SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

24,089 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 — Desktop Build Analysis

This desktop pairing combines a 6-core Zen 4 APU from AMD’s 8000 series with NVIDIA’s entry-level Ampere-based GeForce RTX 4010. The CPU sits at the 76th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 18th percentile among all graphics cards, producing a combined percentile of 47. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK; all frame-rate discussion below is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores, not measured results.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this build?

A: The build lands at the 47th percentile overall, meaning it sits near the midpoint of all tracked desktop configurations. The CPU contributes a strong 76th-percentile rank, while the GPU pulls the combined score down with an 18th-percentile rank.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8600G compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24,089. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U by 0.4% (rival score 24,188), leads the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U by 0.4% (rival score 23,982), trails the Intel Core i5-13400 by 0.8% (rival score 24,280), and trails the Intel Core i7-1360P by 1% (rival score 24,344). Effectively, it trades blows with all four rivals within a 1.4-point percentage band.

Q: How does the RTX 4010 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU’s single benchmark score is 2,893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. It trails the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB by 0.5% (rival score 2,907), trails the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF by 0.6% (rival score 2,910), trails the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB by 0.7% (rival score 2,913), and trails the Quadro P600 by 1% (rival score 2,923). All rivals are within a single percentage point.

Q: What memory and socket does the CPU require?

A: The Ryzen 5 8600G uses AMD Socket AM5, supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and does not support ECC memory. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

Q: What is the GPU’s power requirement?

A: The RTX 4010 has a 50 W TDP and the suggested PSU rating is 250 W. It requires no external power connectors and occupies a single slot.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 8600G integrates a Radeon 760M graphics solution. This is relevant because the build includes a discrete GPU, but the iGPU provides a fallback display output and can offload light tasks.

Q: What is the release timing for these components?

A: The Ryzen 5 8600G launched on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $229. The RTX 4010 launched on 2024-04-15. Both are currently marked as Active in production status.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a pronounced imbalance between the two components. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24,089 places it at the 76th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s score of 2,893 places it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. This 58-percentile gap indicates that the GPU will be the limiting factor in nearly every graphics-bound workload.

In CPU-intensive tasks such as data compression (PassMark score 293,306), integer math (77,042), and floating-point math (47,919), the processor demonstrates substantial headroom that the RTX 4010 cannot exploit in gaming scenarios. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance — 21,503 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 9,031 in R20 multi-core — shows it can feed far more capable graphics hardware. However, the GPU’s 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 96.00 GB/s memory bandwidth cap frame generation at relatively modest levels.

In gaming workloads, the RTX 4010 will bottleneck the system at essentially all settings. The CPU can deliver single-thread scores of 3,035 in Cinebench R23 and 3,878 in PassMark single-thread, which are strong enough to drive high frame rates in less demanding titles. But the GPU’s pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s and texture rate of 42.29 GTexel/s limit how many pixels and texels can be processed per second. For productivity workloads that are multi-threaded and GPU-accelerated, the CPU will lead while the GPU accelerates specific tasks like ray tracing (6 RT cores) and tensor operations (24 tensor cores).

The combined percentile of 47 reflects this tug-of-war: the CPU pulls up, the GPU pulls down, and the system lands near the middle of all tracked builds. In CPU-bound applications, expect near-full utilization of the processor. In GPU-bound applications, expect the graphics card to be saturated while the CPU remains underutilized.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path within the same motherboard generation. The Ryzen 5 8600G uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, and the socket supports newer Ryzen processors that share the AM5 interface. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means most AM5 motherboards can handle it without exotic cooling.

Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 at 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The platform does not support ECC memory, which is typical for consumer desktop builds. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This means the graphics card has adequate bandwidth for its class, though a x16 connection would offer more headroom for future GPUs.

The RTX 4010’s power profile is remarkably light: a 50 W TDP with no external power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. This leaves enormous PSU headroom for a future GPU upgrade. A user could install a significantly more powerful graphics card without changing the power supply, as long as the new card’s requirements fit within the existing PSU’s capacity. The single-slot, 163 mm length (6.4 inches) design means physical clearance is rarely an issue.

The most sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, since the CPU has demonstrated it can outperform the current graphics card by a wide margin. The CPU’s 76th-percentile rank suggests it can drive mid-range to upper-mid-range GPUs without becoming the primary bottleneck. Alternatively, users could add more DDR5 memory, though the dual-channel configuration already provides 83.2 GB/s.

The platform’s integrated Radeon 760M graphics provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or fails. This is a useful redundancy for troubleshooting, though the iGPU is far weaker than the RTX 4010 in raw graphics throughput.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity and are willing to accept modest gaming capability. The Ryzen 5 8600G’s 76th-percentile CPU rank makes it suitable for developers compiling code, students running multi-threaded applications, and small business workstations handling office suites, data analysis, and light content creation.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations are the primary gaming audience. The RTX 4010’s 18th-percentile GPU rank means it will handle esports titles and older games reasonably well, but modern AAA games will require reduced settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3,035 in Cinebench R23 ensures that CPU-bound scenarios — such as physics calculations, AI-driven NPC logic, and game world streaming — will not hold back the system beyond the GPU’s limits.

Content creators who work with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance (21,503 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) for rendering timelines, while the GPU’s 24 tensor cores can accelerate AI-assisted effects and denoising. 3D rendering workloads that use GPU acceleration will see modest throughput from the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS, but CPU-based rendering will shine.

Software developers will appreciate the 12 threads for parallel builds and the PassMark data encryption score of 17,181 for secure operations. Students and office workers get a responsive system for everyday tasks, with the iGPU serving as a backup. The 65 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP combine for a low total power draw, making this an efficient workstation for always-on environments.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24,089, placing it at the 76th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, scores 24,188 with a delta of -0.4%, meaning the 8600G is essentially tied. The Intel Core i5-13400 scores 24,280 (delta -0.8%), and the Intel Core i7-1360P scores 24,344 (delta -1%). The AMD Ryzen 7 8840U scores 23,982 (delta +0.4%), meaning the 8600G is slightly ahead. All four rivals are within a 1.4-percentage-point spread, indicating this CPU sits in a highly competitive performance band.

In multi-threaded benchmarks, the 8600G achieves 21,503 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 9,031 in R20 multi-core. Single-thread scores are 3,035 in R23 and 1,274 in R20. Geekbench results show 10,850 multi-core and 2,433 single-core. PassMark multi-thread is 25,294, with single-thread at 3,878. 3DMark thread scaling tests show 6,199 at 16 threads, 5,187 at 8 threads, 3,510 at 4 threads, 1,869 at 2 threads, and 985 at 1 thread.

The GPU’s only benchmark is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 2,893, placing it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, scores 2,907 (delta -0.5%), while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2,910 (delta -0.6%), the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2,913 (delta -0.7%), and the Quadro P600 scores 2,923 (delta -1%). The GPU is essentially tied with these four rivals, all within a single percentage point.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU operates at a high tier while the GPU operates at an entry level. The combined percentile of 47 accurately reflects this split: the build is neither a high-end gaming rig nor a weak office machine — it is a CPU-first system with modest graphics capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4010’s 18th-percentile GPU rank makes high-refresh gaming at 1080p achievable only in esports and older titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3,035 Cinebench R23) ensures the processor will not cap frame rates, but the GPU’s 96.00 GB/s bandwidth and 2.706 TFLOPS will limit maximum FPS in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and 21,503 Cinebench R23 multi-core score can handle encoding workloads, while the GPU’s 24 tensor cores and 6 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for AI-enhanced streaming features. The 50 W GPU TDP keeps thermals and power draw low during extended streaming sessions.

Video editing: The CPU leads with 10,850 Geekbench multi-core and 25,294 PassMark multi-thread scores, handling timeline scrubbing and export encoding efficiently. The GPU accelerates effects and transitions with its 768 shading units, though 4 GB of VRAM may limit complex multi-layer projects.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will outperform GPU-based rendering on this system given the GPU’s 2.706 TFLOPS. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads at up to 5.00 GHz boost clock will handle most rendering workloads reasonably well. GPU-accelerated ray tracing is possible via 6 RT cores but will be slow.

Software development: The CPU’s 12 threads accelerate compilation, and the PassMark integer math score of 77,042 indicates strong compute throughput. The GPU is sufficient for basic UI rendering and light GPU compute tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power costs low for always-on development machines.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 76th-percentile rank ensures snappy responsiveness in spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsers. The iGPU provides a backup display solution. The low total power draw (65 W CPU + 50 W GPU) makes this an efficient choice for dorm rooms or small offices.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not measured results.

The RTX 4010’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,893, at the 18th GPU percentile, suggests this card handles 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings in modern titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,035 in Cinebench R23 indicates it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games. The GPU’s 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will be a limiting factor for texture-heavy games and high-resolution textures.

For esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, the combination of a strong CPU and modest GPU should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA single-player games, expect to reduce settings to low or medium to maintain playable FPS. The 6 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests ray-traced performance will be limited to lighter effects.

The 18th-percentile GPU rank places this card near the bottom of the discrete GPU market. Users seeking 1440p or 4K gaming will find this GPU inadequate; 1080p is the practical ceiling. The CPU’s 76th-percentile rank means upgrading the GPU later will yield significant gaming improvements without changing the processor.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines AMD’s Ryzen 5 8600G — a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor on the 8000 series — with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4010, an Ampere-architecture GPU based on the GA107 chip. The CPU is fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The GPU uses Samsung’s 8 nm process with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die.

The combined percentile of 47 places this build near the midpoint of all tracked desktop configurations. The CPU’s 76th-percentile rank is the standout feature, while the GPU’s 18th-percentile rank is the limiting factor. This is a CPU-first desktop where the processor significantly outperforms the graphics card.

The build class is desktop, meaning components are designed for full-size cases with standard expansion slots. The GPU is a single-slot, 163 mm (6.4 inches) long card with 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It runs at a 4.30 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU is fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking.

Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and does not support ECC. It provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and includes a Radeon 760M integrated GPU. The launch MSRP is $229.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: 21,503 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 9,031 in R20, 10,850 in Geekbench multi-core, and 25,294 in PassMark multi-thread. Single-thread scores are 3,035 in Cinebench R23, 1,274 in R20, 2,433 in Geekbench, and 3,878 in PassMark. 3DMark thread scaling reveals near-linear scaling from 4 to 16 threads: 3,510 at 4 threads, 5,187 at 8 threads, and 6,199 at 16 threads.

The 76th-percentile rank means this CPU outperforms three-quarters of all tracked processors. Its nearest rivals — the Ryzen 5 7540U, Ryzen 7 8840U, Core i5-13400, and Core i7-1360P — all score within 1.4% of this chip. In real workloads, the 8600G handles compilation, rendering, and multi-tasking with ease, while its high single-thread performance keeps everyday applications responsive.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is an Ampere-architecture GPU based on the GA107 chip, fabricated on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. It has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs. The card includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, providing hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration.

Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU runs at 1417 MHz base and 1762 MHz boost clocks, with memory at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). Compute throughput is 2.706 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s.

The card has a 50 W TDP, requires no external power connectors, and has a suggested PSU rating of 250 W. It is single-slot, 163 mm (6.4 inches) long, and provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU’s only benchmark score is 2,893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals — the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, and Quadro P600 — all score between 2,907 and 2,923, meaning the 4010 is within 1% of all of them. This suggests the 4010 delivers performance roughly equivalent to those very different cards, despite its lower absolute specifications. In rendering workloads, the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles light 3D tasks, while the 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation for modern game textures and large GPU-accelerated workloads.