SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS

33,244 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

8,746 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile: A Balanced 45W Laptop Platform

This laptop-class pairing combines a 6-core Zen 4 CPU with an entry-level Ampere GPU, landing at the 64th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is the stronger half, sitting at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU trails at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. This creates a system where processor-heavy workloads will shine, but graphically demanding tasks will be limited by the GPU's modest capabilities. The platform is built for portable productivity and moderate gaming rather than high-refresh-rate or high-fidelity experiences.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA106 chip fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. It packs 12,000 million transistors across a 276 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1065 MHz with a boost clock of 1343 MHz, and its memory runs at 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective speed. Memory configuration includes 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute resources include 1792 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The RTX 3050 A Mobile carries 14 RT cores and 56 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features. Pixel rate is 42.98 GPixel/s, texture rate is 75.21 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 4.813 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 4.813 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

Benchmark results show a mixed picture. The PassMark G3D score of 11664 places this GPU at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 8746 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 (8743, 0% delta), slightly ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 (8686, 0.7% delta), and slightly behind the AMD Radeon R9 M265X (8851, -1.2% delta) and AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 (8863, -1.3% delta). These rivals are all older or lower-tier parts, indicating this is an entry-level mobile GPU.

For rendering workloads, the data suggests limited capability. The OpenCL score of 52998 indicates some compute potential, but the PassMark GPU compute score of 4419 is modest. The DirectX scores are telling: DirectX 9 at 152, DirectX 10 at 61, DirectX 11 at 94, and DirectX 12 at 55. The low DirectX 12 score relative to older API scores suggests the GPU may not fully leverage modern rendering paths. The 4 GB VRAM capacity and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings but will struggle with high-resolution textures or ray-traced workloads. RT cores exist but with only 14 of them, ray tracing performance will be minimal.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a laptop-specific socket. The CPU is part of the 8000 series, codenamed Hawk Point, built on Zen 4 architecture. This is a 4 nm TSMC part with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus providing 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The GPU is a mobile part with a 45 W TDP and no power connectors, drawing power through the motherboard. The suggested PSU field is null, meaning no specific PSU headroom is provided; for a laptop this is expected since power delivery is fixed by the system design. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which provides adequate bandwidth for its class.

A sensible next upgrade path would be constrained by the laptop form factor. The CPU and GPU are both soldered or integrated into the motherboard (the GPU is listed as slot width "IGP", indicating integrated-class packaging). Users cannot swap either component. The realistic upgrade is to a completely new laptop with a higher-tier GPU, since the CPU at the 83rd percentile is already strong while the GPU at the 44th percentile is the limiting factor. The DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 4 are current-generation features, so the platform itself is not outdated, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 44th-percentile performance cap the system's longevity for gaming.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data for measured FPS by game at ultra settings is empty (measuredFpsUltraByGame is an empty object), and the flag dataIsMeasured is false. All FPS discussion here is therefore estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct measurement.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11664 (44th percentile) and DirectX scores, frame rates will be modest. The DirectX 11 score of 94 and DirectX 12 score of 55 suggest that newer games using DirectX 12 will perform worse than older titles on DirectX 11. At 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU would likely deliver playable frame rates (30-60 FPS) in older or less demanding titles, but would struggle in modern AAA games requiring more than 4 GB VRAM or heavy DirectX 12 usage. At 1440p, the 192.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM would be significant bottlenecks, likely pushing many games below 30 FPS at ultra settings.

The CPU's strong single-thread score (PassMark single thread of 3653) ensures that CPU-bound scenarios are not the primary constraint, but the GPU's 44th-percentile position means most gaming scenarios will be GPU-limited. For esports titles at lower settings, the system could perform adequately, but for high-fidelity gaming, expectations should be tempered. The gap between the GPU's DirectX 9 score (152) and DirectX 12 score (55) indicates the hardware is best suited for legacy or lightweight titles rather than modern, graphically intensive releases.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system exhibits a clear imbalance: the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU in relative terms. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 64, which is lower than the CPU alone but higher than the GPU alone, reflecting the blend.

For CPU-bound workloads—such as compilation, data compression, encryption, and multithreaded productivity tasks—the processor will be the limiting factor only in that it is the component doing the work, but it will not hold back performance relative to its class. For GPU-bound workloads—gaming, 3D rendering, GPU compute—the GPU will be the bottleneck. The PassMark GPU compute score of 4419 is low relative to the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 22586, meaning any task that offloads to the GPU will see limited throughput.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but telling. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 55 is approximately 58% of its DirectX 11 score of 94, suggesting that newer graphics APIs will not be fully utilized. This means that even if the CPU can feed frames quickly, the GPU will cap the frame rate in modern titles. In CPU-heavy scenarios like physics calculations (PassMark physics score of 1095) or integer math (72640), the CPU will excel, but these are rarely the limiting factor in gaming. The balanced conclusion is that this is a CPU-first system where the GPU is adequate for light-to-moderate graphical tasks but cannot match the CPU's capability.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 8000 series, built on Zen 4 architecture with the codename Hawk Point. It is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors across a 178 mm² die. Base clock is 4.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The TDP is 45 W, which is standard for high-performance mobile parts. Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3.

Benchmark results indicate a strong mobile CPU. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13220 and single-core score of 1714 demonstrate solid multithreaded and single-threaded performance. The Cinebench R15 scores are 2094 multicore and 270 single-core. PassMark results show a multithread score of 22586, single-thread score of 3653, and an average benchmark score of 33244, placing it at the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the Intel Core i7-14701E (33206, 0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33201, 0.1% delta), Intel Core i5-12600HX (33375, -0.4% delta), and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (33091, 0.5% delta). This means the 8645HS trades blows with these parts within a 0.5% range, making it competitive with both Intel and AMD options from similar or higher tiers.

For real workloads, the data reveals specific strengths. PassMark data compression score of 265483 is very high for a mobile part, indicating strong performance in file archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption score of 15588 and extended instructions score of 20003 show robust cryptography and SIMD capability. Floating-point math score of 44833 and integer math of 72640 are both strong, benefiting scientific computing and general productivity. The random string sorting score of 31748 is moderate, and the find prime numbers score of 75 is low, suggesting the CPU is not optimized for certain single-threaded integer loops. The integrated Radeon 760M graphics provide a fallback display output, but the discrete GPU handles graphics.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The 83rd-percentile CPU with 6 cores and 12 threads at up to 5.00 GHz boost is well-suited for developers who compile code, students running virtual machines or data analysis, and small business users handling spreadsheets, databases, and document processing. The PassMark data compression score of 265483 and encryption score of 15588 make it particularly good for IT professionals who frequently archive, encrypt, or transfer data.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks—such as video encoding with x264/x265, audio production, or photo batch processing—will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13220. The data shows strong floating-point math (44833) that aids in rendering software that uses CPU-based ray tracing.

Gamers should target 1080p resolution with medium settings or esports titles. The GPU's 44th percentile and 4 GB VRAM mean that high-resolution gaming (1440p and above) or ultra settings in modern games will be disappointing. The DirectX 12 score of 55 suggests that newer game engines will not be well-utilized. This is not a system for AAA gaming at high fidelity; it is for light gaming, older titles, or competitive games with lower graphical demands.

Students and professionals who need a portable laptop for coursework, research, and everyday productivity will find the CPU's single-thread score of 3653 (PassMark) and R23 single-core score of 1714 sufficient for responsive system operation. The 45 W TDP is typical for performance laptops, trading some battery life for compute capability. Small business workstations handling accounting, CRM, and office suites will see smooth performance, with the CPU's percentile indicating it outperforms most desktop CPUs, let alone laptop parts.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33244.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU sits at the 44th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8746.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus providing 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 64th among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: Are there measured FPS data for this configuration?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; all gaming FPS figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile. The CPU is a mobile processor from the 8000 series with Zen 4 architecture, and the GPU is a mobile Ampere part. The system's combined percentile of 64 places it above the median of all CPU+GPU pairs, but the composition is uneven: the CPU is a top-tier mobile part (83rd percentile) while the GPU is mid-to-low tier (44th percentile). This is a productivity-first laptop with gaming as a secondary consideration, suitable for users who need strong CPU performance for work or study but do not demand high-end graphics.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmarks are consistently strong. Cinebench R23 multicore score is 13220 and single-core is 1714; Cinebench R15 multicore is 2094 and single-core is 270. PassMark multithread score is 22586, single-thread is 3653, and the average benchmark score is 33244, placing it at the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-12600HX (33375, -0.4% delta), while it edges out the Intel Core i7-14701E (33206, 0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33201, 0.1% delta), and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (33091, 0.5% delta).

The GPU's benchmarks are modest. PassMark G3D score is 11664, GPU compute is 4419, and OpenCL score is 52998. The average benchmark score is 8746, placing it at the 44th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 (8743, 0% delta), NVIDIA Quadro P2200 (8686, 0.7% delta), AMD Radeon R9 M265X (8851, -1.2% delta), and AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 (8863, -1.3% delta).

The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms its direct rivals by a hair's breadth while the GPU trades blows with decade-old desktop parts. The CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 44th percentile create a combined 64th percentile, meaning this system will excel in CPU-heavy tasks but is firmly entry-level for graphics. Users should prioritize processor-intensive workloads—compilation, compression, encryption, multithreaded productivity—and approach gaming with realistic expectations at 1080p with reduced settings.