SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE

27,712 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

This pairing combines a 6-core AMD Zen 4 mobile processor with an NVIDIA Ada Lovelace laptop GPU, placing the build at the 80th percentile overall. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores rather than direct game testing. The CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU lands at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, suggesting a closely matched pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other in raw compute terms.

Gaming Performance

Because no measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU+GPU combination, frame rates must be inferred from the underlying benchmark scores. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s PassMark G3D score of 24926 places it in the upper tier of laptop graphics, and its Geekbench Vulkan score of 145807 indicates strong DirectX 12-class performance. The CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 3914 ensures that frame pacing in most titles will not be bottlenecked by the processor, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load dominates.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated FPS for AAA titles would likely exceed 100 frames per second in most cases, given the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS and the CPU’s boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Esports titles would run considerably higher, potentially reaching 200+ FPS, as they typically rely more on single-core performance — the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2532 is strong for a 35-watt part. At 1440p, expect a modest drop but still comfortably playable frame rates, likely in the 80–120 FPS range for demanding titles. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint; the 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the 192-bit memory bus may limit performance in bandwidth-heavy scenes.

The GPU’s DirectX 12 benchmark score of 96 (PassMark) is notably lower than its DirectX 11 score of 244, which suggests that the card’s architectural strengths in ray tracing and mesh shaders — supported by 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores — may not be fully captured by legacy rasterization tests. In practice, games using DirectX 12 Ultimate features could see better relative performance than these numbers imply. For ray-traced titles, the 58 RT cores provide hardware acceleration that older GPUs lack, though the estimated frame-rate penalty at 4K could be substantial. Overall, this pairing is best suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming or smooth 1440p gameplay, with 4K reserved for less demanding titles or those with DLSS enabled.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27712, placing it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X with an average score of 27636, a difference of just 0.3% — effectively a statistical tie. The Intel Core i5-12600KF scores 27799, which is 0.3% higher, again within noise. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K both score 27578, putting them 0.5% behind. This clustering indicates that the 8500GE, despite its 35-watt TDP, delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a mobile form factor.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 38135, placing it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 with a score of 38299, a 0.4% difference — though this comparison seems anomalous given the RTX 4080 Mobile’s vastly higher specifications. The RTX 5080 Mobile scores 38349, 0.6% higher, while the RTX 4070 scores 37648, 1.3% lower. The Tesla P4 scores 37628, also 1.3% lower. The near-identical scores between these disparate GPUs suggest that the average benchmark score metric may be heavily weighted toward compute tests that do not fully differentiate gaming-oriented cards.

Combined, the CPU and GPU percentiles (79 and 81 respectively) align closely, indicating a balanced system where neither component is the clear weak link. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17940 is particularly impressive for a 35-watt part, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 24926 confirms it as a high-end mobile graphics solution. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11191 is lower relative to the G3D score, hinting that compute-heavy workloads like machine learning inference may not scale as well as gaming performance.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is unusual for a mobile chip but suggests design flexibility. The base clock of 3.40 GHz boosts to 5.00 GHz, and the 35-watt TDP is remarkably low for the performance on offer — a key differentiator from desktop parts like the Ryzen 5 7600X, which has a higher TDP but scores only 0.3% better on average.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The L3 cache is modest by desktop standards, but the dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth helps compensate. ECC memory support is included, a feature typically reserved for workstation parts. The integrated Radeon 740M graphics provide a basic display output, though the discrete RTX 4080 Mobile handles all rendering duties.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a CPU that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2532 is strong for a mobile chip, while the multi-core score of 17940 demonstrates that the 6 cores scale well under load. PassMark integer math scores 62666, while floating-point math scores 39065 — the integer advantage suggests strong performance in general productivity tasks. Data compression scores 246397, while encryption scores 14197, indicating that the CPU handles compression workloads particularly well relative to encryption. The extended instructions score of 17962 and find prime numbers score of 79 round out the picture, showing a balanced ALU/FPU design.

The 4 nm process with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die is dense, and the low TDP means sustained all-core loads are unlikely to trigger thermal throttling in a well-designed laptop chassis. The multiplier is unlocked, which is unusual for a mobile chip and could appeal to enthusiasts with access to unlocked mobile platforms, though the 35-watt TDP limits overclocking headroom.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of the CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and the GPU’s 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports 1080p gaming at frame rates well above 144 Hz in competitive titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3914 (PassMark) ensures minimal bottleneck in CPU-bound scenarios, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM handles modern game assets without issue.

Streaming: The GPU’s 232 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture include dedicated hardware encoders, though the FACT PACK does not specify NVENC details. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 21135 (PassMark) provides enough headroom for software encoding at 1080p60 while gaming, though hardware encoding would be more efficient. The 12 threads allow background tasks like OBS to run without severely impacting game performance.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17940 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 159575 (Geekbench) make this a capable pair for 4K timeline editing. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for GPU-accelerated effects, and the 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with large frame buffers. Export times would be competitive with desktop systems in the same performance tier.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 7424 shading units and 232 TMUs provide substantial rasterization throughput, with a texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s. The 58 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders in applications like Blender or V-Ray. The CPU’s 6 cores may become a bottleneck for CPU-based rendering, but GPU rendering would be the primary path for most artists.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 246397 indicates fast build times for projects with heavy I/O, while the 16 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code. The 12 threads handle parallel compilation well, and ECC memory support is a plus for long-running builds where data integrity matters. The GPU’s compute capabilities could accelerate local machine learning model training, though the 11191 PassMark GPU compute score suggests moderate performance in this area.

Student and office work: The 35-watt TDP means long battery life in a laptop chassis, and the integrated Radeon 740M provides a fallback when the discrete GPU is idle. The CPU’s single-thread performance handles spreadsheet calculations, web browsing, and document editing with ease. The 12 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks, but it ensures future-proofing for any GPU-accelerated productivity apps.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on the AD104 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It features 7424 shading units, 232 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, with a base clock of 1290 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) across a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 110-watt TDP is moderate for a high-end mobile GPU, and the IGP slot width suggests it is designed for thin-and-light laptops rather than bulky gaming rigs.

The 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores provide the hardware foundation for ray tracing and DLSS. The FP32 throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS matches the FP16 throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is notable — many GPUs halve FP16 throughput, so this 1:1 ratio indicates strong compute versatility for AI workloads. The pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s are respectable for the class.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 24926 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575, with Vulkan scoring 145807. The PassMark DirectX scores are mixed: DirectX 9 scores 286, DirectX 10 scores 157, DirectX 11 scores 244, and DirectX 12 scores 96. The low DirectX 12 score compared to DirectX 11 is curious and may reflect driver maturity or test methodology rather than actual gaming capability. The PassMark G2D score of 929 indicates strong 2D performance, while the GPU compute score of 11191 suggests that general-purpose compute is not this card’s primary strength.

The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for 1440p gaming with high-resolution textures and for 4K in many titles, though the 192-bit bus width could limit performance in memory-bandwidth-intensive scenes. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s nearest rival, the RTX 4070, scores 1.3% lower on average, which is a small gap given the 4080’s higher tier. This suggests that the mobile 4080 is closer in performance to the desktop 4070 than to the desktop 4080.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is a desktop platform socket — this is unusual for a mobile processor and suggests the 8500GE may be found in all-in-one or mini-PC form factors rather than traditional laptops. The AM5 socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the CPU’s memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is the ceiling for this platform. The PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single GPU at x16 and one or two NVMe SSDs.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 support. The CPU’s 14 lanes are allocated between the GPU and other devices, so adding multiple high-bandwidth peripherals could saturate the available lanes. Memory is limited to DDR5, and ECC support is included, which is a plus for workstation use cases. The suggested PSU field is null in the FACT PACK, so no specific power supply recommendation can be made; however, the CPU’s 35-watt TDP and GPU’s 110-watt TDP suggest a combined power draw of around 145 watts for the core components, leaving headroom for a 200-watt or higher power adapter in a laptop or mini-PC configuration.

A sensible next upgrade would be a CPU with more cores on the same AM5 socket, as the platform supports the full Ryzen 7000/8000 series lineup. However, the 8500GE’s 35-watt TDP is optimized for low-power operation, and a higher-TDP CPU would require a more robust cooling solution. For the GPU, an upgrade to a newer mobile GPU from the GeForce 50-series would be possible in a laptop with a compatible MXM or soldered configuration, but the RTX 4080 Mobile’s 81st percentile placement means there is limited headroom for improvement without a platform change.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 79th percentile and GPU’s 81st percentile are nearly aligned, indicating a well-balanced pairing for most workloads. In gaming, the bottleneck shifts based on resolution: at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark score of 3914) may occasionally limit frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU’s high throughput ensures that most scenarios are GPU-bound. At 1440p and above, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, as its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB VRAM become the primary constraints.

In multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU’s 6 cores are the bottleneck relative to higher-core-count alternatives. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17940 is respectable, but a Ryzen 9 or Core i9 laptop CPU would significantly outperform it. The GPU’s compute score of 11191 (PassMark) is lower than its G3D score of 24926, suggesting that the GPU is more optimized for graphics than for general-purpose compute — a potential bottleneck for machine learning tasks that rely on tensor core performance.

The FPS scaling between resolutions would show the classic pattern: minimal difference between 1080p and 1440p in GPU-bound titles, with a more pronounced drop at 4K. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock helps maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenes, but the 16 MB L3 cache is small compared to desktop parts, which could cause occasional stutters in open-world games with large asset streaming. Overall, the system is balanced for gaming and mixed workloads, with the CPU becoming the bottleneck in heavily threaded productivity tasks and the GPU becoming the bottleneck at 4K gaming.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE a good match for the RTX 4080 Mobile?

A: Yes, the CPU’s 79th percentile and GPU’s 81st percentile are closely aligned, indicating balanced performance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 27712 is within 0.5% of its closest rivals, and the GPU’s score of 38135 places it in the same tier, so neither component dramatically limits the other in most workloads.

Q: What resolution is this build best suited for gaming?

A: Based on the GPU’s 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 12 GB VRAM, the system is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming or 1440p at high settings. At 4K, the 192-bit memory bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in demanding titles, though less intensive games should run smoothly.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation processors. This makes the platform suitable for long-running compute tasks where memory errors could corrupt data.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and how does it affect cooling?

A: The CPU has a 35-watt TDP, which is very low for a 6-core Zen 4 processor. This means a capable air cooler can handle it, and in a laptop chassis, it allows for thinner designs with less aggressive cooling solutions.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 Mobile compare to the RTX 4070?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 38135, which is 1.3% higher than the RTX 4070’s score of 37648. The 4080 Mobile also has more VRAM (12 GB vs. the 4070’s unspecified size in the data) and higher clock speeds, so the performance gap may be larger in memory-intensive scenarios.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 80, meaning it outperforms approximately 80% of all system configurations in the benchmark database. This places it in the upper tier of laptop builds.

Q: Is the CPU’s integrated graphics usable alongside the discrete GPU?

A: Yes, the Radeon 740M integrated graphics can be used for display output or light tasks when the RTX 4080 Mobile is idle, potentially saving power. The CPU’s 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes can be allocated to both the discrete GPU and other devices as needed.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers and content creators who need desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor. The 81st percentile GPU and 79th percentile CPU deliver smooth 1080p and 1440p gaming, making it ideal for gamers who play on external monitors or high-refresh laptop displays. Content creators working with 4K video editing will benefit from the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and the CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores, particularly in applications that leverage GPU acceleration.

Software developers will find the CPU’s data compression score of 246397 useful for fast builds, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long compilation sessions. Students and office workers who occasionally game will appreciate the low 35-watt CPU TDP for battery life, while the RTX 4080 Mobile ensures that any gaming session runs at high settings. Small business workstations that need occasional GPU acceleration for CAD or data visualization would also benefit, though the 12 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for most professional applications.

The build is less suited for users who prioritize maximum multi-core performance for CPU-based rendering — the 6-core CPU is a limiting factor compared to higher-core-count alternatives. Similarly, users who need massive VRAM for machine learning training might find the 12 GB insufficient, despite the tensor core support. For most gaming and mixed-use scenarios, however, this is a high-tier configuration.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 processor with a 35-watt TDP and 5.00 GHz boost clock, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, an Ada Lovelace GPU with 7424 shading units, 58 RT cores, 232 tensor cores, and 12 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. The CPU is built on TSMC’s 4 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC’s 5 nm process, both representing leading-edge manufacturing.

The combined percentile of 80 places this system in the upper quintile of all configurations, with the CPU and GPU percentiles (79 and 81) nearly identical. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 27712 and the GPU’s score of 38135 together indicate a system that can handle modern gaming at high settings, content creation with GPU acceleration, and productivity tasks without significant bottlenecks. The lack of measured FPS data means exact game performance is estimated, but the underlying scores suggest a capable and well-balanced mobile gaming platform.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds