SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8640U + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

26,462 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8640U and AMD Radeon 8050S combine a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 mobile CPU with an RDNA 3.5 mobile GPU. In the aggregate benchmark database, the pairing sits at the 84th combined percentile, driven by a GPU that is stronger in its own pool (89th percentile) than the CPU (78th percentile). The GPU uses shared system memory, so its effective bandwidth is system-dependent.

Balance and Bottleneck

The first thing to note is that the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact combination, so FPS scaling is not available as evidence. That leaves benchmark percentiles and absolute scores as the main quantitative signal for balance. The GPU sits at the 89th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 78th percentile of all CPUs. In relative terms, the Radeon 8050S is the stronger half of this pairing within its own benchmark pool. The combined percentile of 84 sits between the two, which is consistent with a system where graphics throughput outpaces general CPU throughput.

That gap has consequences for workload balance. Rendering and other GPU-heavy tasks should find more headroom in the Radeon 8050S than in the Ryzen 5 8640U. The CPU’s multithreaded scores, such as the PassMark multithread result of 20322 and the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 10433, are respectable for a 6-core part, but the GPU’s 89th percentile suggests that in visually complex scenes the graphics subsystem will often finish its work before the CPU can feed it more data. In lightly threaded or latency-sensitive workloads, the CPU could become the limiting factor. Its single-thread PassMark score of 3534 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1651 are solid, yet the CPU is still lower in its own pool than the GPU is in its own pool.

The CPU’s mixed workload profile reinforces this. PassMark integer math scores 68051, while floating-point math scores 40330. Data compression scores 230080, and random string sorting scores 28066. These are strong throughput numbers, but the physics score of 1033 and the find-prime-numbers score of 69 show that certain single-thread workloads are comparatively modest. For a system aimed at gaming or GPU-accelerated creation, the GPU will usually be the component doing the heavy lifting. For CPU-bound tasks like code compilation or heavily threaded productivity, the CPU’s 12 threads provide enough parallelism to avoid severe bottlenecks, but the 78th percentile still places it below the GPU in relative standing.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an RDNA 3.5 part built on a 4 nm process, with a die size of 308 mm². Its memory is entirely System Shared: no dedicated VRAM size, bus width, or bandwidth is listed in the fact pack. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, but the slot width is IGP and power connectors are None, so this is an integrated-class GPU solution rather than a discrete add-in card. Memory bandwidth is “System Dependent,” meaning the effective bandwidth available to the GPU depends on the rest of the platform rather than on a fixed VRAM specification.

Clocks are listed at 1295 MHz base and 2800 MHz boost. The GPU contains 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It also has 32 ray tracing cores. The fact pack does not list a tensor core count, so AI-acceleration hardware beyond the compute units is not quantified here. Compute throughput is 11.47 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with a 1:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s.

In benchmarks, the Radeon 8050S scores 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58398 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 62108, which places it at the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Against its nearest listed rivals, it is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, and 2.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, 2.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, and 2.7% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP. The data shows a GPU that is effectively trading blows with a workstation-class Radeon Pro part while staying within a few percentage points of mainstream Radeon mobile and LP desktop cards.

For rendering workloads, the 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 figure and 32 ray tracing cores give the Radeon 8050S real compute capacity. The 1:1 FP16 ratio means half-precision workloads are not artificially slowed down on paper. However, the lack of dedicated video memory means large textures and complex scenes depend on system memory bandwidth. The CPU’s memory support is DDR5, dual-channel, with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, which is the platform-level ceiling visible in the fact pack. The GPU’s effective experience will vary with the system’s actual memory configuration, since the GPU memory bandwidth is listed as System Dependent.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 8640U’s average benchmark score is 26462. That places the CPU at the 78th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 10433 in multicore and 1651 in single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1663 multicore and 256 single-core. Geekbench results are 8185 multicore and 2131 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 20322, a single-thread score of 3534, integer math at 68051, floating-point math at 40330, extended instructions at 16500, data compression at 230080, data encryption at 14013, random string sorting at 28066, physics at 1033, and find-prime-numbers at 69.

Compared with its nearest CPU rivals, the 8640U is effectively tied with the Intel Core i9-12900HK and Intel Core i7-1280P, both showing a deltaPct of 0. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS and 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 8024P. That is a tightly contested cluster. The 8640U does not dominate its nearest rivals, but it also does not trail them by any meaningful margin. Its average score is 26462, versus 26469 for the Intel parts and 26402 for the 7435HS. The EPYC 8024P is the only one in the group above it, at 26555.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 62108, placing it at the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 and Vulkan score of 58398 are both strong. The CPU and GPU together produce a combined percentile of 84, which is higher than the CPU alone and lower than the GPU alone. This indicates that the overall system is above-average in the database, and that the GPU is doing more to lift the combined score than the CPU. The 78th percentile CPU and 89th percentile GPU together form a pairing where the graphics component carries the higher performance tier.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users who need a laptop-class platform with stronger graphics than the CPU alone would provide. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with its 4.90 GHz boost clock and 16 MB of shared L3 cache, make it a capable productivity processor. The GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 32 ray tracing cores make it useful for rendering tasks that can use OpenCL or Vulkan acceleration.

Gamers at typical mobile display resolutions should find that the GPU’s 89th percentile is the dominant factor in frame delivery. The CPU’s 78th percentile and strong single-thread score of 3534 in PassMark mean it is unlikely to hold back modern game engines at standard laptop settings. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated effects, video encoding, or 3D scenes would benefit from the Radeon 8050S’s compute throughput and the CPU’s multithreaded Cinebench R23 score of 10433. Developers compiling code or running parallel tests would use the CPU’s 12 threads, 89.6 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth, and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Students with mixed coursework in office productivity, browsing, and light media creation would get a balanced system at the 84th combined percentile. Small business workstations that need to handle spreadsheets, databases, and occasional GPU-accelerated tasks would find the combination of 6 cores, 12 threads, and a 89th-percentile GPU well matched to their workload.

The integrated graphics on the CPU are listed as the Radeon 760M, which provides a fallback path when the higher-power Radeon 8050S is not needed. That dual-graphics arrangement is useful for users who want to extend battery life or reduce thermal load during light tasks. The GPU itself has a TDP of 55 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 28 W. For a laptop-class system, the combined thermal envelope is modest enough to suggest broad applicability in portable workstations and high-performance consumer laptops.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 8640U is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor from the 8000 series, codenamed Hawk Point. It is built on a 4 nm TSMC process and has a die size of 178 mm². The base clock is 3.50 GHz and the boost clock is 4.90 GHz. Its TDP is 28 W. The socket is AMD Socket FP8. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Radeon 760M. The multiplier is not unlocked.

Cinebench R23 multicore performance is 10433, and single-core is 1651. Cinebench R15 shows 1663 multicore and 256 single-core. Geekbench multicore is 8185, single-core is 2131. These scores put the CPU at the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26462. For real-world workloads, the R23 multicore score indicates strong performance in multithreaded applications given the 6-core configuration. The single-core score of 1651 in R23 and 3534 in PassMark suggests fast responsiveness in everyday tasks and games that depend on one or two threads.

The PassMark suite adds a more granular view. Integer math at 68051 and floating-point math at 40330 show solid general arithmetic throughput. Data compression at 230080 is high, which points to good performance in file archiving and data-moving workloads. Data encryption at 14013 is a more moderate result. Extended instructions score 16500, and random string sorting scores 28066. Physics at 1033 and find-prime-numbers at 69 are lower, which is typical for a mobile CPU in legacy single-thread physics or prime-sieve tests. The multithread score of 20322 and single-thread score of 3534 together describe a CPU that can handle parallel productivity work while retaining strong per-core speed.

The nearest rivals show how tight this market segment is. The 8640U is level with the Intel Core i9-12900HK and Intel Core i7-1280P, both with deltaPct 0. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS and 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 8024P. In practice, these differences are within noise. The 8640U’s advantage is not raw speed over those chips, but rather the combination of 28 W TDP, 4 nm process, and integrated graphics in one mobile package.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. With measured FPS absent, frame expectations below are estimates from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

The GPU’s 89th percentile and the CPU’s 78th percentile suggest that, at typical laptop gaming resolutions and settings, the Radeon 8050S will be the primary driver of frame rates. Its 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 32 ray tracing cores give it enough compute to handle modern gaming effects, including ray-traced lighting, though the exact performance will depend on system memory bandwidth because the GPU has no dedicated VRAM. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3534 in PassMark and 2131 in Geekbench single-core indicate that game logic and draw call processing should be handled comfortably. The 6-core/12-thread configuration is sufficient for modern multi-threaded game engines, and the R23 multicore score of 10433 suggests consistent delivery of CPU-side frame data.

The lack of measured game FPS means no exact ultra-preset numbers can be reported for any specific title. Based on the benchmark scores, the pairing should be capable of playable frame rates at standard settings, with the GPU’s 89th percentile serving as the main indicator of graphics performance. The 89th percentile GPU is not an extreme high-end part, but it sits above the majority of the GPU pool. The combined 84th percentile also supports a gaming profile that is better than average. For competitive or high-refresh scenarios at lower settings, the CPU’s strong single-thread speed should help keep frame times consistent. For visually demanding titles, shared memory may become a constraint, and the data does not quantify how much performance is lost compared with a dedicated VRAM configuration.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 8050S have dedicated VRAM?

A: No. The fact pack lists the GPU memory size, type, and bus width as System Shared, and bandwidth as System Dependent.

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 5 8640U use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8.

Q: How many cores and threads does the Ryzen 5 8640U have?

A: It has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Does the Radeon 8050S have ray tracing hardware?

A: Yes. The GPU includes 32 ray tracing cores. No tensor core count is listed in the fact pack.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 84, with the CPU at 78 and the GPU at 89.

Q: What memory type does the Ryzen 5 8640U support?

A: It supports DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Q: Are there any measured game FPS results for this exact pairing?

A: No. The fact pack contains an empty measuredFpsUltraByGame object and dataIsMeasured is false.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build according to the buildClass field. It combines the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 mobile processor, with the AMD Radeon 8050S, an RDNA 3.5 mobile GPU. The CPU is built on a 4 nm TSMC process with a die size of 178 mm². The GPU is also built on a 4 nm process, with a die size of 308 mm². Both components are listed as Active in production status.

The overall tier of the system can be read from the combined percentile of 84. That places the pairing in the upper portion of the database, driven mostly by the GPU’s 89th percentile. The CPU’s 78th percentile is slightly lower but still above the middle of the CPU pool. In terms of raw compute, the CPU offers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10433 and a PassMark multithread score of 20322, while the GPU offers an OpenCL score of 65818 and a Vulkan score of 58398. The combination is balanced toward graphics, but the CPU is strong enough to avoid being a weak link in most laptop workloads.

This pairing appears designed for systems where GPU compute matters more than maximum CPU throughput. The 84th combined percentile is a strong laptop-tier result. The Radeon 8050S is not at the very top of the GPU pool, but it is well above average, and the CPU’s efficiency-oriented 28 W TDP makes the platform suitable for thin-and-light and workstation-class laptops.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the CPU’s AMD Socket FP8 socket. Memory support is DDR5, dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, but it is an IGP-class part with no power connectors and a TDP of 55 W. The CPU TDP is 28 W. No suggested PSU is listed in the fact pack, which is typical for a laptop-class component pairing where the system vendor controls power delivery.

The upgrade path is constrained by the laptop form factor. The fact pack lists no successor for the GPU and no suggested PSU, and it does not enumerate alternative CPU compatibility for the socket beyond this specific processor. The sensible next step within the data is to maximize the platform’s existing features: use the CPU’s integrated Radeon 760M for light workloads and the Radeon 8050S for GPU-heavy tasks. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is the main platform resource that can be adjusted by the system builder, since the GPU’s memory bandwidth is System Dependent. For users seeking more CPU or GPU throughput, the fact pack does not provide a higher-tier upgrade path for this exact pairing, so the practical upgrade would involve moving to a different platform or system rather than swapping individual components on this one.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8640U + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds