmark personality, favoring workloads that can exploit fast, local data access.

Examining the benchmark scores, the CPU shows a clear scaling pattern from single to multi-threaded tasks. The 3DMark tests reveal a progression: 804 for single-thread, 1,575 for 2-threads, 3,097 for 4-threads, 5,357 for 8-threads, and 6,764 for 16-threads. The near-identical scores between the 16-thread (6,764) and max-threads (6,755) tests indicate the chip is fully utilized by 16 threads, with no hidden headroom. In Cinebench, the R23 multicore score of 22,366 stands in contrast to the single-core 3,157, representing a roughly 7x scaling factor. Geekbench results show 11,086 multicore and 1,849 single-core, while PassMark’s multithread score of 26,318 and single-thread 2,970 reinforce this pattern.

The CPU’s percentile rank of 77 against all CPUs places it in the upper quartile, but the nearest rivals highlight its competitive positioning. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D scores marginally higher at 24,728 with a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the 5700X3D is essentially tied with that chip. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX is 0.5% ahead, while the Intel Core i5-12450HX and i5-11600 are 0.5% and 0.6% behind, respectively. These sub-1% deltas indicate that the 5700X3D sits in a highly contested performance band, where architectural differences and cache configurations produce nearly identical average scores.

For real workloads, the data suggests the 5700X3D excels in multi-threaded rendering and physics calculations. The PassMark physics score of 2,686 and floating-point math score of 46,492 indicate strong computational throughput, while the integer math score of 81,257 points to solid general-purpose processing. The single-thread score of 804 in 3DMark is modest, which means lightly-threaded tasks like legacy game engines or certain productivity apps may not see the full benefit of the 3D V-Cache design. The CPU’s memory bandwidth is capped at 51.2 GB/s via dual-channel DDR4, which is a potential bottleneck for data-intensive workloads that rely on rapid memory access.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture emerges from the CPU’s 77th percentile and the GPU’s 88th percentile, yielding an overall pair rank of 272 out of 3,732 pairs, which places it in the 83rd combined percentile. The average FPS across all tested games is 199.2, a figure that reflects the GPU’s dominance in most scenarios. However, the CPU’s average benchmark score of 24,709 and the GPU’s average benchmark score of 60,347 reveal a significant gap in raw compute capability between the two components.

The GPU’s benchmark results are staggering in comparison. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223, Geekbench OpenCL score of 255,416, and Vulkan score of 271,631 demonstrate extreme graphics and compute throughput. PassMark G3D score of 38,194 and GPU compute score of 26,613 further solidify its position. The GPU’s nearest rivals are somewhat surprising: Intel Arc Pro A60 at 60,326 (0% delta), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 at 60,140 (0.3% delta), AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61,896 (-2.5% delta), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58,657 (2.9% delta). These deltas show that the RTX 4090’s average benchmark score is nearly identical to professional workstation cards, which is unusual for a consumer gaming GPU.

The combined benchmark data suggests that the CPU is the limiting factor in most workloads, but not to a degree that cripples the system. For instance, the CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,764 is strong, but the GPU’s compute capabilities are on another level. This imbalance means that in CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or AI inference, the system will perform at the CPU’s level, while in GPU-bound tasks like rasterization or ray tracing, the RTX 4090 will stretch its legs. The pair’s FPS rank of 272 out of 3,732 pairs indicates that while this is not the absolute fastest combination, it is well above the median and should handle most demanding titles at high settings without issue.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the AD102 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process, packing 76,300 million transistors into a 609 mm² die. This results in a transistor density of 125.3M per mm², a signal of the manufacturing efficiency. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2235 MHz and a boost clock of 2520 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus provides a staggering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, which is crucial for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

The GPU’s compute resources are immense: 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 128 RT cores, and 512 tensor cores. These translate to a pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s, texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput of 82.58 TFLOPS. The FP16 performance is identical at 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1), which benefits machine learning and certain scientific workloads. The RT cores and tensor cores are the hardware foundation for ray tracing and DLSS, respectively, and their sheer number explains why the GPU dominates in modern titles.

The benchmark scores for the GPU are consistently high. The PassMark G3D score of 38,194 is nearly 60% higher than the CPU’s entire average benchmark score, highlighting the GPU’s raw graphics muscle. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 271,631 indicates excellent cross-platform API performance. However, the PassMark DirectX scores are oddly low (224 for DX10, 326 for DX11, 150 for DX12, 397 for DX9), which may reflect benchmark methodology rather than real-world performance, as the 3DMark and Geekbench results paint a much more favorable picture.

For rendering workloads, the RTX 4090’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are decisive advantages. This capacity allows for large scenes, high-resolution textures, and complex ray-traced environments without memory swapping. The 128 RT cores accelerate ray tracing significantly, while the 512 tensor cores enable DLSS upscaling and AI-based denoising. The pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s ensure that even at 4K resolution, the GPU can sustain high fill rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system excels at 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming, with measured FPS exceeding 300 in esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (793 FPS at 1080p, 548.5 at 1440p) and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege (427 at 1080p, 280 at 1440p). The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads handle game logic well, while the GPU’s raw power ensures frame rates far beyond monitor refresh rates.

Streaming: The combination of 8 CPU cores and the GPU’s NVENC encoder (implied by the 512 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture) makes this a capable streaming rig. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 26,318 can handle encoding overhead, while the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM provides headroom for game capture and overlay software.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,366 and the GPU’s compute scores (OpenCL 255,416) suggest strong performance in video editing suites that leverage both CPU and GPU acceleration. The 24 GB VRAM is particularly beneficial for timeline previews and effects rendering in 4K or higher resolutions.

3D Rendering: The GPU’s FP32 performance of 82.58 TFLOPS and 128 RT cores make this system a rendering powerhouse. The CPU’s 16 threads provide adequate geometry processing, but the GPU will dominate final frame rendering, especially with ray-traced scenes. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures data transfers don’t bottleneck the render pipeline.

Software Development: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads handle compilation tasks efficiently, as evidenced by the PassMark integer math score of 81,257. The large 96 MB L3 cache speeds up repetitive code compilation, while the GPU’s compute capabilities can accelerate testing and simulation workloads. The ECC memory support is a plus for long-running build processes.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is massively overprovisioned for typical office tasks. The CPU’s single-thread score of 804 in 3DMark is more than sufficient for document editing and web browsing, while the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking is far beyond what spreadsheets or presentations require. The system will handle any student workload with extreme ease, though power consumption may be a consideration.

Who Should Build It

This build targets enthusiasts and professionals who demand maximum graphics performance without sacrificing CPU capability. Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions will benefit most, as the measured FPS at 3840x2160 in games like Counter-Strike 2 (131 FPS) and Cyberpunk 2077 (52.6 FPS) indicate playable frame rates at ultra settings. Content creators working with 3D rendering, video editing, or machine learning will find the 24 GB VRAM and tensor cores indispensable for their workflows.

Small business workstations that require GPU acceleration for CAD, simulation, or data visualization would also benefit, given the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking and compute scores. The CPU’s 77th percentile ensures that most professional applications will run smoothly. However, this is not a build for budget-conscious users or those who only need basic productivity, as the hardware exceeds the requirements for such tasks by a wide margin. The target user is someone who wants a no-compromise GPU experience on a proven, mature platform.

FAQ

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D?

A: The CPU scores 804 in 3DMark single-thread, 318 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1,325 in Cinebench R20 single-core, and 3,157 in Cinebench R23 single-core, indicating moderate single-threaded capability.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the RTX 4090 provide?

A: The GPU offers 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth through its 384-bit bus, using 24 GB of GDDR6X memory at 21 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The pair ranks at the 83rd combined percentile, with a pair rank of 272 out of 3,732 pairs based on average FPS across games.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 5700X3D support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and server applications.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU uses TSMC’s 7 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC’s 5 nm process.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X3D compare to the Ryzen 5 7600X3D?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X3D has an average benchmark score of 24,709, while the Ryzen 5 7600X3D scores 24,728, resulting in a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning they are essentially equal in performance.

Q: What FPS can I expect at 4K in Cyberpunk 2077?

A: At 3840x2160 resolution with ultra settings, the system achieves 52.6 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the RTX 4090 is the dominant component, with an 88th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 77th. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 60,347 is more than double the CPU’s 24,709, suggesting that in most workloads, the GPU can operate far beyond what the CPU can feed it. This is evident in the FPS scaling: at 1080p, games like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hit 793 FPS, but at 4K, that drops to 323.6 FPS. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,764 may become a limiting factor in CPU-intensive titles or at lower resolutions where frame rates are extremely high.

Conversely, the CPU’s large 96 MB L3 cache helps mitigate some bottlenecking in gaming, as data reuse is high. However, the memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is a potential constraint for the GPU, which requires 1.01 TB/s. This mismatch means that the CPU cannot supply data fast enough to fully utilize the GPU in all scenarios. The benchmark deltas to rivals (all within 2.9%) show that the CPU is well-matched to its peers, but the GPU is in a different class entirely. The system will be GPU-bound in most modern games at high resolutions, but CPU-bound in esports titles at 1080p where frame rates exceed 300 FPS.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D, a 5000-series processor on the AM4 socket, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, a GeForce 40-series GPU. The CPU is from the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer), while the GPU uses Ada Lovelace. The system achieves a combined percentile of 83, placing it in the upper tier of benchmarked pairs. The average FPS across all tested games is 199.2, with a pair rank of 272 out of 3,732, indicating this is a high-performing combination, though not the absolute top.

The build’s tier is defined by the GPU’s 88th percentile, which is the primary driver of its overall ranking. The CPU’s 77th percentile is respectable but not exceptional, meaning the system’s performance is heavily skewed toward graphics-intensive tasks. The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured: true) provides concrete evidence of real-world capabilities, with the system averaging over 300 FPS in several esports titles and maintaining playable frame rates in demanding AAA games at 4K. This is a high-end desktop configuration designed for users who prioritize GPU performance above all else.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data from ultra settings across a wide range of games reveals the system’s strengths. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance in esports titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (793 FPS), Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege (427 FPS), and Valorant (369.8 FPS). Even at 2560x1440, these titles remain above 237 FPS, and at 3840x2160, they still exceed 131 FPS. The data indicates that this system is overkill for competitive gaming at 1080p, where the CPU is likely the limiting factor.

For AAA titles, the performance is strong but more varied. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 77.9 FPS at 1080p, 69.6 FPS at 1440p, and 52.6 FPS at 4K, which is playable but not ultra-high refresh. Red Dead Redemption 2 achieves 98.6 FPS at 1080p, 71.4 at 1440p, and 48 at 4K. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 128.9 FPS at 1080p, 103.6 at 1440p, and 76.8 at 4K. The most demanding title in the dataset, Ark: Survival Ascended, only achieves 51.2 FPS at 1080p, 32.9 at 1440p, and 18.7 at 4K, showing that even this powerful GPU can be challenged by poorly optimized games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU’s 105 W TDP and the GPU’s 450 W TDP suggest a suggested PSU of 850 W, which is sufficient for this configuration. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, while the CPU is still active in production.

For upgrades, the AM4 socket is a mature platform, meaning the Ryzen 7 5700X3D is likely the pinnacle of CPU performance available. The next logical upgrade would be to a newer platform with DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 support, but that would require a full system rebuild. The GPU, being end-of-life, could be replaced by the GeForce 50 series when it becomes available, but the current RTX 4090’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth will remain relevant for years. The system’s bottleneck is the CPU’s memory bandwidth and single-thread performance, which limits frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. A sensible next upgrade would be to a newer CPU platform that offers higher memory bandwidth and more PCIe lanes, though this would require replacing the motherboard and RAM as well.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Roblox

Counter-Strike 2

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds