SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

24,089 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

This desktop pairing combines AMD's Zen 4-based Ryzen 5 8600G with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace flagship-tier RTX 4080 SUPER, creating a configuration that sits at the 81st combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairs. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the GPU is a 5 nm AD103 chip with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory. The benchmark data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores rather than direct frame-rate measurements.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4080 SUPER is built around the AD103 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz, with memory running at 1438 MHz (23 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory is accessed via a 256-bit bus, yielding a substantial 736.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth — a figure that positions this card well for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The compute configuration is robust: 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operations pipelines. Ray tracing hardware includes 80 dedicated RT cores, while 320 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated workloads. Peak FP32 performance reaches 52.22 TFLOPS, with FP16 also rated at 52.22 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel fill rate is 285.6 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 816.0 GTexel/s — numbers that translate directly into strong rasterization and texture-heavy scene performance.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU's high-end standing. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test returns a score of 6600, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores hit 219065 and 260075 respectively. Passmark G3D scores 34245, with GPU compute at 19822. The card's 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it firmly in the upper echelon, and its average benchmark score of 54209 is within 0.1% of the non-SUPER RTX 4080 (deltaPct -0.1), indicating the SUPER variant's performance uplift is modest but present. The nearest rival comparisons show the card trailing the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X by 1.1% and the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 2.7%, though those deltas are small enough to be within run-to-run variance.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores means hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS-style upscaling are both fully supported. The 16 GB frame buffer is generous for 4K texture sets and complex scenes, while the 736.3 GB/s bandwidth reduces bottlenecks when streaming high-resolution assets. The 320 W TDP and triple-slot cooler design indicate this is a power-hungry card that requires substantial chassis airflow and a 700 W suggested PSU.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, the following gaming expectations are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The RTX 4080 SUPER's 86th GPU percentile and 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest this pairing is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and solid 4K performance in most titles. The 16 GB GDDR6X memory with 736.3 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for modern game textures at ultra settings.

The CPU's gaming-relevant metrics are moderate: a single-thread 3DMark score of 985, a 2-thread score of 1869, and a 4-thread score of 3510. These figures suggest the Ryzen 5 8600G can feed the RTX 4080 SUPER adequately in most scenarios, though heavily CPU-bound titles may see performance limited by the 6-core/12-thread configuration at higher frame rates. The 8-thread score of 5187 and max-thread score of 6161 indicate that scaling beyond 4 threads is efficient, which bodes well for modern multi-threaded game engines.

At 1080p, the GPU's raw power would likely push frame rates well beyond monitor refresh rates in many titles, but the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3878) may become the limiting factor in esports titles or games with poor multi-thread optimization. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the RTX 4080 SUPER's 285.6 GPixel/s pixel fill rate should maintain high frame rates. At 4K, the 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM become the dominant factors, with the CPU's role diminishing significantly.

These estimates should be treated with caution — the absence of direct FPS measurements means actual performance could vary based on game-specific optimization, driver maturity, and thermal conditions. The data suggests a capable high-end gaming platform, but exact frame rates remain unverified for this pairing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor from the 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. The chip is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Base clock is 4.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the 65 W TDP makes it a relatively efficient part for the AM5 socket.

Cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 via a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and includes integrated Radeon 760M graphics — a notable feature for this desktop chip. The multiplier is unlocked, enabling overclocking, and the processor was released on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $229.

Benchmark performance is solidly mid-range. Cinebench R23 scores are 21503 multi-core and 3035 single-core, while R20 yields 9031 multi-core and 1274 single-core. Geekbench results show 10850 multi-core and 2433 single-core. The 3DMark suite produces scores ranging from 985 single-thread to 6199 for 16 threads, with max-thread at 6161 — showing near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads.

The 76th percentile ranking among all CPUs places this chip above the majority of processors, but its nearest rivals tell a more nuanced story. The Ryzen 5 7540U scores 24188 (deltaPct -0.4), meaning the 8600G is just 0.4% behind it. The Ryzen 7 8840U scores 23982 (deltaPct 0.4), putting the 8600G slightly ahead. The Intel Core i5-13400 scores 24280 (deltaPct -0.8), and the Core i7-1360P scores 24344 (deltaPct -1). These deltas are all within 1%, indicating the 8600G performs nearly identically to a range of competing mobile and desktop chips despite its lower core count in some cases.

PassMark results reveal workload-specific strengths: integer math scores 77042, floating-point math 47919, and extended instructions 22610. Data encryption scores 17181, compression 293306, and random string sorting 35067. Physics scores 1450, while the find prime numbers test returns 96 and single-thread performance is 3878. These figures suggest the CPU handles general productivity tasks well, with particularly strong integer and compression performance for its class.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between these components is asymmetric. The RTX 4080 SUPER ranks at the 86th GPU percentile with an average benchmark score of 54209, while the Ryzen 5 8600G ranks at the 76th CPU percentile with an average score of 24089. The GPU is significantly more powerful relative to its peer group than the CPU, which creates a potential bottleneck scenario in CPU-light workloads.

In gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 985, PassMark single-thread of 3878) will likely limit frame rates in scenarios where the GPU is underutilized — typically at 1080p with lower graphical settings. The CPU's 8-thread score of 5187 and max-thread of 6161 indicate that multi-threaded game engines will scale better, but the 6-core/12-thread configuration may still struggle to keep up with the GPU's 52.22 TFLOPS throughput in the most demanding CPU-bound titles.

The GPU's compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute 19822, Geekbench OpenCL 219065) are far ahead of what the CPU can feed in compute-heavy workloads. This imbalance is less problematic at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth of the GPU far exceeds the CPU's 83.2 GB/s, meaning data transfer between CPU and GPU is not likely to be a limiting factor in most workloads.

The combined percentile of 81 reflects this imbalance — the pairing is strong overall, but the CPU holds back the GPU's full potential in some scenarios. The FPS scaling would likely show diminishing returns when pairing this CPU with such a high-end GPU, particularly at 1080p. Users seeking maximum performance from the RTX 4080 SUPER would benefit from a higher-tier CPU, but the 8600G provides adequate feeding for most gaming and productivity workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 24089, ranking at the 76th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are within 1%: the Ryzen 5 7540U at 24188 (-0.4%), Ryzen 7 8840U at 23982 (+0.4%), Core i5-13400 at 24280 (-0.8%), and Core i7-1360P at 24344 (-1%). This clustering suggests the 8600G is well-positioned in the mid-range desktop and high-end mobile overlap zone.

The GPU averages 54209 across its benchmark suite, placing it at the 86th percentile. The RTX 4080 (non-SUPER) scores 54247 (-0.1%), making the SUPER variant essentially a lateral move in benchmark terms. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (-1.1%), the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (-2.7%), and the Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (-2.8%) — all trailing the RTX 4080 SUPER by small margins.

The combined picture shows a system at the 81st percentile overall, which places it in the upper quintile of all CPU+GPU pairs. The GPU is the dominant contributor to this ranking, while the CPU contributes solidly but not spectacularly. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 for the GPU combined with the CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 6161 indicates a system capable of handling demanding 3D workloads, though the gap between GPU compute (19822 PassMark) and CPU multi-thread (25294 PassMark) shows where the bottleneck may appear.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize GPU-heavy workloads at high resolutions. Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings will benefit most from the RTX 4080 SUPER's 86th percentile performance, 16 GB VRAM, and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking ensures adequate support for these scenarios, where GPU load dominates.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or GPU-accelerated effects will find the 320 tensor cores and 80 RT cores valuable for tasks like AI upscaling, denoising, and ray-traced previews. The 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates compute-heavy rendering pipelines. The CPU's 21503 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides sufficient processing power for encoding and asset preparation tasks.

Software developers targeting GPU compute or game development will appreciate the CUDA-capable architecture and the 16 GB frame buffer for large datasets. The CPU's 77042 PassMark integer math score and 293306 compression score handle compilation and build tasks efficiently. Students and small business workstations would find this configuration overkill for typical office work, but the integrated Radeon 760M in the CPU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled or underutilized.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the GPU's raw power (52.22 TFLOPS) will likely exceed the CPU's feeding capability, with the 985 single-thread 3DMark score potentially limiting frame rates in CPU-bound titles. At 1440p, the balance improves, and the 736.3 GB/s bandwidth supports high frame rates with ultra textures.

Streaming: The 320 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features. The CPU's 12 threads handle encoding overhead, though the 65 W TDP limits sustained multi-thread performance compared to higher-core-count alternatives.

Video editing: The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 285.6 GPixel/s pixel rate accelerate timeline rendering and effects. The CPU's 21503 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles export tasks, while the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large project files.

3D rendering: The 80 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering, and the 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance speeds up compute-based renderers. The 16 GB VRAM accommodates complex scenes, but the CPU's 6 cores may slow scene preparation and geometry processing.

Software development: The CPU's 77042 integer math and 293306 compression scores handle compilation, while the GPU's 19822 PassMark compute score accelerates parallel workloads. The 16 GB VRAM supports large data structures for machine learning or data processing tasks.

Student and office work: This configuration is significantly overpowered for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's 3878 PassMark single-thread score handles office applications smoothly, and the integrated Radeon 760M provides display output even without the discrete GPU active.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G (6 cores, 12 threads, Zen 4 Phoenix architecture, 65 W TDP) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER (AD103, Ada Lovelace, 320 W TDP). The CPU's 76th percentile ranking and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking yield a combined 81st percentile overall. The system uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform with DDR5 memory support and 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU.

The RTX 4080 SUPER is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, requiring a 700 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector. The GPU is marked as end-of-life production status with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. The CPU remains in active production with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

This pairing represents a high-end GPU matched with a mid-range CPU, creating a system that excels in GPU-bound workloads at high resolutions but may underutilize the graphics card in CPU-limited scenarios. The 81st combined percentile indicates strong overall performance, though the CPU's modest core count and cache size (16 MB L3) relative to its GPU partner create an imbalance worth considering.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 81, placing it in the upper quintile of all CPU+GPU pairs. The CPU ranks at the 76th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 86th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8600G compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU scores 24089 on average, which is within 1% of four rivals: the Ryzen 5 7540U (24188, -0.4%), Ryzen 7 8840U (23982, +0.4%), Intel Core i5-13400 (24280, -0.8%), and Intel Core i7-1360P (24344, -1%).

Q: What is the RTX 4080 SUPER's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 736.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1438 MHz, which translates to 23 Gbps effective.

Q: Does this combination have measured gaming FPS data?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

Q: What are the GPU's ray tracing and tensor core specifications?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores. It delivers 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 52.22 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (1:1 ratio).

Q: What is the CPU's integrated graphics capability?

A: The Ryzen 5 8600G includes integrated Radeon 760M graphics. This provides display output capability even without the discrete RTX 4080 SUPER installed or active.

Q: What are the power requirements for this build?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 320 W TDP and requires a 700 W suggested PSU. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector and is a triple-slot design.