SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

25,517 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

44,795 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The chip is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process node, containing 10,700 million transistors within a 180 mm² die. The 65 W TDP is notably modest for an 8-core part, making it a power-efficient option for desktop builds. It supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. The processor provides PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache. This arrangement is typical for Zen 3, with the unified L3 pool benefiting multi-threaded workloads. The CPU's 3DMark scores show a clear scaling pattern: 1,762 in the 2-thread test, 3,382 in 4-thread, 5,585 in 8-thread, and 6,628 in 16-thread. The near-saturation between 8-thread (5,585) and max-thread (6,617) scores indicates that the processor extracts most of its performance from eight physical cores, with simultaneous multithreading adding roughly 18% more throughput.

In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 20,655 in multi-core and 2,916 in single-core. These numbers position it as a strong mainstream desktop chip. The multi-core result reflects the 8-core/16-thread configuration, while the single-core score demonstrates the Zen 3 architecture's efficiency at moderate clock speeds. Geekbench results show 9,959 multi-core and 1,907 single-core, corroborating the Cinebench picture.

The CPU sits at the 78th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25,517. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Xeon D-2752TER scores 25,530 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25,485 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25,550 (0.1% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25,446 (0.3% behind). This means the Ryzen 7 5700 is functionally tied with these competing parts, all within a 0.4% performance band. The practical takeaway is that this CPU delivers performance comparable to a range of mid-range mobile and desktop parts, with the 8-core/16-thread configuration giving it an edge in heavily threaded productivity tasks.

PassMark results reinforce the multi-threaded strength: a multithread score of 24,303, integer math at 90,091, floating-point math at 51,427, and extended instructions at 21,945. Data compression scores 316,699, which is exceptionally high and indicates strong performance in archiving and compression workloads. Data encryption at 20,096 further shows capability in security-related tasks. The single-thread PassMark score of 3,296 is competitive but not class-leading.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has a launch MSRP of $179.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 scores 25,517 on average, which is 0.3% higher than the Ryzen 7 5825U's 25,446.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as true for this processor.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 falls at the 78th percentile against all CPUs.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 4.60 GHz, while the base clock is 3.70 GHz.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system percentile is 81, placing this pairing in the upper quintile of all desktop configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score of 25,517 sits at the 78th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 44,795 reaches the 84th percentile. This asymmetry suggests the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,628 and max-thread score of 6,617 show that the processor is well-utilized across all available threads. The single-thread score of 901 is comparatively lower, which may constrain performance in lightly threaded applications. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 20,655 and single-core of 2,916 provide a balanced picture: strong multi-core capability with adequate single-core performance.

The GPU delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,024. In Geekbench compute tests, it scores 176,953 in OpenCL and 213,808 in Vulkan. PassMark G3D score is 31,624, with GPU compute at 18,396. The graphics card's average benchmark score of 44,795 places it at the 84th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45,152, 0.8% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45,384, 1.3% ahead), NVIDIA RTX A6000 (44,075, 1.6% behind), and Intel Arc A730M (45,592, 1.7% ahead). The GPU is effectively trading blows with high-end mobile parts and professional workstation cards.

The measured FPS data across 53 games shows an average of 177.5 FPS, ranking this pair 621st out of 3,732 pairs. This is a strong position, indicating that the combination delivers high frame rates across a broad game library. The data is measured, not estimated, which adds confidence to the performance picture.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the pair achieves 298.6 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 354 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, and 412.5 FPS in Valorant. These numbers comfortably exceed 240 Hz refresh rates in esports titles. At 1440p, Counter-Strike 2 still hits 198.1 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege manages 232 FPS, making high-refresh 1440p viable for competitive shooters.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The multi-thread score of 24,303 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 20,655 indicate the processor can handle simultaneous game and encode workloads. The GPU's NVENC (inferred from tensor cores) supports hardware encoding, offloading the CPU.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,655 and PassMark floating-point math of 51,427 suggest capable video rendering. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and timeline scrubbing. In practice, 4K exports will be reasonably quick, though not at the level of higher-core-count workstation parts.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 60 RT cores make it well-suited for real-time 3D work and ray-traced renders. The CPU's 8 cores provide solid CPU-based rendering, with the 16 threads helping in multi-threaded render engines.

Software Development: The 16 threads handle compilation tasks well, as evidenced by the 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,628. The data compression score of 316,699 speeds up build artifact handling. The 65 W TDP keeps power costs low during long compile sessions.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 3,296 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,916 handle daily office tasks with ease. The 78th percentile CPU ranking ensures responsiveness in spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing. This is overkill for basic office work, but the headroom means it will not feel slow for years.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who want high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p without compromising on ultra settings. The measured 126.8 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone at 1080p and 112.6 FPS at 1440p demonstrate strong performance in modern shooters. For 4K gaming, the pair still achieves playable frame rates in many titles, such as 97.5 FPS in Warzone and 74 FPS in Assetto Corsa, but more demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 46 FPS at 4K.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the combined CPU multi-threading and GPU compute power. The CPU's 16 threads handle Premiere Pro and After Effects workflows, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM accommodates 4K timelines and complex effects. The 84th percentile GPU ranking indicates this is a high-tier graphics solution for creative work.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 threads and the 20,655 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The data compression score of 316,699 speeds up package management and build caching. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet under sustained load, which is beneficial in office environments.

Students and small business users who want a system that handles both productivity and gaming will find this a balanced choice. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking, while the GPU's high FPS in esports and AAA titles covers entertainment needs. The system is over-specified for basic tasks, but that longevity is a feature.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) reveals a strong 1080p performer. Esports titles excel: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 659.6 FPS, Valorant reaches 412.5 FPS, and Roblox achieves 384.8 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 354 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 manages 298.6 FPS. These scores push well beyond 240 Hz displays.

At 1440p, performance remains high: Valorant manages 392.7 FPS, Rainbow Six Siege 232 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 198.1 FPS. Heavier titles like Call of Duty: Warzone run at 112.6 FPS, Control at 95.4 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 at 63.7 FPS. These numbers support high-refresh 1440p gaming on high settings.

At 4K, the pair becomes more resolution-bound. Warzone still delivers 97.5 FPS, Overpower runs at 91 FPS, and Assetto Corsa achieves 74 FPS. Demanding games drop below 60 FPS: Cyberpunk 2077 at 46 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 12.5 FPS. For 4K gaming, users should expect to lower settings or use upscaling in the most demanding titles.

The average FPS across all measured games is 177.5, with a pair rank of 621 out of 3,732. This puts the system in the top 17% of tested pairs, indicating consistently high frame rates across a wide variety of game types.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are reasonably balanced, but the data suggests the GPU is the stronger component. The CPU's 78th percentile versus the GPU's 84th percentile means the graphics card is more capable relative to its peers. In practice, this means the CPU may limit the GPU in certain scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions where frame rates are highest.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more relevant. The 3DMark single-thread score of 901 and PassMark single-thread of 3,296 indicate the CPU can drive high frame rates, but esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 at 298.6 FPS and Valorant at 412.5 FPS may approach CPU limits. The 2-thread 3DMark score of 1,762 suggests moderate dual-thread performance, which affects games optimized for fewer threads.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows the expected drop-offs: Counter-Strike 2 drops from 298.6 to 198.1 to 107.5 FPS, while Warzone drops from 126.8 to 112.6 to 97.5 FPS. The Warzone scaling is notably shallow, suggesting the CPU is the bottleneck even at 4K for that title. Conversely, Ark: Survival Ascended drops from 43.3 to 27.9 to 12.5 FPS, showing severe GPU limitation at higher resolutions.

The data indicates that in most titles, the GPU is the primary performance driver at 1440p and above. At 1080p, the CPU can become a limiting factor in high-FPS esports scenarios, but the overall balance is good for a desktop gaming system.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The CPU is a mainstream 8-core/16-thread Zen 3 part on the AM4 platform, while the GPU is a high-end Ada Lovelace graphics card. The combined percentile of 81 places this system in the upper quintile of all configurations.

The CPU's 78th percentile and GPU's 84th percentile indicate a slightly GPU-heavy system. This is a sensible pairing for gaming, where the GPU typically matters more. The CPU provides solid multi-threaded performance for productivity, while the GPU delivers high frame rates in games. The 65 W CPU TDP and 285 W GPU TDP suggest a total system power draw that requires a 600 W power supply as suggested.

This pairing is best described as a high-performance desktop for gaming and content creation. The 8-core CPU handles modern workloads competently, while the 12 GB GPU provides ample graphics power for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K gaming. The system is well-suited for users who want a single machine for both work and play.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is based on the AD104 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It has 7,680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. The GPU includes 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads.

Memory consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1,313 MHz, with 21 Gbps effective data rate. The base clock is 2,310 MHz with a boost clock of 2,610 MHz. The GPU achieves a pixel rate of 208.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 626.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 40.09 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The GPU's benchmark scores show strong compute capability. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 176,953 and Vulkan score of 213,808 demonstrate excellent compute throughput. PassMark G3D score of 31,624 is high, while GPU compute at 18,396 indicates solid non-graphics performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,024 reflects good DirectX 12 gaming performance.

At the 84th percentile against all GPUs, the RTX 4070 Ti outperforms the average graphics card by a significant margin. Its nearest rivals include the RTX 5090 Mobile (0.8% ahead), Radeon Pro 5500 XT (1.3% ahead), RTX A6000 (1.6% behind), and Arc A730M (1.7% ahead). The GPU trades blows with these parts, though the RTX 4070 Ti's desktop power envelope likely means better sustained performance than the mobile parts.

For rendering workloads, the 60 RT cores accelerate ray-traced effects, while the 240 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-driven features. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1440p gaming with high-resolution textures and for moderate 4K content creation. The 504.2 GB/s bandwidth supports high-throughput compute tasks. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, with a predecessor in the GeForce 30 series and successor in the GeForce 50 series, but its performance remains competitive at the 84th percentile.