SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

25,517 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 pairing represents a desktop build that combines a power-efficient Zen 3 processor with a top-tier Ada Lovelace graphics card, resulting in a combined percentile ranking of 82 across all hardware configurations. This combination targets users who prioritize high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, though the CPU's 78th percentile standing relative to all CPUs suggests it serves as the more modest partner in this duo. The benchmark data indicates a system that excels in GPU-bound scenarios while maintaining respectable, though not class-leading, CPU performance for everyday tasks and multithreaded applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's core and thread configuration?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 features 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with a Cezanne codename, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC.

Q: How does the GPU's memory bandwidth compare to typical 1440p gaming needs?

A: The RTX 4080 offers 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for high-resolution textures and 4K gaming scenarios.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance score?

A: In Geekbench single-core testing, the Ryzen 7 5700 scores 1907 points, and its Cinebench R23 single-core result is 2916 points, indicating strong per-core efficiency for its class.

Q: Does the RTX 4080 support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 76 RT cores for ray tracing and 304 Tensor cores for AI-accelerated tasks, such as DLSS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The build sits at the 82nd percentile compared to all other pairings, with an average FPS of 189.2 across the measured game suite.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the system?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 has a TDP of 65 watts, while the RTX 4080 has a TDP of 320 watts, with a suggested power supply of 700 watts for the entire system.

Q: What socket and memory type does the CPU require?

A: The processor uses the AMD Socket AM4 and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with ECC capability.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD103 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It houses 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units, which translate to a texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s. The GPU's compute capabilities are highlighted by its FP32 performance of 48.74 TFLOPS, which is identical to its FP16 output due to a 1:1 ratio, making it highly versatile for both gaming and compute workloads.

Memory configuration is a critical strength: 16 GB of GDDR6X operates across a 256-bit interface to produce 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. This is ample for 4K texture streaming and complex scenes, as evidenced by the measured FPS figures at 3840x2160 resolution. The card also features 76 RT cores and 304 Tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, respectively. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 6567 points, and its Passmark G3D score is 34457, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs.

The benchmark results show the RTX 4080 trailing the RTX 4080 SUPER by a tiny 0.1% in average score, while leading the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X by 1.1%. This indicates the card is almost identical in performance to its immediate successor variant, making it a very mature and well-optimized design. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 214739 and Vulkan score of 263779 further underscore its compute prowess, which is relevant for rendering tasks where the 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 power can be fully utilized. The 320 W TDP and triple-slot cooler design suggest it is a power-hungry component that demands ample case airflow and a robust power supply.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25517, placing it at the 78th percentile of all CPUs, which is respectable but not exceptional. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon D-2752TER with a score of 25530 (0.1% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U at 25485 (0.1% lower), indicating the Ryzen 7 5700 sits in a tightly contested mid-range segment. In multithreaded tests, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 score of 20655 and a Passmark multithread score of 24303, while single-thread performance is represented by a Passmark single-thread score of 3296.

The GPU, on the other hand, is a clear high-end performer with an average score of 54247, ranking at the 86th percentile. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, scores 54209, a mere 0.1% difference, confirming the RTX 4080 is essentially equivalent in raw compute. The combined build percentile is 82, and the pair ranks 404th out of 3732 possible pairs by FPS, with an average of 189.2 FPS across all measured games.

The data paints a picture of a system where the GPU is the dominant force. While the CPU holds its own with a 78th percentile score, the GPU's 86th percentile ranking means that in most gaming scenarios, the graphics card will be the primary determinant of frame rates. The 3DMark 16-thread CPU score of 6628 and single-thread score of 901 show a balanced processor, but the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 34457 dwarfs the CPU's contributions in graphics-intensive tasks.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the system is exceptional, with titles like Counter-Strike 2 hitting 325 FPS and Valorant reaching 413 FPS at that resolution. These numbers indicate that the CPU can feed the GPU effectively for esports, though the RTX 4080 is overkill for such low resolutions, as shown by the 717 FPS in CS:GO.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the GPU's NVENC capabilities and Tensor cores, though the data shows the CPU can handle encoding tasks with its 16 threads, scoring 20096 in Passmark data encryption. Video editing software that leverages GPU acceleration will see significant gains from the 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance, with the 16 GB VRAM allowing for large timelines and 4K previews.

3D rendering workloads are where this pairing shines, as the GPU's 76 RT cores and 304 Tensor cores accelerate ray-traced renders and AI denoising. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 indicates the CPU can handle scene preparation, while the GPU handles the heavy lifting, though users may find the CPU a bottleneck in CPU-bound simulation tasks.

Software development tasks like compiling code will see moderate performance, with the Passmark integer math score of 90091 suggesting solid throughput for build processes. The 8 cores and 16 threads are adequate for parallel compilation, but not exceptional compared to higher-core-count rivals.

For student and office work, this system is massively overpowered, but the 65 W CPU TDP means it remains efficient for everyday tasks. The single-thread score of 3296 in Passmark ensures snappy application loading, and the 16 GB VRAM is irrelevant for such workloads, making this a luxury choice for productivity.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is a Zen 3 architecture processor with the Cezanne codename, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, built on a 7 nm process with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a total of 16 MB of L3 cache, which is standard for the generation.

Memory support is limited to DDR4 with dual-channel operation, providing a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. This is a potential limitation for memory-intensive workloads, though the 65 W TDP is a significant advantage for power efficiency. The CPU supports ECC memory, making it suitable for entry-level workstations, and it connects via PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

In benchmarks, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 is 0.1% lower than the Intel Xeon D-2752TER, but 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U. The Geekbench multicore score of 9959 and single-core of 1907 demonstrate balanced performance. The Passmark physics score of 984 and prime number score of 58 are modest, indicating that the CPU is not optimized for extreme computational physics, but its floating-point math score of 51427 shows competence in general math operations.

The CPU's 78th percentile ranking means it outperforms 78% of all CPUs, but it is not a high-end part. Its nearest rivals are a mix of server and mobile chips, suggesting it competes well across form factors. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the 65 W TDP limits headroom without additional cooling. For gaming, the single-thread score of 3296 in Passmark is sufficient for most titles, but the 16 MB L3 cache is smaller than some rivals, which could impact performance in cache-sensitive games.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings reveals a system that is remarkably consistent across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across the game suite is 189.2, with esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaching 717 FPS and Valorant hitting 413 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 84 FPS, while Ark: Survival Ascended is the most taxing at 47 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the system maintains high frame rates, with Counter-Strike 2 at 215 FPS and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 253 FPS. AAA games like Red Dead Redemption 2 drop to 65 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 71 FPS, indicating a strong 1440p experience. The most demanding title, Ark: Survival Ascended, falls to 30 FPS, showing that even this GPU struggles with unoptimized games.

At 3840x2160, the system is still capable, with Valorant achieving 364 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 120 FPS. However, AAA titles show the strain: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 47 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 16 FPS. The data indicates that 4K gaming is viable for less demanding titles, but users may need to adjust settings for the most graphically intensive games.

The FPS scaling between 1080p and 4K shows the GPU's bandwidth and compute limits. For example, Fortnite drops from 156 FPS at 1080p to 52 FPS at 4K, a 67% reduction, highlighting the increased load on the 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth. The CPU's role is evident in 1080p where high FPS titles like CS:GO (717 FPS) show the processor can keep up with the GPU, while at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who demand high frame rates at 1440p or are willing to compromise at 4K. The data shows 1440p is the sweet spot, with most titles running above 60 FPS, including demanding ones like Control at 102 FPS and Cyberpunk 2077 at 71 FPS. Gamers with 240Hz 1440p monitors will find this system capable of hitting those refresh rates in esports titles, as evidenced by the 253 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege.

Content creators and 3D artists will benefit from the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which accelerates rendering and video encoding. The 76 RT cores enable real-time ray tracing previews, and the Tensor cores speed up AI-based workflows. The CPU's 16 threads handle non-GPU tasks like asset compilation, though its 78th percentile ranking means it is not a bottleneck for most creative software.

Software developers will find this system capable for compilation and testing, with the Passmark integer math score of 90091 indicating solid performance. The 65 W TDP and 16 threads provide a balance of efficiency and parallelism. Students and office workers are over-served by this hardware, but the system's power efficiency at idle and moderate load makes it a future-proof investment for heavy multitasking.

Small business workstations requiring GPU compute for simulations or data analysis will appreciate the ECC memory support and the GPU's compute capabilities. The 16 GB VRAM allows for large datasets in GPU-accelerated applications, and the 700 W PSU requirement is manageable for a professional environment.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, representing a significant investment in GPU performance. The CPU is a 65 W part from the 5000 series, based on Zen 3, while the GPU is a 320 W behemoth from the GeForce 40-series. The combined percentile of 82 places this system in the top 18% of all builds, with an average FPS of 189.2 across the measured games.

The pairing is inherently unbalanced in favor of the GPU, which sits at the 86th percentile, while the CPU is at the 78th percentile. This suggests the system is designed for GPU-intensive workloads rather than CPU-bound tasks. The build's overall tier is high-end, with the GPU being the primary driver of performance, while the CPU provides adequate support without being a bottleneck in most scenarios.

The data from the 3DMark Steel Nomad test (6567 points) and the Passmark G3D test (34457 points) confirms the GPU's high-end status. The CPU's best performance comes in multithreaded tasks like Cinebench R23 (20655 points), but it is not a top-tier processor. This build is best described as a "GPU-first" system, where the graphics card is the star and the CPU is a competent, energy-efficient companion.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear bottleneck pattern: the GPU is the limiting factor at 1080p in esports titles, while the CPU becomes less relevant at higher resolutions. In games like Counter-Strike 2, the FPS drops from 325 at 1080p to 120 at 4K, showing the GPU's rendering limits. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulations (Passmark physics score of 984), the CPU's modest performance could hinder overall system responsiveness.

The CPU's 78th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 86th percentile suggests that in mixed workloads, the CPU will often be the component that reaches its limits first. For example, in games with heavy AI or simulation logic, the 8 cores might struggle to maintain high FPS, even if the GPU has headroom. The 16 MB L3 cache is smaller than some competitors, which could impact gaming performance in cache-heavy titles.

However, the measured FPS data shows that in practice, the GPU is the primary bottleneck for most games at 1440p and 4K. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 30-40% lower, and from 1440p to 4K another 40-50% lower, indicating the GPU's compute and bandwidth limits are the main constraints. The CPU can deliver high FPS in esports titles (e.g., 413 FPS in Valorant at 1080p), but the GPU's performance is what determines the experience in AAA games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature platform that supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel operation and ECC capability. The memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s, which is a limiting factor for memory-intensive workloads, but the 20 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU are sufficient for most expansion cards. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 3 slots, though it may limit bandwidth in some scenarios.

The system requires a 700 W power supply based on the GPU's 320 W TDP and CPU's 65 W TDP, leaving headroom for future upgrades. The GPU is already end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, so the next sensible upgrade would be a newer GPU generation, though the current RTX 4080 is only 0.1% slower than the RTX 4080 SUPER, indicating it has plenty of life left.

For CPU upgrades, the AM4 platform supports newer Ryzen 5000 series parts, but the 5700's 65 W TDP and 78th percentile ranking suggest that upgrading to a higher-core-count CPU like a Ryzen 9 would improve multithreaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655. However, the platform's DDR4 memory support is a dead-end compared to newer DDR5 platforms, so a full platform upgrade would be required for significant CPU improvements. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is ample for current games, but future titles may require more, making a GPU upgrade the more likely next step.