SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

29,713 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The Ryzen 5 9600X and RTX 3070 form a pairing where the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s strong single-thread performance keeps frame rates high in lighter titles. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1253 and PassMark single-thread score of 4570 place it in the top tier for per-core work, which directly supports the measured FPS in esports and older titles. At 1920x1080, the pair delivers 476.3 FPS in Valorant and 461 FPS in CS:GO, figures that far exceed what the RTX 3070’s raw rendering throughput would suggest if the CPU were limiting. This indicates the 9600X is not the bottleneck at 1080p in these scenarios.

However, the GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factor when resolution climbs. In Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate drops from 62 at 1080p to 46 at 1440p and 30 at 2160p — a scaling pattern that mirrors the GPU’s compute limits (20.31 TFLOPS FP32) rather than any CPU deficiency. The same trend appears in Ark: Survival Ascended, which falls from 33.6 at 1080p to 22.2 at 1440p and 8.3 at 2160p, indicating the GPU is overwhelmed by this title’s demands. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 7585 and max-thread score of 7590 show near-identical performance regardless of thread count, meaning the 6-core/12-thread design handles all available threads efficiently without saturation.

The data suggests a balanced pairing for most workloads, but with a clear division: at 1080p, the CPU can push frame rates to extremes in games with light graphical loads, while at 1440p and above, the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking (vs all GPUs) becomes the ceiling. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this middle-ground positioning. In multi-threaded tasks, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17528.5 shows it can keep up with the GPU’s compute output, but the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 22214 versus the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 30027 suggests the GPU is the weaker link in raw parallel throughput. This imbalance means users targeting 4K gaming will see the GPU bottleneck dominate, while those at 1080p with high refresh monitors will likely be CPU-limited in the most demanding titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this build excels in competitive titles. Valorant hits 476.3 FPS, CS:GO reaches 461, and Rainbow Six Siege posts 248. Even at 1440p, Valorant maintains 404.7 FPS and CS:GO delivers 317, making this a strong choice for 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. The CPU’s single-thread performance (1253 in 3DMark single-thread) supports these high frame rates, though the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking means some AAA titles at 1080p will fall below 144 FPS — Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 62 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 57.7.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and 3DMark 16-thread score of 7585 provide enough headroom for encoding while gaming, but the GPU’s 8 GB memory may limit simultaneous encode and render tasks. The RTX 3070’s 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores support hardware acceleration, and the measured FPS in streaming-friendly titles like Fortnite (103 at 1080p) suggests acceptable performance. However, users should expect lower frame rates when broadcasting at 1440p, where Fortnite drops to 64.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17528.5 and Geekbench multicore score of 14438 indicate competent 4K video editing performance for a 6-core part. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821 provides hardware acceleration for effects and rendering. The 8 GB GDDR6 may be limiting for complex compositions, but the CPU’s data compression score of 341021 in PassMark suggests efficient handling of codec-heavy workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 30027 and Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2691 place it above many laptops (e.g., Ryzen 7 7840H at 29868 avg score), but below desktop parts like the Ryzen 7 5800XT (29879). The GPU’s 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 and 11195 PassMark GPU compute score provide solid but not exceptional rendering power. Blender and similar workloads will be GPU-bound, and the 8 GB VRAM will cap scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 89918 and extended instructions score of 28023 indicate strong compiler and code processing performance. The 12 threads handle parallel builds well, as evidenced by the 3DMark 8-thread score of 6726. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, but the 9600X’s 81st percentile ranking vs all CPUs ensures responsiveness in IDEs and containerized workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance (2183.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core) makes everyday tasks feel snappy, and the 65W TDP keeps power draw low. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled, though the RTX 3070 handles any GPU-accelerated office applications. The PassMark single-thread score of 4570 is sufficient for spreadsheet, browser, and document workloads without perceptible lag.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize 1080p and 1440p performance over 4K. The measured FPS shows that at 1080p, most titles exceed 60 FPS — with esports titles like Valorant (476.3), CS:GO (461), and Rainbow Six Siege (248) far exceeding that threshold. At 1440p, the pair still delivers playable frame rates in most titles (Cyberpunk at 46, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43.4), but 4K is only viable in lighter games (Minecraft at 68, Roblox at 105.1). Content creators working at 1080p or 1440p will find the CPU’s 6 cores sufficient for editing, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p rendering. Developers and students benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread and multithread scores without needing the GPU’s full power — the 81st percentile CPU ranking ensures smooth compilation and office work. Small business workstations that need occasional GPU acceleration (e.g., for design software) will find this pairing capable, though the 220W GPU TDP requires adequate cooling. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier and AM5 socket provide overclocking headroom for enthusiasts, but the stock 65W TDP keeps power requirements modest.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing AMD’s Ryzen 5 9600X with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 3070. The CPU, from the 9000 series based on Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge), launched on August 7, 2024, with a launch MSRP of $279. The GPU, from the GeForce 30-series based on Ampere architecture, launched August 31, 2020, with a launch MSRP of 499 USD and is now end-of-life. The combined percentile ranking of 71 places this build in the upper-midrange tier, outperforming 71% of all CPU+GPU pairs. The CPU’s 81st percentile vs all CPUs is notably stronger than the GPU’s 61st percentile vs all GPUs, indicating the processor is the higher-performing component. The pair ranks 1394th out of 3732 pairs by average FPS across games, with an average of 138.8 FPS — a figure that reflects strong 1080p performance but middling 4K capability. This is a pairing that leverages a modern, high-IPC CPU with a previous-generation GPU to deliver solid 1080p and acceptable 1440p gaming, while the CPU’s headroom ensures it will not be the limiting factor in most scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance compared to its multithread performance?

A: The 9600X scores 1253 in 3DMark single-thread and 2183.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core, versus 7585 in 3DMark 16-thread and 17528.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore. This shows a roughly 6x scaling from single to multi-thread, consistent with 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17208, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17083), 1% higher than the GTX 690 (17037), and 1.1% higher than the HD 7970M (17019). It trails the Tesla K40c by 1.5% (17468).

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 4K in AAA titles?

A: Measured 4K performance shows Cyberpunk 2077 at 30 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28.4, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 8.3. Lighter titles fare better: Minecraft at 68, Roblox at 105.1, and Valorant at 323.6.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this build?

A: At 1080p in esports titles, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1253 in 3DMark single-thread) allows frame rates to reach 476 in Valorant, indicating the GPU is not limiting. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking becomes the constraint, as seen in Cyberpunk dropping from 62 to 30 FPS from 1080p to 4K.

Q: What memory does this build support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC support. The GPU uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 448 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The GPU has a suggested PSU of 550W and a TDP of 220W, while the CPU has a TDP of 65W. A 550W power supply is the minimum recommendation for this pairing.

Q: How does the CPU’s overall score compare to its rivals?

A: The 9600X has an average benchmark score of 29713, which is 0.2% above the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29656), 0.5% below the Ryzen 7 7840H (29868), 0.6% below the Ryzen 7 5800XT (29879), and 0.8% below the Ryzen 7 8845HS (29955).

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured: true) shows this build’s gaming capability across 55 titles. At 1920x1080 with ultra settings, the average frame rate across all games is 138.8 FPS, but the distribution is wide. Esports titles dominate: Valorant hits 476.3, CS:GO reaches 461, and Rainbow Six Siege X posts 249.7. Competitive shooters also perform well: Counter-Strike 2 runs at 209.5, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 178. Single-player action games are generally playable: Assetto Corsa at 124, Doom at 158.4, and Control at 87.5. However, demanding AAA titles struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 at 62, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 57.7, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 33.6.

At 2560x1440, the GPU’s limitations become apparent. Valorant still hits 404.7, but most titles see significant drops: Counter-Strike 2 falls to 135.3, Cyberpunk 2077 to 46, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 43.4. Ark: Survival Ascended becomes nearly unplayable at 22.2, while lighter games like Minecraft (130) and Roblox (178.9) remain smooth. The 1440p average across all titles is not explicitly listed, but the pattern shows roughly 50-60% of 1080p performance, consistent with the GPU’s bandwidth and compute limits.

At 3840x2160, only esports and light titles remain viable. Valorant hits 323.6, CS:GO 187, and Rainbow Six Siege X 92.1. Minecraft runs at 68, Roblox at 105.1, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 134. But most AAA titles fall below 30 FPS: Cyberpunk at 30, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28.4, Ark: Survival Ascended at 8.3, and Hitman 2 at 28. This confirms the RTX 3070’s 8 GB VRAM and 20.31 TFLOPS are insufficient for smooth 4K gaming in modern titles, making 1080p the sweet spot and 1440p the practical ceiling.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29713, placing it in the 81st percentile vs all CPUs. Its strongest results are in PassMark multithread (30027), Geekbench multicore (14438), and Cinebench R23 multicore (17528.5). The single-thread scores are equally impressive: 2183.5 in Cinebench R23, 2923 in Geekbench, and 4570 in PassMark single-thread. The 3DMark results show linear scaling from 2 threads (2456) to 8 threads (6726) to 16 threads (7585), with max threads (7590) barely exceeding 16-thread performance, indicating efficient thread utilization.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17208, placing it in the 61st percentile vs all GPUs. Its PassMark G3D score of 22214 is the headline figure, complemented by Geekbench OpenCL at 112821 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3162. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11195 shows solid compute capability, while the DirectX 12 score of 85 and DirectX 11 score of 182 are lower than expected for a GPU of this tier, possibly reflecting driver or test variations.

Combined, the CPU’s 81st percentile versus the GPU’s 61st percentile creates a disparity where the processor outperforms the graphics card by 20 percentile points. This means the GPU is the limiting component in graphics-bound workloads, but the CPU provides ample headroom for CPU-bound tasks. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this average, positioning the build as upper-midrange overall. The pair’s average FPS of 138.8 across all games and its 1394th rank out of 3732 pairs confirm that this build delivers above-average gaming performance, though not top-tier.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 9600X is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor based on Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge), manufactured on TSMC’s 4nm process with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 3.90 GHz and boosts to 5.40 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. Memory support includes DDR5 in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes and includes integrated Radeon Graphics. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-thread and multithread workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2183.5 confirms excellent per-core performance, which translates to fast application launches and responsive gaming. The multicore score of 17528.5 demonstrates that 6 cores can compete with 8-core parts, as evidenced by its near-parity with the Ryzen 7 7840H (avg score 29868 vs 29713) despite having fewer cores. The PassMark data compression score of 341021 and integer math score of 89918 indicate strong performance in data-heavy tasks like file archiving and code compilation. The floating point math score of 60081 supports scientific and engineering workloads.

The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking places it above most processors, but its nearest rivals are all 8-core parts (Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, Ryzen 7 7840H, Ryzen 7 5800XT, Ryzen 7 8845HS), all within 0.8% of its average score. This suggests the 9600X’s higher clock speed and Zen 5 IPC compensate for its fewer cores. For real workloads, this means the CPU handles gaming and productivity without bottlenecks, but heavily threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering may see slightly lower performance than 8-core alternatives. The 65W TDP is notably efficient, allowing for compact cooling solutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which provides a clear upgrade path within the Ryzen 9000 series and potentially future generations. The socket supports DDR5 memory, and the dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is current for the platform. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes (CPU only) is ahead of the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, meaning the RTX 3070 does not saturate the available bandwidth — a future GPU upgrade to a PCIe 5.0 card would take full advantage of the platform.

The GPU’s suggested PSU of 550W and 220W TDP, combined with the CPU’s 65W TDP, mean a 550W power supply provides adequate headroom for the current build. However, upgrading to a more powerful GPU (e.g., a next-gen card with higher TDP) would likely require a larger PSU. The GPU’s 1x 12-pin power connector is specific to this model, and the dual-slot design (242mm length, 112mm height) fits most mid-tower cases.

The most sensible next upgrade would be a GPU replacement, as the CPU’s 81st percentile ranking and 6-core/12-thread configuration provide ample performance for several more years. The RTX 3070’s 8 GB VRAM is the primary limitation at 4K, and upgrading to a GPU with more memory would unlock higher resolutions. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier and AM5 socket allow for future CPU upgrades within the same platform, though the current 9600X already outperforms many 8-core rivals. For users who need more multi-threaded performance, a Ryzen 7 or Ryzen 9 on the same socket would be a drop-in upgrade, but the 9600X’s strong single-thread score (1253 in 3DMark) means gaming performance would not improve significantly. The platform’s DDR5 support is current, and the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for most workloads, though higher-speed DDR5 kits could provide marginal gains.