SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

26,106 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile pairing represents a mainstream laptop configuration aimed at delivering a balanced experience for both productivity and 1080p gaming. This analysis uses only the provided benchmark data to assess the CPU, GPU, and their combined potential, noting that no measured frame rates exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from synthetic scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point. It operates on a 4nm TSMC process node with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The chip has a 28W TDP, marking it as an efficient mobile part designed for thin-and-light laptops. Its cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Benchmark results place the CPU in the 78th percentile of all tested processors, indicating solidly above-average performance for a mobile chip. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 11486 and single-core score of 1711 reveal a processor that handles heavily threaded workloads well while maintaining competitive single-thread responsiveness. The Geekbench scores of 7461 multicore and 1778 single-core reinforce this profile. PassMark results show a multithread score of 19889, with strong integer math at 68173 and floating-point math at 39725. The extended instructions score of 15855 and data encryption score of 13551 suggest robust cryptographic and SIMD performance, while data compression at 226544 indicates good archival and file-handling capabilities.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 8640HS sits within a tight performance band. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U by 0.3% in average benchmark score but leads the Intel Core i7-14701TE by 0.4%. Against the Intel Core i9-11900KF, it is 0.4% slower, and it edges out the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 by 0.5%. These deltas, all under half a percent, mean the 8640HS is effectively performance-equivalent to these four alternatives in general-purpose computation. For real workloads, this translates to a CPU that can handle everyday multitasking, office suites, and moderate content creation without bottlenecking, though it will not match high-core-count desktop parts in rendering or heavy compilation tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 8640HS and the RTX 4050 Mobile is best understood through their respective percentile positions. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile, while the GPU holds the 63rd percentile, with the combined system at the 71st percentile. This gap suggests the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card, meaning in CPU-light, GPU-heavy scenarios like gaming at high resolutions or rendering complex 3D scenes, the RTX 4050 will likely be the limiting factor. Conversely, in CPU-intensive tasks such as video encoding, code compilation, or scientific simulations, the 6-core/12-thread processor will be the constraint, while the GPU remains underutilized.

The data from PassMark physics (score 970) and GPU compute (score 5947) illustrate this divide. The CPU’s physics score indicates moderate gaming physics capability, but the GPU’s compute score, while respectable for a mobile part, will not accelerate every workload equally. For gaming at 1080p, the pairing is reasonably balanced; the CPU’s single-core score of 3584 in PassMark is sufficient to feed the GPU in most titles. However, at 1440p or higher, the GPU’s 63rd percentile standing will more prominently cap frame rates. For productivity, the 0.4% advantage over the Intel Core i7-14701TE in average CPU score provides a reference point: this is a mainstream chip that will not bottleneck mid-range tasks, but pairing it with a higher-tier GPU would create a noticeable imbalance in GPU-bound workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s aggregate benchmark score is 26106, placing it at the 78th percentile. Its specific scores include a Cinebench R15 multicore of 1845 and single-core of 268, plus a Geekbench multicore of 7461. The PassMark single-thread score is 3584, and the multithread score is 19889. These figures indicate a processor that excels in single-threaded responsiveness, crucial for everyday application launches and web browsing, while offering competent multi-threaded throughput for shorter render jobs or batch processing.

The GPU, with an average benchmark score of 19049, sits at the 63rd percentile. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748 and Vulkan score of 75235 demonstrate strong compute capability for a mobile chip. PassMark results show a G3D score of 14423, with DirectX 11 at 130 and DirectX 12 at 61, suggesting the graphics card is well-optimized for modern APIs but shows lower raw scores in synthetic DX12 tests. The GPU compute score of 5947 indicates moderate compute throughput, suitable for light rendering or AI-assisted tasks. Against rivals, the RTX 4050 Mobile is effectively tied with the AMD Radeon RX 6600, trailing by 0.1%, and matches the NVIDIA Quadro K6000. It leads the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation by 0.5% but lags the NVIDIA Tesla K20m by 0.2%. This places it as a capable 1080p gaming GPU with entry-level 1440p potential, but not a high-end compute powerhouse.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations below are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 63rd percentile and PassMark G3D score of 14423 suggest it is suited for 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with the CPU’s 78th percentile ensuring it does not hold back frame rates. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the strong single-core score (3584 PassMark) will likely allow frame rates well above 100 FPS at 1080p, though these figures are estimates. In AAA games, the RTX 4050 Mobile’s 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle 1080p ultra settings in older titles, but newer, more demanding games may require medium to high settings to maintain smooth performance.

Given the GPU’s 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance, ray tracing at 1080p will be possible but likely not at high settings without DLSS assistance. The 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores support this, but the modest 50W TDP limits sustained clock speeds. For 1440p, the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s will become a limiting factor, and frame rates will likely drop significantly, making 1080p the recommended resolution for this pairing. The lack of measured data means these are educated estimates, but the performance class of the GPU—comparable to a desktop RX 6600—supports a 1080p-focused gaming experience.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This pairing is capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming in competitive titles. The CPU’s single-core score of 3584 PassMark and the GPU’s G3D score of 14423 suggest frame rates that can exceed 144 FPS in lighter games, but in demanding AAA titles, expect 60-100 FPS at high settings. The 71st combined percentile indicates a system that will not consistently hit 144 FPS in all games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11486, can handle software encoding at moderate bitrates while gaming, but using the GPU’s NVENC encoder (implied by Ada Lovelace architecture) offloads this work. The GPU’s 80 tensor cores also support AI-enhanced streaming features, but the 50W TDP limits sustained encoding performance.

Video Editing: The CPU’s multithread score of 19889 in PassMark and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 74748 make this a viable entry-level video editing machine. 1080p timelines with light effects will be smooth, but 4K multi-layer edits will strain the 6-core processor. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing, but expect longer export times compared to higher-core chips.

3D Rendering: This is a mixed bag. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11486 handles basic CPU rendering, but the GPU’s 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 GB VRAM will be the primary renderer for GPU-accelerated engines like Blender Cycles. Expect manageable renders for single objects or simple scenes, but complex scenes will exceed the 6 GB VRAM, causing slowdowns.

Software Development: The CPU’s strong single-core performance (1711 Cinebench R23 single-core) makes for snappy code compilation and IDE responsiveness. The 12 threads handle parallel builds adequately, with a PassMark multithread score of 19889 indicating moderate compilation speeds. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code libraries.

Student and Office Work: This is an excellent fit. The CPU’s 78th percentile ensures smooth multitasking across browsers, document editors, and communication apps. The integrated Radeon 760M provides a fallback for basic graphics tasks when the discrete GPU is idle, extending battery life. The 28W CPU TDP contributes to a portable, all-day laptop experience.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5nm TSMC process, with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1455 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). Its 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 48 ROPs give it a pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s. The chip includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI workloads, with FP32 performance of 8.986 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same rate (1:1).

At the 63rd percentile, the RTX 4050 Mobile sits in the upper-midrange of mobile GPUs. Its PassMark G3D score of 14423 and DirectX 12 score of 61 indicate good but not exceptional gaming performance. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming with high textures, but will limit ultra-high-resolution textures or heavy modding. The 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p but will struggle at 1440p with high settings. The GPU’s compute scores—5947 in PassMark and 74748 in OpenCL—show it is capable of light rendering and compute tasks, but it is not a workstation-class GPU. Its 50W TDP is low, enabling thin laptop designs, but this limits sustained boost clocks under load. The RT and tensor cores support DLSS and ray tracing, but users should expect to rely on DLSS for playable frame rates in ray-traced titles.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who prioritize 1080p performance over 1440p or 4K. The 63rd GPU percentile and 6 GB VRAM make it ideal for esports and mainstream AAA titles at high settings, but not for maxed-out 1440p gaming. Content creators who work with 1080p video or light 3D scenes will find the CPU’s 12 threads and the GPU’s compute capability sufficient, though 4K work will be slow. Developers will appreciate the fast single-core performance for coding and the 12 threads for parallel builds, making this a solid mobile workstation for programming. Students and office workers benefit from the efficient 28W CPU, which enables long battery life while handling daily tasks with ease. Small business workstations that need occasional GPU acceleration for presentations or light design work will also find this pairing competent. It is not suited for heavy 3D rendering, professional video editing at 4K, or high-refresh 1440p gaming.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining a mainstream 6-core CPU with a mid-tier mobile GPU. The combined percentile of 71 places it in the upper-midrange of all tested laptop configurations. The CPU’s 78th percentile and GPU’s 63rd percentile show a system weighted toward processor performance, making it more adept at productivity than pure gaming. The pairing is best described as a balanced all-rounder for 1080p gaming and everyday computing, with the CPU pulling ahead in multi-threaded tasks and the GPU handling modern game graphics at moderate settings. It does not excel in any single category but provides a reliable, portable foundation for a wide range of tasks.

FAQ

Q: Is this laptop good for 1080p gaming?

A: Yes, with caveats. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 14423 and 6 GB VRAM support high settings in most titles at 1080p, but the 63rd percentile means demanding AAA games may require medium settings for smooth play. No measured FPS data exists for this combination, so these are estimates.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 8640HS is within 0.5% of all four nearest rivals in average benchmark score. It is 0.3% slower than the Ryzen 5 8540U, 0.4% faster than the Core i7-14701TE, 0.4% slower than the Core i9-11900KF, and 0.5% faster than the Ryzen AI 5 340.

Q: Can this system handle video editing?

A: For 1080p video editing, yes. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11486 and GPU’s OpenCL score of 74748 provide adequate performance for light timelines. 4K editing will be limited by the 6-core CPU and 6 GB GPU VRAM.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect gaming?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth from its 6 GB GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming but will bottleneck performance at 1440p with high textures.

Q: Does this CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 8640HS includes a Radeon 760M integrated GPU, which allows basic display output and light graphics tasks when the discrete RTX 4050 is not needed, potentially saving power.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and is it enough for modern games?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. This is adequate for 1080p gaming with high textures in most titles, but newer games with large texture packs may exceed this limit, causing stutters or reduced texture quality.

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this laptop?

A: The system holds a combined percentile of 71, placing it in the upper-midrange of laptop configurations. The CPU is stronger (78th percentile) than the GPU (63rd percentile), making it more balanced for productivity than pure gaming.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds