SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

25,517 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 pairing is a study in extremes, combining a 65-watt, 8-core Zen 3 processor with a 450-watt flagship graphics card. The benchmark data shows that while the RTX 4090 is the dominant force, the Ryzen 7 5700 holds its own as a capable mid-range CPU. This desktop build achieves a combined percentile of 83, placing it in the top tier of all systems, but its performance profile is heavily skewed toward GPU-bound scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, specifically the Cezanne codename. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform and is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process node, containing 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The chip runs with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps it efficient. Its cache hierarchy comprises 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache. This is a desktop-class part, released in April 2022 with a launch MSRP of $179.

In benchmark tests, the Ryzen 7 5700 demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance for its class. The data shows a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 and a single-core score of 2916. The Geekbench multicore score is 9959, with a single-core score of 1907. The PassMark multithread score of 24303, combined with a single-thread score of 3296, confirms that the CPU can handle demanding workloads. Specific sub-tests reveal its strengths: PassMark integer math scores 90091, floating-point math scores 51427, and extended instructions score 21945. Data compression and encryption workloads are also strong, with PassMark scores of 316699 and 20096, respectively.

The CPU holds a percentile ranking of 78 against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25517. Its nearest rivals are closely matched, with the Intel Xeon D-2752TER scoring 25530 (a -0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scoring 25485 (a 0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H scoring 25550 (a -0.1% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U scoring 25446 (a 0.3% delta). These tight deltas indicate the Ryzen 7 5700 is positioned at a performance equilibrium with these other processors, meaning the real-world differences in CPU-bound tasks will be negligible.

For real workloads, the 8-core/16-thread configuration, combined with the 16 MB L3 cache, makes this a solid processor for gaming and productivity. The single-thread performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1224 and 3DMark single-thread score of 901, is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking most modern games at standard refresh rates. The multi-thread scores suggest it can handle video encoding and compilation tasks, but the 65 W TDP and the architecture's age mean it is not a top-tier workstation part.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is a flagship graphics card based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and the AD102 chip. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with a massive 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. This is a triple-slot card, 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 61 mm wide, requiring a 16-pin power connector. The card's TDP is 450 W, and the suggested PSU is 850 W. It features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. The memory clock is 1313 MHz, translating to 21 Gbps effective.

The compute specifications are substantial: 16384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. Crucially, it includes 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores, designed for ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks. The card's clock speeds are a base of 2235 MHz and a boost of 2520 MHz. Its fill rates are 443.5 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,290.2 GTexel/s texture rate. The FP32 and FP16 performance are both rated at 82.58 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The card supports PCIe 4.0 x16 and has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. It is an end-of-life product, launched in September 2022 with a launch MSRP of $1,599 USD, succeeding the GeForce 30 series and preceding the GeForce 50 series.

Benchmark results show the GPU's raw power. It scores 9223 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 255416 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 271631 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 38194, and the PassMark GPU Compute score is 26613. The GPU holds a percentile ranking of 88 against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60347. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc Pro A60 (60326, 0% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60140, 0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61896, -2.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657, 2.9% delta). This places the RTX 4090 in a unique position, as its nearest competitors are professional workstation parts, not consumer gaming cards.

For rendering, the 24 GB of VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are decisive for 4K textures and complex scenes. The RT and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects and DLSS, making it a top-tier choice for 3D rendering and AI workloads. The data indicates the GPU is the primary driver of performance in this build.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data is clear: this build is a GPU-dominant system. The CPU's average benchmark score is 25517, placing it in the 78th percentile. The GPU's average score is 60347, placing it in the 88th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 83.

In terms of gaming performance, the measured FPS data across 53 games shows an average FPS of 208.7 across all titles, with a pair rank of 176 out of 3732 pairs. This places the build in the top 5% of all tested CPU-GPU combinations. The data reveals significant scaling with resolution. At 1920x1080, the build achieves high frame rates in many titles, such as 359 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 427 FPS in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege. At 2560x1440, these numbers drop to 238 FPS and 280 FPS, respectively. At 3840x2160, the frame rates are 133 FPS and 154 FPS.

More demanding titles show the CPU's limitations at lower resolutions. In Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate is 85 FPS at 1080p, 75.3 FPS at 1440p, and 50.5 FPS at 4K. Similarly, Red Dead Redemption 2 achieves 96 FPS at 1080p, 72 FPS at 1440p, and 48 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 1440p in these titles is smaller than the gap between 1440p and 4K, suggesting the GPU is heavily loaded at 4K. However, in CPU-bound esports titles like Valorant, the frame rate remains extremely high even at 4K, hitting 365.3 FPS. This indicates that the CPU can keep up with the GPU in lightly threaded workloads.

The CPU benchmarks show a mixed picture. The 3DMark 16-thread score is 6628, while the max-thread score is 6617, implying that the processor does not gain much from more than 16 threads, which is expected. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 is respectable, but the single-core score of 2916 is more modest. The PassMark single-thread score of 3296 is adequate for gaming.

The combination of a 78th percentile CPU and an 88th percentile GPU yields a system where the GPU is the limiting factor in most high-resolution scenarios, but the CPU can become the bottleneck in 1080p gaming with high refresh rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between the Ryzen 7 5700 and its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 has an average benchmark score of 25517. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Xeon D-2752TER scores 25530 (-0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485 (+0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25550 (-0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25446 (+0.3%). This means the CPU's performance is statistically equivalent to these other chips.

Q: How does the RTX 4090's benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4090 has an average benchmark score of 60347. It is nearly identical to the Intel Arc Pro A60 (60326, 0% delta) and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60140, 0.3% delta). It is slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657, 2.9% delta) and slightly behind the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61896, -2.5% delta).

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this build?

A: The build achieves an average FPS of 208.7 across all games in the dataset. This yields a pair rank of 176 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top percentile for overall gaming performance.

Q: Is this build more CPU-limited or GPU-limited at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the CPU is often the limiting factor. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate is 85 FPS, while in Red Dead Redemption 2, it is 96 FPS. The GPU has more headroom, but the CPU's single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 901, constrains the maximum frame rates.

Q: Can this build handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, it can handle 4K gaming, but not at ultra-high refresh rates in the most demanding titles. In Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate at 3840x2160 is 50.5 FPS, and in Red Dead Redemption 2, it is 48 FPS. Lighter titles perform better, such as Counter-Strike 2 at 133 FPS and Valorant at 365.3 FPS.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 450 W. This indicates the GPU is the dominant power consumer and requires a robust power supply, with a suggested PSU of 850 W.

Q: What memory and PCIe support does this build have?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, with ECC support. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this build is exceptional for esports and competitive shooters, with the data showing 359 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 427 FPS in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, and 413.5 FPS in Valorant. The CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient to drive high frame rates, though the GPU is not fully utilized in these scenarios.

Streaming: The combination of the 8-core, 16-thread CPU and the GPU's 512 tensor cores provides a strong foundation for streaming. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 24303 can handle encoding, while the dedicated tensor cores can offload AI-enhanced streaming features. The data shows solid performance in games like Fortnite (172 FPS at 1080p) and Call of Duty: Warzone (128.1 FPS at 1080p), leaving headroom for encoding.

Video Editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655, is capable for video editing. The GPU's 24 GB of VRAM and 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerate rendering and effects. The PassMark floating-point math score of 51427 suggests strong computational throughput for processing video frames.

3D Rendering: This is where the GPU dominates. The RTX 4090's 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores are built for ray-traced rendering and AI denoising. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9223 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 271631 indicate top-tier performance. The CPU's role is to feed the GPU, and its 8 cores are adequate, though not the fastest available.

Software Development: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a PassMark data compression score of 316699, are well-suited for compilation and code building. The task of running virtual machines or containers is supported by the 16 MB L3 cache. The system's overall balance is less critical here, as most development workloads are CPU-bound.

Student and Office Work: The 65 W TDP of the CPU makes this an efficient system for everyday tasks, though the GPU is overkill for this scenario. The CPU's single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 1907, is more than enough for office applications and web browsing. The data shows that the system is overprovisioned for this use case, but it would handle any office workload without issue.

Who Should Build It

This build targets a specific type of user: one who prioritizes GPU performance above all else. For gamers, this is a system for 1440p and 4K gaming, where the GPU's power is most evident. The data shows that at 2560x1440, the build achieves 112.6 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone and 149.2 FPS in Assetto Corsa, making it ideal for high-refresh 1440p monitors. At 3840x2160, it can still push 76.1 FPS in Control and 99.5 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, which is suitable for 4K gaming at high settings.

Content creators, particularly 3D artists and video editors, will find the RTX 4090's 24 GB VRAM and tensor cores transformative for rendering and AI workloads. The CPU is sufficient for the task, but the GPU is the primary selling point.

Software developers who work with large codebases or run simulations will benefit from the 8-core CPU, but the GPU is not a significant factor for their work. The same applies to students and small business workstations, where the CPU's efficiency is a plus, but the GPU is a waste of resources for most office tasks.

This is not a balanced build for budget-conscious users. It is a system for those who want the absolute best GPU performance and are willing to pair it with a competent, but not top-tier, CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a clear bottleneck structure. At 1920x1080, the CPU is the limiting factor in many games. The frame rate difference between 1080p and 1440p in CPU-bound titles is smaller than the difference between 1440p and 4K. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate drops from 85 FPS at 1080p to 75.3 FPS at 1440p (an 11.4% drop), but then to 50.5 FPS at 4K (a 32.9% drop from 1440p). This indicates that the GPU is not fully saturated at 1080p, and the CPU's performance is the limiting factor.

In contrast, at 3840x2160, the GPU is almost always the bottleneck. In games like Red Dead Redemption 2, the frame rate is 48 FPS at 4K, which is a significant drop from 72 FPS at 1440p. The GPU's raw power is being fully utilized. The GPU's percentile ranking of 88 versus the CPU's 78 confirms that the GPU is the stronger component. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 901 and PassMark single-thread score of 3296 suggest that it can hold up in most games, but it is not a high-end part.

In terms of FPS scaling, the data shows that esports titles like Valorant and Counter-Strike 2 scale well with resolution. Valorant goes from 413.5 FPS at 1080p to 365.3 FPS at 4K, indicating that the CPU is not the bottleneck. However, in demanding titles like Ark: Survival Ascended, the frame rate is 52 FPS at 1080p and 17 FPS at 4K, showing that the GPU is the primary limiter. The system is balanced in the sense that the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at 4K, but the CPU will hold back the GPU's potential at 1080p.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM4, which supports the Ryzen 7 5700. This is a mature socket, and the CPU's memory support is for DDR4 with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The motherboard must provide a PCIe 4.0 slot for the GPU to operate at full bandwidth, but the CPU's PCIe Gen 3 lanes are a limitation for other devices.

The power supply is a critical consideration. The GPU has a TDP of 450 W and the CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 850 W. This gives headroom for the system, but a larger PSU would be needed for future upgrades. The GPU requires a 16-pin power connector, which is a specific requirement.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU is the most likely candidate. The Ryzen 7 5700 is a mid-range part, and upgrading to a higher-core-count CPU on the same AM4 socket would improve CPU-bound performance. However, the data shows that the CPU is not a major bottleneck at 4K, so the benefit would be most noticeable at 1080p. The memory support is for DDR4, which is the last generation, so any future platform upgrade would require a new motherboard and memory. The GPU is end-of-life, and its successor is the GeForce 50 series, but there is no data on that in this pack.

The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus for the GPU is not fully utilized by the CPU's Gen 3 lanes, but the bandwidth is sufficient for the RTX 4090. The upgrade path is limited by the AM4 socket, which is at the end of its life. A future upgrade would involve moving to a new platform, likely with DDR5 memory and PCIe 5.0.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPU. It is a pairing of a mid-range, power-efficient processor with a top-tier, power-hungry graphics card. The combined percentile for the build is 83, placing it in the top tier of all systems. The CPU's percentile is 78, and the GPU's percentile is 88, indicating a significant performance gap between the two components.

The data shows that this is a GPU-first system. The RTX 4090 is the star of the show, driving performance in gaming and rendering. The Ryzen 7 5700 is a competent supporting actor, providing adequate CPU performance without being the primary source of performance. The build's overall tier is high, ranking 176th out of 3732 pairs in terms of average FPS across games. This makes it a powerful, but unbalanced, system that is best suited for users who prioritize graphics performance above all else.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Roblox

Minecraft: Java Edition

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds