SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 82nd percentile among all tested combinations. This is a configuration built around a 6-core Zen 4 processor and a flagship Blackwell GPU, where the data shows a clear division of labor: the CPU handles the thread count demands of modern titles, while the GPU dominates raw rendering throughput. The benchmark results indicate a system that is exceptionally capable at high resolutions but requires careful consideration regarding CPU-bound scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, specifically the Phoenix die, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The processor is built on a 178 mm² die containing 25,000 million transistors. Cache is organized as 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The TDP is rated at 65 W, and the multiplier is unlocked, which allows for overclocking flexibility. The processor was released on March 31, 2024, with a launch MSRP of $170.

Benchmark data places this CPU at the 77th percentile among all processors. Its average benchmark score is 25,005. Looking at the nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F scores 24,964, which is a delta of 0.2 percent, meaning the 8400F is essentially neck-and-neck with that chip. The Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24,935 (0.3 percent slower), and the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24,911 (0.4 percent slower). Interestingly, the AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25,103, which puts the 8400F 0.4 percent behind that enterprise chip.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 20,851, while the single-core score is 2,943. The 3DMark results show a scaling pattern from 1,874 in the 2-thread test to 6,165 in the max-thread test. This means the processor scales to about 3.3x performance when going from 2 threads to all 12 threads. The PassMark multithread score is 24,389, with a single-thread score of 3,685. For integer math, the score is 74,021, while floating-point math comes in at 46,217. The data compression score is 288,158, and encryption is 16,646. The physics score is 1,332.

The 65 W TDP is notable for a desktop chip. The data suggests this is a power-efficient part that still delivers competitive multi-threaded performance. For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20,851 indicates strong capability for productivity tasks, while the single-core score of 2,943 shows respectable responsiveness for everyday operations. The processor sits in a class with the Ryzen 5 7500F, differing by only 0.2 percent in average score, which means users should expect similar performance in CPU-bound tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of a 6-core CPU with a top-tier GPU creates a situation where the CPU can become the limiting factor in certain scenarios. The Ryzen 5 8400F has a 77th percentile CPU score, while the RTX 5080 sits at the 87th percentile among GPUs. This 10-point gap suggests that in workloads where both components are active, the CPU will likely reach its ceiling before the GPU does.

The FPS data across games confirms this dynamic. At 1920x1080, where CPU load is relatively higher, the average frame rate across all games is 209.7 FPS. The pair ranks 164th out of 3,861 pairs by FPS, which places it in the top 4.2 percent of all tested combinations. However, the scaling from 1080p to 4K shows where the bottleneck shifts. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 347.1 at 1080p to 128 at 4K. In Valorant, the drop is much less severe, going from 464.5 at 1080p to 408.9 at 4K. This suggests Valorant is less GPU-intensive at higher resolutions, while Counter-Strike 2 becomes more GPU-bound.

In CPU-heavy games, the limitation shows. In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the frame rate goes from 122.4 at 1080p to 73.6 at 4K. The 1080p figure is not exceptionally high, indicating the CPU may be limiting. Similarly, in Cyberpunk 2077, the 1080p result of 92 FPS and 4K result of 51.6 FPS show a steep scaling curve, which is typical of a GPU-bound title at higher resolutions.

The data indicates that at 1080p, the CPU is often the constraint, especially in esports titles. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiter in most games, which is expected given the RTX 5080's rendering power. The balance is not perfect, but the overall pair rank of 164 out of 3,861 suggests the combination is well above average in practice.

Benchmark Performance

The GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture part built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It features 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. The base clock is 2,295 MHz with a boost clock of 2,617 MHz. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has a TDP of 360 W, with a suggested PSU of 750 W. It uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and measures 304 mm in length. The launch MSRP is 999 USD.

The GPU's benchmark scores are substantial. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 8,637. Geekbench results show 235,901 in OpenCL and 255,450 in Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 36,565, with a G2D score of 1,415. Compute performance is 21,789 in PassMark GPU compute. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 56,083, placing it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs.

Comparisons to rivals show the RTX 5080's position. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55,757, which is 0.6 percent slower. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698 (0.7 percent slower), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828 (2.3 percent slower). The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57,367, putting the RTX 5080 2.2 percent behind that card. This places the RTX 5080 in a tight cluster of high-end GPUs, with only a 2.3 percent spread between the four nearest rivals.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is mid-range in the grand scheme of all processors, paired with a GPU that is near the top of the GPU hierarchy. The combined percentile is 82, which reflects the GPU's strong contribution. The average FPS across all measured games at 1080p is 209.7, which is high, but the pair's rank of 164 out of 3,861 indicates that many other combinations achieve higher frame rates, primarily those with stronger CPUs.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, this system delivers very high frame rates in most titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 347.1 FPS, Valorant at 464.5 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X at 409.2 FPS. These numbers are sufficient for 240 Hz or even 360 Hz monitors in esports. At 2560x1440, these titles still hit 225.6, 436.3, and 267.8 FPS respectively, which maintains high-refresh capability.

Streaming: The CPU has 12 threads, which is adequate for encoding while gaming, but the GPU does not have a dedicated hardware encoder listed in the data. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 24,389 suggests it can handle streaming software, but the 65 W TDP and 6-core design may limit simultaneous gaming and encoding at the highest settings. In practice, the high GPU frame rates at 1080p leave headroom for software encoding.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20,851 indicates solid performance for rendering timelines and exporting footage. The single-core score of 2,943 helps with timeline scrubbing and interface responsiveness. The data compression score of 288,158 suggests efficient handling of compressed video codecs. This is a capable, but not top-tier, video editing CPU.

3D rendering: In CPU-based rendering, the 20,851 Cinebench R23 multicore score is respectable for a 65 W part. However, the RTX 5080's GPU compute score of 21,789 in PassMark and its FP32 performance of 56.28 TFLOPS indicate that GPU rendering will be significantly faster. For GPU-accelerated renderers, this combination excels, with the CPU feeding the scene data and the GPU doing the heavy lifting.

Software development: The 4 nm process and 12 threads provide good compile times. The PassMark integer math score of 74,021 is strong for code compilation, and the 16 MB of L3 cache helps with working sets. The single-thread score of 3,685 ensures fast IDE response. This is a productive developer machine, though not the fastest for large builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's 77th percentile ranking and the GPU's 87th percentile ranking are overkill for typical office tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,685 handles spreadsheets and documents easily, while the GPU accelerates any graphics work. The 65 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, which is beneficial for a study environment. The 16 GB GDDR7 memory on the GPU is irrelevant for office work, but the system is future-proof.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p, the average across games is 209.7 FPS, which is excellent for competitive gaming. At 2560x1440, the system still delivers strong results, with most titles exceeding 100 FPS, such as Control at 108.5 and Fortnite at 104.9.

Content creators who use GPU-accelerated rendering will benefit from the RTX 5080's compute capabilities. The GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 84 RT cores support fast rendering and ray-traced previews. The CPU's 20,851 Cinebench R23 multicore score handles asset preparation and scene management.

Developers working on shader-heavy projects or game engines will appreciate the combination. The CPU's 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache handle build tasks, while the GPU's 10,752 shading units allow for real-time shader testing at high resolutions.

Students in engineering or creative fields will find the system capable of running CAD, design, and simulation software. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 87th percentile provide a solid foundation for coursework, and the 65 W CPU TDP means the system is energy-efficient for dorm use.

Small business workstations that require occasional 3D visualization or video conferencing with background tasks will perform well. The high GPU score ensures smooth graphics, while the CPU's single-thread score of 3,685 keeps productivity applications responsive.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, which places this desktop configuration above most tested pairs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8400F compare to the Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25,005, which is 0.2 percent higher than the Ryzen 5 7500F's score of 24,964.

Q: What is the RTX 5080's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 56,083 and sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 5080 provides 960.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth through its 256-bit GDDR7 interface.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5080 is 750 W, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the pair's rank by FPS among all tested combinations?

A: The pair ranks 164th out of 3,861 pairs, with an average FPS across games of 209.7 at 1080p.

Gaming Performance

The data is measured, not estimated, with actual FPS results for each game at three resolutions under ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance in esports titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 756.5 FPS, Valorant reaches 464.5 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X runs at 409.2 FPS. To The Core achieves 347.5 FPS, and Minecraft: Java Edition runs at 338.7 FPS.

For triple-A titles at 1080p, the results are strong but more variable. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 92 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 90.3 FPS, and The Medium at 69.7 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended is the most demanding, dropping to 50.6 FPS at 1080p. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 122.4 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the system remains highly capable. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 225.6 FPS, Valorant remains high at 436.3 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X runs at 267.8 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 hits 79 FPS, Control runs at 108.5 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 128 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 34.8 FPS, which is the lowest in this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is heavily utilized. Valorant still runs at 408.9 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 maintains 128 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 51.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 46.3 FPS, and The Medium hits 46 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 15.5 FPS, which is the worst result across all games. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 73.6 FPS, which is playable.

The average FPS across all games at 1080p is 209.7, which confirms this is a high-performance gaming system. The pair's rank of 164 out of 3,861 pairs shows that while the average is high, there are many pairs with higher frame rates, typically those with more powerful CPUs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current desktop platform for AMD. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16. This means the GPU has bandwidth headroom, but the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 lanes could be a limitation for future Gen 5 NVMe drives.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, and the GPU's TDP is 360 W. The suggested PSU is 750 W, which provides headroom for the current components. The data shows no indication of power efficiency issues, but a 750 W PSU leaves room for modest overclocking or additional drives. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU could be replaced with a higher-core-count AM5 processor, though the data does not specify which models are compatible. The 65 W TDP of the current CPU suggests the motherboard can handle more power-hungry parts. The GPU is already near the top of the current generation, so the next upgrade would be a future GeForce 60 series, which is listed as the successor.

The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on the GPU is substantial, and the 960.0 GB/s bandwidth is high, so memory capacity is unlikely to be a bottleneck. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU are adequate for one GPU and one NVMe drive, but adding multiple Gen 4 drives could saturate the lanes. The platform is modern, with DDR5 support and PCIe 5.0 for the GPU, making it viable for several years.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 flagship with a 360 W TDP. The combined percentile is 82, placing this configuration well above the median of all tested pairs.

The overall tier is high-end on the GPU side and mid-range on the CPU side. The GPU sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU is at the 77th percentile. This asymmetry means the system is best suited for resolutions where the GPU is the primary bottleneck, such as 1440p and 4K. At 1080p, the CPU can limit performance in CPU-intensive titles, but the average FPS of 209.7 across games shows that this is rarely a practical issue.

The pair ranks 164th out of 3,861 pairs by FPS, which is in the top 4.2 percent. This makes it a strong performer overall, though not the absolute fastest. The system is a practical choice for gamers who want high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, and for creators who need GPU compute power. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system efficient, while the 750 W suggested PSU provides adequate power for the 360 W GPU. This is a balanced, capable desktop build that represents a sensible pairing of mid-range CPU and high-end GPU.