SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8500G + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

20,425 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G and AMD Radeon 860M pairing represents a modern, power-efficient laptop platform built around AMD’s 4 nm process technology. The data in this analysis is derived from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; therefore, all gaming frame rate discussions are estimates based on the CPU and GPU’s performance in compute and graphics workloads.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, the gaming performance figures below are estimates drawn from the benchmark scores of both components. The Radeon 860M’s Geekbench scores provide the primary evidence for its gaming capability: it achieves 22,759 in OpenCL and 30,043 in Vulkan. These scores place the GPU at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, indicating a solid integrated graphics solution that outperforms a significant majority of the discrete and integrated options in the database.

The Ryzen 5 8500G’s single-thread performance, measured at 998 in 3dmark_single_thread and 2,593 in Cinebench R23 single-core, is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the 860M in most gaming scenarios. The CPU’s 3dmark_2_threads score of 1,913 suggests that even lightly-threaded game engines will have ample processing headroom. For esports titles and older games, this pairing should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings, though exact numbers are unavailable. At 1440p, the 860M’s 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate that frame rates will drop considerably, and users should expect to lower settings to maintain smooth gameplay.

The 860M’s memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," meaning its performance scales with the DDR5 memory speed of the host laptop. The CPU’s 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is a theoretical ceiling; in practice, the shared memory architecture means the GPU accesses the same pool, so higher-speed DDR5 modules will directly improve gaming FPS. The GPU’s 8 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support suggest ray-traced effects are technically possible, but at 3.072 TFLOPS, the performance cost will be steep, and ray tracing should generally be disabled for playable frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 8500G is built on AMD Socket AM5, which is the current mainstream desktop platform—though this specific build is classified as a laptop, indicating the socket is used in a mobile form factor. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support listed as true. The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single discrete GPU or a fast NVMe SSD, though the 860M itself connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 15 W, making this a low-power pairing that requires minimal cooling and power delivery. The suggested PSU is null in the data, but the combined 80 W thermal envelope means a modest power adapter will suffice; no dedicated power connectors are listed for the GPU, which is typical for an IGP. The CPU’s multiplier is not unlocked, so overclocking is not an option; however, the 5.00 GHz boost clock already provides strong single-thread performance out of the box.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be adding a discrete GPU, since the PCIe Gen 4 x8 interface on the 860M suggests the system is designed to accommodate a more powerful graphics card. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a 74th percentile ranking, indicate it can handle a mid-range discrete GPU without becoming a severe bottleneck. Alternatively, users could upgrade the memory to higher-speed DDR5 modules to unlock more of the 860M’s potential, as its bandwidth is system-dependent.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a balanced pairing with the GPU being the primary limiter in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU sits at the 74th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs—a close match that suggests neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The combined percentile is 73, reinforcing that this is a well-matched platform.

In gaming, the 860M’s Vulkan score of 30,043 is its strongest result, indicating that games using the Vulkan API will see the best performance. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS is modest, so at higher resolutions or with demanding graphical settings, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,368 and single-core score of 2,593 show it can feed the GPU adequately in most scenarios, but in CPU-heavy games with complex physics or large numbers of NPCs, the 6-core/12-thread configuration may cause frame dips.

The FPS scaling picture is clear: at 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to push the GPU to its limits; at 1440p or higher, the GPU’s pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s becomes the ceiling. For productivity workloads, the CPU’s multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 18,368, Geekbench multi-core 9,444) indicate it will handle compilation and rendering tasks competently, with the GPU playing a minor role unless the software uses OpenCL or Vulkan acceleration.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets users who need a compact, power-efficient laptop that can handle both everyday productivity and light-to-moderate gaming. The 74th percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for students running office applications, web browsers, and coding environments, where the single-thread score of 2,593 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy responsiveness. For software developers, the 12 threads and strong multi-core scores—18,368 in Cinebench R23 and 21,610 in Passmark multithread—provide enough parallelism for compiling code and running virtual machines.

Content creators working with photos or 1080p video will find the CPU’s 63,123 integer math score and 39,074 floating point math score in Passmark sufficient for rendering and encoding tasks. The 860M’s OpenCL score of 22,759 means GPU-accelerated effects in editing software will work, though render times will be longer than with a discrete GPU. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations are the primary audience; the Vulkan score of 30,043 suggests that popular esports titles and older AAA games will run acceptably. Small business workstations can leverage the 65 W CPU TDP for silent, cool operation, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive tasks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The base clock is 3.50 GHz, boosting to 5.00 GHz, which explains its strong single-thread performance: 998 in 3dmark_single_thread, 2,593 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 3,891 in Passmark single-thread. These scores place it at the 74th percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of desktop CPUs in the database.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the multi-threaded scores: 18,368 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 7,714 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 9,444 in Geekbench multi-core. The 3dmark tests show scaling from 1,913 at 2 threads to 5,224 at 16 threads, with a max-thread score of 5,213, indicating good thread scaling up to the 12-thread limit. The Passmark physics score of 1,318 is relatively low, suggesting that highly physics-intensive simulations may not be this chip’s strongest suit.

The CPU’s nearest rivals by average benchmark score include the AMD EPYC 9454P (0% delta), Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (-0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 5600 (-0.2% delta), and AMD EPYC 7713 (0.3% delta). This places the 8500G in the same performance class as a previous-generation desktop Ryzen 5 5600, which is notable given the 8500G’s much lower power envelope and integrated graphics capability.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is not unlocked, so the CPU operates at its stock 3.50 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost clocks only.

Q: What type of memory does this platform require?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support listed as true. The memory bandwidth is rated at 83.2 GB/s.

Q: Can the Radeon 860M handle ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so ray tracing is technically enabled, but the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance will make ray-traced games run at low frame rates.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8500G compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600?

A: The 8500G’s average benchmark score of 20,425 is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 5600’s 20,468, placing them in the same performance tier despite the 8500G being a newer, lower-power chip.

Q: What is the power consumption of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 15 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 80 W. The GPU requires no power connectors.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: The build class is "laptop," and the GPU’s display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," confirming this is a mobile platform.

Q: When was each component released?

A: The CPU was released on January 7, 2024, with a launch MSRP of $179. The GPU was released on February 28, 2025.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 20,425, placing it at the 74th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 9454P, scores 20,422 (0% delta), while the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V scores 20,454 (-0.1% delta). The Ryzen 5 5600 scores 20,468 (-0.2% delta), and the AMD EPYC 7713 scores 20,363 (0.3% delta). This tight cluster shows the 8500G delivers performance comparable to enterprise server chips and a previous-generation desktop CPU.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26,401, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, scores 26,421 (-0.1% delta), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 scores 26,331 (0.3% delta). The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26,553 (-0.6% delta), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 scores 26,683 (-1.1% delta). The 860M’s individual scores are 22,759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30,043 in Geekbench Vulkan, with the Vulkan result being notably stronger.

The combined picture shows a CPU and GPU that are nearly identical in percentile ranking (74 vs 72), resulting in a combined percentile of 73. This indicates a well-balanced platform where neither component will consistently hold back the other. The CPU’s 3dmark scores (single-thread 998, 2-thread 1,913, 4-thread 3,130, 8-thread 4,565, 16-thread 5,224, max-thread 5,213) show good scaling across thread counts, supporting the GPU’s needs in modern multi-threaded game engines.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G CPU with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated GPU. The CPU is part of the 8000 series, using the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm process, with 6 cores and 12 threads. The GPU is based on RDNA 3.5 architecture and is part of the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile. The 860M has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with a boost clock of 3000 MHz.

The overall tier of this build is solidly mid-range, as evidenced by the 73rd combined percentile. The CPU’s 74th percentile and GPU’s 72nd percentile both indicate above-average performance relative to all components in the database. This is not a high-end gaming rig or a workstation-class machine, but it is a capable all-rounder for users who need a single device for work, study, and casual gaming. The 4 nm process for both components, manufactured by TSMC, contributes to the low power draw and compact form factor typical of laptop designs.

The CPU has a launch MSRP of $179, which positions it as a mainstream part. The GPU has no launch MSRP listed, consistent with its status as an integrated graphics solution. The production status for both components is "Active," meaning they are currently available in the market.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The 860M’s Vulkan score of 30,043 is its strongest benchmark, suggesting that Vulkan-based games will perform best. At 1080p with medium settings, this pairing should achieve frame rates suitable for 60 Hz displays, but 144 Hz panels will likely exceed the GPU’s capabilities in demanding titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 2,593 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in this scenario.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,368. The 860M does not have dedicated encoding hardware listed, so streaming will rely on the CPU’s x264 encoder, which will reduce gaming performance but remain feasible at lower bitrates and resolutions.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 63,123 and floating point math score of 39,074 indicate solid performance for video encoding and effects. The 860M’s OpenCL score of 22,759 enables GPU acceleration in editors, but timeline scrubbing and final renders will be faster with a discrete GPU. For 1080p projects with light effects, this platform is adequate.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7,714 and R15 multi-core score of 1,851 show the CPU can handle CPU-based rendering, but the 860M’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 compute is limited for GPU rendering. Blender users will need to rely on the CPU’s 12 threads for Cycles rendering, which will be slow but workable for small scenes.

Software Development: The CPU’s Geekbench multi-core score of 9,444 and single-core score of 2,354 provide strong compilation times for code and fast IDE responsiveness. The 16 MB L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth support large codebases in memory. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running build processes.

Student and Office Work: The 65 W CPU TDP and 15 W GPU TDP result in long battery life and quiet operation, ideal for classroom and office environments. The Passmark single-thread score of 3,891 ensures snappy application launches, and the 6 cores handle multitasking across browsers, office suites, and video calls without strain. The 74th percentile CPU ranking means this system will not feel sluggish for typical productivity tasks.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8500G + AMD Radeon 860M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds