SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS

33,244 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a balanced mid-tier laptop combination: a CPU sitting in the 83rd percentile of all processors paired with a GPU in the 67th percentile, yielding a combined percentile of 75. The data shows a CPU-forward configuration in which the processor outranks the graphics subsystem by a clear margin — a profile that favors games and workloads where six fast cores and strong per-thread throughput matter more than raw GPU horsepower. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact pairing, so all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from in-game measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck

This is a GPU-limited pairing in most graphically demanding scenarios, and that is the correct design for a gaming laptop at this tier. The Ryzen 5 8645HS sits at the 83rd percentile versus all CPUs, while the RTX 4060 Mobile sits at the 67th percentile versus all GPUs — a 16-point spread that tells you which component runs out of headroom first when the resolution and detail settings climb. At 1080p and above with ultra settings, the graphics subsystem will be the limiting factor in virtually every modern AAA title.

The counterweight is the CPU's excellent per-core performance. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1714 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3653 mean the 8645HS will not choke high-refresh, low-resolution gaming the way weaker mobile chips do. In esports-style titles where frame rates scale with CPU speed, the bottleneck shifts: the 5.00 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread results indicate the CPU can feed frames fast enough that the GPU becomes the ceiling again. That is the healthy pattern — the CPU stays ahead, the GPU sets the pace.

For productivity, the relationship inverts. The six-core, twelve-thread configuration lands at the 83rd percentile overall with an average benchmark score of 33244, effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-14701E (deltaPct 0.1), the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (deltaPct 0.1), and the Intel Core i5-12600HX (deltaPct -0.4), and marginally ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (deltaPct 0.5). Competing with eight-core-class chips from a six-core part signals strong sustained throughput per core — but it also signals the ceiling: heavily threaded workloads that scale past twelve threads will find the CPU, not the GPU, to be the limit.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is a 75th-percentile laptop build — solidly upper-mid-range, capable across both gaming and creation workloads without excelling at either extreme.

On the CPU side, the aggregate numbers are consistent: Cinebench R15 multi-core 2094 and single-core 270; Cinebench R23 multi-core 13220 and single-core 1714; PassMark multithread 22586 and single-thread 3653. The spread between single- and multi-core results is typical of a six-core design — the multi-core score is roughly 7.7 times the single-core score in R23, which indicates the SMT threads are being used efficiently rather than sitting idle. The auxiliary PassMark results reinforce a well-rounded compute profile: integer math 72640, floating point 44833, data compression 265483, encryption 15588, extended instructions 20003, string sorting 31748, and physics 1095.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4060 Mobile posts a PassMark G3D score of 17469, GPU compute 6816, Geekbench OpenCL 89420, and Geekbench Vulkan 89569 — the near-identical OpenCL and Vulkan figures suggest consistent driver performance across both APIs. The aggregate GPU score of 22729 places it 0.7 percent behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, 0.8 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, 1.3 percent behind the Intel Arc B580, and 1.3 percent ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile. Those deltas are tight: within roughly a percent and a half of desktop-class discrete cards and its own successor-generation mobile part. In practical terms, this GPU delivers performance that was flagship-adjacent not long ago, in a mobile power envelope.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 8645HS is a Zen 4 (Hawk Point) mobile processor built on TSMC's 4 nm node, carrying 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. It runs six cores and twelve threads, with a 4.30 GHz base clock and a 5.00 GHz boost clock — figures that place it firmly in high-performance-mobile territory rather than thin-and-light territory. The 45 W TDP confirms a performance-oriented design.

The cache hierarchy is where much of its responsiveness comes from: 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus 16 MB of shared L3. That per-core L2 allocation benefits workloads with predictable, core-local data access — compilation, code interpretation, and many game engines — while the shared L3 provides a workable pool for cross-thread data sharing.

Memory support is DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. That figure matters for both gaming (feeding the GPU via shared platform bandwidth) and memory-sensitive productivity tasks. ECC is not supported, consistent with its consumer market segment. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes — enough for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 link plus fast NVMe storage. The multiplier is locked, so no overclocking; the platform is also paired with integrated Radeon 760M graphics, which handle display output and light workloads when the discrete GPU is idle.

What do the scores mean for real workloads? The R23 multi-core score of 13220 puts sustained rendering and encoding throughput in the same bracket as larger rival chips — the nearestRivals list shows it trading blows with eight-plus-core competitors. The single-core 1714 is the more telling figure: snappy desktop responsiveness, fast application launches, and strong performance in software that remains lightly threaded. The PassMark physics score of 1095 and find-prime-numbers result of 75 reflect solid computational throughput for simulation and scientific-lite workloads.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets a specific buyer: the mobile gamer-creator hybrid. For gamers, the estimated performance profile — a 67th-percentile GPU with a 83rd-percentile CPU — points to 1080p high-refresh gaming and 1440p play at moderate-to-high settings as the sweet spot. Content creators doing video editing, 3D rendering, and GPU-accelerated effects will find the RTX 4060 Mobile's compute scores and the CPU's multi-thread throughput genuinely productive, though not workstation-class.

Software developers are an excellent fit. Twelve threads handle parallel compilation comfortably, the 5.00 GHz boost and 1714 R23 single-core score keep single-threaded tooling fast, and 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth supports containerized and VM-heavy workflows. Students get a machine that covers engineering software, light simulation, and gaming in one chassis. Small-business workstations benefit from the encryption score of 15588 and compression throughput of 265483 for data-handling tasks, though the lack of ECC rules out error-critical deployments.

What this build is not: an enthusiast 4K gaming rig or a thread-ripping rendering box. Buyers whose primary workload scales past twelve threads or demands flagship GPU performance should look further up the stack.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the dataset contains no in-game measurements for this pairing, so every frame-rate statement here is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not recorded data.

With that caveat stated, the estimates are reasonable to draw. A PassMark G3D score of 17469, positioned within a percent of the RTX 2080, RX 7700 XT, Arc B580, and RTX 5060 Mobile, corresponds to a performance class that comfortably handles 1080p ultra-settings gaming in most modern titles and 1440p gaming with settings tuned down from maximum. The most demanding current AAA releases at ultra settings will push the 8 GB of VRAM and the 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth harder, making texture-lean presets the safer choice at higher resolutions.

Ray tracing changes the math. Twenty-four RT cores provide hardware acceleration, but at this tier the estimated result is playable rather than high-refresh RT performance, with upscaling carrying most of the load when RT is enabled. Conversely, competitive and esports titles are CPU-bound territory, and the 8645HS's single-thread scores and 5.00 GHz boost indicate high-refresh 1080p play is achievable — the GPU, not the processor, will set the frame ceiling there.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Estimated from the benchmark data rather than measured, the pairing supports high-refresh 1080p play. The CPU's 83rd percentile rank and strong single-thread results keep frame delivery fast, while the GPU's 17469 G3D score defines the ceiling in graphically intensive titles.

Streaming: Single-PC streaming is viable. The twelve threads absorb encode overhead without gutting game performance, and the PassMark multithread score of 22586 indicates enough aggregate headroom for game plus broadcast workloads simultaneously.

Video editing: The GPU compute score of 6816 and Geekbench OpenCL result of 89420 point to solid timeline scrubbing and effects acceleration, while the R23 multi-core 13220 handles export renders. Long 4K exports will be competent rather than fast — this is a mid-tier mobile editor.

3D rendering: The same numbers apply: viewport work is smooth, and GPU-accelerated renders benefit from the 96 tensor cores for AI-assisted denoising and upscaling. Final-frame rendering lands mid-pack by design.

Software development: A standout scenario. The 3653 single-thread score, 5.00 GHz boost, 16 MB L3, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth deliver fast compile times and responsive IDEs; twelve threads handle parallel builds and test suites without contention.

Student and office work: Overqualified in the best sense. Everyday applications, web workloads, and document tasks barely register against this hardware, and the encryption and compression scores make file-heavy academic or administrative work quick. The integrated Radeon 760M extends battery-friendly light use.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4060 Mobile is an Ada Lovelace part built on TSMC's 5 nm process — the AD107 chip, carrying 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die at a density of 118.9M per mm². The configuration: 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores. Base clock is 1545 MHz with a 1890 MHz boost, producing 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput (with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio), a pixel rate of 90.72 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 181.4 GTexel/s.

Memory is the defining constraint and the defining strength. Eight gigabytes of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus yields 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The bus width limits the ceiling — this is not a 4K-ultra card by spec — but the bandwidth is well matched to the shader count, and the tight benchmark deltas against wider-bus rivals suggest the architecture compensates well.

For rendering work specifically, the 96 tensor cores and 6816 GPU compute score make this a legitimate acceleration card for viewport rendering, AI upscaling, and denoising in modern creative applications. The near-identical OpenCL (89420) and Vulkan (89569) Geekbench scores mean cross-API performance is stable regardless of which compute path an application takes. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, alongside Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6, ensures full access to current-generation rendering features. At 115 W TDP on a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, it is a power-efficient design whose scores — within 1.3 percent of the RTX 5060 Mobile that followed it — show how little generational ground it gives up.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class pairing: a mobile Hawk Point CPU on Socket FP8 matched with a mobile Ada Lovelace GPU. Combined, the build lands at the 75th percentile — upper mid-range overall, with a clear internal tilt: the processor (83rd percentile) is the stronger half, the graphics subsystem (67th percentile) the pace-setter in games.

That asymmetry is the build's identity. It is a machine built around a fast, efficient six-core CPU that carries more rank than its GPU partner, which in turn delivers graphics performance competitive with desktop-class cards and its own successor within the tightest of margins. For a mobile platform balancing a 45 W processor against a 115 W GPU, the pairing is coherent: neither component is dramatically wasted on the other, and the combined 75th percentile confirms a configuration that performs above the middle of the pack across both gaming and productivity measurement suites.

FAQ

Q: Is this pairing better for gaming or productivity workloads?

A: The benchmark data tilts toward productivity. The CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile versus the GPU's 67th, so heavily threaded and single-threaded CPU workloads punch above the build's gaming ceiling. Both are competent; the CPU is the stronger half.

Q: Can this build handle 1440p gaming?

A: Estimated from the benchmark scores — no measured FPS data exists for this pairing — the GPU's G3D score of 17469 and its position within roughly a percent of the RTX 2080 and RX 7700 XT indicate 1440p play is realistic at tuned settings, with 1080p ultra as the comfortable default.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average score of 33244 sits within half a percent of the Intel Core i7-14701E (0.1%), AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (0.1%), Intel Core i5-12600HX (-0.4%), and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (0.5%) — effectively dead heats across the board.

Q: Is 8 GB of VRAM a limitation?

A: At this tier, it is the main constraint. The 128-bit bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are well matched to the 3072 shading units, but the most demanding AAA titles at maximum settings and higher resolutions will press against the 8 GB buffer.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked. Performance tuning is limited to what the 4.30 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost clocks deliver out of the box.

Q: Is this suitable for software development?

A: Yes — it is one of the strongest use cases. The 1714 Cinebench R23 single-core score, 3653 PassMark single-thread result, 16 MB of shared L3, and 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth support fast tooling and parallel builds across twelve threads.

Q: Are the frame rates in this analysis measured?

A: No. The dataset contains no measured FPS entries for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores and percentile positions.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds