SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

52,873 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 form a desktop pairing that targets the upper-middle tier of the performance spectrum, with a combined percentile of 75. This analysis relies strictly on the available benchmark data, which consists of synthetic CPU and GPU scores rather than measured game frame rates. The data shows a system with a very strong processor and a graphics card that performs at a competitive but not top-tier level, making the balance between the two components a critical factor for real-world use.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It belongs to the 9000 series and is manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC process, with 8,315 million transistors packed into a 70.6 mm² die. The chip operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, within a 65 W TDP envelope. This processor is designed for the AMD Socket AM5 platform and supports DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

The benchmark results indicate a CPU that excels in both single-threaded and multithreaded workloads. Its Passmark single-thread score of 4258 is a strong indicator of responsive everyday performance and solid gaming capability. In multithreaded tests, the processor achieves a score of 28312, which places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The integer math score of 84198 and floating-point math score of 56570 demonstrate robust number-crunching ability, while the data compression score of 325678 suggests high efficiency in archiving and file management tasks. The data encryption score of 15716 and extended instructions score of 26370 further confirm its capability in security-related and specialized instruction workloads.

When positioned against its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 9500F is extremely competitive. Its average benchmark score of 52873 is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164, which scores 52901, a delta of -0.1%. It is also within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Xeon 634, which scores 52974, and the AMD EPYC 7313P, which scores 53206. Interestingly, it trails the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by only -0.8% in average score, despite the 7900X typically having more cores. This indicates that the Zen 5 architecture is highly efficient and that the 9500F's performance per core is exceptional.

The processor's L3 cache is 32 MB shared, with 1 MB of L2 per core. This cache configuration is well-suited for gaming and general productivity, where data locality can be exploited. The lack of integrated graphics is a notable point, meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output, but this is a standard expectation for a desktop processor paired with a dedicated graphics card. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, giving enthusiasts the ability to push the 5.00 GHz boost clock further, provided adequate cooling is used for the 65 W chip.

Balance and Bottleneck

The central question for any pairing is where the performance bottleneck lies. The benchmark data shows a significant disparity between the CPU and GPU percentiles. The Ryzen 5 9500F is in the 91st percentile of CPUs, while the Radeon RX 7700 sits in the 58th percentile of GPUs. This 33-point gap strongly suggests that in most gaming and many general computing scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor for frame rate output. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU with data, but the GPU may not be able to keep up with the CPU's potential in highly demanding graphical scenarios.

This imbalance is not necessarily a flaw; it is a design choice that prioritizes a responsive system for less graphics-intensive tasks. For workloads like software compilation, data processing, or even high-refresh-rate gaming at lower graphical settings, the CPU will not be the constraint. However, in modern AAA games at high resolutions and ultra settings, the RX 7700 will reach its performance ceiling first. The FPS scaling will therefore be dictated primarily by the GPU's capabilities in graphics-bound scenarios, while the CPU's high single-thread score of 4258 ensures that frame pacing and minimum frame times remain stable, preventing stutters that might otherwise be caused by a weaker processor.

The data shows that this is a system where the CPU provides a premium foundation, but the GPU determines the graphical fidelity ceiling. The 65 W TDP of the CPU is remarkably low for the performance level, which means cooling the processor is straightforward. This allows the system builder to allocate more of the power budget and thermal headroom to the GPU, which has a 200 W TDP and requires a 550 W power supply. The practical result is a system that excels in CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding or code compilation, while remaining competent for gaming, albeit with the expectation that the GPU will be the primary performance barrier in that domain.

Benchmark Performance

The core benchmark results for this build are clear. The CPU's average benchmark score is 52873, placing it in the 91st percentile among all processors. Its single-thread score is 4258, and its multithread score is 28312. The GPU's average benchmark score is 15852, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its primary gaming-related score, Passmark G3D, is 20974, with a GPU compute score of 10963. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the GPU scores 2865, and its OpenCL score via Geekbench is 106028.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 75, which reflects the high-end CPU dragging the average up against the mid-range GPU. Comparing the GPU to its nearest rivals clarifies its standing. The RX 7700 scores 20974 in G3D, while the AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014 on average, a delta of -1.0%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129 on average, which is -1.7% relative to the RX 7700's average of 15852. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 1.1% ahead, scoring 15679. It is important to note that the average benchmark score and the G3D score are different metrics; the G3D score is specifically for 3D graphics performance, while the average score includes other tests like compute and 2D. The data shows the RX 7700 performs in a tight cluster with these rivals, meaning it is not a class-leading product but is highly competitive in its segment.

The CPU's nearest rival data reinforces its strong position. The Ryzen 9 7900X, a significantly more expensive and higher-core-count processor, only manages to be 0.8% faster on average. This means the 9500F offers nearly the same synthetic performance as a much larger chip, highlighting the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture. The picture is of a processor that is a top-tier performer, paired with a graphics card that is a solid, mid-pack contender, resulting in a system that is much more capable on the CPU side than the GPU side.

Who Should Build It

This build is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks over raw graphical fidelity. The 91st percentile CPU performance makes it an excellent choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration is sufficient for parallel workloads, and the high single-thread speed ensures snappy UI interactions. Students in computer science or engineering fields will benefit from the fast compilation times and data processing capabilities, while office workers will find the system highly responsive for spreadsheet, database, and virtualization tasks.

For gamers, this build targets those playing at 1440p or 1080p with high refresh rates, particularly in esports titles where the CPU is often the bottleneck. The strong CPU ensures high minimum frame rates, while the GPU provides enough power to run modern games at high settings. However, gamers aiming for 4K resolution or maximum settings in the most demanding AAA titles may find the GPU to be the limiting factor. The system is also suitable for small business workstations where reliability and multi-threaded performance for data analysis or financial modeling are more important than gaming, given the CPU's high percentile and the GPU's respectable compute scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 4258 is ideal for feeding a high-refresh monitor. It will prevent frame drops in CPU-bound scenarios, ensuring a smooth experience. The GPU, with a G3D score of 20974, can handle most titles at 1080p with high frame rates, but users should expect to adjust settings for the most demanding games to maintain high FPS.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread CPU provides enough parallelism to handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously. The multithread score of 28312 indicates there is sufficient headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, although using the GPU's hardware encoder would offload this task entirely, freeing up the CPU for game logic.

Video Editing: The CPU's performance is the highlight here. The data compression score of 325678 and integer math score of 84198 will accelerate video timeline scrubbing and export times. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth can assist with effects and color grading, making this a capable editing rig.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering engines, the 9500F's multithread score of 28312 will be the primary driver of performance, placing it ahead of many rivals. For GPU-accelerated renderers, the RX 7700's 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 40 RT cores will provide decent acceleration, though it is not in the top tier of rendering GPUs.

Software Development: Developers will benefit from the fast compilation speeds driven by the high integer math and floating-point scores. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with code locality, and the dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s prevents memory bottlenecks during large builds.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for basic tasks, but the 91st percentile CPU ensures that any future software requirements are met. The low 65 W TDP of the CPU means it runs cool and quiet, making it a pleasant workstation for long study sessions or office use, with the GPU providing the necessary display outputs.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate expectations presented here are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than definitive results. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 20974 and its strong performance in 3DMark Steel Nomad (2865) suggest it is capable of smooth 1080p gaming in most titles at high settings. Based on its similarity to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (which scores 16129 on average), the RX 7700 is expected to deliver high frame rates in esports titles and playable frame rates in AAA games.

For 1440p gaming, the 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing for higher texture quality without running out of memory. However, the raw compute power (25.18 TFLOPS) may not be sufficient for maximum settings in the most demanding recent releases at this resolution. The CPU's high single-thread performance will ensure that frame times are consistent, providing a stable gaming experience. Users should expect that this system is optimized for high-refresh 1080p gaming or high-quality 1440p gaming at medium-to-high settings, rather than 4K gaming, where the GPU would likely struggle to maintain high frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 32 chip manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process. It contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 96 render output units (ROPs). It features 40 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration. The memory subsystem is a highlight, with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The memory clock is 2438 MHz, with an effective data rate of 19.5 Gbps.

The GPU's clock speeds are set at 1900 MHz base, 2041 MHz game, and 2459 MHz boost. These clocks result in a pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also rated at 25.18 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The card has a TDP of 200 W and requires a 550 W power supply, with connections for 2x 8-pin power connectors. It is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C.

In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU scores 20974 in Passmark G3D, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its performance in DirectX 11 (score 186) and DirectX 12 (score 96) tests indicates solid modern API support. The DirectX 9 score of 261 suggests strong legacy performance. For compute tasks, the GPU achieves a Passmark GPU Compute score of 10963 and an OpenCL score of 106028. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 is a modern measure of gaming performance. The GPU's average benchmark score of 15852 puts it in direct competition with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, with deltas of -1.0% and -1.7% respectively. This indicates the RX 7700 is a competent performer for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with its 16 GB VRAM providing future-proofing for higher-resolution textures.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 6-core Zen 5 processor that is a top-tier performer, sitting in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is a mid-range RDNA 3.0 graphics card, sitting in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. The combined build percentile is 75, reflecting the strong CPU contribution. The class is desktop, and the overall tier is upper-middle, with the CPU providing near-flagship-level processing power while the GPU provides solid, reliable graphics performance. This is a system where the processor is the star of the show, and the graphics card is a capable, well-matched partner that will handle most gaming and creative tasks without issue, though it will not break any performance records on its own.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's single-thread performance relative to its rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 9500F has a Passmark single-thread score of 4258. This high score is reflected in its average benchmark score of 52873, which is only -0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, indicating excellent per-core performance.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and how does it affect gaming?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This large VRAM capacity allows for high-resolution textures and helps future-proof the card for newer games that require more memory.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for gaming performance?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU is in the 91st percentile, while the GPU is in the 58th percentile. In graphics-intensive games at high settings, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck, while the CPU will handle physics and game logic efficiently.

Q: What is the performance class of the GPU compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 15852. It is -1.0% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 and -1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, meaning it performs in a very similar tier to these cards.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F supports ECC memory, which is a feature that can be beneficial for workstation builds where data integrity is critical, such as in financial modeling or server applications.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU, and what does it mean for cooling?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP. This is a low power draw for the performance level offered, which means a capable air cooler is sufficient for keeping temperatures in check, allowing for a quieter and more efficient system.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this build?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All FPS discussion is estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores and should be treated as an approximation of real-world performance.