SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8500G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

20,425 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile combination represents a mid-range laptop pairing built around AMD’s Zen 4 architecture and NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an 8 GB GDDR6 mobile solution with a 115 W TDP. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and percentile positions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. The chip contains 20,900 million transistors within a 137 mm² die size, and it operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU supports DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, delivering 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support. The 8000 series processor uses AMD Socket AM5 and is classified as a mobile segment part, with a launch MSRP of $179.

Benchmark data shows the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities are solid for its class. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 18,368 in multi-core and 2,593 in single-core. The 3DMark results reveal a clear scaling pattern: 3dmark_2_threads scores 1,913, 3dmark_4_threads reaches 3,130, 3dmark_8_threads hits 4,565, and 3dmark_16_threads rises to 5,224. The max_threads score of 5,213 is nearly identical to the 16-thread result, indicating that the 6-core/12-thread configuration is fully utilized by the time 16 threads are engaged, with minimal gains beyond that point. The single-thread 3DMark score of 998 shows that individual core performance is adequate for lightly threaded workloads but not class-leading.

PassMark results reinforce the CPU’s mixed workload character. The multithread score of 21,610 and single-thread score of 3,891 (also listed as 3,891 in the passmark_singlethread field) sit in the upper-middle range. Integer math hits 63,123, floating-point math reaches 39,074, and extended instructions score 19,098. Data compression scores 250,197, while data encryption is 14,220. The physics score of 1,318 and the find prime numbers score of 87 highlight that the chip is not optimized for every compute type. For real workloads, this means the 8500G handles typical office productivity, coding, and moderate multi-threaded tasks without strain, but it will not match higher-core-count desktop parts in heavily threaded rendering or simulation tasks.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 20,425, placing it at the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 9454P with an average score of 20,422 (0% delta), Intel Core Ultra 7 258V at 20,454 (-0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 5600 at 20,468 (-0.2% delta), and AMD EPYC 7713 at 20,363 (0.3% delta). The performance parity among these parts is striking—all four rivals fall within a 0.5% margin. This suggests the 8500G delivers compute capability roughly equivalent to a previous-generation desktop Ryzen 5 and a current ultraportable Core Ultra 7, despite being a mobile-focused chip.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which provides a clear upgrade trajectory within the same motherboard ecosystem. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is enabled, making it suitable for workstation-style builds where data integrity matters. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 14 lanes available from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single high-speed GPU and one or two NVMe drives, though expansion is more limited than desktop AM5 parts with additional lanes.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 115 W, so the combined thermal budget for this laptop pairing is roughly 180 W before accounting for other components. There is no suggested PSU value in the FACT PACK, so power supply recommendations cannot be quantified. The GPU uses no external power connectors and is listed as an IGP slot width, meaning it is soldered or integrated into the laptop motherboard rather than being a standalone card. This limits upgradeability—the GPU cannot be swapped independently.

A sensible next upgrade for users on this platform would be to move to a higher-core-count AM5 CPU if the motherboard supports it, since the socket is shared across the Ryzen 7000 and 8000 series. However, the mobile form factor means the CPU and GPU are likely soldered, making component-level upgrades impractical. More realistically, users would upgrade the entire laptop. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is modest by current standards, so a future platform with faster DDR5 or additional channels would provide meaningful gains in memory-bound workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU-GPU pairing places it at the 71st percentile among all laptop configurations tested. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 20,425 with a 74th percentile ranking, while the GPU’s average benchmark score is 22,729 with a 67th percentile ranking. The CPU performs above the GPU in relative terms, which has implications for workload balance.

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the 8500G is essentially tied with the AMD EPYC 9454P (0% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (-0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 (-0.2% delta), and the AMD EPYC 7713 (0.3% delta). This means the 8500G’s compute throughput is indistinguishable from an enterprise EPYC server chip in aggregate benchmarks, though the workload distribution differs significantly—the EPYC parts likely excel in memory-intensive tasks while the 8500G relies on higher single-thread clock speeds.

The GPU’s nearest rivals show a similar clustering. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22,895 (-0.7% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT scores 22,549 (0.8% delta), the Intel Arc B580 scores 23,021 (-1.3% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22,435 (1.3% delta). The RTX 4060 Mobile sits within 1.3% of all four rivals, meaning its raw compute performance is comparable to a desktop RTX 2080 from the previous generation and roughly on par with the newer RTX 5060 Mobile.

The GPU’s individual benchmark scores show specific strengths. Geekbench OpenCL reaches 89,420 and Vulkan scores 89,569. PassMark G3D scores 17,469, while G2D is 730. Compute workloads score 6,816 in PassMark GPU compute. The DirectX tests are more varied: DirectX 9 scores 216, DirectX 10 scores 107, DirectX 11 scores 157, and DirectX 12 scores 73. These lower DirectX scores compared to the G3D result suggest the GPU is better optimized for modern API workloads or that the benchmark methodology weights differently.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4060 Mobile’s 67th percentile GPU ranking and its proximity to the desktop RTX 2080 (-0.7% delta) suggest it can drive high-refresh 1080p gaming in most titles, though the estimated FPS would vary widely by game. The CPU’s 74th percentile ranking and single-thread score of 998 in 3DMark indicate it will not bottleneck GPU performance in most gaming scenarios, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates cannot be stated.

Streaming: The GPU includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which are Ada Lovelace features that support hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-based upscaling. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6,816 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 89,420 indicate sufficient parallel compute for encoding tasks. The CPU’s 12 threads can handle game logic and streaming overhead simultaneously, though the 65 W TDP may limit sustained multi-threaded performance during simultaneous gaming and encoding.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,368 and PassMark multithread score of 21,610 suggest capable timeline editing and export performance for 1080p and moderate 4K projects. The GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate VRAM for GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. The combined percentile of 71 indicates this pairing is above average for content creation laptops, but not at the top tier.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads limit rendering throughput compared to higher-core-count parts, but the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7,714 shows reasonable performance for occasional renders. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 11.61 TFLOPS and its proximity to the desktop RTX 2080 (-0.7% delta) suggest it can handle GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane, though the 8 GB VRAM may constrain scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 63,123 and data compression score of 250,197 indicate strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and version control operations. The single-thread score of 3,891 in PassMark supports fast interactive coding environments. The 16 MB shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core provide sufficient cache for typical development workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 74th percentile ranking and low TDP of 65 W make it efficient for everyday tasks. The integrated Radeon 740M graphics provide a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is not needed. PassMark single-thread performance of 3,891 ensures responsive application switching, and the 12 threads handle multitasking across browsers, documents, and communication tools without issue.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The data is not measured, and the figures should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 22,729 places it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs, with a performance delta of -0.7% versus the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and +1.3% versus the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile. This suggests the RTX 4060 Mobile should deliver frame rates comparable to a desktop RTX 2080 at similar settings. For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, users can expect playable frame rates in most titles, with esports games likely exceeding 100 FPS and AAA games typically landing between 60 and 100 FPS. At 1440p, frame rates would drop, with demanding titles potentially falling below 60 FPS at ultra settings. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth would likely limit performance to lighter titles or require reduced settings.

The CPU’s 74th percentile ranking and its performance parity with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 (-0.2% delta) indicate that it can keep up with a mid-range desktop processor in gaming. The single-thread 3DMark score of 998 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,593 demonstrate sufficient per-core performance for game logic and physics. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is lower than some desktop platforms, which may slightly impact performance in memory-sensitive games, but the overall pairing should provide a balanced gaming experience at 1080p.

Who Should Build It

This laptop pairing targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance for gaming and productivity. The CPU’s 74th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 67th percentile ranking place the system at the 71st combined percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly 71% of tested laptop configurations. Gamers playing at 1080p with high or ultra settings are the primary audience, as the RTX 4060 Mobile’s performance is comparable to a desktop RTX 2080 (-0.7% delta), which was a high-end card in its generation. Content creators who work with 1080p video or moderate 3D scenes will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,368 and the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 11.61 TFLOPS sufficient for occasional rendering tasks.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 63,123 and data compression score of 250,197, which support fast builds and repository operations. The 12 threads handle concurrent compilation and testing. Students and office workers benefit from the 65 W CPU TDP and efficient operation, with the integrated Radeon 740M providing a backup display solution. Small business workstations that run office applications, light database work, and occasional GPU-accelerated tasks would find this pairing adequate, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit larger data visualization workloads. The launch MSRP of $179 for the CPU indicates it is positioned as a mainstream part, and the GPU’s performance class aligns with mid-range mobile gaming laptops.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a relatively balanced pairing, with the CPU performing at the 74th percentile and the GPU at the 67th percentile. The CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers, which means in CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform better than in GPU-bound workloads. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 20,425 is 2,304 points lower than the GPU’s average score of 22,729, but the percentile difference is more meaningful—the CPU outperforms a larger share of its competitors than the GPU does.

In gaming, the GPU is likely the primary bottleneck in most titles, given that the RTX 4060 Mobile’s performance is comparable to a desktop RTX 2080 (-0.7% delta) but not to higher-tier modern GPUs. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 3,891 in PassMark and 998 in 3DMark single-thread suggests it can feed the GPU adequately at 1080p, but at lower resolutions or in CPU-intensive simulations, the 6-core/12-thread configuration may limit frame rates. The 3DMark scaling from 2, 4, 8, and 16 threads shows diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, indicating the CPU is well-suited for gaming workloads that typically use 4-8 threads.

In productivity, the CPU is the limiting factor for heavily multi-threaded tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, where its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,368 is modest compared to higher-core-count desktop parts. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth may also constrain GPU-compute workloads that exceed this memory capacity. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6,816 is lower than the G3D score of 17,469, suggesting the GPU is more optimized for graphics rendering than for raw compute, which aligns with its gaming focus.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 20,425, which puts it within 0.3% of the AMD EPYC 9454P (20,422), Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (20,454), AMD Ryzen 5 5600 (20,468), and AMD EPYC 7713 (20,363).

Q: What is the GPU’s performance relative to desktop cards?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score of 22,729 is -0.7% versus the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22,895) and +1.3% versus the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22,435), placing it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does this pairing support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores as part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this configuration?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores and percentile positions.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD107 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1890 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory runs on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU contains 3,072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units, along with 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores. Its FP32 throughput is 11.61 TFLOPS with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), and the pixel rate is 90.72 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 181.4 GTexel/s.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 22,729, placing it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22,895 (-0.7% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT scores 22,549 (0.8% delta), the Intel Arc B580 scores 23,021 (-1.3% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22,435 (1.3% delta). This places the RTX 4060 Mobile in the same performance class as a desktop RTX 2080, a significant achievement for a mobile part with a 115 W TDP.

In compute benchmarks, the GPU scores 89,420 in Geekbench OpenCL and 89,569 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark results show a G3D score of 17,469, a G2D score of 730, and a GPU compute score of 6,816. The DirectX benchmarks are lower: DirectX 9 scores 216, DirectX 10 scores 107, DirectX 11 scores 157, and DirectX 12 scores 73. The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has no external power connectors, indicating it draws power from the laptop motherboard. For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 24 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 96 tensor cores support DLSS and AI-based features. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming with high textures, but may limit 4K or heavily modded titles.