SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 pairing represents a notable asymmetry in desktop computing. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part built on TSMC's 4nm process, while the GPU is a massive Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory. This combination sits at the 68th percentile overall among all builds, with the processor at the 77th percentile and the graphics card at the 59th percentile. The data indicates a desktop-class system where the CPU substantially outperforms the GPU relative to their respective markets, a dynamic that shapes every workload discussed below.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, manufactured on a 4nm process by TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, drawing a 65W TDP. The 8000-series part features a dual-channel DDR5 memory bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip has no integrated graphics, which aligns with its F-series designation.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25005. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, which scores 24964, a mere 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i7-11850H and i7-13620H trail by 0.3% and 0.4%, respectively, while the AMD EPYC 9474F leads by 0.4%. This clustering indicates that the 8400F sits in a tightly contested performance band where no single competitor holds a meaningful advantage.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20851 demonstrates strong throughput for a 6-core part. The PassMark multithread score of 24389 reinforces this, with integer math at 74021 and floating-point math at 46217. Data compression performance is particularly strong at 288158 in PassMark, suggesting efficient handling of archival and storage tasks. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a progression from 1874 at 2 threads to 6165 at max threads, indicating reasonable scaling as additional threads are utilized.

Single-thread performance is equally relevant. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2943 and PassMark single-thread score of 3685 show that the Zen 4 architecture delivers competitive per-core performance. The 3DMark single-thread score of 951 and 2-thread score of 1874 suggest that lightly-threaded applications, such as older games or certain productivity tools, will perform adequately. The data encryption score of 16646 and extended instructions score of 22175 in PassMark indicate solid cryptographic and SIMD workload handling.

The 4nm process and 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die contribute to the efficiency profile. The 65W TDP means thermal management is straightforward, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking headroom for users who want to extract additional performance. The 16 MB shared L3 cache is modest by modern standards, but the dual-channel DDR5 interface helps mitigate latency-sensitive workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides the foundation for this build. The Ryzen 5 8400F supports DDR5 memory exclusively through a dual-channel interface, with ECC memory not supported. The platform offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and one or two NVMe drives. The 65W TDP keeps power delivery requirements modest, meaning the CPU does not demand an elaborate VRM design on the motherboard.

The GPU, in contrast, has a 575W TDP and the suggested power supply is 950W. This represents a significant power requirement that the CPU's modest 65W TDP does little to offset. The RTX 5090 D V2 uses a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot design, measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The physical footprint requires a case with adequate clearance, and the 950W PSU recommendation leaves headroom for the rest of the system.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the CPU, since the AM5 socket supports newer Ryzen 5 generations. The GPU is already at the top of its class, so upgrading it would yield diminishing returns. Users could move to a higher-core-count AM5 processor to better balance the system for multi-threaded workloads, since the current 6-core part may bottleneck the GPU in CPU-intensive scenarios. The platform's DDR5 support means memory upgrades are straightforward, and the PCIe Gen 4 interface is sufficient for current storage and graphics cards.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU built on TSMC's 5nm process, with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The chip, designated GB202, features 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation units. Ray tracing is handled by 170 dedicated RT cores, while 680 tensor cores accelerate AI and DLSS workloads. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz for an effective 28 Gbps.

The memory subsystem is substantial: 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus delivers 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth. This configuration supports high-resolution textures and large datasets without capacity constraints. The pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate performance. Compute performance is rated at 104.8 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, showing balanced throughput for general and half-precision workloads.

The GPU's benchmark score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 is 16504, placing it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. This is a surprisingly low position for a flagship-class card, and the nearest rivals confirm this: the NVIDIA T400 scores 16508 (0% difference), the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415 (0.5% slower), and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408 (0.6% slower). The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, just 0.9% behind. The data shows that the RTX 5090 D V2, despite its massive memory and compute specifications, benchmarks in the same performance class as much more modest cards in this particular test.

The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connectors. The dual-slot design and 304 mm length require a full-size case, and the 16-pin power connector demands a compatible PSU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 2943 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 16504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad suggest the system can drive high refresh rates at lower resolutions, but the GPU's 59th percentile position means it is not a top-tier performer. Expect smooth frame rates in esports titles where CPU single-thread performance dominates.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads provide enough headroom for encoding alongside gaming, but the 77th percentile CPU position means concurrent encoding and gaming may strain the processor. The GPU's tensor cores could offload encoding work via NVENC, but the benchmark data does not quantify this capability.

Video editing: The PassMark data compression score of 288158 and multithread score of 24389 indicate solid performance for timeline editing and export tasks. The 24 GB of VRAM allows for large projects and multiple high-resolution streams without memory pressure.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20851 shows the CPU can handle moderate rendering workloads, but the GPU's compute capability at 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 is the stronger asset. Rendering software that leverages CUDA or OptiX would benefit from the GPU's 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread performance (3685 in PassMark) accelerates compilation of small projects, while the multithread score aids parallel builds. The 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth at 83.2 GB/s support rapid code iteration.

Student and office work: The 65W TDP and efficient 4nm process make this a reasonable desktop for academic use. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking ensures responsive productivity, though the GPU's power draw may be excessive for typical office tasks. The lack of integrated graphics means the discrete GPU is mandatory, which is worth noting for basic use cases.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 25005, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, scores 24964, a 0.2% difference that is statistically insignificant. The Intel Core i7-11850H and i7-13620H are similarly close, at 0.3% and 0.4% behind, respectively. The AMD EPYC 9474F leads by 0.4%, showing that the 8400F competes with a server-class chip in this metric.

The GPU scores 16504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are tightly packed, with the NVIDIA T400 at 16508 (0% difference) and the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16415 (0.5% slower). The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 0.6% behind, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is 0.9% behind. The GPU's percentile position is notably lower than the CPU's, indicating an imbalance.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 68, reflecting the CPU's stronger relative position. The CPU's 77th percentile versus the GPU's 59th percentile means the processor is better positioned within its market than the graphics card is within its own. The combined picture is a system where CPU-bound tasks will perform above average, while GPU-bound tasks will perform closer to median levels.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than verified results.

The CPU's single-thread score of 2943 in Cinebench R23 and 3685 in PassMark suggest strong performance in games that rely heavily on one or two cores. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 5275 indicates that multi-threaded game engines will also benefit. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504, while at the 59th percentile, suggests it can handle modern titles at high settings, but the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, which is not a flagship-class card.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU is likely to be the limiting factor in many titles, as the 6-core configuration may struggle to feed the GPU's rendering pipeline. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes more relevant, and the 24 GB of VRAM ensures capacity is never an issue. The GPU's 1.34 TB/s memory bandwidth supports high-resolution textures without stutter. The pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s provide ample fill-rate for most scenes.

Given the GPU's 59th percentile position, users should expect frame rates that are competitive but not class-leading. The CPU's higher percentile suggests that games with heavy physics or simulation components will perform relatively better. Overall, the system is estimated to deliver playable frame rates at high settings across most titles, with the CPU being the more likely bottleneck at lower resolutions.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity tasks while still requiring a capable GPU for gaming or compute workloads. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU's 24 GB of VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth, though the 59th percentile GPU performance means they are not getting flagship-tier frame rates. The CPU's 77th percentile ensures that CPU-bound games run smoothly.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20851 and the GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The 24 GB VRAM allows for large scenes and high-resolution textures. Software developers will find the single-thread performance adequate for compilation, and the multithread score of 24389 helps with parallel builds.

Students and small business users may find the system overpowered for their needs, given the GPU's 575W TDP and the 950W PSU requirement. The lack of integrated graphics means the discrete GPU is always active, which increases idle power draw. However, the CPU's 65W TDP keeps baseline consumption modest.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's overall performance ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25005.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is 0% different from the NVIDIA T400 and 0.5% faster than the AMD Radeon PRO W7500.

Q: What memory type does this build support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 has a 575W TDP and the suggested PSU is 950W, with a single 16-pin power connector required.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 8400F has no integrated graphics, so the discrete GPU is mandatory for display output.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and architecture?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 with the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, built on a 4nm process.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The CPU+GPU pairing is at the 68th combined percentile, with the CPU at 77th and the GPU at 59th.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry is clear from the percentile data. The CPU at the 77th percentile significantly outperforms the GPU at the 59th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression (288158 in PassMark) or single-threaded applications (3685 in PassMark), the processor will not be the limiting factor. The 3DMark thread scaling from 1874 at 2 threads to 6165 at max threads shows that the CPU can handle increasing thread counts without major scaling issues.

The GPU becomes the bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504, while respectable, places the card in the same performance class as the NVIDIA T400 and AMD Radeon PRO W7500, which are not gaming-focused products. In gaming scenarios, the GPU's 59th percentile position means that frame rates will be limited by the graphics card, not the CPU, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput matters.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to the lack of measured FPS data, but the benchmark scores imply that at 1080p, the CPU's stronger relative position may lead to GPU-limited performance in many titles. At 4K, the GPU's fill-rate capabilities (423.6 GPixel/s) become the primary constraint. The CPU's 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory bandwidth are adequate for feeding the GPU, but the 6-core configuration may cause occasional frame-time spikes in heavily threaded games.

The power dynamics reinforce this imbalance. The CPU's 65W TDP is minimal, while the GPU's 575W TDP dominates the system's power draw. The 950W suggested PSU provides ample headroom, meaning power is not a bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 4 x16 interface for the GPU and Gen 4 lanes for other devices ensure no bandwidth constraints.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part on AMD Socket AM5, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory. The pairing sits at the 68th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 77th percentile and the GPU at the 59th percentile.

The system's overall tier is mid-to-upper range, driven primarily by the CPU's strong relative performance. The GPU, despite its flagship-level specifications, benchmarks at a lower percentile, which tempers the system's overall positioning. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20851 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504 define the performance envelope.

The build is characterized by an imbalance where the CPU outperforms the GPU relative to their respective markets. This makes it well-suited for CPU-intensive workloads like software development, data compression, and moderate multi-threaded productivity. For gaming, the system delivers solid but not class-leading performance, with the GPU's 59th percentile position being the primary constraint. The 24 GB of VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth provide future-proofing for high-resolution textures, while the CPU's 65W TDP keeps idle power low.