SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8500G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

20,425 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile pairing is a laptop configuration that combines a modern 6-core Zen 4 processor with a high-end Ada Lovelace graphics solution. This analysis relies exclusively on synthetic benchmark data, as the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimates derived from the CPU and GPU's respective performance scores, not direct gaming measurements.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the component benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24926 places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, indicating strong rasterization capability, while the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 998 and multi-thread score of 5213 suggest adequate processing power to feed the graphics card in most scenarios.

At 1080p resolution, this pairing should deliver high frame rates in esports and competitive titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 3891 in PassMark and the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 244 point to solid performance in games that rely on single-core efficiency. The GPU's 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient headroom for texture-heavy scenes, while the 7424 shading units suggest strong fill-rate capabilities. Estimated 1080p ultra settings performance would likely exceed 100 FPS in most modern titles, with lighter esports games potentially reaching 144 FPS or higher.

Moving to 1440p resolution, the GPU's 80 ROPs and 133.2 GPixel/s pixel rate become more significant. The RTX 4080 Mobile's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 compute performance indicates it can handle the increased pixel workload, though frame rates would naturally drop from 1080p levels. Estimates suggest 60-100 FPS in AAA titles at high settings, with the 12 GB VRAM buffer preventing capacity-related stuttering in most current games. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 4565 remains sufficient for 1440p gaming, as the graphics card becomes the primary bottleneck at this resolution.

At 4K, the limitations of both components become apparent. The GPU's 192-bit memory bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest for 4K workloads compared to higher-tier desktop cards, though the 12 GB capacity helps. Estimated 4K performance would range from 30-60 FPS in demanding titles at ultra settings, with less demanding games achieving playable frame rates. The CPU's 74th percentile ranking versus all CPUs suggests it would not substantially bottleneck the GPU at 4K, where the graphics card is almost certainly the limiting factor. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 96 indicates strong modern API support, which benefits 4K performance in newer titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This configuration excels at 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 81st percentile ranking and the CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 1913 support frame rates well above 100 FPS in competitive titles. For 240Hz monitors, esports games should perform admirably, though demanding AAA titles may not consistently hit those refresh rates.

Streaming: The GPU's 232 tensor cores and 58 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features. The CPU's 12 threads, evidenced by the 3DMark max-threads score of 5213, offer sufficient parallel capacity for simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The PassMark data encryption score of 14220 indicates solid cryptographic performance for secure streaming protocols.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18368 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 combine for strong video editing performance. Timeline scrubbing and preview rendering would benefit from the GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS compute capability, while export times would be aided by the CPU's multi-threaded throughput. The 12 GB VRAM allows for complex effect stacks and high-resolution previews.

3D rendering: The GPU's PassMark compute score of 11191 and the CPU's PassMark floating-point math score of 39074 indicate capable rendering performance. Blender and similar applications would leverage the GPU's 7424 shading units for viewport work and the CPU's 6 cores for physics simulations. The 16 MB shared L3 cache helps with scene data locality, though rendering farms would still prefer higher-core-count workstations.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 63123 and the 12 threads support fast compilation of large codebases. The Geekbench multi-core score of 9444 indicates strong general-purpose performance for IDE responsiveness. The 4 nm process node and 65W TDP contribute to efficient sustained workloads during long build sessions.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the headroom ensures no slowdowns in document editing, spreadsheet analysis, or web browsing. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3891 provides snappy application launching, while the integrated Radeon 740M offers a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled for battery savings.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 20425, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD EPYC 9454P with an average score of 20422, representing a 0% delta, followed by the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V at 20454 (-0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 at 20468 (-0.2%), and the AMD EPYC 7713 at 20363 (+0.3%). This near-tie cluster indicates the 8500G performs on par with both enterprise server chips and a previous-generation desktop processor, a notable result for a mobile CPU.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 38135, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 at 38299 (-0.4%), followed by the RTX 5080 Mobile at 38349 (-0.6%), the RTX 4070 at 37648 (+1.3%), and the Tesla P4 at 37628 (+1.3%). The GPU outperforms the RTX 4070 by 1.3% and trails the MX570 by just 0.4%, showing it sits at a performance tier where minor architectural differences determine rankings.

The combined percentile for this build is 78, reflecting a configuration where the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU. The CPU's 3DMark results show a scaling pattern from 998 single-thread to 5213 max-threads, indicating good multi-thread utilization across its 12 threads. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 145807, slightly below its OpenCL score of 159575, suggests balanced compute performance across different APIs.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p resolutions above all else. The GPU's 81st percentile ranking and the CPU's 74th percentile ranking combine for a 78th percentile overall build, making it suitable for gamers who want strong 1440p performance without stepping up to the highest-tier mobile GPUs. Esports enthusiasts will find the single-thread performance and high pixel rate sufficient for 240Hz displays in competitive titles.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the balanced CPU-GPU compute capabilities. The GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18368 support efficient rendering workflows. The 12 GB VRAM accommodates large 4K video projects, while the 12 threads handle background tasks like asset imports and timeline previews.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 63123 and multi-thread score of 21610. The 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provide fast data access for build tools. The ECC memory support is a rarely seen feature in mobile CPUs, appealing to developers working on data-critical applications.

Students and office workers would find this configuration more powerful than necessary, but the performance headroom ensures longevity. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3891 makes for responsive daily use, while the GPU can handle occasional light gaming or photo editing. Small business workstations running virtualization or database workloads would leverage the 12 threads and ECC memory support.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G features 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix2. It operates on a 4 nm TSMC process node with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The base clock is 3.50 GHz with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, running at a 65W TDP. This is a mobile-market segment CPU with a launch MSRP of $179.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration provides low-latency access to frequently used data, as reflected in the CPU's strong single-thread performance. The 3DMark single-thread score of 998 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2593 indicate excellent per-core efficiency, while the multi-thread scores show expected scaling across 12 threads: Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 18368, approximately 7.1 times the single-core score.

The PassMark results reveal workload-specific strengths. Integer math scores 63123, floating-point math scores 39074, and extended instructions score 19098. Data compression scores 250197, while data encryption scores 14220. The find prime numbers test scores 87, which is a relatively low result, and physics scores 1318. These figures suggest the CPU excels at general-purpose computing and compression tasks but shows more modest performance in certain specialized workloads. The 3DMark threaded progression, from 1913 at 2 threads to 5213 at max threads, demonstrates efficient multi-threading without significant scaling drop-offs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth is rated at 83.2 GB/s, with ECC memory support enabled. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, ensuring full bandwidth for the graphics card. The platform supports the Radeon 740M integrated graphics as a fallback, which can be useful for troubleshooting or low-power scenarios.

The GPU's TDP is 110W, and the CPU's TDP is 65W, for a combined 175W of component power draw. The suggested PSU is not provided in the data, but the relatively modest power requirements suggest that a standard laptop power adapter should suffice. The GPU uses no power connectors and has an IGP slot width, indicating it is soldered to the motherboard rather than user-replaceable.

A sensible next upgrade for this laptop platform would focus on the CPU side, as the GPU is typically not upgradeable in mobile form factors. The AM5 socket supports future Zen-based processors, though the 8500G's 65W TDP suggests cooling headroom for higher-TDP chips. However, the GPU's 81st percentile ranking means it is already a strong performer, and upgrading the CPU would only benefit CPU-bound scenarios. The 12 GB VRAM is fixed, so users requiring more graphics memory would need a different laptop entirely.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are reasonably balanced for gaming workloads, with the GPU showing slightly higher relative performance. The CPU's 74th percentile versus all CPUs and the GPU's 81st percentile versus all GPUs create a 7-point gap, meaning the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU may become more involved at 1080p in CPU-intensive titles.

The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 4565 versus its max-threads score of 5213 shows that 8-thread workloads capture 87.6% of the maximum multi-threaded performance. This indicates good thread scaling but also suggests that games utilizing 8 or fewer threads will see the CPU perform near its peak. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 96 versus its DirectX 11 score of 244 shows a significant gap, suggesting that DirectX 12 titles may be more GPU-bound, while DirectX 11 games could place more load on the CPU.

For content creation workloads, the balance shifts depending on the task. The GPU's compute score of 11191 in PassMark and the CPU's multi-thread score of 21610 in PassMark indicate that rendering tasks will scale with whatever component is more heavily utilized. Video encoding benefits from the GPU's tensor cores, while physics simulations and logic-heavy tasks lean on the CPU. The 12 threads provide adequate parallelism for most creative applications, though 16+ thread CPUs would show an advantage in heavily threaded scenes.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor with a 65W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture chip with 7424 shading units and 12 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile ranking of 78 places this configuration in the upper tier of laptop builds, though not at the absolute top.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 20425 and the GPU's average benchmark score of 38135 combine to position this build in the 78th percentile overall. The GPU's 81st percentile ranking is notably higher than the CPU's 74th percentile, indicating that the graphics card is the more dominant component in this pairing. This configuration represents a strong mid-to-high-end laptop option, suitable for 1440p gaming and serious content creation, with the CPU providing adequate support without significantly bottlenecking the GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 78, with the CPU at the 74th percentile and the GPU at the 81st percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 8500G has an average benchmark score of 20425, which is nearly identical to the AMD EPYC 9454P at 20422, representing a 0% delta. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V by 0.1% and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 by 0.2%.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 Mobile have?

A: The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 8500G supports ECC memory in a dual-channel DDR5 configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the difference between the GPU's OpenCL and Vulkan scores?

A: The GPU scores 159575 in Geekbench OpenCL and 145807 in Geekbench Vulkan, indicating slightly stronger OpenCL compute performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more dominant in this pairing?

A: The GPU is relatively stronger, ranking in the 81st percentile of all GPUs compared to the CPU's 74th percentile ranking.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen 5 8500G has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8500G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds