SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

52,873 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F pairs a modern 6-core Zen 5 processor with NVIDIA’s entry-level RTX 4010 GPU, creating a desktop combination that sits at the 55th combined percentile across all benchmarked systems. This is a build where the CPU is clearly the stronger partner, with the processor ranking in the 91st percentile among all CPUs while the GPU lands in just the 18th percentile among all GPUs. The data shows a lopsided pairing that favors multi-threaded productivity and single-thread responsiveness over graphical horsepower, making it a system that will excel in CPU-bound work while struggling to keep pace in modern gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is built on the Zen 5 architecture using the Granite Ridge codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. It packs 6 cores and 12 threads, running at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The 65 W TDP reflects an efficient design, and the unlocked multiplier allows for manual overclocking if the platform and cooling permit. Cache is laid out as 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, which is standard for a desktop Ryzen 5 part.

Memory support includes DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor, which is generous for expansion. There is no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory. The processor was released on September 7, 2025, with a launch MSRP of $219, and it remains in active production. The part number is 100-000001406.

Benchmark data from PassMark shows a strong all-around performer. The single-thread score of 4258 places it well above typical desktop processors, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded applications such as web browsing, office work, and legacy software. The multithread score of 28312 reflects the 6-core/12-thread configuration handling parallel workloads effectively. Integer math scores 84198, floating point math scores 56570, and extended instructions score 26370, showcasing strong computational throughput across different instruction types. Data compression scores 325678, while data encryption scores 15716, and random string sorting hits 34174. The physics score is 1851, and find prime numbers scores 220. The average benchmark score is 52873, placing the CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 9500F sits 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 (52901), 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 634 (52974), 0.6% behind the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206), and 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53288). These deltas are all under 1%, meaning the 9500F is virtually tied with those higher-core-count or server-class parts in aggregate PassMark scoring, which is notable given its lower core count and 65 W TDP. The practical interpretation is that the 9500F delivers workstation-class compute in a mainstream desktop package, with the 91st percentile ranking confirming it outperforms the vast majority of installed CPUs.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA107 chip, manufactured on an 8 nm process at Samsung with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. It features 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units. The GPU includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, providing ray tracing and AI acceleration capabilities typical of the Ampere generation. The base clock is 1417 MHz with a boost clock of 1762 MHz, while the memory clock runs at 1500 MHz or 12 Gbps effective.

Memory is the most limiting factor: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus delivers 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a very narrow memory interface, and 4 GB of VRAM is insufficient for modern AAA gaming at high textures or for serious GPU-accelerated rendering. The pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The TDP is just 50 W, and the card is single-slot with no power connectors, drawing entirely from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W, which is very modest. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. The card measures 163 mm (6.4 inches) in length and 69 mm (2.7 inches) in height.

API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU was released on April 15, 2024, and is in active production. The predecessor is GeForce 30 and the successor is GeForce 50. There is no launch MSRP listed in the data.

The only benchmark score for the GPU is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2893, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This is a very low ranking, indicating that the RTX 4010 is far below the median GPU in raw 3D performance. Nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907, delta -0.5%), NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910, delta -0.6%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913, delta -0.7%), and NVIDIA Quadro P600 (2923, delta -1%). These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the RTX 4010 scores essentially the same as higher-end GPUs in this specific 3DMark test, which is surprising given the specification differences. However, the 18th percentile overall ranking confirms that the GPU is a low-end part in the broader market.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a PassMark average score of 52873, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The GPU scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pair is 55th across all desktop builds, reflecting the mismatch where a top-decile CPU is paired with a bottom-quintile GPU.

Looking at individual CPU benchmarks: single-thread at 4258, multithread at 28312, integer math at 84198, floating point math at 56570, extended instructions at 26370, data compression at 325678, encryption at 15716, random string sorting at 34174, physics at 1851, and prime numbers at 220. These scores show a processor that excels at integer-heavy tasks like compression and sorting, but is relatively weaker in floating-point physics simulation, which is common for mainstream desktop CPUs.

The combined picture is a system that will feel extremely snappy in everyday use and in CPU-heavy productivity, but will hit a hard wall in any GPU-intensive workload. The GPU’s 18th percentile ranking means that even the weakest CPU-driven tasks like video playback or 2D desktop rendering will be fine, but anything involving 3D acceleration, modern game rendering, or GPU compute will be severely constrained. The CPU can feed the GPU far more data than the GPU can process, which is the core imbalance of this pairing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the bottleneck in any 3D or graphics workload. The GPU’s 18th percentile versus the CPU’s 91st percentile means that in gaming, the RTX 4010 will be the limiting factor long before the Ryzen 5 9500F struggles. For example, in a CPU-bound scenario like high-frame-rate esports at low settings, the CPU could push hundreds of frames, but the GPU’s 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 and 96 GB/s bandwidth will cap output well below what the CPU can deliver. In GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or ray tracing, the CPU will be mostly idle while the GPU is fully saturated.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like data compression, encryption, or software compilation, the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking means it will outperform the vast majority of systems. The PassMark multithread score of 28312, when compared to the nearest rival AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at -0.8% delta, shows that the 6-core chip is competitive with a 12-core part in aggregate, meaning the CPU is not the bottleneck in any multi-threaded task.

The FPS scaling evidence (though estimated, since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination) would show that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the GPU bottleneck becomes less severe because the CPU can feed frames faster, but 4 GB VRAM will still cause stutters and texture pop-in. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s 96 GB/s bandwidth and 16 ROPs will be overwhelmed, and FPS will drop to unplayable levels in modern titles. The 250 W suggested PSU confirms that the GPU is not power-hungry, but the bottleneck is computational, not thermal.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU compute over graphics. Gamers at 1080p with esports titles or older games that are CPU-bound will find the Ryzen 5 9500F’s 4258 single-thread score and 28312 multithread score more than sufficient, but they must accept that the RTX 4010 will limit them to low or medium settings and that 4 GB VRAM will cause issues in newer games. Content creators who work with CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, batch image processing, or software development will benefit from the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking and the 12 threads for parallel compilation.

Students and small business workstations that run office suites, web applications, and light programming will see excellent responsiveness from the 5.00 GHz boost clock, and the 65 W TDP means low power draw and quiet operation. The lack of integrated graphics means a GPU is required, but the RTX 4010 provides basic display output and hardware acceleration for video playback. The ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes make this a viable platform for a small-scale server or workstation where data integrity and expansion are valued, though the 4 GB GPU is not suited for compute tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is AMD Socket AM5, which is the current mainstream socket, and the CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for future GPUs and NVMe storage. The 65 W TDP means the CPU is easy to cool, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking if the user desires. The motherboard will need to support AM5, and the platform is designed for longevity, so a future CPU upgrade within the same socket is a sensible path.

The GPU is the obvious first upgrade. The RTX 4010 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, so a newer GPU with higher performance will slot in without issue. The suggested PSU of 250 W for the current GPU means that any upgrade will likely require a more powerful power supply, but the CPU TDP of 65 W leaves significant headroom for a higher-end GPU. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM and higher FP32 throughput, as the CPU can easily feed a much faster card. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus on the RTX 4010 are the primary limitations, and replacing it with a card that has at least 8 GB of VRAM and a 128-bit or wider bus would resolve the most severe bottlenecks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with low settings in esports titles, the CPU’s 4258 single-thread score and 28312 multithread score can feed high frame rates, but the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking and 2.706 TFLOPS will cap the output. Expect playable but not high-refresh experiences in competitive games, and low settings in AAA titles due to the 4 GB VRAM.

Streaming: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads can handle software encoding at reasonable quality, and the RTX 4010’s tensor cores could assist with NVENC (though not specified in data, the architecture supports it). However, the GPU’s low performance means streaming at high resolution or with game capture will strain the system. The 28312 multithread score suggests the CPU can handle the encoding load while the GPU struggles with the game.

Video editing: The CPU excels here with a 325678 data compression score and 84198 integer math score, which speeds up timeline scrubbing and export encoding. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM limits GPU-accelerated effects and 4K preview, but for 1080p editing on CPU-based codecs, the system performs well.

3D rendering: This is a poor fit. GPU rendering in Blender or similar relies on the GPU’s CUDA cores and VRAM, and the RTX 4010 with 2.706 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM will be extremely slow. CPU rendering will use the 6 cores effectively, but the lack of a high-end GPU makes this system unsuitable for serious 3D work.

Software development: Excellent fit. The 4258 single-thread score speeds up compilation of single-threaded build steps, and the 28312 multithread score accelerates parallel builds. The PCIe Gen 5 and ECC memory support make this a stable development workstation.

Student and office work: Perfectly adequate. The CPU’s high single-thread performance handles web browsers, spreadsheets, and document processing with ease. The GPU provides basic display output for multiple monitors via the 4x mini-DisplayPort, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps power costs low.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average PassMark score of 52873.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4010 have, and what is its memory bus width?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score and percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 4010 scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 9500F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the CPU has no integrated graphics (N/A), so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 W, and the GPU has a 50 W TDP with no power connectors.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC memory support.

Q: What is the CPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is $219, and the CPU was released on September 7, 2025.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The CPU’s 91st percentile and the GPU’s 18th percentile indicate that the GPU will be the limiting factor in virtually all gaming scenarios.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 and 96 GB/s bandwidth will produce low FPS in modern AAA titles, likely in the 20-40 range depending on the game. The 4 GB VRAM will cause texture streaming issues and stuttering in games that require more than 4 GB of VRAM at ultra settings. Esports titles at 1080p low settings could reach 60-90 FPS, but the GPU’s 16 ROPs and 64-bit memory interface will cap performance. At 1440p, the GPU will be overwhelmed, and even at low settings, frame rates will drop below playable thresholds in most 3D games. At 4K, the system is not viable for gaming, as the GPU lacks both the compute power and memory bandwidth. The CPU’s 4258 single-thread score ensures that frame times will be consistent, but the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking means the experience will be defined by the graphics card’s limitations. For users who prioritize gaming, this GPU should be replaced immediately; the CPU is more than capable of driving a much faster graphics card.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds