SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

29,713 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 represents a desktop configuration built for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the CPU providing top-tier single-thread performance while the GPU delivers substantial rasterization power. The combination sits at the 75th percentile among all tested CPU-GPU pairings, indicating a well-above-average system for its class, though the data reveals a distinct performance ceiling imposed by the graphics card in CPU-bound workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a clear and consistent bottleneck pattern across the measured games. At 1920x1080, the average frame rate across all games is 160.3 FPS, but this drops to 160.3 FPS as the average for the entire dataset, with individual titles showing the GPU becoming the limiting factor as resolution increases. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1253 in 3DMark and 2183.5 in Cinebench R23 places it in the 81st percentile among all CPUs, meaning it has ample headroom to feed the RTX 3080 in most scenarios.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p is instructive. For example, Counter-Strike 2 drops from 243 FPS at 1080p to 161 FPS at 1440p, a 33.7% reduction, while at 4K it falls to 90 FPS. This pattern indicates that at 1080p, the CPU is often the primary driver, but as pixel count rises, the GPU’s workload dominates. In contrast, a heavily CPU-bound title like Valorant shows 554.1 FPS at 1080p, 471.5 FPS at 1440p, and 379.9 FPS at 4K — the relatively modest drop between resolutions suggests the CPU maintains high frame rates even when the GPU is stressed.

The RTX 3080’s 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23172, indicates it is a strong but not top-tier card. The pair’s combined 75th percentile is lower than the CPU’s 81st percentile, which confirms that the GPU is the limiting component in this build. This is particularly evident in heavy rasterization titles like Red Dead Redemption 2, where 1080p yields 64.8 FPS, 1440p drops to 47.8 FPS, and 4K falls to 34.4 FPS — the GPU cannot maintain 60 FPS even at 1080p in this demanding title.

The data also shows that the CPU’s multi-threaded performance, while solid, is not the constraint in gaming workloads. The Ryzen 5 9600X scores 17528.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which places it near the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (deltaPct -0.6%) and AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (deltaPct -0.8%). This suggests that for gaming, the six-core CPU is more than sufficient, and the real performance ceiling comes from the GPU’s 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth, which can become saturated at higher resolutions and with demanding textures.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29713, placing it at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with its nearest rivals being the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29656, +0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29868, -0.5%), AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (29879, -0.6%), and AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (29955, -0.8%). The Ryzen 5 9600X is effectively within 1% of these higher-core-count parts, which is a strong showing for a six-core processor. The single-thread performance is exceptional, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1253 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2923, indicating that the Zen 5 architecture delivers industry-leading per-core throughput.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23172, placing it at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, -0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23250, -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23273, -0.4%), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23276, -0.4%). This is a somewhat misleading comparison, as the RTX 3080’s PassMark G3D score of 25086 shows its true gaming strength, while the average score is dragged down by lower compute numbers. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 152423 indicate robust DirectX 12 and compute performance.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that outperforms its class and a GPU that is solidly mid-to-high tier. The pair’s average FPS across all measured games is 160.3, which places it at rank 946 out of 3732 pairs, or the 74.6th percentile. This means the build delivers frame rates that are higher than roughly three-quarters of all tested configurations, making it a capable system for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with playable 4K performance in many titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance compared to its multi-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 9600X scores 1253 in 3DMark single-thread and 2183.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core, while scoring 7590 in 3DMark max threads and 17528.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore. The single-thread scores are exceptionally strong, placing the CPU at the 81st percentile overall, while the multi-thread scores are competitive with higher-core-count rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (deltaPct -0.6%).

Q: How does the RTX 3080 perform in compute-heavy workloads?

A: The GPU’s PassMark GPU Compute score is 14397, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 152423. These are solid but not outstanding figures, placing the GPU at the 68th percentile overall. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 indicates good DirectX 12 performance, but the GPU is not a top-tier compute card.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this build?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking is higher than the GPU’s 68th percentile, and the combined percentile is 75. In games like Valorant, the CPU drives 554.1 FPS at 1080p, but in GPU-heavy titles like Red Dead Redemption 2, the frame rate drops to 64.8 FPS at the same resolution, showing the GPU’s performance ceiling.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3080, and how does it affect performance?

A: The RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus with a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the data shows that at 4K, frame rates in many titles drop below 60 FPS, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 34.4 FPS and Control at 55 FPS, suggesting that the memory capacity or bandwidth can become a constraint.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 9600X compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29713, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29656) and 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29868). It is also 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (29879) and 0.8% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (29955), showing that the six-core CPU is virtually tied with these eight-core parts.

Q: What is the build’s overall ranking among all tested CPU-GPU pairs?

A: The pair ranks 946 out of 3732 pairs, which places it at the 75th percentile. The average frame rate across all measured games is 160.3 FPS, which is higher than most configurations but below top-tier builds featuring newer GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory, and what is the memory bus width?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 9600X supports ECC memory and uses a dual-channel DDR5 memory bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This is a key feature for workstation and professional use cases, though the GPU’s 320-bit bus is separate.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is ideally suited for gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gameplay. The data shows that the CPU can push over 200 FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 (243 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (554.1 FPS at 1080p), while the GPU maintains over 60 FPS in most AAA titles at 1440p. The 75th percentile combined ranking confirms that this is a strong gaming build for users who want to avoid the cost of a top-tier GPU without sacrificing competitive frame rates.

Content creators and developers will also find value in this pairing, as the CPU’s 17528.5 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 14438 Geekbench multicore score handle video encoding and compilation tasks effectively. The GPU’s 8704 shading units and 272 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated rendering and AI workloads, though the 10 GB VRAM may limit very large 3D scenes. Students and small business professionals will appreciate the CPU’s strong single-thread performance for office applications and the ECC memory support for data integrity, though the GPU is overkill for such workloads.

The build is less suitable for users targeting 4K gaming at maximum settings, as the data shows many titles fall below 60 FPS at 3840x2160, such as Ark: Survival Ascended (13.9 FPS) and Cyberpunk 2077 (34.4 FPS). However, for 1080p and 1440p gaming, this is a well-balanced system where the CPU provides ample headroom for future multi-threaded games.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the pair excels at 1080p, with esports titles hitting extremely high frame rates: Counter-Strike 2 at 243 FPS, Valorant at 554.1 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 289 FPS. At 1440p, these drop to 161, 471.5, and 190 FPS respectively, still well above 144 Hz refresh rates. The GPU’s 68th percentile ranking is sufficient for this scenario, as the CPU is rarely the bottleneck.

Streaming while gaming benefits from the CPU’s 12 threads and strong multicore score of 17528.5 in Cinebench R23, which can handle encoding alongside game logic. The GPU’s 272 tensor cores also support hardware-accelerated encoding, though the data does not specify streaming performance. The 75th percentile combined ranking indicates the system can handle simultaneous load without major frame drops.

Video editing is well-served by the CPU’s 14438 Geekbench multicore score and the GPU’s 14397 PassMark GPU Compute score, which accelerate effects and rendering. The 10 GB GDDR6X memory with 760.3 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p timeline playback, but 4K projects with heavy effects may require more VRAM. The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking ensures snappy timeline scrubbing and export performance.

3D rendering workloads benefit from the GPU’s 8704 shading units and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance, but the 10 GB VRAM can be a limiting factor for complex scenes. The CPU’s 17528.5 Cinebench R23 multicore score handles physics and geometry calculations, though six cores may be insufficient for very large scenes. The 68th percentile GPU ranking places it below top-tier rendering cards.

Software development tasks, including compilation and testing, are accelerated by the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1253 3DMark single-thread) and 12 threads. The ECC memory support is a notable advantage for long-running builds where memory errors could corrupt outputs. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development, but the combination does not hinder typical workflows.

Student and office work is over-served by this configuration, as the CPU’s 4570 PassMark single-thread score and the GPU’s 1054 PassMark G2D score handle spreadsheet, browsing, and document tasks effortlessly. The 65W CPU TDP keeps power consumption moderate, and the dual-slot GPU fits standard cases. This scenario does not stress the system, but it provides a smooth experience.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 uses the GA102 chip on an 8 nm Samsung process, with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. It has 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, with 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores. The boost clock is 1710 MHz, and the memory operates at 19 Gbps effective on a 320-bit bus, providing 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 29.77 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1), and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark scores show a strong gaming card: PassMark G3D score of 25086, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 33620. The average benchmark score of 23172 places it at the 68th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, -0.3%) and AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23273, -0.4%). The GPU’s pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s indicate it can handle high-resolution rendering efficiently.

For rendering workloads, the 10 GB GDDR6X memory is a double-edged sword. It provides enough bandwidth for most 1080p and 1440p tasks, but the data shows that at 4K, performance drops significantly in VRAM-hungry titles like Ark: Survival Ascended (13.9 FPS) and Cyberpunk 2077 (34.4 FPS). The RT cores enable ray tracing, but the 68th percentile ranking suggests it is not a top-tier ray tracing card. The GPU’s 320W TDP requires a 700W power supply, and its dual-slot design with a 285 mm length fits most mid-tower cases.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) using a 4 nm TSMC process. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The CPU features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

The benchmark scores are dominated by exceptional single-thread performance: 3DMark single-thread score of 1253, Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2183.5, and Geekbench single-core score of 2923. The multi-thread scores are also strong, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 17528.5 and Geekbench multicore at 14438. The average benchmark score of 29713 places it at the 81st percentile, with nearest rivals being the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29656, +0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29868, -0.5%), AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (29879, -0.6%), and AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (29955, -0.8%).

For real workloads, the CPU’s single-thread performance means snappy response in office applications and games, while the 12 threads handle moderate multi-tasking. The PassMark scores show strong integer math (89918), floating point math (60081), and extended instructions (28023), but the data compression (341021) and encryption (16638) scores are lower, suggesting less optimized performance in these areas. The 65W TDP makes it efficient, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the boost clock of 5.40 GHz is already high.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, a 6-core Zen 5 processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, an Ampere-based GPU from the GeForce 30-series. The CPU was released on 2024-08-07 with a launch MSRP of $279, while the GPU was released on 2020-08-31 with a launch MSRP of 699 USD and is now end-of-life. The combination achieves a combined percentile of 75, meaning it outperforms 75% of all tested CPU-GPU pairs.

The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking is higher than the GPU’s 68th percentile, indicating that the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. The pair’s average frame rate across games is 160.3 FPS, which is high but not exceptional, given that many top-tier builds exceed 200 FPS. The system is best characterized as a high-performance 1080p and 1440p gaming machine, with the CPU providing enough headroom to support a GPU upgrade in the future.

The build class is desktop, and the data confirms it is suitable for a wide range of tasks, but its primary strength is gaming. The 75th percentile combined ranking is respectable, but the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 68th percentile position mean it is not a top-tier 4K or ray tracing system. This is a balanced build where the CPU outclasses the GPU, making it a sensible choice for users who want to prioritize single-thread performance and upgrade the GPU later.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (confirmed as measured, not estimated) shows a wide range of performance across 55 games. At 1920x1080, the build delivers high frame rates in esports titles: Valorant at 554.1 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 537.4 FPS, Roblox at 314 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 289 FPS. AAA titles at 1080p include Call of Duty: Warzone at 175.8 FPS, Doom at 180.1 FPS, and Fortnite at 118 FPS, all playable at high refresh rates.

At 2560x1440, performance drops but remains strong for most titles: Valorant at 471.5 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 161 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 156.1 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 102.2 FPS. Heavier games like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 51.8 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 47.8 FPS, and Control at 78.9 FPS, which are playable but not at high refresh rates. The 1440p data shows the GPU is the limiting factor in demanding titles.

At 3840x2160, performance drops significantly, with many games falling below 60 FPS: Call of Duty: Warzone at 135.4 FPS, Valorant at 379.9 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 90 FPS are exceptions, but Ark: Survival Ascended at 13.9 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 at 34.4 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 34.4 FPS are not playable at 4K. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K ultra settings in modern titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which is future-proof for next-generation GPUs and NVMe drives. The CPU’s 65W TDP is low, meaning the existing power supply has headroom for a GPU upgrade, though the RTX 3080 requires a 700W PSU, and a more powerful GPU would need even more.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The RTX 3080’s 320W TDP and 700W suggested PSU mean the system draws significant power, but the CPU’s low TDP leaves room for a stronger GPU. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU with more VRAM, as the 10 GB capacity is the main bottleneck at 4K, though the CPU’s 81st percentile ranking suggests it can handle a more powerful card.

The AM5 platform is expected to support future Ryzen processors, so the CPU upgrade path is clear. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration can be replaced with a higher-core-count chip if multi-threaded workloads demand it, though the current CPU is already competitive with 8-core rivals. The 700W PSU is sufficient for the current build, but a future GPU upgrade would likely require a higher-wattage unit.

The platform also supports the CPU’s integrated Radeon Graphics, which provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails. The dual-slot GPU with a 285 mm length fits most cases, and the 1x 12-pin power connector may require an adapter for older power supplies. The system’s overall upgrade path is straightforward, with the GPU being the most logical first upgrade.