SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

25,517 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs AMD’s 8-core Ryzen 7 5700 with NVIDIA’s high-end RTX 3080 Ti, creating a desktop configuration that ranks in the 81st percentile overall among all benchmarked pairs. The data shows a system that excels at high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, while still delivering playable 4K performance in most titles. The CPU is a solid mid-range performer, but the GPU is the dominant component, driving the vast majority of the system’s capabilities. This analysis will break down the strengths, bottlenecks, and ideal use cases for this specific pairing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the clear powerhouse of this configuration, built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip. It features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering a substantial memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s. This high bandwidth is crucial for feeding the 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units at high resolutions. The card’s base clock is 1365 MHz, boosting up to 1665 MHz, which allows it to reach a pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 532.8 GTexel/s. For compute-heavy tasks, the GPU delivers 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 matching at 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1).

The RTX 3080 Ti is equipped with dedicated hardware for modern rendering techniques, including 80 RT cores and 320 Tensor cores. This hardware is essential for real-time ray tracing and DLSS, though the benchmark data provided focuses on traditional rasterization. In the Passmark G3D test, the GPU scores 26,896, which is a strong result. Looking at the nearest rivals, the data shows the RTX 3080 Ti’s average benchmark score of 41,187 is 2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40,377), 0.8% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40,870), and 1.2% lower than the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (41,707). This places the GPU in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, confirming that while it is not the absolute fastest card available, it is a top-tier performer that outpaces many recent and professional offerings. For rendering, the combination of high VRAM and massive bandwidth means it can handle large textures and complex scenes at 4K, though the 12 GB capacity may be a limiting factor in the most extreme cases.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature and widely supported socket. The Ryzen 7 5700 is a Zen 3 (Cezanne) architecture processor, and it supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a plus for workstation use. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes, while the RTX 3080 Ti utilizes a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU is technically limited to Gen 3 bandwidth by the CPU’s lanes, though in practice this has a minimal impact on gaming performance. The system’s power requirements are notable: the CPU has a 65W TDP, but the GPU’s TDP is 350W. NVIDIA suggests a 750W PSU for this graphics card, which leaves reasonable headroom for the rest of the system components.

The upgrade path here is interesting. The AM4 socket is at the end of its life for new high-end CPUs, but the Ryzen 7 5700 itself is a recent release (April 2022) and remains an active production part. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the RTX 3080 Ti is listed as end-of-life, with its successor being the GeForce 40 series. The platform’s DDR4 memory support means that upgrading the CPU later would also require a new motherboard and memory if moving to a newer socket. However, for the current configuration, the data suggests that the GPU is the primary performance driver, and any CPU upgrade within the AM4 socket would likely yield diminishing returns for gaming. The 750W suggested PSU provides enough headroom for the 350W GPU and 65W CPU, but a future GPU upgrade with a higher TDP would necessitate a PSU upgrade as well.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, built on TSMC’s 7nm process. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It features a total of 16 MB of L3 cache, with 512 KB of L2 and 64 KB of L1 per core. The CPU’s TDP is a modest 65W, making it an efficient part on this platform. In the Cinebench R23 benchmark, it scores 20,655 points in multi-core and 2,916 points in single-core. This indicates a strong multi-threaded capability that is useful for productivity tasks. The Geekbench scores are 9,959 multi-core and 1,907 single-core.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25,517, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within a 0.3% performance delta, showing that the Ryzen 7 5700 is in a highly competitive performance tier. Specifically, it is 0.1% faster than the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25,530) and the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (25,550), and 0.1% slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (25,485). It is 0.3% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (25,446). For real workloads, the 8-core/16-thread configuration is well-suited for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Passmark multi-thread score of 24,303 supports this, while the single-thread score of 3,296 indicates solid performance for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The data suggests this is a well-balanced CPU for a high-end gaming build, as it provides enough multi-core grunt to keep up with the RTX 3080 Ti without becoming a primary bottleneck in most games.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data for this build is measured, not estimated, and the pair ranks 936th out of 3,732 pairs by average FPS, with an average of 160.9 FPS across all tested games. This is a strong result, indicating that this system is capable of very high frame rates. At 1920x1080, the system dominates in esports titles. For example, it achieves 559.9 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, 413 FPS in Valorant, and 300 FPS in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege. It also handles demanding titles well, with 128 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 116.2 FPS in Grand Theft Auto V, and 73.6 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very high for competitive games, with 393.4 FPS in Valorant and 197 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege. The system still delivers excellent performance in AAA titles, with 114 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 77.3 FPS in Grand Theft Auto V, and 56.9 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its limits but still provides playable frame rates in many games. Valorant leads with 363.9 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege hits 105.9 FPS. However, more demanding titles drop below 60 FPS, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 36.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 33.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 10 FPS. The data clearly shows that this is a 1080p and 1440p gaming machine first, with 4K capabilities reserved for lighter titles or those with less demanding graphics.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance of this system is heavily skewed towards the GPU, which is the primary driver of gaming performance. The GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking is higher than the CPU’s 78th percentile, and its average benchmark score of 41,187 is significantly higher than the CPU’s 25,517. In gaming, the GPU is usually the limiting factor at higher resolutions. This is evident from the FPS scaling between 1080p and 1440p. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate drops from 73.6 FPS at 1080p to 56.9 FPS at 1440p, a 23% reduction. This is a typical GPU-bound scaling pattern, where the workload increases with resolution and the GPU’s performance ceiling is reached.

However, the CPU is not entirely without its own limits. In esports titles at 1080p, the high frame rates (e.g., 559.9 FPS in CS:GO) suggest that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU these frames. But as the resolution increases, the FPS drops, confirming that the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The CPU is a solid performer, but it is not in the top tier like the GPU. For example, the CPU’s single-thread score of 901 in 3DMark is respectable but not class-leading. In workloads that are highly multi-threaded and not GPU-accelerated, such as software compilation, the CPU will be the limiting factor. But for gaming, the evidence points to the GPU being the dominant component, with the CPU providing adequate support without being a major constraint at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: This is the primary use case for this build. The measured data shows an average of 160.9 FPS across all games, with esports titles like Valorant hitting 413 FPS at 1080p and Counter-Strike 2 achieving 250.5 FPS. For competitive gamers with 144Hz or 240Hz monitors, this system is more than capable at 1080p and 1440p, delivering the high frame rates needed for a smooth, responsive experience.

Streaming: The combination of the 8-core CPU and the RTX 3080 Ti’s NVENC encoder (implied by the Tensor cores) makes this a capable streaming rig. The CPU has enough multi-threaded headroom, as shown by its Cinebench R23 score of 20,655, to handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without major performance hits in games like Call of Duty: Warzone, which runs at 128 FPS at 1080p.

Video Editing: The system is well-suited for video editing. The GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 12 GB of VRAM can accelerate effects and rendering in applications like Adobe Premiere Pro. The CPU’s multi-core score of 20,655 in Cinebench R23 also provides solid performance for timeline scrubbing and export tasks. The high memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s helps with handling high-resolution footage.

3D Rendering: For 3D applications, the GPU is a formidable renderer. Its Passmark GPU Compute score of 15,282 and 34.10 TFLOPS of compute performance are strong indicators for GPU-accelerated render engines. The CPU can also contribute with its 8 cores, as shown by the 20,655 multi-core Cinebench score, but the GPU will be the primary workhorse for final frame renders.

Software Development: This is a viable workstation for developers. The 8-core/16-thread CPU is efficient for compiling code, as evidenced by its Passmark Integer Math score of 90,091. The fast storage and high memory bandwidth will make large projects more manageable, and the system’s overall responsiveness is supported by its 81st combined percentile ranking.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overkill for standard office tasks, but it will handle them with ease. The CPU’s single-thread performance, scored at 3,296 in Passmark, ensures snappy application loading and responsiveness for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets. The system is more than sufficient for any academic workload, though the GPU’s power draw of 350W makes it an inefficient choice for simple tasks.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is tailored for gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The measured FPS data shows that it excels in competitive titles like Valorant (413 FPS at 1080p) and Rainbow Six Siege (300 FPS at 1080p), making it ideal for esports enthusiasts. It is also a strong choice for gamers who want to play AAA titles at high settings with excellent performance, such as Call of Duty: Warzone at 128 FPS and Cyberpunk 2077 at 73.6 FPS at 1080p. The system is less suited for 4K gaming on the most demanding titles, as the data shows sub-60 FPS performance in games like Cyberpunk 2077 (36.1 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (33.7 FPS) at 4K.

For content creators, this build is a powerful tool. Video editors and 3D artists will benefit from the GPU’s compute capabilities and 12 GB of VRAM. Software developers working on multi-threaded applications will find the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads useful for compilation. The system is also suitable for small business workstations that require high-performance computing for tasks like CAD or data analysis, given the CPU’s strong multi-core scores and ECC memory support. However, due to the high power requirements of the GPU (350W TDP), it is not an ideal choice for a low-power office environment. The target user is someone who values raw performance for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads over energy efficiency or platform longevity.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the average benchmark score for this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 25,517, while the GPU has an average score of 41,187. The combined system ranks in the 81st percentile of all benchmarked pairs.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 Ti compare to the GeForce RTX 5070 in this database?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti’s average benchmark score of 41,187 is 2% higher than the RTX 5070’s score of 40,377, as indicated by a deltaPct of 2 for the RTX 5070 as a rival.

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of the RTX 3080 Ti?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s, achieved with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus.

Q: What is the boost clock of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz and a base clock of 3.70 GHz.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU wattage for the RTX 3080 Ti is 750 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65W, and the GPU has a TDP of 350W.

Q: What are the measured FPS results for Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p?

A: The measured FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 at 2560x1440 resolution with ultra settings is 56.9 FPS.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 CPU has support for ECC memory.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The benchmark data provides a clear picture of a system where the GPU outshines the CPU. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 scores 20,655 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2,916 in single-core, with an average benchmark score of 25,517. This places it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within a 0.3% delta, indicating it is a solid, mid-to-high-tier processor. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, on the other hand, achieves a Passmark G3D score of 26,896 and an average benchmark score of 41,187, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. It is 2% faster than the RTX 5070 and 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300, confirming its position as a high-end graphics card.

The combined picture shows a system that is greater than the sum of its parts in gaming. The pair’s average FPS across all tested games is 160.9, ranking it 936th out of 3,732 pairs. This high average is driven by the GPU’s dominance, as the CPU is sufficient to avoid being a major bottleneck at lower resolutions. The CPU’s performance is adequate, but it is the RTX 3080 Ti that delivers the exceptional frame rates seen in the data. The system is a top-tier performer for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K performance that is playable in many titles but not for the most demanding ones. This pairing represents a high-performance gaming rig where the GPU is the star, and the CPU is a capable supporting actor.