SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

25,517 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 pairing is a study in stark contrast: a highly efficient, mid-range desktop CPU from the Zen 3 generation paired with the absolute flagship of NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 GPU architecture. The data reveals a system where the GPU holds the 92nd percentile among all GPUs and the CPU sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, creating a combined percentile of 85. This build is unequivocally a desktop-class machine designed to push the boundaries of graphical performance, with the CPU serving as a capable but clearly secondary partner to the monstrous RTX 5090.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a data-center-grade graphics card dressed in consumer clothing. Its specifications are staggering: 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus delivers 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The GPU is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, housing 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The sheer scale of the silicon is reflected in its compute resources: 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. For ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, the card includes 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, pushing FP32 performance to 104.8 TFLOPS.

The clock behavior is interesting; the base clock is listed at 2017 MHz with a boost of 2407 MHz. While these are high figures, the real story is the memory subsystem. The 1.79 TB/s bandwidth is critical for the card’s 4K and high-refresh-rate ambitions, ensuring that the massive frame buffers required by modern titles are fed without bottleneck. The benchmark scores confirm this raw power. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), the card scores 18,355, a figure that places it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 79,842 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, which scores 79,605 (a delta of 0.3%), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X, which scores 80,959 (a delta of -1.4%). This places the RTX 5090 in elite company, trading blows with professional-grade compute accelerators.

For rendering, the implications are clear. The 32 GB VRAM alone is enough to handle massive 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and multi-layer compositing without spilling into system memory. The FP32 and FP16 performance being identical (104.8 TFLOPS) suggests that the card can handle both standard and mixed-precision workloads at similar throughput, which is beneficial for certain scientific and AI rendering tasks. The Vulkan score of 376,728 in Geekbench further underscores its compute prowess, while the OpenCL score of 334,370 shows strong cross-API compatibility. In practical terms, the benchmark results indicate that this GPU is not just for gaming; it is a rendering workhorse capable of tackling professional-grade 3D modeling, video effects, and GPU-accelerated compute tasks.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: This build is tailor-made for esports and competitive titles. The measured FPS at 1080p is astronomical, with Counter-Strike 2 hitting 368 FPS, Valorant reaching 413 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 437 FPS. Even at 1440p, these titles remain far above 240 Hz, with Valorant at 392 FPS and CS2 at 243 FPS. The CPU’s single-thread score of 901 in 3DMark is sufficient to feed the GPU in these scenarios, ensuring the frame rate is dictated by the graphics card’s immense throughput.

Streaming: The combination of a 16-thread CPU and the RTX 5090’s dedicated tensor cores provides a robust foundation. The CPU’s multi-threaded PassMark score of 24,303 offers headroom for software encoding, while the GPU’s hardware encoders can handle the video stream with negligible performance impact. The high L3 cache (16 MB) helps maintain consistent frame times during simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads.

Video editing: The 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 5700 with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,655 provides substantial processing power for timeline scrubbing and effect previews. However, the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance will accelerate exports and rendering significantly. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 334,370 indicates that GPU-accelerated effects will be nearly instantaneous, making this a potent combination for 4K or even 8K video workflows.

3D rendering: This is where the RTX 5090 shines. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355, combined with 170 RT cores, means ray-traced renders will complete in fractions of the time compared to lower-tier cards. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8,675 will handle scene preparation and physics simulations adequately, but the GPU will be the primary render engine, excelling in both rasterization and path-tracing tasks.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data encryption score of 20,096 and data compression score of 316,699 indicate strong performance for compilation tasks and handling large codebases. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, while the 7 nm process node keeps power consumption low at just 65 W TDP, making it an efficient workstation CPU for developers who don't need extreme multi-core density.

Student and office work: This configuration is wildly overpowered for such tasks, but the data shows it would be flawless. The single-core Geekbench score of 1,907 ensures snappy application launches, and the 32 GB VRAM is irrelevant for these tasks, but the CPU’s 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is more than sufficient for office suites and web browsing. The low 65 W CPU TDP means the system won't generate excessive heat in a quiet office environment, though the GPU’s 575 W TDP makes that a moot point for the overall system.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature ecosystem. The Ryzen 7 5700 supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with ECC support, a feature that is unusual for consumer CPUs and valuable for workstation stability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 lanes (20 lanes from the CPU), which is a potential bottleneck for the RTX 5090, which uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. While the GPU will function, it will not be running at its full potential bandwidth, which could impact certain high-throughput workloads.

The power situation is critical. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, but the GPU has a 575 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 950 W. This is a massive power draw, meaning the system requires a substantial power supply. The CPU’s low TDP is a relic of its efficiency-focused design, but the GPU negates any total system power savings. The 1x 16-pin power connector on the GPU is a modern standard, but it requires a PSU that can deliver the required wattage through that single connector.

A sensible next upgrade on this platform would be a CPU with a higher core count or newer architecture, but the AM4 socket is a dead end in terms of modern features like PCIe 5.0 from the CPU. The data suggests that the current CPU is the limiting factor in this pairing, so a future upgrade would likely involve a platform change to a newer socket that supports PCIe 5.0 natively to fully unlock the RTX 5090’s bandwidth. However, for gaming, the CPU’s performance is still sufficient, and the upgrade path would be more about removing platform bottlenecks than adding raw CPU power.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance here is heavily skewed. The GPU sits at the 92nd percentile, while the CPU is at the 78th percentile. This gap is the defining characteristic of the build. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations or certain simulation games, the Ryzen 7 5700 will be the limiting factor. Its 3DMark single-thread score of 901 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,296 are respectable, but they are not top-tier.

The FPS scaling across resolutions provides the clearest evidence of the bottleneck. In a game like Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS goes from 84 at 1080p to 76 at 1440p and 53 at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is only a 10% drop, suggesting that at 1080p, the CPU is starting to hold the GPU back. In contrast, the drop from 1440p to 4K is 30%, which is more typical of a GPU-bound scenario. This pattern is repeated in games like Red Dead Redemption 2 (99 to 74 to 49 FPS) and Control (153 to 116 to 78 FPS).

The data implies that at 1080p, the CPU is the bottleneck in many titles, preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, as the resolution demands more from the graphics card than the CPU. For esports titles like Valorant, the FPS only drops from 413 at 1080p to 364 at 4K, a 12% drop, which indicates that the CPU is the primary constraint even at high resolutions, but the absolute FPS is so high it doesn't matter. The pair rank by FPS is 146 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS of 212.3 across games, which is an elite tier, but the CPU is undeniably the weaker link in the chain.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25,517, placing it in the 78th percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U, which scores 25,485 (a delta of 0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, which scores 25,446 (a delta of 0.3%). The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is solid: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 20,655, while Geekbench multi-core scores 9,959. Single-thread performance is also strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 2,916 and Geekbench single-core at 1,907.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 79,842, placing it in the 92nd percentile. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, which scores 79,605 (a delta of 0.3%). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 and PassMark G3D score of 39,650 are exceptional.

The combined picture is one of massive GPU dominance. The GPU’s average score is over three times higher than the CPU’s average score. This means that in mixed workloads, the GPU will almost always be the component that finishes its tasks first, waiting on the CPU to catch up. In gaming, this manifests as the CPU limiting FPS at lower resolutions, as seen in the benchmark data. The combined percentile of 85 reflects the high performance of both components, but the delta between them is the critical takeaway for understanding system behavior.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is for a user who demands absolute maximum graphical fidelity and frame rates, regardless of cost. The primary target is a gamer who owns a 4K 120Hz+ display or a 1440p 240Hz+ display. For 4K gaming, the measured FPS shows that most AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (53 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (49 FPS) are just barely playable at ultra settings without upscaling, but esports titles like Valorant (364 FPS) and CS2 (136 FPS) are exceptionally smooth. For 1440p, the card is overkill for everything, with nearly every game exceeding 100 FPS.

Content creators and 3D artists are also a key audience. The 32 GB VRAM and massive compute throughput make it ideal for rendering high-resolution scenes, video editing with heavy effects, and AI training or inference tasks. The CPU’s 16 threads and 65 W TDP make it a decent workhorse for code compilation and general productivity, but the GPU is the star of the show.

Software developers working on graphics-intensive applications or machine learning models would benefit from the CUDA and tensor core performance. Students and office workers are not the target audience; this system is far too powerful and expensive for their needs. Small business workstations that rely on GPU-accelerated rendering or simulation would find value, but the 575 W TDP of the GPU requires a robust power infrastructure that most office environments are not equipped for. This is a build for enthusiasts, professionals, and gamers who want the best GPU available and are willing to pair it with a competent, but not top-tier, CPU.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The data is measured and provides a comprehensive view of gaming performance at ultra settings across three resolutions. At 1080p, the system is a monster, delivering over 300 FPS in many titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 822.3 FPS, Minecraft reaches 362 FPS, and Roblox runs at 482.4 FPS. Even demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (84 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (99 FPS) are well above 60 FPS.

At 1440p, performance remains stellar, with most games staying above 100 FPS. Valorant (392 FPS), Counter-Strike 2 (243 FPS), and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege (286 FPS) are all exceptionally high. Heavier games like Cyberpunk 2077 (76 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (74 FPS) remain playable, though they begin to show the strain of the resolution.

At 4K, the GPU’s raw power is pushed to its limits. Esports titles remain very fast, with Valorant at 364 FPS and CS2 at 136 FPS. However, AAA titles start to struggle to maintain high frame rates. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 53 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 49 FPS, and Control to 78 FPS. Some games, like Ark: Survival Ascended (18 FPS) and Revolution Idle (40 FPS), are not playable at 4K ultra without upscaling technologies, which are not reflected in these measured FPS figures. The average FPS across all games is 212.3, which is an elite figure that ranks 146th out of 3,732 pairs.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 85, indicating it outperforms 85% of all tested CPU and GPU pairings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 has an average benchmark score of 25,517, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 5 7640U’s score of 25,485.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5090?

A: The RTX 5090 has a memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s, provided by 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus.

Q: What is the boost clock of the RTX 5090?

A: The boost clock is 2407 MHz, with a base clock of 2017 MHz.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and how does it compare to the GPU’s TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 575 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 950 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s score in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 scores 20,655 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2,916 in single-core.

Q: What is the average FPS across all games for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across all games is 212.3, ranking 146th out of 3,732 pairs.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne. It is built on TSMC’s 7 nm process, with a transistor count of 10,700 million on a die size of 180 mm². The base clock is 3.70 GHz, which boosts to 4.60 GHz. The CPU supports DDR4 memory with ECC, a feature not found on all consumer chips. Its 16 MB of L3 cache is standard for the architecture, with 512 KB of L2 cache per core.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a CPU that is strong in multi-threaded tasks but not a leader in single-thread performance. The 3DMark max threads score is 6,617, which is nearly identical to the 16-thread score of 6,628, indicating the CPU is efficient at scaling across its cores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,655 is solid for an 8-core chip, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. The PassMark multi-thread score of 24,303 and integer math score of 90,091 show strong general-purpose compute.

For real-world workloads, this CPU is a capable workhorse. The 16 threads allow for smooth multitasking and parallel compilation. The data encryption score of 20,096 and compression score of 316,699 are particularly high, suggesting it excels in file archiving and security-related tasks. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for its performance, making it an efficient choice for a system that will be running for long periods. However, its single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 901 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,296, is not class-leading. In gaming, this means it can handle modern titles, but it may be the limiting factor in high-refresh-rate scenarios with a GPU as powerful as the RTX 5090.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, confirmed by the buildClass field. It pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 5700, a mainstream 8-core CPU from the 5000 series, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, the flagship GPU of the GeForce 50-series. The pairing is characterized by a massive performance disparity: the GPU is in the 92nd percentile, while the CPU is in the 78th percentile. The combined percentile is 85, which places this system in the top 15% of all builds in the database.

This is not a balanced build; it is a GPU-first configuration where the graphics card is the undisputed focus. The CPU is a competent mid-range part that provides enough power for gaming and productivity, but it is clearly outclassed by the GPU. The system is designed for one primary purpose: to extract the maximum possible graphical performance from the RTX 5090. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 575 W TDP create a power draw disparity that is almost comical, but it confirms the GPU’s dominance.

In terms of tier, this is a high-end enthusiast or professional workstation. The RTX 5090’s 32 GB of VRAM and compute capabilities push it into professional territory, while the CPU keeps the overall platform cost down. The build is a statement piece, designed for users who prioritize GPU performance above all else and are willing to accept a CPU that may bottleneck in certain CPU-bound scenarios. The data shows that for 4K gaming and GPU-accelerated content creation, this configuration is exceptional. For 1080p gaming, it is overkill, and the CPU will often be the limiting factor, preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential.