SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

24,089 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

43,223 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

This desktop pairing combines AMD’s 6-core Zen 4 APU with NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace GPU, landing at the 80th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings in the benchmark database. The CPU holds the 76th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards — a closely matched duo that skews slightly toward graphics performance. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU pairing, every frame rate figure presented here is an estimate based on the benchmark scores of each component. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 29995 places it at the 83rd percentile, indicating strong 1440p and capable 4K gaming potential. The CPU’s single-thread score of 985 in 3DMark and 3035 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can feed the GPU adequately at high resolutions, where the graphics card becomes the primary bottleneck.

At 1080p, the RTX 4070 SUPER’s raw compute power — 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 and a texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s — would likely produce very high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock helping to minimize draw-call bottlenecks. The 12 GB GDDR6X memory with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for modern game assets, while the 56 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing. Estimating from the GPU’s 83rd percentile standing, 1080p ultra settings should deliver well over 100 FPS in most competitive and AAA titles, though the exact figures cannot be confirmed without measured data.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 83rd percentile becomes more relevant, as resolution scaling shifts the load toward the graphics card. The 198.0 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests strong fill-rate performance for high-resolution rendering. The CPU’s 16 MB shared L3 cache and 6 cores / 12 threads would handle game logic and physics without becoming a limiting factor, though the 0.4% deltaPct versus the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U indicates the 8600G is roughly on par with that mobile chip in average benchmark scores. Estimated frame rates at 1440p ultra would likely remain comfortably above 60 FPS in most titles, with ray tracing enabled dropping performance but still playable.

For 4K gaming, the 12 GB VRAM capacity becomes a consideration — some modern titles at ultra settings with high-resolution textures may approach this limit. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with the latest rendering features. The 1% deltaPct behind the RTX 4090 Mobile in average benchmark scores suggests the desktop RTX 4070 SUPER performs near that mobile flagship, which bodes well for 4K at medium-to-high settings. However, users targeting 4K ultra with ray tracing should temper expectations, as the 83rd percentile GPU position indicates it is not a top-tier 4K card.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24089 places it at the 76th percentile, with a combined CPU+GPU percentile of 80. The 3DMark multi-threaded scores show a scaling pattern: 1869 at 2 threads, 3510 at 4 threads, 5187 at 8 threads, and 6161 at maximum threads. This indicates reasonable multi-threading efficiency, with the 6-core / 12-thread configuration extracting most of its performance by 8 threads.

Cinebench R23 results show 21503 multi-core and 3035 single-core, representing strong single-thread performance for a 65 W TDP chip. The Geekbench scores of 10850 multi-core and 2433 single-core reinforce this picture. PassMark integer math at 77042 and floating-point math at 47919 demonstrate balanced compute capabilities for general workloads.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 43223 places it at the 83rd percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 represents modern API performance, while Geekbench OpenCL at 172795 and Vulkan at 205624 show strong compute capabilities. PassMark G3D at 29995 is the standout figure, with GPU compute at 17108 indicating solid non-graphics workloads.

The nearest rivals for the CPU are all within 1%: the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U at 24188 (-0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U at 23982 (+0.4%), the Intel Core i5-13400 at 24280 (-0.8%), and the Intel Core i7-1360P at 24344 (-1%). This tight clustering means the 8600G performs essentially identically to these alternatives in aggregate benchmarks. For the GPU, the RTX 4070 SUPER sits within 1% of the Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262, -0.1%), RTX 5050 Mobile (43268, -0.1%), Quadro M6000 (43301, -0.2%), and RTX 4090 Mobile (43667, -1%). The combined picture shows a system that is balanced within approximately 7 percentile points between CPU and GPU.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4070 SUPER is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The AD104 chip features 7168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. Clock speeds range from a 1980 MHz base to a 2475 MHz boost, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration includes 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for high-resolution textures and ray-traced workloads, though the 192-bit bus width is narrower than higher-tier cards in the 40-series lineup. The 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated features like DLSS, which could extend the card’s useful lifespan in games that support these technologies.

Compute performance is substantial: 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 and matching 35.48 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate capabilities for high-resolution rendering. The PassMark G3D score of 29995 at the 83rd percentile places this card well above the median GPU, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 confirms modern API efficiency.

The 220 W TDP with a suggested 550 W PSU represents a moderate power footprint for the performance class. The dual-slot design (267 mm length, 112 mm height, 42 mm width) should fit in most ATX cases, though the 16-pin power connector requires an appropriate PSU cable. With production status marked as end-of-life and a successor in the GeForce 50 series, this card represents the tail end of the Ada Lovelace generation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile gap between CPU (76th) and GPU (83rd) is modest, suggesting neither component dramatically overshadows the other in most workloads. However, the nature of gaming workloads typically favors GPU utilization, and the 7-percentile-point advantage for the GPU means that at lower resolutions (1080p), the CPU may become the limiting factor in high-FPS scenarios.

The CPU’s multi-thread scaling data provides insight: 3DMark scores rise from 1869 at 2 threads to 6161 at max threads, showing a 3.3x improvement. This indicates that the 6-core design handles multi-threading reasonably but does not scale linearly, which is typical for consumer processors. In gaming, where 8 threads are often the practical maximum, the 5187 score at 8 threads suggests the CPU can maintain high frame rates without becoming a severe bottleneck.

The GPU’s 83rd percentile versus the CPU’s 76th means that in GPU-bound scenarios (high resolutions, ray tracing, heavy effects), the RTX 4070 SUPER will be the limiting factor — which is the preferred direction for gaming, as it allows the CPU to keep up with frame generation. In CPU-bound scenarios (competitive shooters at 1080p, physics-heavy simulations, strategy games), the Ryzen 5 8600G’s single-core strength (985 in 3DMark single-thread, 3035 in Cinebench R23 single-core) will determine the ceiling.

The FPS scaling between resolutions would likely show diminishing returns as resolution increases, with the GPU becoming progressively more dominant. At 1080p, the CPU might limit frame rates in less demanding titles; at 1440p and 4K, the GPU takes over as the primary constraint. This is a healthy balance for a gaming system, as it avoids the frustration of a GPU that is too weak to drive modern titles at acceptable settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 83rd percentile and 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 compute should drive 144Hz+ monitors at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, though the CPU’s single-thread score of 985 in 3DMark may cap extreme frame rates in esports titles. The 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth support high-texture settings without stuttering.

Streaming: The 224 tensor cores on the GPU enable hardware-accelerated encoding and AI features, while the CPU’s 12 threads (6161 in 3DMark max threads) can handle game plus streaming overhead simultaneously. The 0.4% deltaPct versus the Ryzen 7 8840U suggests similar multi-tasking capability to that mobile processor.

Video editing: The GPU’s 17108 PassMark compute score and 172795 Geekbench OpenCL score accelerate effects and rendering, while the CPU’s 21503 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles timeline operations. The 12 GB VRAM is useful for previewing 4K timelines with effects applied.

3D rendering: The CUDA-compatible GPU with 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores excels at GPU-accelerated renders, with the 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 throughput driving fast iterations. The CPU’s 47919 PassMark floating-point math score provides supplementary CPU rendering capability, though the 6-core configuration will be slower than higher-core alternatives.

Software development: The CPU’s 293306 PassMark data compression and 17181 data encryption scores indicate solid performance for build tools and code compilation. The 77042 integer math score supports rapid compilation, while the 16 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code. The 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP CPU paired with the integrated Radeon 760M graphics means the system can operate efficiently during light workloads, with the discrete GPU only engaging when needed. The 2433 Geekbench single-core score ensures responsive application usage, while the 3878 PassMark single-thread score matches or exceeds typical office processors.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh or 4K medium-to-high settings represent the primary audience, given the GPU’s 83rd percentile and the 12 GB GDDR6X memory. Those who want ray tracing enabled will benefit from the 56 RT cores, and the 224 tensor cores enable DLSS for additional performance headroom.

Content creators working with video editing, motion graphics, or 3D rendering will find the GPU’s compute capabilities (17108 PassMark GPU compute, 172795 Geekbench OpenCL) valuable, while the CPU’s 6 cores / 12 threads handle non-accelerated tasks adequately. The 12 GB VRAM supports larger projects than 8 GB cards, though 16 GB or more would be preferable for very large scenes.

Developers and power users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance for compilation, virtualization, and occasional gaming will appreciate the 80th combined percentile. The CPU’s data encryption score of 17181 and data compression score of 293306 indicate strong performance for security-related tasks and file handling.

Students and small business users building a single workstation that can handle both productivity and entertainment will find this pairing sufficient, though the combined cost of the components (CPU launch MSRP $229, GPU launch MSRP 599 USD) suggests this is not a budget-oriented build. The 76th CPU percentile and 83rd GPU percentile mean this system outperforms the majority of desktop configurations in the database.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. Built on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, it operates at a 4.30 GHz base clock and 5.00 GHz boost clock within a 65 W TDP. The 8000 series positioning makes this an APU with integrated Radeon 760M graphics, though the discrete RTX 4070 SUPER makes the iGPU secondary.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. This configuration supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The 25,000 million transistor count and 4 nm process node represent a modern, efficient design that balances performance and power consumption.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in single-threaded tasks relative to its multi-threaded capability. The 3035 Cinebench R23 single-core score is strong, while the 21503 multi-core score is respectable but not exceptional for a 6-core part. The PassMark single-thread score of 3878 confirms this pattern, while the 25294 PassMark multithread score shows the 12 threads working effectively together.

The nearest rivals — all within 1% in average benchmark scores — include the Ryzen 5 7540U (-0.4%), Ryzen 7 8840U (+0.4%), Intel Core i5-13400 (-0.8%), and Intel Core i7-1360P (-1%). This tight clustering means the 8600G provides essentially identical aggregate performance to these very different processors, spanning mobile and desktop designs. The 76th percentile ranking places it above the median but not in the top tier of CPUs.

For real workloads, the 6-core / 12-thread configuration handles modern games, productivity applications, and light-to-moderate content creation without issue. The 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures snappy response in single-threaded applications, while the 12 threads manage multi-tasking effectively. The 16 MB L3 cache is modest compared to higher-tier Ryzen parts but sufficient for the core count.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, with the CPU at the 76th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8600G compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24089, which is 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U (24188), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (23982), 0.8% behind the Intel Core i5-13400 (24280), and 1% behind the Intel Core i7-1360P (24344).

Q: What is the memory configuration of the RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth and memory clock of 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the TDP of each component and the suggested PSU?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, the GPU has a 220 W TDP, and the suggested power supply rating is 550 W.

Q: Does this CPU have integrated graphics, and what is it?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 8600G includes Radeon 760M integrated graphics, though the discrete RTX 4070 SUPER would typically be used for display output.

Q: What is the production status of the RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series listed as its successor.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the CPU provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing of AMD’s Ryzen 5 8600G (6 cores, 12 threads, Zen 4 architecture, 4 nm process) with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Ada Lovelace architecture, 5 nm process, 7168 shading units). The combined percentile of 80 indicates this system outperforms 80% of all CPU-GPU pairings in the database, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of desktop configurations.

The CPU’s 76th percentile and GPU’s 83rd percentile create a system that is slightly GPU-heavy in terms of relative performance. This is generally favorable for gaming, as the graphics card is more likely to be the limiting factor than the processor. The 65 W CPU TDP combined with the 220 W GPU TDP results in a system that requires a 550 W power supply, which is modest for this performance class.

The build class is explicitly desktop, distinguishing it from mobile or workstation configurations. The 80th combined percentile places this pairing above the majority of systems, making it suitable for high-refresh gaming at 1440p, content creation, and general productivity. The CPU’s integrated Radeon 760M graphics provide a fallback display output and power-efficient mode, though the discrete GPU dominates in all performance-sensitive scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current mainstream desktop platform from AMD. The memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, and the platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s available lanes.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU leaves substantial thermal and power headroom within the AM5 platform, meaning a future CPU upgrade to a higher-core-count Ryzen processor would be feasible without changing the motherboard. The suggested 550 W PSU provides some headroom for minor upgrades but would likely need replacement if a significantly more powerful GPU were installed.

The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. Given the 220 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU, a future GPU upgrade would need to respect the power supply’s capacity unless the PSU is also replaced. The 16-pin power connector is the current standard for NVIDIA cards, which should carry forward to future generations.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count AM5 CPU if multi-threaded workloads become more demanding, as the 6-core / 12-thread configuration is the primary limitation in CPU-bound tasks. Alternatively, a future GPU upgrade beyond the RTX 4070 SUPER would provide additional headroom for 4K gaming and more demanding ray tracing, provided the PSU is upgraded accordingly. The DDR5 memory support ensures the platform is current, and the PCIe Gen 4 connectivity is sufficient for current and near-future GPU bandwidth requirements.