SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

25,517 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

178,050 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines AMD’s 8-core Zen 3 desktop processor with NVIDIA’s top-tier Ada Lovelace GPU, creating a system that sits at the 88th percentile overall among all benchmarked configurations. The CPU holds the 78th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU commands the 98th percentile among all GPUs, making this a lopsided but potent combination. The data used here contains no measured frame rates for this exact CPU+GPU pairing; all FPS discussions are therefore estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores and their relative positions.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 4090 D’s 98th percentile GPU rank is the dominant factor. With a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8587 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 246941, the GPU is positioned to drive frame rates well beyond 144 Hz at 1440p and 4K in most titles, assuming the CPU can keep up. The Ryzen 7 5700’s single-thread score of 901 in 3DMark and 3296 in PassMark single-thread tests indicates sufficient per-core performance for high-refresh scenarios, though the GPU will be the primary driver of FPS in this configuration.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s dedicated encoder hardware. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655 and PassMark multi-thread score of 24303 provide enough headroom for software encoding at moderate presets, while the GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture includes dedicated tensor cores (456) and RT cores (114) that can offload encoding and streaming tasks. The 24 GB GDDR6X frame buffer also allows for multiple concurrent encoding streams without memory pressure.

Video editing is a strong use case for this pairing. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads deliver a Geekbench multi-core score of 9959 and a PassMark integer math score of 90091, which supports timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU’s 73.54 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth accelerate rendering, color grading, and export tasks. The 24 GB VRAM capacity is particularly suited for 4K and 8K video timelines where GPU memory is often the limiting factor.

3D rendering and GPU-accelerated workloads are where this system excels. The RTX 4090 D’s 114 RT cores and 456 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI denoising, while its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8587 places it in the top 2% of all GPUs. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8675 and R15 multi-core score of 2082 support viewport performance and scene preparation, though the GPU will dominate final frame renders.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 316699 and data encryption score of 20096 indicate strong performance for build servers and code compilation tasks. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 278621 supports GPU-accelerated testing and simulation, while the 24 GB VRAM allows for large dataset handling in machine learning pipelines.

Student and office work is adequately served, though this configuration is overkill for such tasks. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1762 and PassMark single-thread score of 3296 handle everyday productivity with ease, while the GPU’s power and memory are largely idle in these workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP and the GPU’s 425 W TDP mean the system draws significant power even during light usage, making it a less efficient choice for purely office-oriented tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25517, placing it at the 78th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (avg score 25530, delta -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (avg score 25485, delta 0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (avg score 25550, delta -0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (avg score 25446, delta 0.3%). These deltas are negligible, indicating the Ryzen 7 5700 performs within a tight band of comparable processors, neither leading nor trailing by more than 0.3% in aggregate.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 178050, placing it at the 98th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all higher-scoring: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (avg score 182109, delta -2.2%), the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (avg score 183725, delta -3.1%), the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation (avg score 184664, delta -3.6%), and the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB (avg score 187147, delta -4.9%). The RTX 4090 D trails these by 2.2% to 4.9%, positioning it just below the absolute top-tier compute cards but still far above the vast majority of GPUs.

The combined percentile of 88 reflects the CPU’s mid-high position and the GPU’s near-top position. The CPU’s 3DMark scores scale from 901 (single-thread) to 6628 (16-thread), showing a 7.4x scaling factor across thread counts, which is typical for an 8-core/16-thread design. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8587 is its primary gaming benchmark, while its Geekbench Vulkan score of 246941 and OpenCL score of 278621 indicate strong compute performance across different APIs.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process. It contains 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The chip integrates 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die, with a 65 W TDP. Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark data shows a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6628 is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 6617, indicating that the 8-core/16-thread configuration is fully utilized at this level. The 8-thread score of 5585 is 84% of the 16-thread score, suggesting efficient scaling from 8 to 16 threads. The 4-thread score of 3382 and 2-thread score of 1762 show linear scaling at lower thread counts, confirming the design’s efficiency.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R23 multi-core score of 20655 is strong for a 65 W part, while the single-core score of 2916 indicates competitive per-thread performance. The R20 multi-core score of 8675 and R15 multi-core score of 2082 follow expected scaling patterns. Geekbench scores of 9959 multi-core and 1907 single-core place the chip in the upper-mid range for desktop processors.

PassMark results provide workload-specific insights. The integer math score of 90091 and floating-point math score of 51427 show balanced ALU and FPU performance. Data compression at 316699 and random string sorting at 33138 indicate strong memory subsystem performance, consistent with the 51.2 GB/s dual-channel DDR4 bandwidth. The extended instructions score of 21945 and data encryption score of 20096 suggest capable AVX2 and AES-NI throughput. The find prime numbers score of 58 is low, reflecting the integer-heavy nature of that test relative to this architecture.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 4K resolution with ultra settings are the primary audience for this pairing. The GPU’s 98th percentile rank and 24 GB VRAM ensure that even the most demanding titles at 4K ultra will run with headroom, while the CPU’s 78th percentile position is sufficient for most game engines at this resolution, where GPU load dominates. At 1440p, the CPU becomes more relevant, but its single-thread scores remain adequate for high-refresh monitors.

Content creators working with large video files or complex 3D scenes will benefit from the GPU’s 24 GB GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth. The CPU’s 16 threads and 16 MB L3 cache support multitasking across editing, rendering, and encoding workflows. The combination of 456 tensor cores and 114 RT cores makes this system well-suited for AI-assisted creative tools and real-time ray tracing previews.

Software developers building and testing large codebases will find the CPU’s 16 threads and 65 W TDP appealing for sustained compile workloads. The GPU’s compute capabilities support CUDA-accelerated testing and machine learning model training, with 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 and 456 tensor cores providing substantial throughput for these tasks.

Students and small business workstations are a secondary fit. The CPU’s power efficiency and 65 W TDP make it a reasonable choice for all-day academic work, but the GPU’s 425 W TDP and triple-slot cooler make this an impractical build for typical student environments. Small businesses needing GPU acceleration for CAD or data analysis would benefit, but the GPU’s end-of-life production status suggests planning for future replacements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4, a platform that supports DDR4 memory across a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory support is present, which is valuable for workstation reliability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes, which is a limitation for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface—the GPU will run at PCIe Gen 3 speeds, reducing available bandwidth compared to a Gen 4 platform, though the practical impact on gaming FPS is minimal.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 800 W, which combined with the CPU’s 65 W TDP, leaves approximately 310 W of headroom for other components after accounting for the GPU’s 425 W TDP. This suggests that a 800 W power supply is adequate but leaves limited room for overclocking or additional high-power peripherals.

The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, though the 65 W TDP limits the practical headroom. A sensible next upgrade would be a CPU with more cores or newer architecture on the AM4 platform, such as a Ryzen 9 part, which would maintain socket compatibility. For the GPU, the end-of-life status and the successor generation (GeForce 50) indicate that future upgrades would require a new GPU, but the PCIe 4.0 interface remains current, so a newer card would be compatible with the existing slot.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25517 is within 0.3% of its nearest rivals, including the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (-0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (+0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (-0.1%), and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (+0.3%).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 88, reflecting the CPU’s 78th percentile and the GPU’s 98th percentile.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 800 W, which accommodates the GPU’s 425 W TDP and the CPU’s 65 W TDP with limited headroom.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is marked as end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data pack. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores and their percentiles, not from direct testing. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8587 and its 98th percentile rank indicate it is among the fastest GPUs available, while the CPU’s 78th percentile position suggests it will not be the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

At 4K ultra settings, the RTX 4090 D’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern AAA titles, and the GPU’s 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests frame rates well above 60 FPS in most games. The CPU’s single-thread score of 901 in 3DMark and 3296 in PassMark are adequate for 4K gaming, where the GPU renders the majority of frames. Estimated 4K ultra performance would be in the 80-120 FPS range for demanding titles, with lighter games exceeding 144 FPS.

At 1440p ultra, the CPU becomes more relevant as frame rates rise. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 5585 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2916 indicate it can handle high-refresh 1440p gaming, but the GPU’s dominance means frame rates will be limited by the CPU in CPU-bound titles. Estimated 1440p ultra performance ranges from 120-200 FPS depending on the game’s engine and CPU utilization.

At 1080p ultra, the CPU’s limitations become apparent. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1762 and single-thread score of 901 suggest that the CPU may bottleneck in esports titles or games with heavy physics simulations, potentially capping frame rates below the GPU’s potential. Estimated 1080p ultra performance varies widely, from 200+ FPS in well-optimized titles to 100-150 FPS in CPU-bound scenarios. These are estimates only; actual results will depend on specific game engines and driver optimizations.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D GPU. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 processor on the AM4 socket, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture part with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile of 88 places this system in the upper tier of benchmarked configurations, though the CPU’s 78th percentile is notably lower than the GPU’s 98th percentile, creating an asymmetric performance profile.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25517 and the GPU’s average benchmark score of 178050 indicate that the GPU contributes the vast majority of the system’s overall compute capability. The CPU is a solid mid-high-range part, competitive with its nearest rivals within 0.3%, while the GPU is near the top of all GPUs, trailing only a few workstation and data center cards by 2.2% to 4.9%.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance in this pairing. The GPU’s 98th percentile rank versus the CPU’s 78th percentile means that in GPU-bound workloads—such as 4K gaming, rendering, and compute-heavy tasks—the GPU will be the limiting factor for overall performance, but in CPU-bound workloads—such as 1080p gaming at high frame rates, physics simulations, and single-threaded applications—the CPU will bottleneck the system.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured for this exact pairing, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 3DMark scores scale from 901 single-thread to 6628 at 16 threads, indicating a 7.4x scaling factor. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8587 is a DX12 benchmark that stresses the GPU, and its 98th percentile rank suggests it can deliver frame rates far beyond what the CPU can support in CPU-bound scenarios.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts with resolution. At 4K, the GPU is almost certainly the limiting factor, as the CPU’s 78th percentile is sufficient to feed the GPU’s rendering pipeline. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes the constraint, potentially capping frame rates below what the GPU could otherwise deliver. For productivity workloads, the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s compute capabilities complement each other, with the CPU handling data preparation and the GPU handling parallel processing.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD102 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, with a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The GPU has 14592 shading units, 456 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units, delivering a pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,149.1 GTexel/s.

Memory consists of 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz, with an effective data rate of 21 Gbps. The GPU’s base clock is 2280 MHz with a boost clock of 2520 MHz. Compute performance is rated at 73.54 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), indicating a balanced design for gaming and compute workloads.

The GPU includes 114 RT cores and 456 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8587 demonstrates strong rasterization and DX12 performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 246941 and OpenCL score of 278621 show cross-API consistency. The GPU’s 98th percentile rank and average benchmark score of 178050 place it among the top 2% of all GPUs, though it trails the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 2.2%, the A100 SXM4 80 GB by 3.1%, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation by 3.6%, and the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 4.9%.

The GPU’s TDP is 425 W, requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector and an 800 W suggested PSU. Its triple-slot cooler and dimensions of 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 61 mm width require substantial case clearance. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which will run at Gen 3 speeds on this CPU’s platform. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, and its launch MSRP was 1,599 USD.