SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8540U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8540U

26,187 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile pairing represents a highly unusual laptop configuration, blending a power-efficient Zen 4 processor with a flagship Ada Lovelace GPU. This combination sits at the 80th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 78th percentile and the GPU at the 81st percentile, indicating a system that is strong across the board but with a notable performance gap between its two main components. The data shows a platform where the GPU is clearly the dominant force, capable of handling demanding graphics workloads, while the CPU provides a solid, efficient foundation for everyday tasks and gaming.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point. It is built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with a die size of 137 mm² and a transistor count of 20,900 million. The base clock is 3.20 GHz, which can boost up to 4.90 GHz under load. This is a mobile-focused chip with a 28 W TDP, designed for efficiency in laptops. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 9721.5 points in multi-core and 1714.5 points in single-core tests. The single-core score of 1714.5 is strong for a 28 W part, reflecting the efficiency of the Zen 4 architecture. The multi-core score of 9721.5 is respectable for a 6-core chip, but it is here that the processor's limitations become apparent, especially when paired with a high-end GPU. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1557.5 points multi-core and 253 points single-core, showing a similar performance profile.

PassMark results further detail the CPU's capabilities. The multithread score is 18332, with a single-thread score of 3639. Integer math scores 57755, while floating-point math scores 34958. Data compression is a strong point at 208619, and data encryption scores 12245. Extended instructions score 14900, and the processor handles random string sorting at 24375. The physics score is 1028, and finding prime numbers scores 69. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 26187, placing it at the 78th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals show just how competitive this chip is. The Intel Core i9-11900KF has an average score of 26212, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Ryzen 5 8540U is essentially tied with a previous-generation desktop i9. The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 26106, a delta of 0.3%, making the 8540U slightly faster. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX scores 26274, a delta of -0.3%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 scores 26324, a delta of -0.5%. These deltas are all within 0.5%, indicating that the 8540U delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a 28 W mobile package. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle demanding productivity tasks like video editing timelines and code compilation without being a bottleneck, but it will not match the sheer multi-core grunt of higher-core-count desktop parts in heavily threaded rendering tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Ryzen 5 8540U and the RTX 4080 Mobile is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The GPU sits at the 81st percentile, while the CPU sits at the 78th percentile. In gaming scenarios, this indicates that at high resolutions and with graphics-intensive settings, the GPU will be the primary driver of frame rates, with the CPU providing enough headroom to avoid severe stutters. However, in CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming with lower graphical settings, the 6-core CPU may become the limiting factor, preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential.

The delta between the CPU's average score (26187) and the GPU's average score (38135) is substantial. This gap of roughly 11948 points highlights a significant imbalance in raw compute power. The GPU's FP32 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS dwarfs the CPU's floating-point capabilities. In practical terms, the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in most GPU-heavy workloads like 4K gaming or 3D rendering, where the GPU is the clear workhorse. Conversely, in lighter e-sports titles at high frame rates, the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread scores will determine the ceiling of performance, and the system will not be able to push frame rates as high as a pairing with a stronger CPU might. The data suggests a system where the GPU is the star, and the CPU is a competent but secondary partner, making it a good choice for GPU-bound tasks but not for maximizing frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of a high-performing laptop system. The CPU's average benchmark score is 26187, which places it at the 78th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is significantly higher at 38135, placing it at the 81st percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 80, indicating that this pairing outperforms the vast majority of laptop configurations.

Looking at the GPU benchmarks, the RTX 4080 Mobile scores 159575 in Geekbench OpenCL and 145807 in Geekbench Vulkan, showcasing strong compute and graphics API performance. In PassMark, it scores 24926 in G3D, 11191 in GPU compute, and 96 in DirectX 12. The DirectX 11 score is 244, DirectX 10 is 157, and DirectX 9 is 286. The G2D score is 929. These scores indicate that the GPU is a top-tier mobile part, capable of handling the most demanding games and rendering workloads. The nearest rivals for the GPU are interesting, with the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 scoring 38299, a delta of -0.4%, and the RTX 5080 Mobile scoring 38349, a delta of -0.6%. The desktop RTX 4070 scores 37648, a delta of 1.3%, and the Tesla P4 scores 37628, a delta of 1.3%. This places the mobile RTX 4080 within striking distance of a desktop RTX 4070, highlighting its exceptional performance for a laptop.

The combined picture is one of high performance with a clear skew. The CPU is a solid mid-range performer, while the GPU is a top-tier part. In a combined workload, the system will excel in tasks that leverage the GPU's massive compute power, such as gaming at high resolutions, video rendering, and 3D modeling. The CPU will handle the supporting tasks, such as physics calculations and game logic, effectively, but its 6-core/12-thread configuration may be a limiting factor in heavily threaded CPU workloads. Overall, the benchmark results indicate a laptop that is a powerhouse for graphics-intensive applications, with a capable but less dominant CPU providing the foundation.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's high G3D score of 24926 and its performance close to a desktop RTX 4070 suggest it can handle high-refresh 1440p gaming in most titles. However, the CPU's single-thread score of 3639 in PassMark may limit frame rates in CPU-bound e-sports titles at 1080p, where the 6-core processor could become a bottleneck, preventing the system from reaching the highest possible frame rates.

Streaming: The RTX 4080 Mobile's tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture are well-suited for hardware encoding. The GPU's strong compute scores (11191 in GPU compute) indicate it can handle the encoding workload without significantly impacting gaming performance. The CPU's 12 threads are adequate for the streaming software and game logic, but the system will rely heavily on the GPU's encoder for a smooth streaming experience.

Video Editing: The CPU's multi-core score of 9721.5 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for 1080p and some 4K video editing timelines. The GPU's 12 GB of memory and high bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s will significantly accelerate effects, color grading, and rendering in GPU-accelerated editors. The system is well-balanced for this task, with the GPU taking the lead on rendering and the CPU handling the timeline and codec tasks.

3D Rendering: The GPU is the clear star here. With 7424 shading units and 58 RT cores, it will handle ray tracing and complex 3D scenes with ease. The CPU's 6 cores, while efficient, will be a limiting factor in CPU-based rendering engines, where a higher-core-count processor would be significantly faster. For GPU-accelerated renderers, this system is excellent.

Software Development: The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1714.5 in Cinebench R23 and 3639 in PassMark ensures responsive compilation for most projects. The 12 threads will handle parallel builds reasonably well. The GPU is not a primary factor here, but its presence does not hinder performance. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for development workloads.

Student and Office Work: This is a case of massive overkill. The CPU's efficient 28 W TDP and strong single-thread performance make it excellent for productivity applications, web browsing, and document creation. The GPU's immense power is unnecessary for these tasks, but it does not detract from the experience. The laptop will be responsive and fast for all office workloads, with battery life likely being more dependent on the display and other components than the CPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a flagship mobile GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip. It is built on TSMC's 5 nm process node, with a die size of 294 mm² and 35,800 million transistors. The GPU has a base clock of 1290 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz. It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective.

The GPU is equipped with 7424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. It has 58 RT cores for ray tracing and 232 tensor cores for AI and DLSS workloads. The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 24.72 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1). The TDP is 110 W, which is high for a mobile part but necessary to feed the powerful chip. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmark results, the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 and Vulkan score of 145807 demonstrate its raw compute and graphics API performance. The PassMark G3D score of 24926 is exceptional, placing it at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The GPU compute score of 11191 further underscores its ability to handle parallel workloads. The DirectX 12 score of 96 is notable, showing its capability in modern graphics APIs. The nearest rival data shows it is within 0.6% of the RTX 5080 Mobile and within 1.3% of the desktop RTX 4070, making it a top-tier mobile graphics solution. For rendering, this means the GPU can handle 4K gaming with high settings, ray tracing, and GPU-accelerated rendering tasks with ease, providing performance that rivals desktop-class components.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 80, indicating it outperforms 80% of all laptop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 26187, which is essentially tied with the Intel Core i9-11900KF (26212, delta -0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (26274, delta -0.3%).

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component in this build?

A: The GPU is the stronger component, with an average benchmark score of 38135 and a percentile of 81, compared to the CPU's score of 26187 and percentile of 78.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The GPU's FP32 performance is rated at 24.72 TFLOPS.

Q: How does the GPU compare to a desktop RTX 4070?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has an average score of 38135, which is 1.3% higher than the desktop RTX 4070's score of 37648.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU is based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, and is built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is engineered for users who demand extreme graphics performance in a portable form factor. Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolutions with high to ultra settings will find the GPU's power more than sufficient, though they should be aware that the CPU may limit frame rates in less demanding e-sports titles at 1080p. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit greatly from the GPU's 12 GB of memory and high compute scores, making it an excellent choice for GPU-accelerated workflows. Software developers will appreciate the CPU's strong single-thread performance and 12 threads for parallel builds, though it is not a workstation-class CPU. Students and office workers will find the system incredibly responsive, but it is vastly overpowered for these tasks, making it a less rational choice for those who do not need the GPU's power. Small business workstations that handle occasional 3D modeling or heavy data visualization would also be well-served by this pairing.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system featuring the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U processor and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part with a 28 W TDP, designed for efficiency. The GPU is a flagship mobile part with 7424 shading units and 12 GB of memory, designed for maximum performance. The pairing places the system at the 80th combined percentile, with the GPU at the 81st percentile and the CPU at the 78th percentile. This makes it a top-tier laptop overall, with a clear emphasis on graphics performance over CPU performance. The system is well-suited for gaming and GPU-accelerated content creation, but it is not the ideal choice for CPU-heavy workloads like software compilation or physics simulations.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24926 and its proximity to a desktop RTX 4070, this system is estimated to be a very strong performer in games. At 1440p resolution with ultra settings, most modern titles should run at high frame rates, well above 60 FPS. At 4K resolution, the 12 GB of memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth will help maintain high textures, and performance should remain playable, though frame rates may drop below 60 FPS in the most demanding titles. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 96 suggests excellent performance in modern APIs. However, the CPU's single-thread score of 3639 in PassMark may become a limiting factor in CPU-bound games at 1080p, where high frame rates are the goal. In such scenarios, the GPU may be underutilized, and the system may not reach the 240+ FPS marks seen in e-sports titles. For 1440p and 4K gaming, the system is estimated to provide an excellent experience, with the GPU as the clear performance driver.