SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

52,873 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti pairing creates an interesting dynamic, where the CPU and GPU occupy distinct performance tiers that influence workload suitability. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 28,312 places it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 26,896 sits in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. This 8-point percentile gap suggests the CPU is relatively stronger in its respective market than the GPU is in its own, but the nature of the bottleneck depends entirely on the workload. In gaming, the RTX 3080 Ti is typically the limiting factor at lower resolutions, but the Ryzen 5 9500F's single-thread score of 4,258 is robust enough to drive high frame rates. Conversely, in heavily threaded productivity tasks, the 6-core, 12-thread CPU will be the constraint, as its multithread score of 28,312 is modest compared to higher-core-count rivals. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than empirical results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 9500F and the RTX 3080 Ti is skewed toward GPU-bound scenarios in gaming, but the CPU becomes the bottleneck in professional workloads. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,258 is competitive, sitting at the 91st percentile overall, which means it can feed the GPU adequately in most titles without causing significant frame pacing issues. However, the GPU's FP32 throughput of 34.10 TFLOPS and texture rate of 532.8 GTexel/s indicate a massive parallel processing capability that can outpace even a strong 6-core processor in pixel-heavy scenes. In contrast, the CPU's floating-point math score of 56,570 and integer math score of 84,198 are solid for a mainstream chip, but they pale in comparison to the GPU's raw compute, meaning any task that relies on CPU physics or AI logic will see the processor as the limiting factor.

The percentile data quantifies this split: the CPU's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 83rd percentile suggests that, relative to their respective product categories, the CPU is the stronger component. This implies that in balanced workloads, the GPU will likely be the first to reach its performance ceiling, especially at 1440p or 4K resolutions where rasterization demands are highest. For high-refresh 1080p gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more critical, and the data indicates the Ryzen 5 9500F with a 5.00 GHz boost clock can handle most titles, but it may struggle to maintain maximum frame rates in CPU-intensive simulations or strategy games. The FPS scaling between resolutions is expected to show diminishing returns as resolution increases, with the GPU becoming the dominant factor at 4K.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 3080 Ti's PassMark G3D score of 26,896 and DirectX 12 score of 110 suggest strong DirectX 12 title performance, likely delivering high frame rates at 1440p and playable 4K in most modern games. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with 912.4 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for high-resolution textures and ray tracing workloads, while the 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. Based on the FP32 throughput of 34.10 TFLOPS, the GPU is estimated to handle 1440p ultra settings at frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles, with 1080p pushing toward 120-144 FPS in esports and optimized shooters.

The CPU's single-thread score of 4,258 supports high-refresh gaming, as it ranks in the 91st percentile, meaning it can keep up with the GPU's frame output in most scenarios. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and the CPU's role diminishes, allowing the RTX 3080 Ti to operate near its full potential. For ray tracing titles, the 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores will provide meaningful acceleration, though the performance hit relative to rasterization is expected to be significant, as is typical for this GPU generation. The estimated FPS figures should be considered optimistic upper bounds, as real-world performance depends on game optimization, driver maturity, and cooling, none of which are quantified in the FACT PACK.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is built on the Zen 5 architecture using the Granite Ridge codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, all within a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, which totals a substantial amount of fast memory for gaming and productivity. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for entry-level workstations where data integrity is critical.

Benchmark results show a PassMark single-thread score of 4,258 and a multithread score of 28,312, placing the CPU in the 91st percentile overall. The nearest rival comparison shows it is 0.1% slower than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164, 0.2% slower than the Intel Xeon 634, 0.6% slower than the AMD EPYC 7313P, and 0.8% slower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X. These narrow deltas indicate the 9500F performs on par with much higher-priced server and enthusiast chips in synthetic benchmarks. The integer math score of 84,198 and floating-point math score of 56,570 suggest strong general-purpose compute, while the extended instructions score of 26,370 and data encryption score of 15,716 indicate capable cryptographic and SIMD performance. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle compiling code, running virtual machines, and processing large spreadsheets without significant slowdowns, though 6 cores may limit heavily threaded rendering tasks.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who prioritize high-resolution gaming with ray tracing, as the RTX 3080 Ti's 12 GB VRAM and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth are well-suited for 1440p and 4K ultra settings. The Ryzen 5 9500F's 91st percentile single-thread performance ensures that CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p remain responsive, making this a flexible build for gamers who switch between competitive and cinematic titles. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 compute, which accelerates CUDA-accelerated effects, though the 6-core CPU may become a bottleneck in multi-stage workflows that rely on CPU encoding or physics simulation.

Software developers will find the CPU's 12 threads and DDR5 memory support adequate for compiling and testing code, while the GPU's 320 tensor cores can accelerate machine learning inference tasks. Students and small business users building a single machine for mixed workloads will appreciate the CPU's 65 W TDP, which allows for efficient cooling and lower power consumption, while the GPU delivers workstation-class graphics performance when needed. The combined percentile ranking of 87 indicates that this pairing performs better than the vast majority of desktop configurations, making it suitable for users who want a single system for gaming, content creation, and productivity without compromising on either front.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,258 and 5.00 GHz boost clock support high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS and 186.5 GPixel/s pixel rate handle GPU-bound scenes, making this system capable of 144Hz gaming at 1440p in most titles. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory prevents VRAM capacity issues at high settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads can handle encoding overhead at moderate bitrates, though dedicated NVENC on the GPU is recommended for minimal performance impact. The GPU's 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores provide headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming, with the 91st percentile CPU ensuring smooth gameplay during broadcasts.

Video editing: The GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS accelerates effects rendering and color grading in CUDA-accelerated software, while the CPU's 28,312 multithread score handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding. The 12 GB VRAM allows for 4K timeline previews with multiple effects layers.

3D rendering: The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 26,896 indicates strong GPU rendering performance for real-time viewports, but final frame rendering in CPU-based engines will be limited by the 6-core, 12-thread CPU. The CPU's 70.6 mm² die size and 8,315 million transistors suggest efficient power use, but rendering times will be longer than with higher-core-count alternatives.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 84,198 and data compression score of 325,678 indicate fast compilation and data processing, while the 32 MB L3 cache improves code locality. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large build caches and virtual machines.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP and single-thread performance make it responsive for daily tasks, while the GPU's 1,091 PassMark G2D score ensures smooth 2D acceleration for multiple monitors. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running research computations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process node. It features 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, along with 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI workloads. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1,365 MHz and a boost clock of 1,665 MHz, with memory clocked at 1,188 MHz effective 19 Gbps. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory is connected via a 384-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s, which is critical for high-resolution textures and memory-intensive compute tasks.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 26,896 and a GPU compute score of 15,282, placing the GPU in the 83rd percentile. The nearest rival comparison shows it is 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300, 1.2% slower than the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB, 1.7% slower than the NVIDIA Tesla M40, and 2.0% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070. The FP32 throughput of 34.10 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) indicate strong compute performance for both gaming and professional applications. The pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 532.8 GTexel/s suggest the GPU can handle high-resolution rendering with complex shaders, while the 80 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The GPU's 350 W TDP and suggested 750 W PSU indicate significant power requirements, and the dual-slot design with a 285 mm length means case compatibility is a consideration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 52,873, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164's 52,901, 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon 634's 52,974, 0.6% lower than the AMD EPYC 7313P's 53,206, and 0.8% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X's 53,288. This places the CPU in the 91st percentile, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 41,187, which is 0.8% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300's 40,870, 1.2% lower than the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB's 41,707, 1.7% lower than the NVIDIA Tesla M40's 41,897, and 2.0% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070's 40,377. This places the GPU in the 83rd percentile.

The combined percentile of 87 indicates that this CPU-GPU pairing outperforms 87% of all desktop configurations in the benchmark database. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,258 is particularly strong, ranking high for gaming and responsiveness, while the GPU's G3D score of 26,896 is solid for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 28,312 and the GPU's compute score of 15,282 show that both components are capable of sustained heavy workloads, though the CPU's 6-core limit is apparent in heavily threaded tasks. The data shows a balanced system where the CPU slightly outperforms the GPU relative to their respective markets, making it a good match for mixed-use scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, meaning this configuration outperforms 87% of all desktop builds in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X?

A: The Ryzen 5 9500F's average benchmark score of 52,873 is 0.8% lower than the Ryzen 9 7900X's 53,288, indicating nearly identical synthetic performance despite the core count difference.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s, derived from 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus with an effective clock of 19 Gbps.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 9500F supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability and data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute throughput?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti delivers 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is identical to its FP16 throughput at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti's average benchmark score of 41,187 is 2.0% higher than the RTX 5070's 40,377, indicating slightly better overall performance.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen 5 9500F has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, supporting high single-thread performance for gaming and responsiveness.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 9500F is built on AMD Socket AM5, which provides a clear upgrade path to higher-core-count Zen 5 processors within the same platform. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support, and provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades. The 65 W TDP of the CPU allows for compact cooling solutions, while the GPU's 350 W TDP and suggested 750 W PSU indicate that the power supply has headroom for additional components. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, which is backward compatible with the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, ensuring no bottleneck from the bus.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count Ryzen 9000-series processor, which would maintain socket compatibility while improving multithreaded performance. The GPU, being end-of-life with a successor in the GeForce 40 series, could be upgraded to a newer generation for improved ray tracing and power efficiency, though the current RTX 3080 Ti remains competitive in the 83rd percentile. The 12-pin power connector on the GPU requires a compatible PSU cable or adapter, and the dual-slot 285 mm length should fit in most mid-tower cases. The platform's DDR5 memory support means users can upgrade memory capacity without changing the motherboard, and the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth provides a solid foundation for future high-bandwidth applications.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds