SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

24,709 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER creates a desktop configuration where the bottleneck shifts dramatically depending on resolution and workload type. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance and large cache become the primary drivers, evidenced by titles like Counter-Strike 2 hitting 322.1 FPS and Valorant reaching 372.1 FPS. These numbers suggest the graphics card is not the limiting factor at this resolution; the processor’s 3D V-Cache architecture is doing the heavy lifting to feed the GPU.

At 1440p, the balance tilts toward the GPU, but the CPU still holds its ground. The data shows moderate FPS drops across most titles—Call of Duty: Warzone falls from 115.7 to 103.3 FPS, while Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 76.8 to 71.8 FPS. This indicates a more even distribution of workload, where neither component is severely underutilized. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth become more relevant here, as the higher pixel count demands more from the memory subsystem.

At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The FPS deltas between 1440p and 2160p are steep—Assetto Corsa drops from 134.7 to 80.8 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 falls from 64.6 to 41 FPS. The CPU’s percentile ranking of 77 against all CPUs is respectable, but it is clearly not the constraint at this resolution. The GPU’s 86th percentile ranking and its 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 compute capability are what matter most here.

The 3DMark thread scaling data reveals the CPU’s behavior under varied loads. The score jumps from 804 in single-thread to 1575 in 2-thread, then to 3097 in 4-thread, 5357 in 8-thread, and plateaus at 6755 in max-threads. This shows excellent scaling up to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that—a pattern consistent with an 8-core, 16-thread design. For gaming, this means the CPU can handle modern titles that utilize 6-8 cores efficiently, but it won’t provide much additional headroom for heavily threaded background tasks while gaming.

The synthetic benchmark scores reinforce this analysis. Cinebench R23 multicore at 22366 versus single-core at 3157 shows a strong multicore-to-single-core ratio, but the single-core score is modest compared to the GPU’s capabilities. In practical terms, the CPU will limit frame rates in esports titles at 1080p, while the GPU will limit frame rates in AAA titles at 4K. The combined percentile of 82 across this pairing suggests a system that is well-matched for 1440p gaming, where the strengths of both components are utilized without either becoming a severe bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, indicating this desktop build outperforms the majority of all tracked CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X3D compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X3D has an average benchmark score of 24709, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D’s 24728 and 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX’s 24822. It is 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i5-12450HX’s 24576 and 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i5-11600’s 24563.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and why does it matter?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 736.3 GB/s bandwidth. This configuration is critical for 4K gaming and texture-heavy workloads, as evidenced by the steep FPS drops at 3840x2160 in games like Ark: Survival Ascended (16.2 FPS) and Cyberpunk 2077 (46.9 FPS).

Q: Is the CPU’s single-thread performance sufficient for modern gaming?

A: The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score is 804, and its PassMark single-thread score is 2970. These are mid-range values, but the 96 MB shared L3 cache compensates in gaming scenarios, allowing high frame rates in CPU-bound titles like Counter-Strike 2 (322.1 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (372.1 FPS at 1080p).

Q: What is the maximum FPS observed across all games in the measured dataset?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 713.9 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 1920x1080. The lowest is 16.2 FPS in Ark: Survival Ascended at 3840x2160.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the non-SUPER RTX 4080?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, which is 0.1% lower than the RTX 4080’s 54247. This places the two cards nearly identical in overall performance, despite any architectural differences.

Q: What is the CPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X3D supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. This is lower than the GPU’s 736.3 GB/s bandwidth, but for gaming, the CPU’s 96 MB L3 cache mitigates memory latency issues, which is why frame rates remain high in cache-sensitive titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24709, placing it in the 77th percentile among all CPUs tracked. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D, scores 24728, a mere 0.1% difference. This near-tie indicates the 5700X3D is competitively positioned within its performance tier. The multicore performance is robust: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 22366, while Geekbench multicore scores 11086. The single-core results are less impressive—Cinebench R23 single-core at 3157 and Geekbench single-core at 1849—but these are acceptable for a Zen 3 part. The PassMark multithread score of 26318 and integer math score of 81257 further demonstrate its strength in parallel workloads.

The GPU delivers an average benchmark score of 54209, placing it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080, scores 54247, a 0.1% difference, making them effectively equivalent. The PassMark G3D score of 34245 and GPU compute score of 19822 highlight its rasterization and compute capabilities. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 6600, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 260075, showing strong API versatility. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 52.22 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 285.6 GPixel/s are top-tier figures.

The combined picture shows a system that punches above its weight. The pair ranks 461st out of 3861 tracked pairs by FPS, placing it in the top 12% of all combinations. The average FPS across games is 187.7. This is a high-performance desktop configuration, though the CPU’s 77th percentile versus the GPU’s 86th percentile reveals a slight imbalance—the GPU is the stronger component. In gaming, this means the CPU will occasionally limit frame rates in esports titles, but for most AAA games, the GPU will be the dominant factor, especially at higher resolutions.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a gamer who primarily plays at 1440p and wants high refresh rates without compromising on visual fidelity. The data supports this: at 2560x1440, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 214.8 FPS, Valorant at 350.5 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 252 FPS. These are competitive-level frame rates. For AAA titles at 1440p, the system delivers playable results—Cyberpunk 2077 at 71.8 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 64.6 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 103.3 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this pairing.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will find the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads adequate, but not exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22366 is solid for a mid-range processor, and the PassMark data compression score of 307237 indicates good performance for archiving tasks. However, the GPU’s compute capabilities—52.22 TFLOPS FP32 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 219065—make it the primary accelerator for rendering workloads.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s strong multithreaded performance for compilation tasks, as indicated by the 3DMark max-threads score of 6755 and PassMark integer math score of 81257. The 96 MB L3 cache also helps with repeated code builds. Students and small business workstations targeting office productivity will be over-served by this hardware, but the system’s versatility means it can handle any productivity software without issue. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a bonus for workstation stability, though it requires compatible DDR4 modules.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this system excels. Counter-Strike 2 hits 322.1 FPS, Valorant 372.1 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 713.9 FPS. These numbers are well beyond the 240Hz refresh rate of most monitors, making this an ideal esports machine at that resolution. At 1440p, frame rates remain high enough for 144Hz displays in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads provide adequate headroom for encoding while gaming. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6764 shows the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads, though the GPU’s NVENC encoder would be the preferred method. The data does not directly measure streaming performance, but the multicore scores suggest sufficient capacity.

Video editing: The GPU accelerates rendering tasks. The PassMark GPU compute score of 19822 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 219065 indicate strong performance for effects and color grading. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9393 supports timeline scrubbing and export tasks. 4K editing is feasible, though 16 GB of VRAM may be tight for complex projects.

3D rendering: The GPU’s FP32 performance of 52.22 TFLOPS and the CPU’s PassMark floating point math score of 46492 make this a capable rendering workstation for small-to-medium scenes. The 16 GB GDDR6X memory is sufficient for most GPU-based renderers. CPU-based rendering will be slower, but the 8-core/16-thread design ensures it is not a bottleneck.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 81257 and data encryption score of 18788 indicate strong performance for code compilation and encryption tasks. The 96 MB L3 cache speeds up iterative builds. The system’s 32 GB of RAM (not specified, but typical for this class) would be adequate for most development environments.

Student and office work: This system is massively overpowered for word processing and spreadsheet tasks, but the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 2970 ensures snappy application responsiveness. The GPU’s G2D score of 1270 is sufficient for multi-monitor setups. The system will never feel slow in these workloads, though the power draw is higher than necessary.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual testing, reveals a system that scales predictably with resolution. At 1920x1080, esports titles dominate: Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 384 FPS, Valorant at 372.1 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 322.1 FPS. Even demanding titles perform well—Doom hits 240.7 FPS, and Assetto Corsa reaches 184.2 FPS. The lowest 1080p result is Ark: Survival Ascended at 48.8 FPS, which is an outlier due to that game’s extreme requirements.

At 2560x1440, frame rates drop by 20-40% depending on the title. Valorant remains high at 350.5 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege hits 252 FPS. AAA games fall into the 60-110 FPS range: Cyberpunk 2077 at 71.8 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 64.6 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 103.3 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for balancing visual quality and frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the limiting factor. Valorant still manages 330 FPS, but most titles drop below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 46.9 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 41 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 16.2 FPS. Some lighter titles remain playable—Dave The Diver at 133.3 FPS and Minecraft at 105 FPS—but for AAA gaming, 4K requires upscaling technologies. The system’s average FPS across all games is 187.7, but this is skewed by esports titles. For a realistic gaming experience, 1440p is the recommended resolution.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts up to 4.10 GHz. The chip is manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process node with 8,850 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. The defining feature is its 96 MB shared L3 cache, which is massive for a desktop CPU and directly benefits gaming by reducing memory latency.

The CPU’s benchmark scores reflect its strengths and weaknesses. The 3DMark single-thread score of 804 is modest, but the 8-thread score of 5357 and max-thread score of 6755 show strong scaling. Cinebench R23 multicore at 22366 is competitive with newer processors, while the single-core score of 3157 is lower than modern Zen 4 or Raptor Lake parts. The PassMark multithread score of 26318 and floating point math score of 46492 demonstrate solid all-around performance.

For real workloads, this CPU excels in cache-sensitive applications. Gaming benefits most from the 96 MB L3 cache, which is why the system achieves such high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. Productivity tasks that rely on single-thread performance, such as Office applications, will perform adequately but not exceptionally. The CPU’s 105 W TDP and support for DDR4 memory make it an easy drop-in upgrade for existing AM4 systems, though its locked multiplier prevents overclocking.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Ryzen 5 7600X3D, which scores a nearly identical 24728, and the Ryzen 9 5900HX at 24822. This positioning means the 5700X3D is a strong performer within its generation, but it does not compete with current-gen flagship CPUs. For users building new systems, this CPU represents a balance between cost (launch MSRP $249) and performance, though its age means platform longevity is limited.

Build Overview

This desktop configuration pairs an AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, creating a system that targets high-end 1440p gaming and content creation. The CPU is a Zen 3-based 8-core processor with 16 threads, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture card with 10240 shading units and 16 GB of GDDR6X memory. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile rank is 82, placing it in the upper tier of all tracked systems.

The GPU is the more powerful component. It ranks in the 86th percentile among GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 77th percentile among CPUs. This imbalance means the GPU has more headroom for future upgrades, but in the current configuration, the CPU will limit performance in some scenarios—particularly at 1080p in esports titles where frame rates exceed what the CPU can sustain. The pair’s average FPS across games is 187.7, with a rank of 461 out of 3861 pairs, which is the top 12%.

The build is well-suited for gamers who prioritize frame rates over resolution, but it also handles productivity tasks. The CPU’s 96 MB L3 cache is a unique asset for gaming, while the GPU’s compute capabilities make it a viable workstation for rendering. The system is not balanced in the traditional sense—the GPU is clearly the star—but the CPU’s strengths complement it well in gaming workloads. For users who want to play at 4K, the GPU is capable, but the CPU will not be the bottleneck at that resolution; the GPU’s own limits will be.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X3D uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is mature and end-of-life for new CPU releases. The socket supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with ECC capability, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the processor. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible. The platform’s main limitation is memory bandwidth—51.2 GB/s is low by current standards—but the CPU’s large cache mitigates this.

The GPU has a TDP of 320 W and requires a 700 W suggested PSU. It uses a single 16-pin power connector and is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm in length. The system’s power requirements are substantial, but a quality 700 W PSU is sufficient for this CPU-GPU combination, given the CPU’s 105 W TDP. The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, so upgrade options are limited to newer generations.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a newer CPU on a different platform, as AM4 has no further processor releases. The motherboard would need to be replaced to move to AM5 or Intel’s current socket. Alternatively, users could upgrade the GPU to a newer generation, but the RTX 4080 SUPER is already a high-end card, so the gains would be marginal. The most impactful upgrade would be a platform change to a newer CPU with higher single-thread performance, which would address the bottleneck in 1080p gaming. However, for 1440p and 4K gaming, the current configuration remains viable.