SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

24,089 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G pairs a modern 6-core Zen 4 processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, creating a desktop build that targets 1080p gaming and mainstream productivity. The CPU, part of the 8000 series, is built on TSMC’s 4 nm process and features a base clock of 4.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It supports DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, delivering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The integrated Radeon 760M graphics provide a fallback display output, though the discrete RTX 4060 handles the heavy lifting. The combination sits at the 69th percentile against all desktop builds, indicating a balanced mid-range configuration. This analysis uses only the provided benchmark data to interpret how the CPU and GPU perform individually and together, with the caveat that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 8600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It operates with a 65 W TDP, making it an efficient choice for compact or air-cooled systems. The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache. The 4 nm process node from TSMC packs 25,000 million transistors into a 178 mm² die. The processor supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single GPU and one or two NVMe drives.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales predictably with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the 2-thread score is 1869, rising to 3510 at 4 threads, 5187 at 8 threads, and peaking at 6199 for 16 threads and 6161 for max threads. The single-thread score of 985 indicates strong per-core performance, typical of Zen 4’s architecture. In Cinebench, the R23 multi-core score of 21503 is substantial for a 65 W part, while the single-core score of 3035 confirms responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks. Geekbench results follow suit, with a multi-core score of 10850 and a single-core score of 2433.

The PassMark suite offers a broader view of workload-specific strengths. The multi-thread score of 25294 and single-thread score of 3878 place it in solid mid-range territory. Integer math scores 77042, while floating-point math reaches 47919, showing capable number crunching for scientific or financial applications. Data compression scores 293306, and data encryption hits 17181, indicating robust performance for archival and security tasks. Extended instructions score 22610, which benefits multimedia encoding. The find prime numbers score of 96 is notably low, suggesting that prime-number sieving workloads are not a strength of this architecture.

The CPU holds the 76th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24089. Its nearest rivals are close: the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U scores 24188 (-0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U scores 23982 (+0.4%), the Intel Core i5-13400 scores 24280 (-0.8%), and the Intel Core i7-1360P scores 24344 (-1%). These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the 8600G trades blows with these parts. For real workloads, this translates to near-identical multi-core rendering times and application responsiveness compared to those rivals. The 8600G’s advantage lies in its modern platform and efficiency, not in raw score dominance.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 4060 GPU posts an average benchmark score of 17639, placing it at the 61st percentile against all GPUs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2302, which is a modern DirectX 12 workload representative of current game engines. Geekbench OpenCL scores 95057, while Vulkan scores 48643, showing strong compute performance for GPU-accelerated tasks. PassMark G3D scores 19545, with GPU compute at 9213. The GPU’s nearest rivals are older or integrated parts: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666 (-0.2%), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (+0.3%), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (+0.5%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509 (+0.7%). The deltas are negligible, meaning the RTX 4060 performs on par with a decade-old discrete GPU and a modern integrated GPU in these aggregate benchmarks, though the feature set differs drastically.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its direct rivals by a hair in some tests and lags by a hair in others, while the GPU sits in a similar tight grouping. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 6199 versus its max-thread score of 6161 indicates that the processor is fully utilized with 12 threads, with no headroom left for additional scaling in threaded workloads. The GPU’s percentile of 61 is lower than the CPU’s 76, suggesting the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this balance, where neither component drags the system down dramatically. For a user, this means the build can handle most modern games at 1080p with high settings and can accelerate video encoding or 3D rendering without the CPU being the sole bottleneck.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 8600G uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current mainstream platform from AMD. This socket supports DDR5 memory, and the CPU’s memory controller runs dual-channel with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported, so standard DDR5 DIMMs are the only option. The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single graphics card and a couple of NVMe drives. The RTX 4060 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so it will run at full bandwidth on this platform without any lane-sharing penalties.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 300 W, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP. This combined draw is modest, meaning most quality power supplies with a 300 W or higher rating will suffice. The RTX 4060 requires a single 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 240 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. This makes it compatible with most mid-tower cases. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, so buyers should be aware that this is a mature product.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count AM5 CPU, such as a Ryzen 7 or Ryzen 9 model, which would drop into the same socket and leverage the existing DDR5 memory. The platform’s PCIe Gen 4 support means a future GPU upgrade to a faster card would not be bottlenecked by the interface, though the RTX 4060’s x8 link could be a minor constraint if the next GPU also uses x8. For most users, the current pairing is well-matched, and the first upgrade should be more memory or storage, as the CPU and GPU are close in relative performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, holding the 76th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile. This creates a CPU-leaning balance, meaning in CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation or data compression, the processor will outperform the GPU’s relative standing. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions, the RTX 4060 will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 1450 is modest, indicating that the CPU may not keep up with the GPU in physics-heavy games, but the GPU’s compute scores suggest it will handle most rendering tasks.

The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6199 versus the 2-thread score of 1869 shows a 3.3x scaling from 2 to 16 threads, which is close to linear for a 6-core part. This means the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in multi-threaded applications. However, the single-thread score of 985 is lower than the multi-thread scaling would suggest, so games that rely heavily on a single core may see the CPU limit frame rates. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19545 and compute score of 9213 indicate that it can push high frame rates at 1080p, but the CPU’s single-thread performance may cap those rates in less optimized titles.

The RTX 4060’s bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s over a 128-bit bus is lower than many higher-tier GPUs, which can limit performance at higher resolutions where memory bandwidth becomes critical. At 1080p, this is less of an issue, but at 1440p or above, the GPU may struggle to maintain high frame rates in memory-intensive scenes. The CPU’s 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is also a potential constraint, as it shares the same DDR5 memory pool. For a balanced system, the 8600G and RTX 4060 are well-matched for 1080p gaming, where the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most titles, but the CPU will take over in CPU-intensive scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1080p resolution and prioritize high settings over maximum frame rates. The CPU’s 76th percentile and GPU’s 61st percentile indicate a system that can handle esports titles and most AAA games at 1080p with smooth performance, though not at extreme refresh rates. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-core scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21503, which is competitive for a 65 W part. The GPU’s compute score of 9213 in PassMark also accelerates rendering tasks.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s data compression and encryption scores, which are 293306 and 17181 respectively, for build processes and code compilation. Students and small business workstations will find the system capable for office applications, web browsing, and light multitasking, with the integrated Radeon 760M providing a backup if the discrete GPU fails. The end-of-life status of the GPU means this is not a future-proof investment, but for immediate needs, the performance is adequate. The build is not suited for 4K gaming or heavy AI workloads, as the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are limiting factors.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3035 in Cinebench R23 and 985 in 3DMark single-thread indicate solid per-core performance, which is crucial for gaming frame rates. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19545 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 suggest it can handle DirectX 12 titles at 1080p with high settings.

Based on the GPU’s 61st percentile and the CPU’s 76th percentile, this system should deliver playable frame rates in most modern games at 1080p ultra settings, with some titles requiring a reduction to high settings to maintain 60 FPS. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but may cause stutters in games that exceed this limit. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are enough for current game engines, but future titles may benefit from more cores. The lack of measured FPS data means these figures are directional, not precise, and actual performance will vary by game and driver optimization.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD107 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It packs 18,900 million transistors into a 159 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The GPU has 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The base clock is 1830 MHz, boosting to 2460 MHz, with memory running at 2125 MHz or 17 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest amount by modern standards, and the bandwidth may become a bottleneck in high-resolution textures or compute workloads. The pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 15.11 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), meaning there is no half-rate penalty for FP16 workloads. The GPU occupies a dual-slot design, requires a single 12-pin power connector, and has a TDP of 115 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W.

In benchmarks, the RTX 4060 scores 2302 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a modern test that stresses ray tracing and mesh shading. Geekbench OpenCL scores 95057, and Vulkan scores 48643, showing strong compute for OpenCL applications. PassMark G3D scores 19545, with GPU compute at 9213. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17639, placing it at the 61st percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, -0.2%), AMD Radeon 780M (17588, +0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, +0.5%), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509, +0.7%). This indicates that the RTX 4060 performs similarly to these parts in aggregate, but its advantage is in feature support like DLSS and ray tracing, not raw throughput.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G scores 3035 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is strong for a 65 W processor and supports responsive gaming and application loading.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4060 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming but may limit high-resolution textures.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 69, indicating a mid-range desktop build that outperforms 69% of all desktop configurations in the database.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 8600G does not support ECC memory, so standard DDR5 modules are required.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and suggested PSU wattage?

A: The RTX 4060 has a TDP of 115 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W, which is a modest requirement for a modern system.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-13400?

A: The Ryzen 5 8600G has an average benchmark score of 24089, while the Intel Core i5-13400 scores 24280, a delta of -0.8%, meaning they are nearly identical in overall performance.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the RTX 4060 is marked as end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, so availability may decrease over time.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system is well-suited. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3035 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 indicate that esports titles will run at high frame rates, while AAA games may need settings tuned to reach 144 Hz. Streaming is viable, as the CPU’s 12 threads handle encoding, and the GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate NVENC, though the 8 GB VRAM may be tight with a game and stream running simultaneously.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9031 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 95057, which accelerates effects and rendering. 3D rendering in Blender or similar software will see strong performance from the CPU’s PassMark floating-point score of 47919, while the GPU’s compute score of 9213 assists with viewport rendering. Software development is a strength, as the CPU’s data compression score of 293306 and encryption score of 17181 speed up builds and code signing.

Student and office work is handled easily, with the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3878 providing snappy application response and the integrated Radeon 760M offering a fallback for multi-monitor setups. The system’s 65 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP keep power consumption low, making it suitable for dorm rooms or small offices. For users who need a single machine for work and play, this build hits a sweet spot, though the end-of-life GPU status means future upgrades will be necessary for demanding titles.