SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

This desktop build pairs AMD's 6-core Zen 4 processor with NVIDIA's workstation-class Ada Lovelace GPU, landing at the 86th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations tracked in the database. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 95th percentile among all GPUs, making this a configuration where the graphics card is the dominant performance driver. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build ranks at the 86th percentile overall, placing it above the vast majority of tracked desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8400F compare to its nearest rival, the Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25,005, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 7500F's 24,964. This is a negligible performance difference, effectively making them equivalent in multi-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 8400F lists integrated graphics as "N/A." A discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What socket and memory type does this CPU use?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How does the GPU's OpenCL score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 146,593 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, has an average score of 135,230, a 0% delta — meaning the two perform nearly identically in that synthetic test.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F scores 2,943 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is a strong result for a 6-core part and indicates good responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on the AD104 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die. The GPU features 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 48 dedicated RT cores, while 192 tensor cores accelerate AI and deep learning workloads. The boost clock reaches 2175 MHz, and the card achieves a pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s alongside a texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s.

Compute throughput is substantial: FP32 performance is rated at 26.73 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). This makes the card well-suited for both single-precision scientific workloads and mixed-precision AI inference. The 20 GB GDDR6 frame buffer with 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth is generous for workstation tasks, though the 160-bit bus width is narrower than typical for this memory capacity — a trade-off that keeps power consumption at 130 W TDP with a suggested 300 W PSU.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the GPU scores 146,593, placing it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. The Vulkan score is 123,842. Against nearest rivals, the RTX 4000 Ada matches the NVIDIA A10M (0% delta), trails the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 by 0.1%, and sits 0.4% behind the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo. The closest competitor, the AMD Radeon PRO V620, leads by 0.9%. These sub-1% deltas mean the RTX 4000 Ada is effectively performance-parity with the top workstation GPUs in its class for compute-heavy tasks.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores means hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS-style upscaling are both fully supported. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs allow multi-monitor workstation setups, and the single-slot form factor (245 mm length, 112 mm height) fits compact chassis. The 16-pin power connector and 300 W suggested PSU indicate modest power requirements for the performance on offer.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, gaming frame rates must be estimated from the individual component benchmarks. The RTX 4000 Ada's 95th percentile GPU ranking and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest it can drive high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most titles, especially with DLSS enabled given the tensor core count. The 20 GB VRAM is ample for high-resolution textures and future game installments that increasingly exceed 8-12 GB usage.

At 1080p, the Ryzen 5 8400F's single-thread score of 951 in 3DMark and 2,943 in Cinebench R23 will likely become the limiting factor in esports and CPU-bound titles, potentially capping frame rates below what the GPU could deliver. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the CPU's 6 cores / 12 threads should keep up with most game engines.

The GPU's memory bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s is modest by high-end gaming standards, which may slightly constrain performance in texture-heavy scenes at 4K. However, the 48 RT cores provide competitive ray-traced performance, and the 192 tensor cores enable DLSS frame generation, which can substantially boost frame rates in supported titles. For a workstation card, the gaming performance is respectable, but it is not optimized for raw rasterization at extreme refresh rates — the focus is clearly on compute and professional workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the GPU ranks at the 95th percentile while the CPU sits at the 77th percentile. This means the Ryzen 5 8400F will frequently be the limiting factor in GPU-bound workloads. In 3DMark multi-threaded tests, the CPU scores 6,091 at 16 threads and 6,165 at max threads, indicating that scaling plateaus beyond 8 threads (5,275) — the 6-core design saturates quickly.

In gaming, this imbalance manifests as CPU bottlenecks at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 951 in 3DMark single-thread and 3,685 in PassMark single-thread will likely constrain frame rates in fast-paced titles. At higher resolutions, the GPU's extensive shading and RT resources take over, and the CPU bottleneck diminishes.

For compute workloads, the balance is more favorable. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,851 and PassMark multi-thread score of 24,389 provide solid CPU-side performance, while the GPU's 146,593 OpenCL score handles parallel compute. In mixed workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, both components contribute, but the GPU will dominate render times while the CPU handles scene management and encoding.

The 0.2% performance delta to the Ryzen 5 7500F and 0.4% delta to the Intel Core i7-13620H confirm the CPU is competitive with mid-range peers. However, the GPU's nearest rivals (A10M, W6800) are all within 0.9% of its score, meaning the GPU is at the top of its class — the bottleneck is unequivocally the CPU in most scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 8400F achieves an average benchmark score of 25,005 across all tests, placing it at the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Ryzen 5 7500F (24,964, +0.2% delta), Intel Core i7-11850H (24,935, +0.3%), and Intel Core i7-13620H (24,911, +0.4%). The AMD EPYC 9474F leads by 0.4% (25,103). This places the 8400F squarely in the middle of a performance plateau where no meaningful difference exists among peers.

In CPU-specific tests, the 8400F shows a strong single-core result: 3,685 in PassMark single-thread and 2,943 in Cinebench R23 single-core. Multi-threaded performance is respectable for a 6-core part: 20,851 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 24,389 in PassMark multi-thread. The CPU's 3DMark scores scale from 1,874 (2 threads) to 6,165 (max threads), confirming reasonable multi-threading efficiency.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 135,218 average across its benchmarks, at the 95th GPU percentile. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 and Vulkan score of 123,842 are strong. The GPU's rivals are within 0.9%: NVIDIA A10M (135,230, 0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (135,396, -0.1%), W6800X Duo (135,774, -0.4%), and Radeon PRO V620 (136,472, -0.9%). This indicates the RTX 4000 Ada is at the top tier of workstation GPUs in compute benchmarks.

Combined, the CPU and GPU produce a 86th percentile build ranking. The picture is clear: this is a GPU-dominant workstation where the CPU is sufficient but not exceptional, and the GPU is near the top of its class.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets professional users who need strong GPU compute without requiring the absolute fastest CPU. Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes will benefit from the 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The 95th percentile GPU ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of GPUs in the database for rendering and simulation tasks.

Developers running CUDA-accelerated workloads or training small machine learning models will find the 192 tensor cores valuable. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor development environments. Students in engineering or data science programs can leverage the GPU's compute power for coursework, while the 65 W TDP CPU keeps the overall system power modest.

Small business workstations handling CAD, architectural visualization, or scientific computing will benefit from the single-slot GPU form factor and 300 W PSU requirement — the build fits in standard workstation chassis without special cooling or power infrastructure. Gamers at 1440p or 4K will get solid performance, though the CPU may limit 1080p high-refresh gaming.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It has 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and the TDP is 65 W. Cache configuration is 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3.

The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. It has no integrated graphics, requires a discrete GPU, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The launch MSRP was $170, and it was released on March 31, 2024.

Benchmark results show a well-rounded performer. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,851 is strong for a 6-core chip, while the single-core score of 2,943 ensures snappy application responsiveness. PassMark scores are consistent: data compression at 288,158, data encryption at 16,646, floating-point math at 46,217, and integer math at 74,021. The extended instructions score of 22,175 indicates good AVX-512-class throughput, though the 89 points in prime number finding suggests that particular workload is not a strength.

The 0.2% delta to the Ryzen 5 7500F means these two CPUs are interchangeable in practice. The 8400F's 77th percentile ranking places it above the median CPU but below high-core-count parts. For the intended GPU-dominant build, the 8400F provides adequate CPU throughput without excessive power draw or heat.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, resulting in an 86th percentile combined ranking. The CPU is a 6-core Zen 4 processor on the AM5 socket, while the GPU is a single-slot workstation card with 20 GB GDDR6 memory. The configuration targets compute-heavy professional workloads rather than pure gaming, though it can handle gaming at high resolutions.

The 77th percentile CPU and 95th percentile GPU create an asymmetrical performance profile. The GPU is the star component, delivering compute performance that rivals the best workstation cards in the database. The CPU is a competent mid-range part that will not bottleneck the GPU in most professional applications, though it may limit frame rates in CPU-bound gaming scenarios.

This is not a balanced gaming rig — it is a workstation with gaming capability. The 130 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP mean the entire system can run on a 300 W PSU, making it efficient and easy to cool. The single-slot GPU and compact dimensions (245 mm length) allow for small-form-factor builds.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 and 95th percentile ranking suggest strong frame rates at 1440p and 4K, but the CPU's 951 3DMark single-thread score may cap 1080p performance below what high-refresh monitors can display. DLSS via tensor cores can boost frame rates further.

Streaming: The 6-core CPU with 12 threads provides enough headroom for encoding while gaming, and the GPU's tensor cores could offload encoding tasks. PassMark multi-thread score of 24,389 indicates adequate parallel processing for stream overlays and chat.

Video editing: The 20 GB VRAM handles large timelines and 4K/8K footage, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 146,593 accelerates effects and color grading. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core of 20,851 supports smooth timeline scrubbing and export encoding.

3D rendering: This is a strength. The GPU's 48 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 192 tensor cores speed up denoising and AI-accelerated render features. FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS makes it suitable for both GPU rendering and viewport previews.

Software development: The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,685 in PassMark ensures fast compilation of single-threaded code, while the GPU accelerates parallel build tasks and CUDA development. The 20 GB VRAM allows large model testing locally.

Student and office work: Overkill for basic tasks, but the 65 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP keep power costs low. The 77th CPU percentile and 95th GPU percentile ensure this system will handle any academic software without issue, from CAD to machine learning frameworks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The 300 W suggested PSU leaves significant headroom for upgrades, as the CPU TDP is 65 W and GPU TDP is 130 W.

The AM5 socket is a current-generation platform with active production status. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count Ryzen CPU on the same socket — the data shows the current 6-core part is the bottleneck in this system, and the platform supports more powerful processors. The DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4 support mean the platform is not outdated.

For GPU upgrades, the single 16-pin power connector and 300 W PSU limit options to cards within that power envelope. The 20 GB VRAM is already generous, so a GPU upgrade would need to target higher bandwidth or more RT cores to show meaningful gains. The platform's PCIe 4.0 x16 slot is sufficient for current and near-future GPUs.

The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to improve the 77th percentile position, though the 4.70 GHz boost clock leaves limited headroom. The 65 W TDP means the stock cooler is likely sufficient, and upgrading to a capable air cooler (without specifying numbers) could enable sustained all-core boosts. The platform's active production status ensures ongoing BIOS support and compatibility with future AM5 processors.