SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

27,051 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

This desktop pairing combines an 8-core, 16-thread AMD processor built on the Zen 3 architecture with NVIDIA’s flagship workstation GPU based on Ada Lovelace. The CPU, part of the 5000 series with the Cezanne codename, sits at the 79th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 27051. The GPU, meanwhile, ranks in the 98th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 184664. Together, this build achieves an 89th percentile combined ranking, indicating a system that is substantially above average across both processing and graphics workloads, though the performance gap between the two components is worth examining closely.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the AD102 chip using a 5 nm process at TSMC, housing 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is substantial: 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is not a gaming card first and foremost — the 32 GB frame buffer is designed for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and multi-application workflows rather than typical consumer gaming loads. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, and the GPU’s base clock is 1155 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz.

The compute configuration is equally imposing. The GPU packs 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation processors. Ray tracing is handled by 100 dedicated RT cores, while 400 tensor cores accelerate AI and deep learning tasks. The FP32 throughput reaches 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. These specifications place the card firmly in professional rendering territory — the tensor cores are particularly relevant for denoising, DLSS-style upscaling, and neural network inference, while the RT cores handle ray-traced scenes with dedicated hardware acceleration.

Benchmark data reinforces this positioning. The GPU scores 175286 in Geekbench OpenCL and 194041 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Vulkan score being higher than OpenCL suggests strong driver optimization for modern graphics APIs, which benefits both professional applications and gaming workloads. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5000 Ada sits just 0.5% above the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, 1.3% below the A100 SXM4 40 GB, 1.4% above the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, and 3.7% above the GeForce RTX 4090 D. These deltas are small, indicating that the RTX 5000 Ada is at the very top of the GPU hierarchy, with only marginal differences separating it from other flagship accelerators.

For rendering specifically, the combination of 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth means large scenes, complex shaders, and high-resolution texture sets can be loaded without swapping. The 100 RT cores make ray-traced renders feasible in real-time or near-real-time, while the 400 tensor cores accelerate AI-based denoising and upscaling. The 98th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms that this is a top-tier rendering solution, though the CPU pairing will determine how fully these capabilities can be utilized.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers a 3dmark single-thread score of 899, a 2-thread score of 1758, a 4-thread score of 3389, an 8-thread score of 5648, a 16-thread score of 6629, and a max-thread score of 6627. The near-identical 16-thread and max-thread scores indicate that the 8-core/16-thread configuration is fully utilized at that thread count, with no additional scaling beyond 16 threads. In Cinebench, the multicore score reaches 12830.5 in R23 and 2107 in R15, while single-core scores are 1494 and 242.5 respectively. Geekbench shows 9950 multicore and 1894 single-core. Passmark results include a multithread score of 24419, single-thread of 3283, integer math at 91541, floating-point math at 51296, data compression at 318262, data encryption at 20325, extended instructions at 21847, find prime numbers at 59, physics at 999, and random string sorting at 33384.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 27051 places it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i9-9900K scores 27097 (-0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 scores 26936 (+0.4%), the Intel Core i5-14400T scores 27166 (-0.4%), and the Intel Core i7-1370P scores 26900 (+0.6%). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the 5700G sits in a performance dead heat with several newer and older processors. The 79th percentile is respectable but not elite — this is a solid mid-to-upper-range CPU rather than a flagship.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 184664 places it at the 98th percentile, and its nearest rivals show similarly tight margins: the A100 SXM4 80 GB at 183725 (+0.5%), the A100 SXM4 40 GB at 187147 (-1.3%), the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell at 182109 (+1.4%), and the RTX 4090 D at 178050 (+3.7%). The combined picture is a system where the GPU is dramatically more powerful than the CPU in relative terms — a 98th-percentile GPU paired with a 79th-percentile CPU. The 89th combined percentile reflects this imbalance: the system is very strong overall, but the CPU is likely to constrain GPU-bound workloads in many scenarios.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 98th percentile ranking and 194041 Vulkan score indicate enormous frame-rate headroom, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 899 in 3dmark and 1494 in Cinebench R23 suggest that at very high refresh rates (240 Hz and above), the processor may become the limiting factor in CPU-bound titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU will dominate, and the 32 GB VRAM ensures textures and geometry load without issue.

Streaming: The 400 tensor cores on the GPU provide hardware acceleration for encoding and AI-based features, while the CPU’s 16 threads handle concurrent encoding, game logic, and streaming software. The 8-core/16-thread configuration with a 65 W TDP runs cool enough for sustained streaming sessions, and the 24419 Passmark multithread score indicates ample headroom for overlays and chat applications.

Video editing: The GPU’s 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 32 GB VRAM accelerate timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export encoding. The CPU’s 12830.5 Cinebench R23 multicore score handles multi-track timelines and background tasks, though the 79th percentile CPU ranking suggests it is not the fastest option for pure CPU-based encoding — the GPU will carry most of the weight in modern editors.

3D rendering: This is where the pairing shines. The 100 RT cores and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput make GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane exceptionally fast. The 32 GB VRAM allows scenes that exceed 16 GB or even 24 GB of geometry and textures. The CPU’s 16 threads provide adequate scene preparation and physics simulation, though the 8-core count is modest for CPU-based renderers.

Software development: The 318262 Passmark data compression score and 20325 data encryption score indicate strong performance for build tools, compression, and cryptographic operations. The 16 threads handle parallel compilation efficiently, and the single-thread score of 3283 in Passmark supports fast interactive editing and IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 9950 Geekbench multicore score is more than sufficient for document processing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and multitasking. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU handles any graphical workload. This pairing is overkill for office tasks but will never feel slow.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM4, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The CPU uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the processor, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 — this means the GPU will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds, but the CPU’s lanes are Gen 3, creating a potential bandwidth bottleneck in data-heavy workloads. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is modest, while the GPU’s TDP is 250 W with a suggested PSU of 600 W. This leaves substantial headroom for additional components — a 600 W PSU is sufficient for the current build, but adding many drives or peripherals may require a higher-wattage unit.

The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking within the 65 W thermal envelope. Memory support is limited to DDR4, which is mature and inexpensive but slower than DDR5 found on newer platforms. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and near-future software. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multiple high-resolution monitors.

A sensible next upgrade would be a CPU with more cores or higher single-thread performance on the same AM4 socket, since the GPU is already near the top of the market. Alternatively, moving to a platform with PCIe Gen 4 or Gen 5 CPU lanes would remove the bandwidth gap between CPU and GPU. The GPU’s 98th percentile ranking means it will remain relevant for several years, so the CPU is the more likely upgrade target.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 89, indicating the system outperforms 89% of all tracked desktop configurations.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 5700G does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the fact pack.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation ranks in the 98th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184664.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-9900K?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27051 on average, which is 0.2% below the Intel Core i9-9900K’s score of 27097 — a negligible difference.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who need maximum GPU compute with a capable but not flagship CPU. The 98th-percentile GPU with 32 GB VRAM is ideal for 3D artists, architects, and product designers working with large scenes and high-resolution textures — the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 100 RT cores enable real-time ray-traced previews. Video editors working with 4K or 8K timelines will benefit from the GPU-accelerated effects and encoding, while the CPU’s 16 threads handle background tasks. Data scientists and AI researchers can leverage the 400 tensor cores for model training and inference, though the 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is more oriented toward graphics than pure compute.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will find the GPU more than sufficient for ultra settings, though the CPU’s 79th percentile ranking may limit frame rates in esports titles at 1080p with very high refresh rates. Software developers building large codebases will appreciate the 318262 data compression score and 16 threads for parallel builds. Students and office workers would be overserved by this hardware, but it will handle any academic or administrative task without breaking a sweat. Small business workstations for CAD, simulation, or video production would benefit from the GPU’s professional features and the CPU’s low 65 W TDP for power-efficient operation.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. Base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and the TDP is a modest 65 W. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR4 in dual-channel mode with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and the CPU uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and the integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide basic display output without a discrete GPU.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that is strong in multithreaded workloads but not exceptional in single-thread performance. The 3dmark single-thread score of 899 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1494 are modest by 2025 standards, while the multicore scores of 12830.5 in R23 and 6629 in 3dmark 16-thread show solid scaling across all 16 threads. The Passmark multithread score of 24419 and integer math score of 91541 indicate strong parallel compute for tasks like video encoding, compilation, and data processing. The data compression score of 318262 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance for archiving, file transfers, and database workloads.

The 79th percentile ranking places this CPU in the upper-middle tier — it outperforms the majority of processors but sits below flagship models. The nearest rivals are all within 0.6% in either direction, indicating that the 5700G is performance-competitive with much newer processors like the Ryzen AI 7 445 and i7-1370P, despite being released earlier. For real workloads, this means the CPU will not bottleneck most applications, but it is not the fastest option available — particularly for single-threaded tasks or workloads that scale beyond 16 threads.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 2021 release (April 12, 2021) from AMD’s 5000 series, while the GPU is a 2023 release (August 8, 2023) from NVIDIA’s workstation Ada lineup. The GPU is the successor to Workstation Ampere and has a successor in Blackwell PRO W, indicating it is one generation behind the current flagship but still actively produced.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is designed for stationary use with standard power delivery and cooling. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 89, places this system in the upper echelon of desktop configurations — it outperforms 89% of tracked builds. The GPU’s 98th percentile is the dominant factor, while the CPU’s 79th percentile is respectable but clearly the weaker component. This is a workstation-class GPU paired with a mainstream desktop CPU, creating a system that is far more capable on the graphics side than the processing side.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance imbalance is stark: the GPU ranks in the 98th percentile while the CPU ranks in the 79th percentile, a gap of 19 percentage points. In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding with GPU acceleration, and ray-traced scenes, the RTX 5000 Ada will operate near its full potential — the CPU’s 16 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU with draw calls and geometry data, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU is the limiting factor.

In CPU-bound workloads, however, the bottleneck shifts. The CPU’s single-thread score of 899 in 3dmark and 1494 in Cinebench R23 will limit frame rates in games that rely heavily on per-core performance, particularly at 1080p with lower graphical settings. The 79th percentile CPU ranking means that in esports titles or simulation games with complex AI, the processor may prevent the GPU from reaching its maximum frame rate. The PCIe Gen 3 CPU lanes also create a bandwidth limitation for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface, though in practice this is unlikely to cause significant performance degradation in most workloads.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing. However, the GPU’s 194041 Vulkan score suggests very high frame rates in Vulkan-based games, while the CPU’s modest single-thread scores suggest that 1080p high-refresh gaming may be CPU-limited. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary determinant of performance, and the CPU’s limitations are less impactful.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The fact pack contains no measuredFps data for any game or resolution, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Based on the GPU’s 98th percentile ranking and its Vulkan score of 194041, frame rates at 1440p and 4K with ultra settings are expected to be very high — likely exceeding 100 FPS in most modern titles at 1440p and approaching or exceeding 60 FPS at 4K in demanding games. The 32 GB VRAM ensures that even the most texture-heavy games will not exceed memory capacity, eliminating a common source of stuttering. The 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate support high resolutions and high refresh rates simultaneously.

At 1080p, the CPU becomes more relevant. The single-thread score of 899 in 3dmark and 3283 in Passmark single-thread suggest that the Ryzen 7 5700G can deliver high frame rates in most games, but may struggle to reach the 200+ FPS that the GPU is theoretically capable of in esports titles. For competitive gaming at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors, this pairing may leave performance on the table. At 1440p and above, the GPU is the clear driver of performance, and the system should deliver an excellent gaming experience across all game types.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds