SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

27,051 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of an AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 creates a desktop system anchored by a Zen 3 CPU and an Ampere GPU. The data set for this configuration is measured, offering a concrete view of its gaming capabilities across a wide range of titles and resolutions. This analysis examines the benchmark results to understand the strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases for this specific combination.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The measured frame rates reveal a system that is exceptionally capable at 1080p and 1440p, but which begins to show its limitations at 4K. Across 55 games at ultra settings, the average FPS is 152.9, a figure that speaks to a high-performance gaming machine. At 1920x1080, the system frequently delivers triple-digit frame rates, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. For instance, esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hit 537 FPS, Valorant reaches 412 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 289 FPS. Even more demanding titles like Call of Duty: Warzone (128 FPS) and Fortnite (115.7 FPS) are exceptionally smooth.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong for competitive play. The same esports titles see a reduction, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 370 FPS and Valorant at 390 FPS, but they remain far beyond the refresh rates of most monitors. Heavier games like Cyberpunk 2077 (57.1 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (46.8 FPS) become more demanding, but are still playable with some adjustments. The data shows a clear trend: at 1440p, the system is a high-performance machine, but it is no longer an esports dominator for AAA titles.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes significantly. The system can still run many games, but the frame rates drop to more modest levels. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone manages 96 FPS, while Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 35 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34.6 FPS. Some games, like Valorant (362 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (218 FPS), still perform well due to their lighter engines. However, for graphically intensive AAA games, the 4K experience is not consistently smooth, suggesting that the RTX 3080's 10 GB of VRAM and the CPU's performance are enough for 1080p and 1440p as the primary targets.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The RTX 3080 is built on the Ampere architecture and the GA102 chip, manufactured on an 8 nm process at Samsung. It features 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a substantial 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1440 MHz with a boost clock of 1710 MHz, while the memory runs at an effective 19 Gbps. The GPU is equipped with 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units.

For ray tracing, the card has 68 dedicated RT cores, and for AI acceleration, it has 272 tensor cores. The raw compute power is significant, with FP32 performance rated at 29.77 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same 29.77 TFLOPS. The pixel rate is 164.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 465.1 GTexel/s. These specs translate to a strong rendering capability, as evidenced by its benchmark scores. In the passmark_g3d test, it scores 25086, and in 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, it scores 4407. Its OpenCL score is 152423, and its Vulkan score is 33620.

The GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs is 68, placing it in the upper third of the performance hierarchy. However, its nearest rivals in the data are the NVIDIA P106-100, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, AMD Radeon RX 6600M, and AMD Radeon R9 M290X, with average scores of 23249, 23250, 23273, and 23276, respectively. The RTX 3080's average benchmark score is 23172, which is -0.3% behind the P106-100 and Radeon Pro Vega 16, and -0.4% behind the RX 6600M and R9 M290X. This indicates that in the aggregate benchmark, its performance is closely clustered with these other cards, despite its higher theoretical specs, which suggests the specific test suite may not fully capture its strengths in high-resolution gaming.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU and GPU each have their own performance profiles, which together define the system's overall capability. The Ryzen 7 5700G achieves an average benchmark score of 27051 and sits in the 79th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-9900K (avg score 27097, deltaPct -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (avg score 26936, deltaPct 0.4%), the Intel Core i5-14400T (avg score 27166, deltaPct -0.4%), and the Intel Core i7-1370P (avg score 26900, deltaPct 0.6%). This puts it in a tightly contested performance band.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 23172, placing it in the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 74. The CPU's performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5 and a single-core score of 1494. Its Geekbench scores are 9950 for multi-core and 1894 for single-core. The GPU's passmark_g3d score of 25086 is its strongest result.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a solid performer, well within the top quarter of all CPUs, and the GPU is a capable, upper-mid-range component. The average FPS across all tested games is 152.9, and the pair ranks 1119 out of 3732 pairs in the database. This suggests that while individual components are strong, the combination is not at the very top of the performance charts, but is a very solid and consistent performer for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM4, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU's memory bandwidth is rated at 51.2 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which means it will run at PCIe 3.0 speeds on this platform. This is a potential bottleneck, though the performance impact is often modest.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, while the GPU's TDP is 320 W. The suggested PSU for this configuration is 700 W. The system's power draw is substantial, but a 700 W unit provides reasonable headroom for the CPU and GPU under load. The GPU requires a single 12-pin power connector.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to consider a CPU that supports PCIe 4.0, as this would fully unlock the bandwidth potential of the RTX 3080. The current AM4 socket supports newer Ryzen 5000 series and 5000 series X3D parts, which have higher benchmark scores and PCIe 4.0 support. However, such an upgrade would only be worthwhile if the application or game is sensitive to PCIe bandwidth or if the CPU becomes the primary bottleneck. For most users, the current setup is balanced, and the next logical upgrade would be a new platform that supports DDR5 and PCIe 5.0, but that would require a new motherboard, CPU, and memory.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne. It is manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz, and the boost clock is 4.60 GHz. It has a 16 MB L3 cache, with 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core. It also includes integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics, though this is secondary to the discrete RTX 3080.

In real workloads, the CPU's performance is strong for multi-threaded tasks. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5 is solid for productivity. The 3DMark tests show scaling from a single-thread score of 899 to a max-thread score of 6627, indicating good scaling with core count. The PassMark tests show a multithread score of 24419, with strong results in integer math (91541) and floating-point math (51296). The data compression score is 318262, and encryption is 20325.

Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-9900K, has a near-identical average score (27097 vs 27051, a -0.2% delta), which puts the 5700G in the same performance tier for general benchmarking. This means in applications that use many cores, the 5700G will perform similarly to the older i9-9900K. The single-thread performance is also competitive, as shown by its Geekbench single-core score of 1894. For real workloads, this CPU is well-suited for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where its 8 cores and 16 threads can be fully utilized.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this system?

A: The average FPS across 55 games is 152.9.

Q: Is this system better suited for 1080p or 4K gaming?

A: The data shows it is strongest at 1920x1080, where it frequently exceeds 100 FPS in demanding titles, while at 3840x2160, many AAA games drop to 35-40 FPS.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700G compare to the Intel Core i9-9900K?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G has an average benchmark score of 27051, which is -0.2% behind the Core i9-9900K's score of 27097.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this configuration?

A: The suggested PSU for this pairing is 700 W.

Q: Does the CPU support PCIe 4.0 for the GPU?

A: No, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so it will run at the lower speed.

Q: What is the RTX 3080's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 3080 sits in the 68th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G scores 12830.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore.

Who Should Build It

This system is a strong choice for gamers who prioritize high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p. The measured FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 (241.7 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (412 FPS at 1080p) makes it ideal for competitive players. For AAA single-player games, the system delivers smooth performance at 1440p, with games like Call of Duty: Warzone hitting 114 FPS. It is less suited for 4K gaming, as titles like Cyberpunk 2077 only reach 35 FPS.

For content creators, the 8-core, 16-thread CPU provides solid performance for video editing and 3D rendering, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5. Software developers will benefit from the multithreaded capabilities, as shown by the PassMark multithread score of 24419. The system is also a viable option for small business workstations that require a balance of CPU and GPU power for tasks like CAD or data analysis. However, its high power draw (320 W GPU TDP) means it is not an energy-efficient office machine, but for power users, it is a capable desktop.

Build Overview

This build pairs an AMD Ryzen 7 5700G desktop CPU with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 GPU. The CPU is a Zen 3 part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card with 10 GB of GDDR6X memory. The system is classified as a desktop build, and its combined percentile ranking is 74, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all system configurations in the database. The CPU is in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 68th percentile of all GPUs.

The overall tier of this build is a high-performance desktop for gaming and productivity. It is not a top-tier, best-in-class system, but it is a very capable machine that delivers excellent performance in its target resolutions. The average FPS of 152.9 across games confirms its gaming pedigree, and the CPU's benchmark scores indicate it can handle demanding workloads. This is a well-rounded build that offers a strong balance of CPU and GPU power, though its PCIe 3.0 CPU interface is a limitation for the newer PCIe 4.0 GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is generally good, but there are specific workloads where one component limits the other. In gaming, the data suggests that the GPU is often the limiting factor at higher resolutions. For instance, at 3840x2160, the FPS drops significantly across most games, indicating that the RTX 3080 is working at its maximum capacity. At 1920x1080, the CPU's performance is more likely to be the limiting factor in high-FPS scenarios, as the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can process them.

The CPU's percentile is 79, while the GPU's is 68. This suggests that, in general benchmark terms, the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is. This is further supported by the CPU's average benchmark score of 27051, which is very close to its rivals, while the GPU's score of 23172 is slightly below its nearest rivals. In CPU-intensive tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 318262) or physics calculations (PassMark score of 999), the CPU is the driving force. However, the GPU's compute capabilities, with a passmark_gpu_compute score of 14397, are also substantial.

The PCIe Gen 3 interface from the CPU to the GPU could be a bottleneck in certain bandwidth-sensitive scenarios, but the performance impact is likely small in most gaming situations. Overall, the system is well-balanced for 1440p gaming, where both components are utilized effectively, but the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck at 4K, and the CPU can be a limiter in high-refresh 1080p esports titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is the primary strength of the system. At 1080p, esports titles like CS:GO (537 FPS) and Valorant (412 FPS) will easily drive a 240Hz or 360Hz monitor. Even at 1440p, these games exceed 300 FPS, making it a top choice for competitive gamers.

Streaming: The 8-core CPU can handle game capture and encoding while gaming, as its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5 provides enough headroom. The RTX 3080's tensor cores can also assist with AI-based encoding, ensuring a smooth stream.

Video editing: The CPU's 16 threads will accelerate timeline scrubbing and export times, while the GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 power will speed up effects and rendering. The 10 GB of VRAM is sufficient for most 4K editing projects.

3D rendering: Software that uses GPU acceleration will benefit greatly from the RTX 3080's 8704 shading units and 68 RT cores. The CPU will also contribute via its 16 threads, as seen in its 3DMark max-thread score of 6627.

Software development: Compilation tasks will be fast, thanks to the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 24419. The system can also handle running multiple virtual machines or containers without issue.

Student and office work: This system is more than sufficient for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. While it is overpowered for these tasks, the 65 W CPU TDP and the overall system's performance make it a responsive and capable workstation, though the GPU's 320 W TDP means it is not a low-power option.