SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

24,089 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

This pairing combines AMD's 6-core Zen 4 desktop processor with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4070 graphics card. The CPU sits at the 76th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 81st percentile among all graphics cards, placing this desktop build in the 79th combined percentile. The data here is benchmark-derived, not measured from game testing, so all FPS figures should be treated as estimates.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process. It packs 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The chip contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Cache is organized as 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, though ECC memory is not supported. It uses AMD Socket AM5 and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores climb from 985 single-thread to 1,869 with 2 threads, 3,510 with 4 threads, 5,187 with 8 threads, and peak at 6,199 with 16 threads. This scaling pattern indicates efficient utilization of available cores, with the 16-thread score being only slightly above the 8-thread result, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 8 threads. The max-thread score of 6,161 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score, confirming that the chip is fully utilized at that point.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R23 multicore score of 21,503 is approximately 7 times the single-core score of 3,035, which is strong for a 6-core/12-thread part. The R20 multicore score of 9,031 versus a single-core score of 1,274 shows similar scaling. The R15 results follow the same pattern with 2,167 multi and 305 single. Geekbench shows a multicore score of 10,850 against a single-core score of 2,433, a ratio of roughly 4.5.

PassMark tests reveal specific workload characteristics. Integer math scores 77,042, floating-point math scores 47,919, and extended instructions score 22,610. Data compression is notably strong at 293,306, while data encryption scores 17,181. The find prime numbers test is relatively weak at 96, and random string sorting comes in at 35,067. Physics scores 1,450, multithread scores 25,294, and single-thread scores 3,878. The average benchmark score across all tests is 24,089.

Against nearest rivals, the 8600G is nearly identical in average score to the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U at 24,188, sitting just 0.4% below it. It is 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U at 23,982, 0.8% below the Intel Core i5-13400 at 24,280, and 1% below the Intel Core i7-1360P at 24,344. These small deltas indicate that this CPU trades blows with a range of mid-range desktop and mobile parts.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 uses the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 35,800 million transistors across 294 mm², giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores.

Memory consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The memory clock is listed at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective. The GPU base clock is 1920 MHz, boosting to 2475 MHz. Pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 29.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1). The card has a 200 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested power supply, using a single 16-pin connector. It is a dual-slot card measuring 240 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show a GPU that excels in both graphics and compute. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3,854. Geekbench OpenCL scores 154,858, while Vulkan scores 174,152. PassMark G3D is 26,927, and GPU compute is 14,720. The DirectX tests show 139 for DirectX 10, 244 for DirectX 11, 103 for DirectX 12, and 320 for DirectX 9. The G2D score is 1,164. The average benchmark score is 37,648.

The RTX 4070 sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show very tight competition. It is 0.1% above the NVIDIA Tesla P4 at 37,628, 0.4% above the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 at 37,507, 1.3% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile at 38,135, and 1.3% above the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 at 37,157. These margins are small, indicating that the RTX 4070's performance class is well established and consistent.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 24,089 places it at the 76th percentile of all CPUs. Its best multi-threaded result is the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,503, which is a strong showing for a 65 W TDP part. The PassMark multithread score of 25,294 corroborates this, and the 3DMark max-thread score of 6,161 confirms consistent scaling.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 37,648 places it at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 174,152 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 154,858, which may indicate better optimization for Vulkan workloads. The PassMark G3D score of 26,927 is solid, while the GPU compute score of 14,720 shows respectable compute throughput.

Combined, this desktop build achieves a 79th percentile ranking. The CPU at 76th and GPU at 81st are closely matched, with the GPU being the slightly stronger component. The combined percentile of 79 reflects a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outperforms the other. The CPU's average score of 24,089 is within 1% of all four nearest rivals, showing that this processor competes directly with a broad range of alternatives. The GPU's margins against rivals are similarly narrow, with all four nearest rivals within 1.3% of its average score.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that gaming performance must be inferred from these benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 985 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 3,035, suggests it can feed the GPU adequately in most scenarios. The GPU's high percentile ranking indicates it will be the primary driver of frame rates at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 79, with the CPU at the 76th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 81st percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8600G compare to the Intel Core i5-13400?

A: The Ryzen 5 8600G has an average benchmark score of 24,089, which is 0.8% below the Intel Core i5-13400's score of 24,280.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the RTX 4070?

A: The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported by the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 4070?

A: The RTX 4070 has a launch MSRP of 599 USD.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the GPU is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the RTX 4070 in benchmark scores?

A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (0.1% higher), AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (0.4% higher), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (1.3% lower), and AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (1.3% higher).

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU at the 76th percentile and GPU at the 81st percentile create a reasonably balanced system. The GPU is the stronger component by a margin of 5 percentile points, which suggests that in GPU-bound workloads, the CPU will not be the limiting factor. However, in CPU-bound scenarios, the GPU may have headroom that goes unused.

Benchmark data supports this assessment. The CPU's single-thread performance is adequate, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 985 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,035. These scores indicate that the CPU can handle most gaming workloads, which typically rely heavily on single-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,878 reinforces this conclusion.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's scaling is solid but not exceptional. The 3DMark scores show a 6.3x increase from single-thread to max-thread, and the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 7.1x the single-core score. This indicates that the 6-core/12-thread configuration is well-utilized, but applications that benefit from more than 12 threads will see the CPU become the bottleneck.

The GPU's performance profile suggests it will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where the 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are taxed. In compute workloads, the GPU's 14,720 PassMark GPU compute score and 154,858 Geekbench OpenCL score indicate strong throughput, but the CPU's 25,294 PassMark multithread score may keep pace in certain parallel tasks.

The lack of measured FPS data for this combination means that bottleneck analysis must rely on percentile positions. The 5-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles is modest, indicating that neither component dramatically outclasses the other. For 1080p gaming, the CPU's strong single-thread scores may be sufficient, while at 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases and becomes the primary determinant of frame rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU at the 81st percentile is well-positioned for high-refresh gaming. The CPU's single-thread score of 985 in 3DMark suggests it can keep up with the GPU's frame output in most titles. The combination should deliver smooth frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, though the absence of measured FPS data requires caution in specific expectations.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with the GPU's 184 tensor cores, provide a reasonable foundation for streaming workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 25,294 indicates sufficient parallel processing power, while the GPU's 154,858 OpenCL score can handle encoding tasks. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU is adequate for streaming overhead.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,503 and the GPU's Vulkan score of 174,152 suggest strong performance in video editing applications. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on the GPU provides ample capacity for video buffers, and the 504.2 GB/s bandwidth supports fast data movement.

3D rendering: The GPU's 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores are well-suited for 3D rendering workloads. The 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the PassMark G3D score of 26,927 indicate strong rendering throughput. The CPU's 16 MB of L3 cache and 6 cores can handle scene preparation and geometry processing.

Software development: The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,433, benefits compilation and code analysis tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 293,306 indicates fast file operations, while the 25,294 multithread score helps with parallel builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 200 W TDP make this a reasonably efficient desktop build. The PassMark integer math score of 77,042 and data encryption score of 17,181 handle typical office workloads with ease. The integrated Radeon 760M in the CPU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. All FPS figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the CPU's 76th percentile and the GPU's 81st percentile, this build should deliver strong gaming performance. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is well-suited for modern game textures and assets at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The 184 tensor cores support DLSS, which can improve frame rates in supported titles.

The CPU's single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 985 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,035, should prevent significant bottlenecking in most games. The 16 MB of L3 cache helps with game data access patterns. The GPU's 2475 MHz boost clock and 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate strong rasterization throughput.

For competitive esports titles at 1080p, this build should achieve high frame rates given the GPU's percentile ranking. For demanding AAA titles at 1440p, the 81st percentile GPU should maintain playable frame rates, though the exact figures depend on the specific game and settings. At 4K, the GPU may struggle with the most demanding titles, but the 12 GB memory capacity provides a buffer for high-resolution textures.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070. The CPU is from the 8000 series, based on Zen 4 (Phoenix) architecture, and is currently active in production. The GPU is from the GeForce 40-series, based on Ada Lovelace architecture, and has been marked as end-of-life, with the GeForce 50-series as its successor.

The build achieves a combined percentile of 79, placing it in the upper tier of desktop systems. The CPU at the 76th percentile is a solid mid-range performer, while the GPU at the 81st percentile is a strong high-end component. The pair is well-matched, with the GPU being the slightly stronger of the two.

The CPU has a launch MSRP of $229 and was released in January 2024. The GPU has a launch MSRP of 599 USD and was released in April 2023. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 200 W TDP indicate a system that requires a 550 W power supply, as suggested by the GPU's specifications.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming will find this build well-suited to their needs. The GPU's 81st percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-thread performance at the 76th percentile provide a capable foundation for most modern titles. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory is sufficient for current game textures, though future titles may require more.

Content creators working in video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU's 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,503, handle rendering tasks and scene management effectively. The 504.2 GB/s GPU memory bandwidth supports large project files.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,433, and its multithread capability at 10,850. The PassMark data compression score of 293,306 indicates fast I/O operations, which speeds up build processes and code analysis.

Students and office workers who need a desktop that handles everyday tasks efficiently will find the CPU's 65 W TDP and the integrated Radeon 760M useful for power conservation. The PassMark integer math score of 77,042 and data encryption score of 17,181 cover standard productivity workloads.

Small business workstations that require reliable performance for professional applications will benefit from this build's balanced profile. The CPU's 76th percentile and GPU's 81st percentile ensure that neither component becomes a consistent bottleneck in typical business software.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current platform for AMD desktop processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 support.

The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU's memory bus is dual-channel, and the absence of ECC support is noted. The GPU requires a 550 W power supply, as indicated by the suggestedPsu field, and uses a single 16-pin power connector.

A sensible next upgrade for this build would be a GPU with a higher percentile ranking, given that the current GPU at the 81st percentile is the stronger component and has more headroom for improvement. The CPU's socket AM5 platform also supports future processors, though no specific upgrade options are detailed in the FACT PACK.

The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, which suggests overclocking potential, though no specific overclocking results are provided. The GPU is a dual-slot card with dimensions of 240 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, which should fit in most mid-tower and full-tower cases. The 200 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP combine for a total that is well within the 550 W suggested power supply rating.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds