SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation form a desktop configuration that targets a very specific intersection of high-end workstation graphics and mid-range CPU throughput. A pairing this lopsided—with a GPU that sits in the 98th percentile of all GPUs and a CPU in the 77th—creates a system where the graphics card is the clear star, but the processor is not a bottleneck in every scenario. The data shows a combined percentile ranking of 88, which indicates that while the GPU dominates the performance profile, the CPU still holds its own in a way that keeps the overall package competitive. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; all gaming and rendering frame-rate discussion is therefore estimated from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the Ryzen 5 8400F and the RTX 5000 Ada is the single most defining characteristic of this build. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 184,664 places it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU’s average score of 25,005 puts it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. This 21-point percentile gap is significant, and it dictates which component limits which workload. In GPU-bound scenarios—such as 4K gaming, high-fidelity ray tracing, or large-scale 3D rendering—the RTX 5000 Ada will be the primary driver of performance, and the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor. The GPU’s FP32 compute of 65.28 TFLOPS and texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s are numbers that dwarf what a six-core processor can feed, so the bottleneck shifts decisively to the graphics card in those tasks.

However, the situation flips in CPU-bound workloads. Applications like data compression, where the 8400F scores 288,158 in Passmark, or integer math at 74,021, will be constrained by the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads. The 3DMark threading results are particularly telling here. The CPU scores 6,091 in the 16-thread test and 6,165 in the max-thread test, showing that it scales well up to its full thread count, but it only manages 1,874 in the 2-thread test. This indicates that the CPU’s single-thread performance is respectable but not exceptional, which matters because the RTX 5000 Ada can generate frames faster than the CPU can process game logic in lightly-threaded titles. For gaming at 1080p or 1440p with lower graphical settings, the CPU will become the bottleneck, as it simply cannot keep up with the GPU’s frame output. At 4K, the GPU workload becomes so heavy that the CPU has ample time to feed it, and the bottleneck shifts back to the GPU.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, is inferred from this balance. In a 1080p esports title, the CPU’s single-thread score of 951 in 3DMark would likely cap the frame rate well below what the RTX 5000 Ada is capable of producing. In a 4K AAA title with ultra settings, the GPU’s 32 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth would be the deciding factor, and the CPU would be more than sufficient. The data suggests that this is a system where the user must be aware of the workload: it is a machine that rewards heavy GPU usage and punishes CPU-bound tasks with underutilization of the graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are consistent with a mid-range Zen 4 part. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 5 8400F scores 20,851 in multicore and 2,943 in single-core. These are strong numbers for a 65W TDP part, and they place the CPU just 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, which has an average score of 24,964. The 8400F’s average score of 25,005 also puts it 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H. Interestingly, the CPU is 0.4% behind the AMD EPYC 9474F, a server-class chip, which shows that the 8400F is punching well above its weight in synthetic benchmarks. The Passmark single-thread score of 3,685 and multithread score of 24,389 further corroborate this, showing a balanced processor that can handle both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded tasks competently.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is on an entirely different level. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5000 Ada scores 175,286, and in Vulkan, it scores 194,041. The average benchmark score of 184,664 places it in the 98th percentile, and its nearest rivals are all data-center or high-end enthusiast parts. It is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, and 3.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D. The only GPU in its immediate vicinity that beats it is the A100 SXM4 40 GB, which is 1.3% faster. This puts the RTX 5000 Ada in rarefied air, performing at a level that is typically reserved for compute-optimized accelerators.

The combined picture is one of extreme GPU dominance. The CPU’s 77th percentile is solidly mid-range, while the GPU’s 98th percentile is top-tier. This means that in any workload that is even partially GPU-accelerated, the RTX 5000 Ada will carry the system to near-top-of-the-line performance. In pure CPU workloads, the system will perform like a mid-range desktop, which is a significant drop-off from the GPU’s capabilities. The data does not include any measured FPS values, so these are estimates based on the benchmark scores, but the disparity is clear: this is a build that should be purchased for the GPU, with the CPU as a supporting actor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on AMD Socket AM5, which is a forward-looking choice. The Ryzen 5 8400F supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the RTX 5000 Ada’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means that the GPU will not be bandwidth-starved by the CPU’s PCIe implementation. The CPU’s 65W TDP is modest, and the GPU’s 250W TDP is substantial, but the suggested PSU for the GPU is 600W, which provides headroom for a system with this configuration.

The upgrade path is one of the strongest arguments for this build. The AM5 socket is current, and the CPU is unlocked, allowing for overclocking to extract more performance from the 4.20 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost clocks. A sensible next upgrade would be to move to a higher-core-count AM5 CPU, such as a 12-core or 16-core Zen 4 part, which would better match the GPU’s capabilities in CPU-bound tasks. The motherboard would not need to be changed, and the DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4 support would carry over. The GPU, being a workstation-class part with a predecessor of Workstation Ampere and a successor of Blackwell PRO W, is at the top of its generation, so upgrading it would be a lateral move unless the user needs the successor’s specific features. The 16-pin power connector and dual-slot design are standard for this class, and the 267 mm length and 112 mm height should fit in most mid-tower cases.

The memory support is another point in favor of the platform. DDR5 is the current standard, and the 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth is adequate for the CPU’s 6 cores. The lack of ECC support is a minor caveat for workstation use, but it is not a dealbreaker for most applications. The PCIe Gen 4 support is also future-proof, as it matches the GPU’s interface and is still the dominant standard for consumer and workstation parts. The 600W suggested PSU leaves room for additional drives and peripherals, and the 65W CPU TDP means that the power supply is not stressed by the processor. This is a platform that can grow with the user’s needs, and the data indicates that the CPU is the first component that should be upgraded to unlock the GPU’s full potential in CPU-bound scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This is a system for users who prioritize GPU compute above all else. The RTX 5000 Ada’s 98th percentile ranking makes it an obvious choice for professionals in 3D rendering, video editing, and scientific computing. The 32 GB of VRAM is the headline feature, and it is well-suited for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and complex simulations. For content creators working with 8K video or massive 3D scenes, the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will handle tasks that would choke lesser cards. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for feeding the GPU in these workloads, and the 16 MB of shared L3 cache is adequate for the data flow.

Gamers, particularly those at 4K resolution, would also find this build compelling, but with caveats. At 4K, the GPU is the bottleneck, and the RTX 5000 Ada will deliver exceptional frame rates in ultra settings. At 1080p or 1440p, the CPU’s 77th percentile performance will limit the frame rate, making this a less attractive option for competitive gamers who demand high refresh rates. For developers, the CPU’s 12 threads and the GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 make this a solid platform for building and testing graphics-intensive applications. The CPU’s Passmark data encryption score of 16,646 and extended instructions score of 22,175 also indicate that it can handle security and encryption workloads competently.

Students and small business workstations would benefit from the CPU’s efficiency and the GPU’s compute power, but the cost of the GPU likely puts this out of reach for most budget-conscious users. The CPU’s launch MSRP of $170 is affordable, and the 65W TDP means that it can be cooled by a capable air cooler, but the GPU’s workstation-class pricing and power requirements are a different story. The data shows that this is a build for professionals who need the GPU’s capabilities and are willing to invest in a platform that can support it. It is not a general-purpose gaming machine, nor is it a budget workstation; it is a targeted tool for GPU-intensive work.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.20 GHz, and the boost clock is 4.70 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a desktop part from the 8000 series, released on March 31, 2024, and it is currently in active production. The CPU has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Benchmark results for the CPU show a progressive scaling that is typical of a 6-core part. The 3DMark scores increase from 1,874 in the 2-thread test to 6,091 in the 16-thread test, and peak at 6,165 in the max-thread test. This indicates that the CPU utilises its full thread count effectively, but the single-thread score of 951 is the weakest point. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 20,851 is strong for a 65W part, and the single-core score of 2,943 is respectable. The Passmark scores paint a similar picture: integer math at 74,021 and floating-point math at 46,217 are good numbers, but the find prime numbers score of 89 is notably low, suggesting that the CPU is not optimised for that specific workload.

Real-world workloads are well-served by these scores. The CPU’s 12 threads are enough for compiling code, running virtual machines, or handling office productivity suites. The data compression score of 288,158 in Passmark is particularly high, indicating that the CPU can handle file archiving and compression tasks with ease. The random string sorting score of 34,604 also shows strong performance in data manipulation tasks. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Ryzen 5 7500F, is just 0.2% faster, which means that the 8400F is essentially at parity with a popular budget gaming CPU. The Intel Core i7-13620H, a mobile part, is 0.4% slower, which shows that the 8400F’s desktop design gives it an edge in sustained workloads. Overall, this is a competent mid-range CPU that will not embarrass itself in any task, but it is not a high-end part.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD102 chip. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The GPU has 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, along with 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores. The base clock is 1,155 MHz, and the boost clock is 2,550 MHz. The memory is 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 18 Gbps. The TDP is 250W, and it requires a 600W power supply and a single 16-pin power connector.

The benchmark scores for the GPU are nothing short of extraordinary. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and Vulkan score of 194,041 are among the highest recorded for any GPU. The average benchmark score of 184,664 places it in the 98th percentile, and it is within 3.7% of the GeForce RTX 4090 D, which is a consumer flagship. The nearest rival, the A100 SXM4 80 GB, is a data-center GPU that costs significantly more, and the RTX 5000 Ada is 0.5% faster. This puts the GPU in a class of its own for workstation tasks.

For rendering, the GPU’s specs are ideal. The 32 GB of VRAM is enough to hold massive 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and multi-frame renders without spilling over into system memory. The 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth ensures that the GPU can feed its 12,800 shading units without stalling. The 100 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 400 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features like DLSS and denoising. The pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s are both top-tier numbers. The FP32 performance of 65.28 TFLOPS is identical to the FP16 performance, which means that the GPU does not sacrifice precision for speed. This is a GPU that is built to render, and the data confirms that it does so at a level that rivals data-center accelerators.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS values for this CPU+GPU combination in the data, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores. The GPU’s 98th percentile ranking suggests that it is capable of extremely high frame rates in almost any game. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking, however, will be the limiting factor in many scenarios. At 4K resolution with ultra settings, the GPU’s massive compute and memory bandwidth will allow it to dominate, and the CPU will be able to keep up with the frame pacing. Estimates suggest that in a game like Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K ultra with ray tracing, the RTX 5000 Ada would deliver frame rates well above 60 FPS, and the CPU would not be the bottleneck.

At 1440p, the situation becomes more balanced. The GPU is still the primary driver, but the CPU’s single-thread performance of 951 in 3DMark will start to show in games that are not heavily multi-threaded. In a title like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the estimated frame rates would be high, but they would be capped by the CPU’s ability to process game logic. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are enough for most modern games, but the lack of additional cores means that background tasks could impact frame pacing. At 1080p, the CPU would be the clear bottleneck, and the GPU would be underutilized, leading to frame rates that are lower than what the GPU is capable of producing in a system with a more powerful CPU.

The data suggests that this is not a dedicated gaming build. It is a workstation that can game, and it will game very well at 4K, but it will not be the best choice for competitive gaming at lower resolutions. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures that it is compatible with the latest game APIs, and the 32 GB of VRAM means that texture quality and resolution can be maxed out without issue. For a user who games at 4K and also does professional work, this is an excellent pairing. For a user who only games at 1080p, the CPU would need to be upgraded to fully utilise the GPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a mid-range Zen 4 CPU with a top-tier workstation GPU. The combined percentile of 88 reflects the GPU’s dominance and the CPU’s solid, if unspectacular, performance. The Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a 65W TDP, and the RTX 5000 Ada is a 250W, dual-slot GPU with 32 GB of VRAM. The system requires a 600W power supply and a standard ATX case that can accommodate a 267 mm GPU. The platform is AM5, which offers a clear upgrade path to higher-core-count CPUs, and the PCIe Gen 4 support is current.

The tier of this build is high-end, but only because of the GPU. The CPU is firmly in the mid-range, and the data shows that it is within 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-13620H and 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-11850H, both of which are mobile parts. This means that the CPU is not a flagship, but it is more than capable for most tasks. The GPU, on the other hand, is a top-2% part, and it is the reason to buy this system. The overall build is a workstation that can handle the most demanding GPU workloads, with a CPU that will not hold it back in GPU-bound tasks. It is not a balanced build, but it is a purposeful one, and the data supports its use for professionals who need the GPU’s capabilities.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 88, with the CPU in the 77th percentile and the GPU in the 98th percentile.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8400F compare to the Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The 8400F is 0.2% faster than the Ryzen 5 7500F, with an average benchmark score of 25,005 compared to 24,964.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 18 Gbps.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 8400F has an unlocked multiplier, and its base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 600W, and the GPU has a 250W TDP with a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 8400F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 compute performance?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada has an FP32 performance of 65.28 TFLOPS, which is the same as its FP16 performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds