SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

27,051 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 pairing is a study in contrasts, a desktop combination that unites an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 APU with the most powerful consumer graphics card of its generation. The CPU, built on TSMC's 7 nm process with a 65 W TDP, is a solid mid-range performer that sits at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, however, is a behemoth, with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and a 1.01 TB/s bandwidth, landing in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 84, indicating a high-performing machine, but the data reveals a significant imbalance: the CPU's strengths are often overshadowed by the GPU's sheer capability, making this a build where the processor frequently becomes the limiting factor.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is a Cezanne-based desktop processor, utilizing the Zen 3 architecture on the AMD Socket AM4 platform. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This is a 65 W TDP part, built on TSMC's 7 nm process with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, alongside a shared 16 MB L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR4, running on a dual-channel bus with a maximum bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

In benchmark performance, the CPU's multi-threaded capability is evident. It scores 6,629 in the 3DMark 16-thread test and 6,627 in the max-thread test, showing good scaling from 8 to 16 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,830.5 and Geekbench multi-core score of 9,950 reinforce this picture. The single-thread performance is more modest, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,494 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1,894. The 3DMark single-thread score of 899 is notably lower than the 2-thread score of 1,758, suggesting that while the cores are efficient, they are not top-tier in raw single-thread speed.

The data shows this CPU is a capable mid-range part. Its average benchmark score of 27,051 places it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Comparing to its nearest rivals, it is effectively tied with the Intel Core i9-9900K, with a delta of -0.2%. It outperforms the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 by 0.4% and the Intel Core i7-1370P by 0.6%, while trailing the Intel Core i5-14400T by -0.4%. This means that in pure CPU compute, the 5700G is competitive with older high-end and newer mid-range parts, offering a balanced performance profile that is strong for multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or compilation, but not exceptional for tasks demanding the absolute best single-core speed. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics are present, but their performance is likely negligible compared to the dedicated GPU in this build.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark picture for this pairing is dominated by the RTX 4090. The GPU's average benchmark score is 60,347, placing it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the Intel Arc Pro A60 with a delta of 0%, showing they are statistically identical in average score. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is 0.3% behind, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 2.9% behind. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is 2.5% ahead. This indicates the RTX 4090 is positioned at the very top of the performance hierarchy, even when compared to professional workstation cards.

In specific GPU tests, the RTX 4090 scores 9,223 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 255,416 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 271,631 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark G3D score is 38,194, and the Passmark GPU Compute score is 26,613. These numbers are exceptionally high, indicating that the GPU is not just a gaming card but a compute powerhouse. The CPU's own benchmark scores, such as the Passmark multi-thread score of 24,419, are respectable but fall far short of the GPU's raw output, highlighting the disparity in their respective capabilities.

The combined system percentile is 84, which is a strong overall score. However, the pair rank by FPS across 3,732 pairs is 173, with an average FPS of 209.1 across all games. This ranking suggests that while the system is fast, the CPU is holding back the GPU in many scenarios, preventing it from achieving the top-tier FPS numbers that the GPU alone could reach with a more powerful processor. The data implies a system that is extremely fast in GPU-bound tasks but is not optimized for maximum frame rates in CPU-bound titles.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is a monster of a graphics card. Based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and the AD102 chip, it is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The memory subsystem is massive: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. The core clocks are high, with a base of 2235 MHz and a boost of 2520 MHz, and the memory runs at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective).

The GPU has 16,384 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 176 ROPs. For ray tracing and AI, it includes 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores. The compute performance is staggering, with an FP32 throughput of 82.58 TFLOPS and an FP16 throughput of 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1). The pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,290.2 GTexel/s. This card is designed for the most demanding tasks, from 4K gaming with ray tracing to 3D rendering and machine learning workloads.

In benchmark scores, the RTX 4090's dominance is clear. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223 is a top-tier result. The Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 255,416 and 271,631, respectively, show its strength in general-purpose compute. The Passmark G3D score of 38,194 and GPU compute score of 26,613 further cement its position. The data indicates that for rendering, the 4090 is in a class of its own, capable of handling 8K video editing, complex 3D scenes, and AI training with ease. Its 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores make it exceptionally well-suited for real-time ray tracing and DLSS, though the CPU may become a bottleneck in such workloads.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700G compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The 5700G has an average benchmark score of 27,051, placing it at the 79th percentile. It is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-9900K, with a delta of -0.2%. It is 0.4% faster than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 and 0.6% faster than the Intel Core i7-1370P, but 0.4% slower than the Intel Core i5-14400T.

Q: What is the performance class of the RTX 4090 based on its benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4090 has an average benchmark score of 60,347, which puts it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. It is statistically tied with the Intel Arc Pro A60 (0% delta) and outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 by 0.3%.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined system percentile is 84, indicating that this build performs better than 84% of all systems in the database. However, the pair rank by FPS is 173 out of 3,732 pairs, showing that the CPU limits the GPU in gaming.

Q: What is the average FPS across all games for this pair?

A: The pair has an average FPS of 209.1 across the tested games. This is a high number, but the rank of 173 suggests that many other CPU+GPU combinations achieve higher average frame rates.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Ryzen 7 5700G's CPU and the RTX 4090?

A: The CPU has a dual-channel DDR4 memory bus with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. In contrast, the GPU has a 384-bit GDDR6X bus with a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s, which is over 19 times higher.

Q: What is the power draw of the RTX 4090, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The RTX 4090 has a TDP of 450 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 850 W. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 5700G support PCIe Gen 4?

A: No, the CPU supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. This is a potential bottleneck for the RTX 4090, which is designed for PCIe 4.0 x16, though the performance impact is likely minor in most scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data strongly indicates that the Ryzen 7 5700G is the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU's average benchmark score of 27,051 is at the 79th percentile, while the GPU's score of 60,347 is at the 88th percentile. This gap is significant, and it manifests in gaming performance. The pair's rank by FPS is 173 out of 3,732 pairs, meaning that despite having an RTX 4090, many other systems achieve higher average frame rates. The CPU's PCIe Gen 3 interface, compared to the GPU's PCIe 4.0, also contributes to this limitation, though the impact on FPS is likely smaller than the raw processing power difference.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as the 3DMark 2-thread test (1,758) or single-thread tasks, the CPU will be the limiting factor. In GPU-bound workloads, like the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test (9,223), the GPU is the star, and the CPU can keep up to a point, but not at the highest frame rates. For example, in a game like "Counter-Strike 2" at 1080p, the system achieves 359 FPS, which is excellent, but the CPU's single-thread score of 899 in 3DMark suggests that this FPS could be higher with a faster processor. The average FPS of 209.1 across all games is high, but the rank of 173 shows that the CPU is holding back the GPU from its full potential, particularly in esports titles where high frame rates are paramount.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The system is capable of very high frame rates, as seen in "Counter-Strike: Global Offensive" with 795.6 FPS at 1080p and "Valorant" with 414.4 FPS at 1080p. However, the CPU may limit the maximum FPS in these titles, preventing the RTX 4090 from reaching its absolute peak.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are adequate for streaming, but the GPU's NVENC encoder (implied by its architecture) would offload the encoding work. The Passmark data encryption score of 20,325 and integer math score of 91,541 suggest the CPU can handle the overhead, though the GPU is the stronger component for this task.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for the system. The GPU's 24 GB of VRAM and 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance will accelerate rendering and effects, while the CPU's multi-core score of 12,830.5 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for timeline navigation and encoding. The system should handle 4K and 8K timelines with ease.

3D Rendering: The RTX 4090 is a top-tier renderer, with its 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores providing massive acceleration for ray-traced workloads. The CPU's 16 threads will assist with scene preparation and physics, but the GPU will be the dominant force.

Software Development: The CPU's multi-threaded performance, with a Passmark multi-thread score of 24,419, is good for compiling code. The 16 threads are beneficial for parallel builds. The GPU is less relevant for this task, but the system is more than capable.

Student and Office Work: This is a massive overkill for this scenario. The CPU's integrated graphics alone would be sufficient for basic tasks, and the RTX 4090's power is completely unnecessary. The system is extremely fast, but the cost and power consumption make it impractical for this use case.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) shows outstanding performance across a wide range of titles. At 1080p, the system achieves very high frame rates in esports and lighter games, such as 795.6 FPS in "Counter-Strike: Global Offensive" and 463.4 FPS in "Roblox." More demanding titles also perform well, with "Cyberpunk 2077" hitting 82.9 FPS and "Red Dead Redemption 2" reaching 94.9 FPS at 1080p.

At 1440p, the frame rates remain high, with "Call of Duty: Warzone" at 112.4 FPS and "Control" at 114.6 FPS. The system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming. At 4K, the RTX 4090's power is evident, with "Counter-Strike 2" reaching 133 FPS and "Fortnite" at 58.8 FPS. However, the CPU bottleneck is more pronounced at lower resolutions, where the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor. For instance, "Ark: Survival Ascended" drops to 52 FPS at 1080p, which is a demanding title, but the CPU's limitations are likely preventing higher frame rates. The average FPS across all games is 209.1, but the rank of 173 suggests that the CPU is a significant limitation in many CPU-bound titles, particularly at 1080p.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop system that pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, a mid-range 8-core processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, a top-tier enthusiast GPU. The CPU is from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture, and is a 65 W part. The GPU is from the GeForce 40-series, based on Ada Lovelace, and has a 450 W TDP. The combined percentile of 84 places this system in the upper echelon of performance, but the specific pairing is unusual. The CPU is a capable mid-range part, but the GPU is a flagship component, creating an imbalance where the CPU is the clear bottleneck. The overall tier is high, but the system is not optimized for maximum performance, as evidenced by its pair rank of 173.

Who Should Build It

This build is suitable for users who prioritize GPU-intensive workloads over CPU-bound tasks. It is a strong choice for content creators working with 3D rendering, video editing, or AI, where the RTX 4090's 24 GB of VRAM and 512 tensor cores will be fully utilized. Gamers at 4K resolution will see excellent performance, as the GPU is less likely to be bottlenecked at higher resolutions. The system is also a good fit for developers who need a powerful GPU for CUDA-based workloads, such as machine learning or scientific computing. However, it is not ideal for esports gamers at 1080p, as the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 899) will limit the frame rates that the RTX 4090 can deliver. Students and office workers should look elsewhere, as this system is vastly over-powered for basic tasks. Finally, small business workstations requiring heavy compute for tasks like video transcoding or 3D modeling would benefit, but the CPU could be a limiting factor in multi-tasking scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is based on the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory and PCIe Gen 3. This is an older platform, and the upgrade path is limited. The memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The CPU has 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, which is a potential bottleneck for the RTX 4090, as it is designed for PCIe Gen 4. The TDP of the CPU is 65 W, but the GPU's TDP is 450 W, with a suggested PSU of 850 W. This means the system requires a robust power supply.

The most sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to replace the CPU with a more powerful AM4 processor that supports PCIe Gen 4, such as a Ryzen 5000 series XT or X3D variant. However, the data in the FACT PACK does not specify such CPUs. The platform is at the end of its life, so a more future-proof upgrade would involve moving to a new socket and platform that supports DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5, but this is not detailed in the pack. For now, the current CPU is the limiting factor, and upgrading it would be the primary way to improve the system's balance, assuming the AM4 platform supports a faster CPU.