SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS

33,244 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile form a laptop pairing that sits at the 73rd combined percentile among all tested builds, with the CPU ranking in the 83rd percentile and the GPU in the 63rd. This is a system where the processor is the stronger partner in raw benchmark terms, yet the graphics card carries the load in ways that define the actual gaming and rendering experience. The data suggests a machine aimed at high-refresh 1080p gaming and portable productivity, with clear limits in raw compute-heavy tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data presents a classic laptop imbalance: the CPU is substantially more capable relative to its peer group than the GPU. The Ryzen 5 8645HS sits at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 4050 Mobile sits at the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. This 20-point gap implies that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput matters more than instruction throughput.

The CPU’s multi-threaded strength is evident in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13220, which places it within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX and 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-14701E. In contrast, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 14423 is only 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600, a desktop-class card from a previous generation. This means that while the CPU can feed frames quickly, the GPU will cap the output in graphically intensive titles. The data implies a bottleneck that shifts: in light e-sports titles, the CPU’s single-core score of 1714 in Cinebench R23 will handle physics and game logic, but in AAA titles, the GPU’s 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 throughput becomes the ceiling.

The FPS scaling picture cannot be measured directly, as no measured FPS rows exist for this combination. However, the benchmark scores indicate that at 1080p, the GPU is likely the limiting factor in most modern games, given its 63rd percentile standing. At 720p or lower, the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking would allow it to push higher frame rates, but the GPU would still constrain the absolute maximum. The data suggests a pairing where the CPU has headroom for future GPU upgrades, but not vice versa — a notable point for a laptop where neither component is user-replaceable.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13220 and a single-core score of 1714, which are strong numbers for a 45W TDP mobile part. In Passmark, the multi-thread score of 22586 and single-thread score of 3653 confirm its position. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600HX, scores 33375 on average, which is 0.4% higher — a negligible difference that places the AMD part in the same performance tier as that Intel chip. The Ryzen 7 7745HX is 0.5% behind, showing that the 8645HS is competitive with higher-tier parts from both vendors.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748 and Vulkan score of 75235 are close, indicating consistent compute performance across APIs. The Passmark G3D score of 14423 places it just 0.1% above the Radeon RX 6600, which is a notable comparison because that AMD card is a desktop part. The RTX 4050 Mobile’s Passmark GPU Compute score of 5947 is lower than its G3D score, suggesting that its strength is in rasterization rather than pure compute. The combined picture is a laptop that performs well above the median in CPU tasks but only slightly above the median in GPU tasks, making it a productivity-first machine with gaming capability.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 33244, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-14701E’s 33206 (0.1% difference) and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H’s 33201 (0.1% difference). This puts the 8645HS in a tight cluster of high-end mobile processors. The GPU’s average score of 19049 is close to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation’s 18954 (0.5% ahead), indicating that this is a mid-range graphics solution that trades blows with professional-grade cards in raw compute.

Who Should Build It

This laptop is for gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh gaming over 1440p or 4K. The RTX 4050 Mobile’s 63rd percentile GPU rank and 6 GB of VRAM suggest it can handle most titles at 1080p with high settings, but the data does not support claims of 4K capability. The CPU’s 83rd percentile rank makes it suitable for content creators who work in video editing or 3D rendering, where multi-core performance matters; the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13220 is evidence of this.

Students and small business users will find the pairing adequate for office work, data compression, and encryption tasks, given the Passmark data compression score of 265483 and encryption score of 15588. Software developers can leverage the 12 threads for compilation, though the lack of ECC memory support may be a consideration for long-running server-like workloads. The 45W TDP CPU and 50W TDP GPU indicate a machine that is portable but not ultra-thin, suited for users who need performance on the go without a desktop-class power draw.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining a 6-core, 12-thread AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. The CPU is based on Zen 4 architecture on a 4nm TSMC process, while the GPU uses Ada Lovelace on a 5nm process. The overall tier is upper-midrange, as evidenced by the 73rd combined percentile. The CPU is the standout component, ranking in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is more modest at the 63rd percentile. This is not a halo product, but it is a capable machine for its intended market segment.

The CPU’s boost clock of 5.00 GHz and base clock of 4.30 GHz are high for a mobile part, and its 16 MB of shared L3 cache helps with gaming performance. The GPU’s 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest, but its 2560 shading units and 80 tensor cores provide solid compute throughput. The system is balanced toward CPU-heavy tasks, making it a workstation-leaning gaming laptop.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 14423 and the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1714 suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, the system would deliver playable frame rates in most titles, but the absence of measured data means specific numbers cannot be stated. The GPU’s 63rd percentile rank implies it is not a high-refresh 1440p card, but it should handle 1080p at high settings.

The CPU’s 83rd percentile rank means it will not be the limiting factor in most games, leaving the GPU to determine performance. For e-sports titles, the CPU’s strong single-core performance would allow high frame rates, but the GPU’s 48 ROPs and 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 throughput would cap the maximum output. For AAA titles, the 6 GB VRAM may be a constraint at ultra settings with high-resolution textures, but the 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p. These are estimates; the data does not confirm any specific game performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 83rd percentile rank and 5.00 GHz boost clock support high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU’s 63rd percentile rank limits the system to 1080p high-refresh rather than 1440p. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 1080p titles, but not for future-proofing at ultra settings.

Streaming: The GPU’s 80 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture support hardware encoding, but the Passmark GPU Compute score of 5947 indicates that concurrent encoding and gaming would strain the system. The CPU’s 12 threads can handle encoding software, but the GPU’s 50W TDP suggests thermal constraints.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13220 places it within 0.1% of the Core i7-14701E, making it capable for 4K timeline editing. The GPU’s 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 helps with effects, but the 6 GB VRAM may limit complex compositions.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-thread performance is strong, but the GPU’s 63rd percentile rank means it is not a rendering powerhouse. The Passmark G3D score of 14423 indicates moderate performance for GPU rendering, but the 6 GB VRAM is a hard limit.

Software development: The CPU’s 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache handle compilation efficiently, and the Passmark integer math score of 72640 supports this. The lack of ECC memory is a minor drawback for mission-critical builds.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3653 in Passmark ensures snappy responsiveness, and the data compression score of 265483 shows capability for large spreadsheets and databases. The GPU is overkill for this, but the system remains efficient.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance ranking relative to other processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS ranks in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33244. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14701E and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile’s Passmark G3D score of 14423 is 0.1% above the AMD Radeon RX 6600, a desktop card. Its average benchmark score of 19049 is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this build?

A: The build ranks in the 73rd combined percentile, which places it in the upper-midrange tier for laptop systems. The CPU is stronger than the GPU, with a 20-point percentile gap.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS does not support ECC memory. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 16 Gbps.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this build?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The CPU uses Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, built on a 4nm TSMC process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It uses Zen 4 architecture on the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on a 4nm TSMC process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The L1 cache is 64 KB per core, L2 is 1 MB per core, and L3 is 16 MB shared. This configuration supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, though ECC is not supported.

The benchmark scores show a processor that is strong in both single and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13220 is within 0.5% of the Ryzen 7 7745HX, a higher-tier part. The single-core score of 1714 is competitive with desktop parts from a few generations ago. The Passmark multi-thread score of 22586 and single-thread score of 3653 confirm this. The data compression score of 265483 and encryption score of 15588 indicate strong performance in data-heavy workloads, making it suitable for database and compression tasks. The 45W TDP is modest, allowing for sustained performance in a laptop chassis.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile uses the AD107 chip on Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5nm TSMC process with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth and an effective memory clock of 16 Gbps. The 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 48 ROPs are backed by 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI workloads. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 8.986 TFLOPS, with a 1:1 FP16 ratio.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that is solid for 1080p gaming but not exceptional. The Passmark G3D score of 14423 places it at the 63rd percentile, just 0.1% above the Radeon RX 6600. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748 and Vulkan score of 75235 are close, indicating consistent performance across APIs. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 5947 is lower than the G3D score, suggesting that the GPU is better at rasterization than compute tasks. The 50W TDP is low, which means it will run cool and quiet, but it also limits the clock speeds to a boost of 1755 MHz. The pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s and texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p, but the 6 GB VRAM is a constraint for higher resolutions and large textures.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket with no upgrade path in a traditional sense. It supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The system supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, which is a modern standard. The GPU has a 50W TDP and no external power connectors, as it is an IGP-class component, meaning it draws power from the motherboard. The suggested PSU is null, indicating that the system uses a proprietary laptop power adapter rather than a standard ATX PSU.

The upgrade path is limited by the laptop form factor. The CPU and GPU are soldered, so the only practical upgrades are memory and storage. The DDR5 memory support means users can increase capacity, but the dual-channel configuration is fixed. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow for fast NVMe storage, which is the most sensible upgrade for this system. The CPU’s 45W TDP and GPU’s 50W TDP indicate that the cooling solution is designed for a combined 95W load, leaving little headroom for performance boosts. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing RAM to the maximum supported by the dual-channel controller and installing a high-speed PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drive to reduce load times, as the benchmark data shows the CPU is capable of handling faster storage.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds